Jump to content

User talk:Neronno

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Welcome to Meta!

[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Hello, Neronno. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requests for new languages/Wikipedia East Frisian 3

[edit]

Hello? It looks like that langcom is currently considering its eligibility, but the proposal texts and following discussions are confusing due to the requesting language, see [1], maybe can you please ask for an expert linguist to help explaining details on its matters mentioned? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I don't know who made this confusing request, but the language is East Frisian Low Saxon (frs). Even if it is classified as Low German, the language differs greatly from Low German (nds) due to the Frisian substrate and the Dutch influence, which is also noticeable in grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary. Neronno (talk) 04:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
In this case, the request title shall be renamed, there are suggestions that "East Frisian" is stq and already having a separate WP stq:. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi! A Language committee member here :)
It looks like you are the main contributor to the wp/frs Incubator.
The "Proposal" section on Requests for new languages/Wikipedia East Frisian Low Saxon 2 confuses a lot of people, including myself. The subsequent discussion makes the page even more confusing.
Since the original proposal was written long ago by an unknown and anonymous user whose involvement in the wp/frs Incubator is unclear, it's probably OK to just start from scratch.
I suggest the following process:
  1. The Language committee marks the current proposal as "rejected", based on the fact that it was filed by an anonymous user.
  2. You create a new proposal with a clear explanation of what is this language, how is it different from the other Germanic varieties, and why it should have a separate wiki project. Its title should probably be Requests for new languages/Wikipedia East Frisian Low Saxon 3. (For instructions on creating a new proposal, see Language committee/Handbook (requesters) and Language proposal policy.)
  3. The Language committee and other interested people have a fresh discussion and decide whether it's eligible.
To alleviate any doubt, what I suggest in #1 is rejecting the proposal and not the whole language. A properly filed proposal for a language that conforms to the policy and has a clear explanation will likely be marked as eligible.
What do you think? Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, that would be fine in my opinion. We will then submit a proper proposal in due course. Neronno (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply