User talk:Romihaitza

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
ro-N Acest utilizator este un vorbitor nativ al limbii române.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
fr-2 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances intermédiaires en français.
it-1 Questo utente può contribuire con un livello elementare in italiano.
es-1 Esta persona tiene un conocimiento básico del español.

Admin Abuse[edit]

Romihaitza, A group of editors and admins refuse to allow a balance of material and links. Gamaliel, Robert McClenon, Jpgordon, JamesMLane, and a few others now own the pages. Any attempts to modify the page is met by thier gang edits. They allow only links to pro kennedy sites, none to negative sites regardless of the wealth of content they may provide. They push their pov on all of the Kennedy pages. It's because of editors and admins like these that Wikipedia is doubted as a source. ie; the New York Times published policy against Wiki as a source. The group refuses to agree to consensus when it is against them. I've now been blocked by Jpgordon in an abuse of admin priv. My act was not vandalism, it's simply not agreeing with their one sided pov. I am not willing to endure any more arb or mediation. These guys are out of control. 05:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


I'll leave this message on Wikipedia as well, but I wanted to make sure you got this. At Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, a couple users and myself are attempting to gather consensus about a possible change in editing. So as not to keep the community out of the loop, we've been posting to user talk pages, which seems to have worked. If you can add your thoughts to the talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. We've gone over a few issues, ranging from perception of anti-wiki to time limits, and recycling pagemove code, so you might want to check out #Rehashing to get up to speed. Thanks in advance, Mysekurity 04:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Partial results[edit]

Hi, I have a remark about the "Partial results" list. I am not comfortable whit that list. Like it is now it looks like this is an competition, like a sports event. That should not be like that. Users can declare that the are willing offer there service to the community in the function of steward. The community can give the support or disapproval for that offer. Finally it is up to the board to decide what the will do whit the offers of assistance.

If you really like to keep the score can you list them not by the level of support but by there listing on the election page and use a template for the list? Greetings, --Walter 23:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the history it was not my idea of this kind of results. My opinion is that until the voting process finishes we shall have the list in the voting order. I will revert the list to the original. Thank you for your comment. -Romihaitza 12:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Walter 18:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations Romihaitza! You've been appointed a new Steward of the Wikimedia projects. Please remember to read the Steward policies and abide to them. Also, please add yourself to Stewards#List of stewards and the languages they speak. If you'll need any help with the Steward interface (under Special:Makesysop), please contact me on my talk page. Datrio 21:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E mare lucru ca esti aici. Te felicit. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 19:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! Why was Spacebirdy's admin request on the Nahuatl Wiktionary archived? Jon Harald Søby 22:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanx! :) --Liso 11:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esti foarte harnicuţ Mihaitza. Imi place. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 16:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

poti verifica de ce sunt blocat din nou?[edit]

Salut Mihaitza! Serios sunt ciudati administratorii de pe RO:WIKI. Te rog sa verifici daca am facut eu propaganda. Uite sunt blocat. Nici macar pagina de discutii nu o pot edita ca sa ma apar. Foarte ciudat. Acum serios o sa propun "desysoping". Este fara jena ce se intampla acolo. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 20:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi ca m-ai deblocat dar sa stii ca inca tot sunt blocat. Plus sa stii ca m-ati dezamagit voi cei de pe ro:wiki. Este incorect! Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 16:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wiktionary[edit]

Thanks, Gerard Foley 08:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Cred că a fost o greşeală. Am scos blocarea şi îmi cer scuze în numele administratorului care te-a blocat. --Romihaitza 13:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi ca m-ai deblocat dar sa stii ca inca tot sunt blocat. Plus sa stii ca m-ati dezamagit cei de pe ro:wiki. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 16:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cum adică eşti tot blocat? -Romihaitza 16:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
UIte ca sunt. Am incercat din nou. Tot acelasi mesaj. Sunt blocat. Am vazut ca m-ai deblocat in jurnalul de blocari. Cert este ca a ramas adresa mea de IP blocata banuiesc. Ai o adresa de mail? Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eu am, dar tu nu ai mentionata aici la meta ;-) -Romihaitza 17:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asa e. Da-mi adresa ta. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tot nu merge. Am vazut ca ai deblocat #172. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, multumesc Mihaitza. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Multumesc Mihaitza. Te-as mai ruga daca ai putea sa-l atentionezi tu pe Rebel pentru ce a facut. Eu ii mai acord o sansa si nu incep un RfC impotriva lui. Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for quick responce! Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic 22:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I requested the bureacrat status, so that slovene Wikiquote could became more independant, but I was granted "only" a admin status. Was this a mistake? TIA! Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Hitri odgovor) 17:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

OK, thanks for answer! Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Hitri odgovor) 18:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


Sysop en:Mikkalai had used his admin power to block a contributor in an outrageous attempt. Sysop en:Mikkalai engaged in an edit war, then he blocked the opponents. The blocked user made only a single edit [[1]]. Still en:Mikkalai didn't reached consensus and was asked to stop the edit war [[2]] by two other users. Still he blocked the user en:user: There was also posted a notice on Wikipedia Administrator's noticeboard a message that concludes very good the bad behaviour of sysop en:Mikkalai. The reason given by mikka is "blocking with an expiry time of 24 hours (offense)". Still there is not an offense in the edit [[[[3]]. Why didn't explain sysop en:Mikkalai what is the offense that he thinks it is?

There is one more important aspect: en:Mikkalai is well known for having Anti-Romanian feelings, he was even blocked once for that reason:

A desysoped should be just fine. Let the people free of this en:Anti-Romanian contributor.


Romihaitza wrote : [4] That's not a problem. Thanks for the adminship -- Sajasaze

Desysopping of Carbonite[edit]

I noticed you desysopped Carbonite, presumably as a result of the wheel war. However, based on conversations with Jimbo, I don't believe we ever intended for him to be desysopped, so I have restored his sysop permissions. Raul654 09:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Divehi Wiktionary request[edit]

Hi, Romihaitza,

I request sysop access on dv.Wiktionary:

Thank you. (Deviathan 12:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]


Here is the Logo for dv:Wikipedia. Can you please upload it?

Deviathan 09:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Mihai[edit]

Uite un abuz de putere. Cred ca tu ma poti ajuta.

block indefinitely[edit]

I was blocked indefinitelly on false accusations that I am user:Bonaparte. Please check and do the proper measures against Sysop en:Mikkalai. I see that is not the first case in which users are blocked by this sysop and no measure have been taken to stop his abuse of power. He uses his sysop power to block innocent people.I am user en:User:Alucard sepetdalv Alucard sepetdalv 14:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin abuse[edit]

block indefinitely[edit]

I was blocked indefinitelly on false accusations that I am user:Bonaparte. Please check and do the proper measures against Sysop en:Mikkalai. I see that is not the first case in which users are blocked by this sysop and no measure have been taken to stop his abuse of power. He uses his sysop power to block innocent people. I am user en:User:Alucard sepetdalv.Alucard sepetdalv 14:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is also my case[edit]

I was also block by this cruel sysop. It's not his first mistake I suppose. He may be obsessed about Bonaparte. Some things must be changed immediately. I am user en:User:Excaliburo and I am 63 years old. I request a check user and immediately unblock like in the previous case. --Excaliburo 20:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Îţi mulţumesc pentru acordarea adminship-ului! Desiphral 17:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply][edit]

Please create subdom... --Redagavimas 18:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Bureaucrat status on[edit]

Hi there! I've requested for bureaucrat status and on the meta Requests for persmission page and you responded by saying that I should create a local request page. I have created that page at [5]. The page is based on the Croatian one. In the future the page will be in the native language. However, I came here to ask what the point of creating the local user page is for that wiktionary right now, when there are no regular users (because there's no content on most pages that I'm trying to recreate...which are most often attacked by vandalism) nor sysops (only 1 sysop exists, who is not active)? --Dijan 04:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

request for permission page[edit]

I'm not sure what happened, but your last edit made many of the current requests be commented out. Did you do it for some reason, or was just a typo? Let me know if my correction wasn't ok, and feel free to revert if necessary.

By the way, I made a request for admin status in bn-wikibooks.


--Ragib 18:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for permission[edit]

Thank you so much. Manop at Thai Wikipedia and Wiktionary - 02:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Few more questions, do you know how to change "system messages" (Special:Allmessages) from Thai Wikipedia to Thai Wiktionary. I changed several of them now. And I feel that it might be an easier way to do that.--Manop 02:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship because of violation of "administration ethics"[edit]

How do you think, if an administrator violates so-called "administration ethics", but does not violate any Wikipedia rule, may administration privileges be dropped? --Jaroslavleff 16:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonator on MO:Wikipedia[edit]

There is an impersonator on Moldovan Wikipedia who impersonates and vandalize my pages [6]. Block him, since it's clear a sockpuppet of User Node, please see here how immediatelly log in after node ue.

Node ue: 20:21, 9 June 2006

Varul lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? (he is the same Node ue, but using a sockppet) 20:22, 9 June 2006

You can use a CheckUser to establish if he is or not Node but first of all to block this impersonator. --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 07:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser on sr:[edit]

Hi. Thank you for quick response in giving me checkuser rights. But, I thought you automatically remove bureaucrat rights? I filed a request for removal of bureaucrat rights, just in case, after I saw it does not go automatically :(. --Бране Јовановић 06:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, policy on our Wikipedia is that you can't be both. I thought it was general policy on checkuser? --Бране Јовановић 06:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it is not a general policy. I thought it was. But it is on our Wikipedia - separation of legislative and executive power etc. I am willing to wave those rights, anyway. Is this a problem? --Бране Јовановић 06:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uyghur Wikipedia interface[edit]

Thankyou Romihaitza for granting me adminship.

I wish to translate some of the Uyghur interface from English to Uyghur; can you show me how I can do that?

Regards -- Jose77, 23:20 Wednesday 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Your help[edit]

Can you help me? I was blocked on English Wikipedia. Please see: En:User:Brasoveanul. Thanks. --Brasoveanul 12:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may desysop Admin because he acted in bad faith and he really has no evidences. I'm clean. --Brasoveanul 12:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, check this out: Node who was one more time Admin on MO:Wikipedia wants to be again Admin.

Brasoveanul, how do you know that if you are not Bonaparte? Hmmm... ;-) --Telex 10:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You told me to look there. Have you forget? By the way you are Varul lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? and you risk to be banned because you impersonates him. --Brasoveanul 12:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Astia vor sa-si bata joc de romani in ultimul hal, rusii naibii.--Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 14:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Nevermind, I am changing this for a request for w:mo:User:Moldova to be made bureaucrat. His nomination is less controversial. Check the page history, you will see: [7] never, at any point, did he have more than one oppose vote. People have blanked the page, yes, but other than Bonaparte, nobody has voted against him yet. And bonaparte shouldn't have a say, because of his constant user-page vandalism. (see w:mo:User:Sulica rus for an example of his pagemove vandalism) --Node ue 05:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mean you proposed to be made a bureaucrat a proved user that had socks? For God sake where do you think you are? You lost all your credibility...--Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 05:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steward update[edit]

I noticed you updated the list of inactive stewards; thanks for doing that! I did notice, however, that two entries were off:

  • Danny last used his steward access on July 3rd, and had used it quite a bit before that. Daniel Mayer (mav), on the other hand, hasn't used his since Jan. 17th.
  • Fantasy slipped in with one on July 6th; did you discount that one, or did he/she get it in after you checked?

I was going to correct the list to reflect this, but every time I try to edit one of those lists with the different colored rows, I screw it up, so I thought it best to just let you know. Again, thanks for doing the update! Essjay (TalkConnect) 08:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Why was my request for st.wiktionary adminship removed?[edit]

I've seen that you removed my admin status request for mg: ([8]). Can you please tell me what was wrong with it, and how I am supposed to proceed to request for admin rights on
Thanks in advance for your help,
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the previous message, I did not see that you've fulfilled my request :)
Thanks a lot for your kind help,
-- AlNo (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


You have removed this request, without any given reason or action. May I ask why? Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Talk - Fast reply) 08:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you gave reason only on archive page. I also saw that several others were granted status with only one or 2 votes in favor (small Wikt.)? Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Talk - Fast reply) 08:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, can you then make us both admins and me also a bureacrat (I'm already admin on :sl WP and Commons and bureacrat on :sl Books)? The reason for two is, that 2 are better then one ;). I hope that this will be solved quickly (we have several vandalized pages to be deleted and non-flagged bot there,...) You can answer here. Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Talk - Fast reply) 17:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we downgraded our request to adminship. BTW How much users most there be to have a bureacrat? Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Talk - Fast reply) 21:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your abuse[edit]

De-sysop should follow fair rules - in every wiki. I was made sys-op ("Histo") in de.Wikiquote to kill copyvios. The community has begun and finished the voting against me in my vacancies (I was in Spain not having the possibilty to defend me in an appropriate manner). It is clear that this is not a fair procedure. It is also clear that it is not allowed to strike the contra-vote of the bureaucrat because he has not enough contributions! There was a lot of support for me from Wikipedians and users who are not long enough in the project due to the ad-hoc-voting conditions (200 contributions in the article namespace). It would have been your duty to control the facts. Regards -- 17:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Import function[edit]

Continuing from Talk:Requests_for_permissions, I would like to ask something about import function. I can now import contents to English Wiktionary and English Wikisource, but that is from English Wikipedia only. When may I import to Chinese Wikisource from another Wiki?--Jusjih 07:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block for vandal Node ue, he acted on purpose like the worst decaying vandal, shame on you kid![edit]

Forged information posted by User:Node_ue[edit]

Following the (long waited) reply from the customer service of, the following post by User:Node_ue is officially considered forged. Here is the message I received from the customer service of

Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:24:14 -0700
To: "Jacky PB" <>
Subject: RE: Abuse - Impersonation - dpotop1 (KMM34737469V27186L0KM)
From: "Yahoo! Mail" <> Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
We have investigated your report, and, based on the information you've
given us, your account does not appear to have been accessed by the
sender of this email.
The sender seems to have forged your email address in the "reply-to"
and/or the "from" field of the message they sent out. Please know that
we are currently aware of this type of spam and are investigating it.
Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Customer Care.
Yahoo! Customer Care

Also, note that the "screen shot" below features a signature by We know now that the signature is forged. So, either some super-spy cracked, of User:Node_ue forged the message himself. Shouldn't this guy be banned? Dpotop 19:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should take it up with an Administrator, as I saw Jmabel described such forgery as an extremely grave offensive against Wikipedia standards. Node's foul tactics should certainly not go unpunished. - Anclation

Umm... I provided the full headers to those who wished to verify its authenticity on Wikipedia-l. None of them seemed to have a problem with it. The mail is authentic. --Node ue 03:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So what are you saying is that the person working for Yahoo is lying and you're not?'re cought again with lies, and you deserve to be banned for good for your offensive act of forgery. --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 06:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Node ue's blocking. He should pay for his offensive act of forgery. --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 16:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Acum ai sansa Mihaitza, arde-l pe copchilul asta anti-roman care este un vandal. --Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 17:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards on IRC[edit]

Hi, I am posting this to the talk page of all stewards. I am user:Walter, steward. It came to the attention that it is for users who urgently need the assistance of a steward it is not always easy to find one. I am posting this to ask your help to try to improve our service to the community.

The best hope I believe for a user to find a steward is IRC I think. There is a channel for the stewards , #wikimedia-stewards but there very few stewards there mostly if any.

So my first request is that when you are online and have time to also open the channel #wikimedia-stewards That can easy and even automatically depending of your IRC-client. Two suggestions; Gaim, you can add IRC-channels and users between your MSN, Jabber and other contacts. Very easy to use. Or chatZilla, more a real IRC program.

You can also use a webbased solution. Can also be useful when you are not at home. The IRC gateway I have setup will do its work for this purpose.

Finaly; You have your real name, your wikimedia user name and some have a totally different IRC name. I have created a new column on Stewards#Active_stewards to fill in your IRC-nick , if you are on IRC offcource. I have already filled it in for some who I know.

This request is not personally direct to you but to all stewards in general. Not everybody needs to be in that IRC -channel. If you know the channel exists that is already a very good start. Greetings, --Walter 20:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Copyright Law issues[edit]

What do you think about commons:Commons:Village pump#Russian Copyright Law issues concerning edits in Wikipedia made by Russian citizens? --Jaroslavleff 19:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek wikisource beaurocrats[edit]


In March there was a request for sysoping User:Lou@elwiktionary [9]. There was a formal request link: wikt:el:Wiktionary:Ο ιστοχώρος της κοινότητας with support from two users.

Below the previous local request User:Ank@elwiktionary requested for beaurocrat rights, but as you can see there was no support for this. User:Ank is listed as Bureaucrat, Steward (!), Sysop having be granted these rights by you. I question why you gave these rights to a user with limited contributions on this wiki without any consensus. Even after 8 months he has less than 100 edits [10] while other users have thousands. Although Ank is a beaurocrat also in el.wikipedia he has limited activity on both projects, but at least in wikipedia there are more beaurocrats. Now the problem is that the only active sysop in el.wiktionary is Lou, and he asks for more sysops but there is no active beaurocrat to give them rights. Since his beaurocratship, Ank has been in wiktionary only twice. You gave beaurocrat rights to an inactive user. I suggest you correct the mistake and clear the problem, granting beaurocrat rights to Lou, who is the only active sysop and most active user. Probably you will need to clear that "steward" flag from Ank too. --Geraki 09:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI steward-status[edit]

[Stewards] - a new steward election will be held soon. The most likely date for the election to start is 25th of November. This date can still change. Like it is now all existing stewards will need to reapply if they wish to remain steward. The rules of this procedure are still under discussion. All existing stewards and interested users for the function of steward can best apply as soon as possible.
--Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 18:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Te-ai uitat ce se intampla mai nou pe Mo:Wiki?--Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 07:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De-sysop of German Admin mo:User:Pill on the Moldovan Wikipedia[edit]

Hello Paginazero, you desysoped another vandal on Moldovan Wikipedia here. Now, I would like you to desysop another one, who was not accepted by community and replaced Epure.


- there is already an elected sysop on Mo.wp so we don’t need this German Admin (mo:User:Pill)
- mo:User:Pill must be de-sysopped for abuse of administrative privileges and employing eliminating methods
- nobody asked him to request temporary sysop rights, he’s not accepted by community

Removal of new vote poll[edit]

Blocks of innocent contributors[edit]

I don’t think Alec deserved to be blocked and certainly his comments were not irrelevant to the fact that this Admin abuses his administrative privileges

Please don’t forget that both mo:User:Alec and mo:User:Dromihete are speakers of Moldovan language which is not the case of mo:User:Pill who is German.

POV pushing by Pill[edit]

Here's a question: what does Pill think he's doing? Here, my opinion on Epure's suitability for bureaucratship and another comment were deleted for what reason exactly? Here, a comment by en:User:Dahn is similarly deleted. So what is this ultimately, a rigged poll, any opinion Pill does not like is simply deleted? Here, User:Alec is blocked for two weeks for supposed "irrelevant comments on Wikipedia:Кандидаць" - since when is that a criterion for blocking? Does anyone else think Pill is going too far - I propose a petition for de-sysopment. As far as I can see, Pill is following the shining example of his predecessors User:Node ue and User:Epure (likely both the same person); both can't say anything beyond a couple of phrases in Romanian/Moldovan and both were de-sysopped for abuse of administrative privileges and employing methods used in Soviet Moldova for getting their way. Let's watch now as Pill deletes this comment under some similar frivolous excuse - let's see how well he responds to criticism and complaints of what I consider legitimate grievances.

Pill’s removal of petition against him[edit]

3 times I tried to tell him to stop his abuse of privileges[edit]


Due to the fact that:

1. He does not speak the language and we can’t understand him
2. His abuse of administrative privileges
3. His bias

We request immediately de-sysop of this bias Administrator. Thank you.

Translation was made by mo:user:Vania tractoristul. Смирнов 07:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no place for further engagement of Pill there. Pill must quit and leave or will ask again a petition against him. He removed it last time but now he will be under supervision of Stewards. I asked him to leave or else he will be de-sysoppped. You should de-sysop now, because we can't stand such injustice from Pill. He can't communicate with us since he doesn't speak the language. He is also bias and blocked innocent users. He was temporary granted with rights and he abused his privileges. Thank you.Смирнов 18:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

simply great[edit]

simply great to see you back again romihaitza! keep up the good work :-) best greetings, oscar 00:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back online ;)[edit]

hi! Aphaia 15:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a time, please give a look on TR/quick. Wikimedia:OurProjects-ro is better to update, added Wikiversity ... I'll very appreciate your help. --Aphaia 12:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, ai putea chiar da înapoi vandalismul şi chiar să faci ceva să nu mai poată fi editată pagina din moment ce s-a închis votul acum o lună, plus ce a scris node acolo nici măcar nu e în romana asa cum susţine el (e în limba rusă). Ne-ar prinde foarte bine ajutorul tău acum din moment ce Dpotop susţine cauza pe Wikipedia-l.--Nicolae 14:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eu am curajul să dau înapoi dar voi fi blocat pe urmă [11] Am primit ameninţare că voi fi blocat de tot, ceea ce mi se pare foarte innacceptabil faptul că nimeni nu se implică, sunt singur şi node este lăsat să vandalizeze cum vrea el. Plus sunt nişte minciuni ordinare. Explică-i tu oricărui admin că eu n-am avut succes.--Nicolae 14:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am dat eu înapoi, dacă eşti drăguţ fă să nu mai poată da înpoi acum. --Nicolae 14:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dacă poţi să fii "developer" pe mowiki de ce nu o închizi? ai tot suportul nostru.--Nicolae 14:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cred că noi ne merităm soarta, dacă nici tu care poţi nu te implici, ce să mai vorbim. Măi parcă vă e frică de cineva, sau de ce?--Nicolae 14:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==== Pashto Wikipedia====[edit]

Pashto Wikipedia[edit]

Hello! Dear Romihaitza! My name is Ahmed Najib Biabani Ibrahimkhel and i have been a Pashto language wikipedian since August 2005. During the this period of time i have translated the interface of the Pashto wikipedia and now since i have recently got the adminship of Pashto wikibooks and Pashto wikitionary, i am trying to translate those interfaces as well. Now since Pashto wikipedia and the other wikisister projects doesnt have any beurocrat, i want you to give me this rank. This will help me make some reliable persons admins and then the translation process would be more speedy. I requested here about some days ago and then i got the reply that i had to add some information about myself. But it wasnt like specific, that what kind of information you want me to put or what qualities do i have to have to apply for the status of beurocrat. I have been editing wikipedia frequently and i am sure i am the only user of Pashto wikipedia with the most edits. you can check the statistics page to be certain about it. so now if there is still some information that is missing and you want me to put here please write to me in my userpage in Pashto wikipedia. Regards

Please add more information -Romihaitza 20:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dear Romihaitza! My name is Ahmed Najib Biabani Ibrahimkhel and i have been a Pashto language wikipedian since August 2005. During the this period of time i have translated the interface of the Pashto wikipedia and now since i have recently got the adminship of Pashto wikibooks and Pashto wikitionary, i am trying to translate those interfaces as well. Now since Pashto wikipedia and the other wikisister projects doesnt have any beurocrat, i want you to give me this rank. This will help me make some reliable persons admins and then the translation process would be more speedy. I requested here about some days ago and then i got the reply that i had to add some information about myself. But it wasnt like specific, that what kind of information you want me to put or what qualities do i have to have to apply for the status of beurocrat. I have been editing wikipedia frequently and i am sure i am the only user of Pashto wikipedia with the most edits. you can check the statistics page to be certain about it. so now if there is still some information that is missing and you want me to put here please write to me in my userpage in Pashto wikipedia. Regards

Please add more information -Romihaitza 20:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

site notcie RO[edit]

Hi, I notice that the current site notice for RO is not the current default message. Can you update it please? Thanks, --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please update, see Talk:Fundraising sitenotice 2006 Q4 --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about the yiddish wikipedia[edit]

i'm sorry, my english is very bad. you gived sysop-right for an user (yi:user:יודל) who is regarded as a troll in the yiddische wikipedia. user:danny taked off is rights before a few weaks. a lot of people leaved the wikipedia because him. please remove is sysop-rights. you can ask about this from all the users in the yiddish wikipedia. Jiddisch 14:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for the prompt response. --Eukesh 17:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say you granted the "import" right to this user on Requests for permissions/Approved temporary, but this user has administrator rights, and therefore should be able to use Special:Import anyway. I was wondering if you meant to do this, if the rights were granted recently, or if you had overlooked this. Thanks. --Thunderhead 04:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just wanted to make sure. Thanks! --Thunderhead 04:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovan Wikipedia[edit]

Hello Romihaitza,

You asked me my opinion about the Moldovan Wikipedia. Sorry I didn't answer as I was quite busy elsewhere.

I have no problem to have a Moldovan Wikipedia as long as it is a heathly and prosperous project. I have a problem if it is only a battle field for trolls, spammers, and people using it only for various political issues. Regards, Yann 22:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Votes in Romanian Wikipedia[edit]

A vote has been organized be the Romanian Wikipedia, suggesting that the only applicable ortography should be the one approved by the Romanian Academy and excluding all other spellings, in particular those officially used in Moldova (with the latin alphabet). I have made my objections known however the vote has still been organized.

My objection relies on the fact that, if, at present Moldavian and Romanian are considered to be the same language, then both spellings have to be acceptable, just as they are in English, where there is no supremacy of British English over American English or vice-versa. However, if only one of the spellings is deemed acceptable, it is logical to assume that the other language is entitled to its own dictionaries.

While the vote is presented as a simple problem of unification of spelling, it actually creates a discrimination towards part of the Romanian speeking population. There may be other Romanian speeking populations abroad in Vojvodina, the Timoc Valley, the Ucraine and even the United States, who claim to use Romanian and may also follow their own spelling rules. I therefore consider the vote as a tentative to promote a discrimination, which should be contrary to the Wikipedia policy. Also, if approved, it raises the question of approving the creation of a separate Moldovan or Moldovan Romanian Wikipedia.

As you seem to have been involved in issues regarding the Moldovan Wikipedia, you might want to look into the matter, before a decision is taken which could have far reaching repercussions. Personally, when statistically several millions of Romanian speeking persons are living abroad, I consider it a very restrictive policy to impose such rules, even a limitation of the freedom of expressions, which is hardly Wikipedia policy. Besides, I consider if Moldovan spelling is not acceptable for the Romanian Wikipedia, a Moldovan Wikipedia should be approved ASAP. It is very unfair to deny some users the right to use their own version, if they have had this right until now.

I am willing to cooperate in any way you deem useful to solve this problem.


Afil 20:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Steward Confirmations[edit]

Hi. This is a semi automated notice so my apologies if it seems a bit impersonal. You're listed as holding the Steward permission. As you know, Stewards get reconfirmed yearly, and it's that time again... I noticed that you haven't yet filled out your statement at Stewards/confirm. If you'd like to learn what the community thinks, please visit the page and put in your statement. Volunteers have been busily translating statements already. It would be best to do this before November 26, as that is when the page is opened for public comment, to coincide with the elections of new stewards. If you would like to not be reconfirmed and have your name removed, you can remove your section, or ask a volunteer to do it for you. I hope this information helps. If you have any questions or comments, there is ongoing discussion at Talk:Stewards/elections_2007. Oh, one last thing, if you already knew about it and just hadn't gotten round to it, apologies for the reminder! :) ++Lar: t/c 04:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Just seeing you on RC so greeting! Long time no see ... And, though I expect you are busy lately, if you find a spare time and are willing, please pick nice donor quotes in your language on Fundraising 2007/comments subpages, feel free to make them bold. Thanks! --Aphaia 19:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steward confirmations[edit]

Hi Romihaitza,

I have removed your steward status as a result of the annual steward confirmations. You did not make it, the mentioned reason was inactivity. Thank you for all your work in the past, and I hope to see you around sometime soon again. Effeietsanders 12:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Olá Romihaitza, someone brought to my attention that You forgot ca.wikibooks [12], I have removed it for now, please let me know if You still need anything there.

Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superprotect status[edit]

Dear Romihaitza, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

Peteforsyth 09:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]