Stewards/elections 2006-2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is the archived 2nd 2006 steward elections (see the last version before the closure). Please do not post new comments on this page.

Following the election, the Board of Trustees appointed 12 users having over 80% support to stewardship. Neutral votes were not counted for the statistics.

  1. M7 100%
  2. Redux 100%
  3. Effeietsanders 100%
  4. Dbl2010 100%
  5. Shanel 98%
  6. Pathoschild 97%
  7. Guillom 95%
  8. Bastique 91%
  9. Drini 91%
  10. Darkoneko 90%
  11. Cspurrier 87%
  12. MaxSem 84%

edit multilingual text

Introduction[edit]

The text below was in the header during the election.

edit multilingual text
English:

New stewards are elected roughly once per year. If you are interested in becoming a steward, see Stewards/Application guidelines (feel free to discuss the rules on the talk page). To discuss the status of current stewards, see Stewards/confirm.

The voting will start on the 25th November 2006 and it will end on the 15th December 2006. Applicants must meet the criteria (see Stewards/Application guidelines) and obtain at least 30 votes in favour with an 80% support ratio. The Board of Trustees will select stewards from the applicants in this election (expected to be about 10 to 20).

In order to be eligible to vote, users must have a valid account on Meta with a link to at least one account on a project where the user has participated at least three months. In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, a CheckUser verification will be carried out and sock puppet votes canceled.

See also:

Deutsch:

Neue Stewards werden zirka einmal pro Jahr gewählt. Wenn du ein Steward werden möchtest, lies die Richtlinien für die Kandidatur (du kannst diese Regeln bei Bedarf auf der Diskussionsseite diskutieren). Die Seite Stewards/confirm dient dazu, Diskussionen über die derzeitigen Stewards zu führen.

Die Abstimmung beginnt am 25. November 2006 und endet am 15. Dezember 2006. Die Bewerber müssen die erforderlichen Kriterien erfüllen und mindestens 30 Prostimmen erhalten, wobei 80 % aller Stimmen Prostimmen sein müssen. Das Wikimedia-Kuratorium wird die Stewards aus den Kandidaten in dieser Wahl auswählen (es werden zirka 10 bis 20 erwartet).

Um wahlberechtigt zu sein müssen die abstimmenden Benutzer ein Benutzerkonto auf Meta mit einem Link zu mindestens einem Projekt haben, auf dem sie bereits seit über drei Monaten aktiv sind. Sollte der Verdacht aufkommen, dass in dieser Abstimmung Sockenpuppen verwendet werden, können Checkuser nach einer Überprüfung Stimmabgaben durch Zweitaccounts entfernen.

See also:

Español :

Nuevos stewards son elegidos aproximadamente una vez por año. Si estás interesado en ser uno de ellos ve a Stewards/Application guidelines (Siéntete libre de debatir acerca de las reglas en la página de discusión). Para discutir el estado de los stewards actuales, ver Stewards/confirm.

La votación empezará el 25 de noviembre de 2006 y terminará el 15 de diciembre de 2006. Los postulantes deben cumplir los requisitos (ver Stewards/Application guidelines) y obtener al menos 30 votos a favor con un 80% de índice de aceptación. El Consejo de Administración seleccionará stewards de los postulantes en esta elección (se espera entre 10 a 20 postulantes).

Para poder votar, los usuarios deben tener una cuenta válida en Meta con un enlace a al menos una cuenta en un proyecto donde el usuario haya estado participando por al menos tres meses. En caso de existir la sospecha de usuarios títeres, se puede realizar la consulta respectiva a un checkuser y cancelar los votos en caso de ser necesario.

See also:

Français :

Les stewards sont élus plus ou moins une fois par an. Si vous êtes intéressé pour devenir steward, voyez Stewards/Application guidelines/fr (vous pouvez discuter sur la page de discussion). Pour discuter le statut des stewards courants, voyez Stewards/confirm.

Le vote commencera le 25 novembre 2006 et finira le 15 décembre 2006. Les candidats doivent se conformer aux critères (voyez Stewards/Application guidelines/fr) et recevoir au moins 30 voix en faveur avec un taux de soutien de 80%. Le Conseil d'administration choisira environ 10 à 20 candidats à l'issue de cette élection.

Afin d'être en droit de voter, les utilisateurs doivent avoir un compte valide sur Méta avec au moins un lien vers un compte sur un projet où ils ont participé pendant au moins trois mois. En cas de soupçon de faux-nez, une vérification CheckUser sera menée et les voix des faux-nez seront disqualifiées.

Voyez aussi:

Interlingua:

Le nove stewards es eligite circa un vice per anno. Si tu ha interesse in devenir un steward, vide Stewards/Application guidelines (sia libere de discuter le regulas in le pagina de discussion). Pro discuter le stato del stewards actual, vide Stewards/confirm.

Le votation comenciara le 25 de novembre 2006 e concludera le 15 de decembre 2006. Le candidatos debe correspnder al criterios (vide Stewards/Application guidelines) e obtener al minus 30 votos in favor con un ration de supporto de 80%. Le consilio administrative del Fundation Wikimedia seligera le stweards del candidatos in iste election (le numero es expectate de esser inter 10 e 20).

A fin de esser eligibile a votar, le usatores debe haber un conto valide in Meta con un ligamine a un projecto al minimo in que le usator ha participate durante al minus tres menses. In caso de suspicion de contos multiple pertinente a un singule personas, un verification de usator essera exequite e le votos duplicative essera cancellate.

Vide tamben:

Italiano:

Gli steward vengono eletti circa una volta l'anno. I requisiti per avanzare la propria candidatura sono esposti in Stewards/Application guidelines/it (chi ha osservazioni sulle regole può porle nella pagina di discussione). Per gli steward attualmente in carica è possibile presentare commenti sulla loro attività, si veda Stewards/confirm.

Le votazioni si apriranno il prossimo 25 novembre 2006 e termineranno il 15 dicembre 2006. Per superare l'elezione, il candidato deve ottenere almeno 30 voti a favore, i voti a favore devono essere almeno l'80% dei voti totali. Tra coloro che supereranno l'elezione il Board sceglierà a suo giudizio i nuovi steward, in numero tale da averne complessivamente tra 10 e 20.

Votanti: può votare chiunque dimostri di essere registrato su Meta ed abbia nella propria pagina utente un link ad almeno una sua pagina utente di un altro progetto a cui partecipa da almeno tre mesi. In caso di sospetto uso di sockpuppet verranno chiesti gli opportuni check user e i relativi voti annullati.

See also:

日本語:

新しいスチュワードは概ね年に1回選出します。スチュワードになることに関心のある人は、Stewards/Application guidelines/jaをご覧ください(the talk pageで規則を議論するのは、自由です)。現在のスチュワードが適任かを議論する場合は、スチュワードの信任をご覧ください。

投票は2006年11月25日から2006年12月15日まで行われます。立候補者は基準に合致していなければならず(Stewards/Application guidelines/ja参照)、最低30票、80%の支持が必要です。理事会ではこの選挙で立候補者の中からスチュワードを選任します(10-20人程度を予定しています)。

投票権については、利用者は利用者が少なくとも3ヶ月参加しているプロジェクトに少なくとも1つのアカウントへのリンクがメタで有効なアカウントになければなりません。ソックパペットの疑いがあれば、チェックユーザーによる確認が行われ、ソックパペットであれば、投票は無効です。

こちらもご覧ください。

Nederlands:

Nieuwe stewards worden grofweg eens per jaar gekozen. Als u geïnteresseerd bent in het stewardschap, kijk dan op De aanmeldingsprocedure (voel u vrij de gestelde regels te bediscussiëren op de overlegpagina). Om mee te praten over de status van de huidige stewards kunt u kijken op Stewards/confirm.

De stemming zal op 25 november 2006 beginnen en zal eindigen op 15 december 2006. Kandidaten moeten voldoen aan de criteria (zie de aanmeldingsprocedure) en ten minste 30 voorstemmen verzamelen, met daarnaast ten minste 80% steun. Het Bestuur van de Wikimedia Foundation zal de stewards kiezen uit de kandidaten in deze stemming (vermoedelijk tussen de 10 en 20 stewards).

Om te kunnen stemmen moeten gebruikers een geldige gebruikersnaam hebben op Meta, met een link naar ten minste een account op een project waar de gebruiker ten minste drie maanden aan heeft deelgenomen. Wanneer er een vermoeden is van sokpopperij, zal een CheckUser verificatie worden uitgevoerd, en sokpopstemmen zullen ongedaan worden gemaakt. See also:

Polski:

Nowi stewardzi wybierani są mniej więcej raz w roku. Jeśli chciałbyś/chciałabyś zostać stewardem, zapoznaj się ze wytycznymi dotyczącymi kandydatur (możesz też podyskutować o tych zasadach na stronie dyskusji). Wątpliwości co działalności aktualnych stewardów można przedyskutować na stronie: Stewards/confirm.

Głosowanie rozpoczęło się 25 listopada 2006 i będzie trwało do 15 grudnia 2006. Kandydaci muszą spełniać określone kryteria (zobacz Stewards/Application guidelines) i zdobyć co najmniej 30 głosów za oraz mieć przynajmniej 80% poparcia. Board of Trustees wybierze stewardów spośród kandydatów w tym głosowaniu (ma to być około 10 do 20 osób).

W głosowaniu mogą wziąć udział osoby, które: posiadają konto na Meta z przynajmniej jednym linkiem do konta w innym projekcie, w którym biorą udział co najmniej od trzech miesięcy. W razie podejrzenia o używanie pacynki, może zostać wszczęta procedura weryfikacyjna CheckUsera i głosy pacynek nie będą brane pod uwagę.

Zobacz także:

Português :

Novos stewards são eleitos uma vez por ano, aproximadamente. Se você estiver interessado em tornar-se Steward, leia Stewards/Application guidelines/pt (sinta-se à vontade para discutir as regras da eleição na página de discussão). Para debater sobre o status dos Stewards atuais, veja Stewards/confirm.

A votação começará em 25 de novembro e terminará em 15 de dezembro de 2006. Os candidatos precisarão satisfazer os critérios (veja Stewards/Application guidelines/pt) e obter, pelo menos, 30 votos a favor, com porcentual de apoio de, pelo menos, 80%. O Conselho Administrativo selecionará Stewards dentre os candidatos nesta eleição (espera-se algo entre 10 e 20).

Para poder votar na eleição, os usuários terão de ter conta válida na MetaWiki, com um link para, pelo menos, uma conta em um projeto do qual estejam participando por, pelo menos, três meses. Em caso de suspeita de uso de sock puppets, executar-se-a verificação por CheckUser, e ditos votos serão cancelados.

See also:

Русский:

Новые стюарды избираются примерно раз в год. Если вам хотелось бы стать стюардом, прочитайте страницу Stewards/Application guidelines (правила можно обсудить здесь). Обсуждения текущих стюардов проходят на странице Stewards/confirm.

Голосование начнётся 25 ноября 2006 года и продолжится до 15 декабря. Кандидаты должны проходить по определённым критериям (см. Stewards/Application guidelines) и получить не менее 30 голосов «за» при общей поддержке не менее 80%. Совет поверенных выберет стюардов из числа кандидатов (ожидатся, что будут выбраны 10—20 человек).

Для того, чтобы участвовать в голосовании, участники должны быть зарегистрированы на Мете, и на их странице участника должна присутствовать ссылка как минимум на один проект, в котором он участвовал не менее трёх месяцев. При подозрениях на кукловодство чекюзерам может быть подан запрос на проверку, по итогам которой подставные голоса будут аннулированы. See also:

Türkçe:

Yeni stewardlar aşağı yukarı yılda bir seçilir. Steward olmak istiyorsanız, başvuru yönergesini inceleyebilirsiniz (tartışma sayfasında kurallarla ilgili görüşlerinizi açıklamaktan çekinmeyin). Mevcut stewardların statüleriyle ilgili görüşlerinizi ise onay sayfasında paylaşabilirsiniz.

Oylama, 25 Kasım 2006'da başlayacak ve 15 Aralık 2006'da sona erecektir. Adaylar gerekli kriterleri (bkz: Başvuru yönergeleri) tutturmak, en az 30 olumlu oy almak ve %80'lik bir oran yakalamak zorundadır. Mütevelli Heyeti adaylar içerisinden stewardları seçecektir (10 - 20 kişi arası olması beklenmektedir).

Oy verebilmek için kullanıcıların, en az üç aydır katkıda bulunulan bir Wikimedia projesine bağlantı verilmiş bir Meta hesabına sahip olmaları gerekmektedir. Kukla kullanıcı şüphesi oluşması durumunda Denetçi doğrulaması gerekecek ve kukla oyları iptal edilebilecektir.

Ayrıca:

中文:

监管员的选举每年举行一次,如果你对此感兴趣,请阅读这个指导(也可在此讨论)。讨论现任监管员的事项请至

本次投票自2006年11月25日开始至12月15日结束。候选人必须达到标准且获得30票以上赞成票并且赞成率超过80%才有资格当选(见指引)Board of Trustees将从其中选出一些人任命为监管员(预计10-20人),

投票人的资格:用户必须在元维基有有效的帐号并且在至少一个维基计划中注册3个月以上。用户验证机制将会在必要的时候使用。

See also:

Bastique (Cary Bass)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Native English speaker, advanced in French, communicative in Spanish
  • Personal info: I'm a bureaucrat in good standing on Commons and an admin in good standing on the english wiki. I'm familiar with the Wikimedia Foundation and many of its policies, having been involved with Wikipedia since June of 2004. I'm available on IRC a good deal of the time, and am familiar with a multitude of users cross-project. I actively work with correspondence to the Wikimedia Foundation via OTRS.
Čeština:
  • Jazyky: en-N, fr-3, es-2 angličtina - mateřský jazyk, pokročilá francouzština, komunikativní úroveň španělštiny
  • Osobní informace: Jsem aktivním byrokratem na Commons a aktivním správcem na anglické Wikipedii. Jsem dobře obeznámen s nadací Wikimedia a mnohými jejími pravidly - jsem na Wikipedii aktivní už od června 2004. Velmi často jsem k zastihnutí na IRC a znám mnoho uživatelů na různých projektech. Odpovídám také na e-maily pro nadaci Wikimedia docházející do systému OTRS.
Dansk:
  • Sprog: en, fr-3, es-2 (Engelsk som modersmål, meget god til fransk, rimelig god til spansk)
  • Personlig information: Jeg er aktiv som bureaukrat på Commons og administrator på den engelske Wikipedia. Jeg er bekendt med Wikimedias regler og retningslinjer, og har vært aktiv på Wikipedia siden juni 2004. Jeg er ofte på IRC, og er kender mange brugere fra flere projekter. Jeg er også en af dem som svarer på epost vha. OTRS.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Englischer Muttersprachler, Französisch fortgeschritten, Spanisch mittelmäßig
  • Persönliche Info: Ich bin Bürokrat in Commons und Admin in der englischen Wikipedia. Ich bin mit der Wikimedia Foundation vertraut und mit vielen der Grundsätze, die in der Wikipedia seit Juni 2004 eingeführt wurden. Ich bin im IRC einen Großteil der Zeit erreichbar und bin projektübergreifend vertraut mit vielen Benutzern. Ich korrespondiere aktiv mit der Wikimedia Stiftung via OTRS.
Español :
  • Idiomas: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglés como lengua materna, francés avanzado, español intermedio
  • Información personal: Soy burócrata en Commons así como también soy administrador y colaborador activo en Wikipedia en inglés. Me encuentro familiarizado con la Fundación Wikimedia y sus políticas, siendo que estoy relacionado con Wikipedia desde junio de 2004. Estoy disponible una buena parte del día en el IRC y también estoy familizarizado con una multitud de usuarios que trabajan en diferentes proyectos. También trabajo activamente con la correspondencia que llega a la fundación vía OTRS.
Français :
  • Langues parlées : en-N, fr-3, es-2 anglais langue maternelle, français courant, espagnol simple courant.
  • Informations personnelles : Je suis bureaucrate actif sur Commons et admin actif sur la Wikipédia anglophone. Je suis familier de la Wikimedia Foundation et de ses règles, étant impliqué dans Wikipedia depuis juin 2004. Je suis souvent disponible sur IRC, et je connais de nombreux utilisateurs sur les autres projets. Je travaille activement sur OTRS (gestion des emails reçus par la Wikimedia Foundation).
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglese di madre lingua, francese avanzato, spagnolo di base
  • Informazioni personali: sono burocrate attivo su Commons e amministratore frequentemente presente sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese. Ho acquisito familiarità con la Wikimedia Foundation e le sue politiche, dal momento che mi occupo di Wikipedia dal giugno 2004. Sono spesso disponibile sui canali IRC, conosco molti dei partecipanti ad altri progetti. Sono attivo nella gestione del servizio OTRS, che si occupa delle email ricevute dalla Wikimedia Foundation.
日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, fr-3, es-2 英語を母語とし、フランス語は上級、スペイン語は会話ができる。
  • 人物について: Commonsで上級のビューロクラットであり、英語版ウィキペディアでは上級の管理者です。ウィキメディア財団とは良い関係を築き、政策にも多く関わっていて、2004年6月からウィキペディアに関わっています。多くの時間をIRCに割いていて、様々なプロジェクトの参加者とも親しいです。OTRSを通じてウィキメディア財団への連絡を積極的に行っています。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: En-N, Fr-3, Es-2 Moedertaal is Engels, gevorderd in Frans, en in staat te communiceren in het Spaans.
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben een bureaucraat met een goede reputatie op Wikimedia Commons en een moderator op de Engelse Wikipedia. Ik ben bekend met de WIkimedia Foundation en veel van haar beleid, aangezien ik betrokken ben bij Wikipedia sinds Juni 2004. Ik ben een groot deel van de tijd beschikbaar op IRC, en ken met veel gebruikers van andere projecten. Ik ben actief op het e-mailsysteem OTRS met het beantwoorden van e-mails aan de Wikimedia Foundation.
Norsk:
  • Språk: en, fr-3, es-2 (Engelsk som morsmål, meget god i fransk, passe god i spansk)
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg er er aktiv som byråkrat på Commons, og administrator på Wikipedia på engelsk. Jeg er kjent med Wikimedias regler og retningslinjer, og har vært aktiv på Wikipedia siden juni 2004. Jeg er ofte på IRC, og er kjent med mange brukere fra flere prosjekter. Jeg er også en av de som svarer på epost vha. OTRS.
Polski:
  • Języki: en-N, fr-3, es-2 język ojczysty angielski, zaawansowany francuski, stopień komunikatywny w hiszpańskim
  • Informacje osobiste: Cary Bass. Jestem aktywnym biurokratą na Commons oraz aktywnym administratorem na angielskiej wiki. Jestem obeznany w Fundacji Wikimedia oraz jej zasadach, jako że uczestniczyłem w Wikipedii od czerwca 2004 roku. Jestem dostępny na IRC-u przez większość czasu, oraz znam wielu użytkowników na różnych projektach. Jestem także aktywnym korespondentem w mailach do Fundacji Wikimedia na OTRS.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Anadilim İngilizce, Fransızca ileri düzeyde, İspanyolca konuşabiliyorum.
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Commons'ta bürokratlık ve İngilizce Wiki'de yöneticilik yapıyorum. 2004 haziranından beri Wikimedia'yla ilgilendiğim için Wikimedia Vakfı ve çoğu politikasına aşinayım. Çoğu zaman IRC'den ulaşılabiliyorum ve bir çok projede sayısız kullanıcıyı tanıyorum. OTRS sayesinde Wikimedia Vakfı'yla uyumlu ve aktif olarak çalışmalarımı sürdürüyorum.
Português :
  • Línguas: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglês como língua-mãe, francês avançado, comunicativa em espanhol
  • Informações pessoais: Sou burocrata de reputação ilibada no Commons e administradora em igual condição na Wikipédia em inglês. Estou familiarizada com a Fundação Wikimedia e suas políticas, pois estou envolvida com a Wikipédia desde junho de 2004. Estou disponível no IRC boa parte do tempo, e conheço vários usuários em vários projetos distintos. Trabalho ativamente com a correspondência da Fundação Wikimedia por meio do OTRS.
Русский:
  • Языки: en-N, fr-3, es-2 английский — родной, французский на хорошем уровне, испанский знаю средне
  • Обо мне: я — активный бюрократ на Commons и активный администратор английской Википедии. Занимаясь Википедией с июня 2004 г., я хорошо знаком с фондом Викимедиа и его правилами. Очень часто можно меня найти на IRC, я познакомился со многими участниками из многих проектов. Я активно отвечаю на получаемые Викимедиа письма через систему OTRS.
中文:
  • 语言能力: en-N, fr-3, es-2 本土英语使用者,熟练使用法语,可用西班牙语交流.
  • 个人资料: 我是维基共享的官员并且也是英文百科的管理员。我对维基媒体基金会及其政策十分了解。我从2004年6月起接触维基百科,我IRC经常在线并且我也和很多跨计划的用户十分熟悉,我目前为基金会的OTRS服务。
العربية:
  • اللغات: إنجليزية (اللغة الأم)، فرنسية (مستوى متقدم)، إسبانية (مستوى متوسط)
  • معلوملت شخصية: أنا بيروقراط في مشروع كومنز, و إداري في ويكيبديا (النسخة الإنجليزية). أشعر بأنني متمكن من مساهماتي و عملي في مؤسسة ويكيمديا و متابع و مدرك لمعظم الأنظمة، حيث أنني كنت قد بدأت العمل منذ مايو 2006. أنا موجود على الأي آر سي معظم الوقت، و أعرف الكثير من المستخدمين في عدة مشاريع. و أنا اعمل بصورة جادة مع المؤسسة من خلال تلقي إتصالات الأفراد و إستفساراتهم و إيصالها أو الرد عليها.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持 / مع الترقية
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ!) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Srikeit 07:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    208.100.195.84 13:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)talk (Not logged in)[reply]
  69. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Nishkid64 02:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Titoxd(?!?) 03:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Gizmo II 05:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Shyam (T/C) 07:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. bainer (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. pfctdayelise 12:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Voice-of-All 17:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Mbimmler 20:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support --- gildemax 21:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Danny 15:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Eloquence 17:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Kordas 13:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Glen S 19:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Tbone 21:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Gribeco 23:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. DVD R W 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Benn Newman 01:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Moumousse13 09:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. en:user:freakofnurture 01:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Michael Billington 09:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  95. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Alvaro 13:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support--clamengh 17:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Albertsab@cawiki 23:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --Shreshth91 04:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Until he turns evil, bastique will be a good steward. So I support him until then. DS 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. --Alhen 04:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Benjism89 12:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Rakela 16:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. --Lmbuga 21:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. CrzRussian 02:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Zzyzx11 05:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Eagle 101 01:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Andre (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Bishonen 05:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
    Jahiegel 06:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Moved to oppose.[reply]
  112. riana_dzasta 13:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Steel en:Steel 17:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 23:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  115. --JARU 00:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Michał P. 19:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC) (ro)[reply]
  119. Support--Shrieking Harpy Talk|Count 21:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    212.254.27.79 23:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC) User not registered. --Snowdog 01:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Raul654 02:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  121. --Alnokta 12:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Menasim 14:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  123. One of the good guys. —Phil | Talk 16:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support --Gmaxwell 16:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Aram33 17:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support --Mido 19:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  127. نعم - Strong Support --Chaos 19:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support --Фэлкон 21:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  129. --Mimouni 21:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Cowman109 00:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Bishonen 18:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC). Oops, too many supports from me, sorry. Perhaps if I register an Oppose as well? Bishonen 04:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  131. Nilfanion 22:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  132. I see no reason why my dear Bastique should not be a steward. Kjetil r 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Oui. TheCustomOfLife 22:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Dan | talk 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Don't think he'll be a bad steward. Effeietsanders 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  136. +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  137. yo --:Bdk: 21:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  138. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية
  1. This is not because I don't trust Bastique or think that he is not a great Wikimedian (he is); it's simply because I would prefer more experience on Meta for stewards. Bastique has less than 100 edits here on Meta prior to this month, and because stewards will have to be primarily active here, I would like to see more time and activity on Meta. You have my full confidence, however, and I will gladly support you if elected. Thanks for your understanding. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Oppose - recent events at en.wik have made me uneasy, but it doesn't seem as though it's going to make a difference anyway. I am also uneasy about calling people bigots. Even if you are correct, it's undiplomatic and shows poor judgement. Moreschi 21:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Strong oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Discussion moved to "Discussion moved from election page" on User talk:Bggoldie. —{admin} Pathoschild 08:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Part of the discussion is moved back below, under the subheading #Part of the discussion which Pathoschild moved from above to bggoldie's talk page, but whose correct location is here, where it belongs.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 08:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I, Zlatko Krastev, moved this discussion back here where it was held and where it belongs! Pathoschild, please take into consideration that the stewards are having rather high-power in Wikipedia and other WMF-projects, and at least I expect them to behave as public persons. -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Your anti-English Wikipedia POV is not appropriate here. Yann 14:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, maybe my command of English is not good enough and I failed to explain it clear: I have nothing against Wikipedia in general, or English Wikipedia in particular. It is all about balance and representativeness. How did it came to your mind that it is me with an anti-something POV? -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Moved here from User talk:Bggoldie (please do not split the discussion into multiple pages)
    • This is a unusual vote against me considering what I've done and where I've contributed. Essentially, you are voting against me because I'm American. Never mind that I contribute to other language Wikipedias, speak French fluently, have contributed toward the Haitian-Kreyol wikipedia. You're only reason for voting against me is because I am American. This seems bigoted. Bastique 20:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      OK, from all candidates your name is the one out of two which rings a bell. I've seen it here and there on en.wiki but nothing memorable. Lets see what have you done so much then? Visiting French Wikipedia I find that you've made 250 edits since May 2005, and the total is less than 500. The toolserver is down desperately waiting for new DB dumps, so I cannot check how many of them are in main namespace. Your contributions to Spanish Wikipedia is between 50 and 100 in total (counter opt-in does not help too), and on Haitian/Portuguese the mileage is less than 50 edits. Only on Gaelic WP you can meet the suffrage criteria. The conclusion - the topmost position you can get support from me is admin or bureaucrat on en.wp. You have the admin rights, call me when you apply for bureaucrat.
      Given the vast number of edits on your personal page on fr.wiki, it seems that you managed to forget a simple fact - Wikipedia is not a webspace provider. On your home wiki the case is even worse! I do not see the need to comment further.
      As for the "bigot" (later "softened" to bigoted) - I dunno! Till now I was under the impression that I am the center of the world and held the corresponding MPOV. Till now it was me being the victim of the Cabel, and now thanks to Hillgentleman I might be accused of becoming a member of a Cabal against you. Feel free to accuse me in anything you like, any time you like, and using any words considered most suitable by you!
      Going back to the main topic: you speak English (language), you live in English (culture), your mindset is English, ... so you are redundant - there are 6 more of that same stuff in the current stewards list. You have no chances of getting my support before living several years outside East/West Coast (of whatever you call America). Given that you are writing and not reading, talking and not listening, I've reconsidered my vote indeed! -- Goldie ± (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      Please accept my sincerest apologies (here, as you prefer, and on your talk page). As I mentioned to HillGentleman on his talk page, I was in shock that I was considered Anglo-American centric in spite of what I have accomplished on Wikimedia Commons in involving other language projects and cultures. Therefore, I apologize for my choice of words and regret that I cannot get you to change your mind. Bastique 15:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      Apology accepted! It seems that I have to degrade my language skills to en-2 (or lower) - I failed to communicate a simple but important message. -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. cj | talk 08:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects, especially on meta. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 13:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Strongly Oppose-I cannot trust him after reading his comments on my talk page. For historical purposes, here are the links:[2][3]. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose I believe this makes it obvious, that Bastique should be not given the power and responsibility being a Steward on Wikipedia. -- Karl Meier 20:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Note, User:Karl Meier has had ongoing and highly controversial disputes with Cool Cat, a user I have recently been mentoring on the Commons and to some extent on en.wp. If anyone wants to consider the single edit to which he has linked, I urge them to investigate the complete situation prior to voting. Bastique
    Quit making ad hominem attacks against me. Who I am and what I have or have not been involved in doesn't matter to this discussion, and because of that I am not going to waste anyone's time here, defending myself against any such irrelevant accusations or insinuations. What matters is that I believe that you shouldn't be trusted with the powers as a steward, when you are unable to use your admin powers in a reasonable and neutral way, dealing with editors that you personally have had a disagreement with. Here is another link to discussion, this time on AN/I, where several editors are questioning Bastique's actions as a ordinary editor and in his role as an admin: [4] -- Karl Meier 22:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Weak Oppose based on the threats to block users and persistent defence of a troll made on en: ANI. I will not have such a user as a steward. recent events at enwiki that have been disappointing and have slightly compromised what trust I had in Bastique. I hope this is simply a one-off incident, hence, changed to weak oppose. Chacor 02:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. With regret - I like Bastique, he has made substantial contributions. However, accusing people of bigotry because they hold the position that we need people from a wider range of backgrounds in order to conter inadvertant bias via societal conditioning shows an unhappy difficulty in seeing things from others' perspectives - precisely the concern these people had, which only confirms their concerns. This is too troubling to overlook. KillerChihuahua 15:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Strong Oppose based on recent actions on English Wikipedia. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose now. I don't oppose because he is anglo-centric. Even I am sometimes anglo-centric; I tend to begin communication with someone in English without question if it is the best language we are going to talk with, and in my opinion it is an anglo-centric attitude. In another occuasion, I am japano-centric or christianity-centric but I wouldn't argue about that. My own view and attitude should not be in NPOV, even if I long for not being so. People are necessarily influenced by their cultural background, and it is inevitable. However it is different that someone is influenced by his background and that someone is unconscious about that. And from my view, his attitude is still anglo-centric even if weakly and he himself tries to take it over. Specially when he accused someone who pointed it out with a harsh word. I had a good impression on his apologies about that, but rushing people who pointed out and accused them showed his vulnerability. He seems good, but I expect him maturity and self-conciousness in much a higher level appropriate for multicultured community. --Aphaia 20:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. With regret as KillerChihuahua and Aphaia, but I feel I can not vote differently :(. --Nux (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Moved from support. As Chacor, et al., I have long thought well of Bastique (such that this is a regretful oppose) but recent en.wiki happenings leave me with concerns that cannot readily be allayed. Jahiegel 06:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Moved from neutral. Oppose per my previous concerns. With the above statement of mentoring Cool Cat, I have to oppose based on his siding with Cool Cat and blocking another user Cool Cat was in conflict with on en:Wikipedia. This demonstrates poor judgement in terms of avoiding conflict of interest situations. —Doug Bell talkcontrib 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I share some of the concerns expressed by Moreschi above, but am neutral leaning oppose for now. —Doug Bell talkcontrib 13:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to oppose. —Doug Bell talkcontrib 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Nicholas, good question. While I don't believe it's mandatory, I feel that it's highly beneficial. I don't have a high amount of edits on Meta, but my edit history goes back considerably. This is notably do to my involvement with other cross-wiki projects such as Wikimedia Commons (I have over 6,000 edits at Commons) and my involvement with the OTRS correspondence system. I consider that my involvement on those projects makes up for a reduced edit count directly on meta.wm. Bastique 14:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I myself do not oppose you, Bastique, but I would like to point out a meta convention; stewards act as meta bereaucrats, I don't know it is de facto or de juri, but past stewards did so without argument. From this reason I can understand a meta regular may feel uneasy to have a steward who is not filled meta admin criteria. --Aphaia 22:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am more than happy to step into this role. I'm quite familiar with the layout and administration of Meta, even if I don't have an overwhelming edit count directly on Meta itself. Bastique 23:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the discussion which Pathoschild moved from above to bggoldie's talk page, but whose correct location is here
Please accept my sincerest apologies (here, as you prefer, and on your talk page). As I mentioned to HillGentleman on his talk page, I was in shock that I was considered Anglo-American centric in spite of what I have accomplished on Wikimedia Commons in involving other language projects and cultures. Therefore, I apologize for my choice of words and regret that I cannot get you to change your mind. Bastique 15:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted! It seems that I have to degrade my language skills to en-2 (or lower) - I failed to communicate a simple but important message. -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bastique, thank you for appology here[5]. However, I cannot accept it. I do not know for what you were appologising. ----Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canvasing for votes : Candidate talkpageing OPPOSED voters during voting to argue/persuade vote or change of vote, examples HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE. ВорВор 05:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Native English speaker, intermediate in German, can read basic French)
  • Personal info: I am a bureaucrat/checkuser/arbcom member on the English Wikinews. I am an admin here on Meta and on the English Wikibooks. I created the Wikinews Print edition and I have compiled it nearly every night for the past 18 months. I am often available on IRC (as CraigSpurrier). I am willing to help with anything that needs doing, including actively monitoring the requests for permissions pages.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Muttersprache Englisch, Deutsch mittelmäßig, Grundkenntnisse im Lesen von Französisch)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin Bürokrat/Checkuser/Arbcom - Mitglied in der englischen Wikinews. Hier auf Meta und im englischen Wikibooks bin ich Administrator. Ich gründete die Wikinews-Druckausgabe und stellte sie fast jede Nacht für die letzten 18 Monate zusammen. Ich bin oft im IRC (als CraigSpurrier) erreichbar. Ich möchte überall helfen, wo etwas getan werden muss, inklusive bei der aktiven Überwachung der Seite für Anfragen für Erlaubnisse (bezogen auf Benutzerrechte).
Español :
  • Idiomas: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Inglés nativo, alemán intermedio, puedo leer francés básico)
  • Información personal: Soy burócrata,checkuser y miembro del arbcom en Wikinoticias en inglés. Soy administrador aquí en Meta y en la versión en inglés de Wikibooks. Soy el creador de Wikinews Print edition(versión impresa de Wikinews) y la he preparado cada noche los últimos 18 meses. Me encuentro usualmente en el IRC como CraigSuprrier. Estoy dispuesto a ayudar con lo que sea necesario, incluyendo monitoreo activo en la página Request for permissions.
Français :
  • Langues: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (anglais langue maternelle, intermédiaire en allemand, peut lire le français basique)
  • Infos personnelles : Je suis bureaucrate/checkuser/arbitre sur le Wikinews anglophone. Je suis un admin ici sur Meta, et sur le Wikibooks anglophone. J'ai créé le Wikinews Print edition et je l'ai compilé pratiquemment chaque nuit pendant les derniers 18 mois. Je suis souvent sur IRC (pseudo : CraigSpurrier). Je suis désireux d'aider avec tout ce qui a besoin d'être fait, incluant la surveillance active des pages de requêtes de permission.


Italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Inglese di madre lingua, discreta conoscenza del tedesco, can read basic French)
  • Informazioni personali: sono bureaucrat/checkuser/membro dell'arbcom sulle English Wikinews in lingua inglese. Sono amministratore qui su Meta e su English Wikibooks in lingua inglese. Ho creato la Wikinews Print edition ed ho preso parte alla compilazione praticamente ogni notte negli ultimi 18 mesi. Sono spesso presente su IRC (come CraigSpurrier). Sono desideroso di essere d'aiuto con tutto ciò che c'è bisogno di fare, compreso il monitoraggio della pagina requests for permissions.
日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, de-2, fr-1.(英語を母語とし、ドイツ語は中級、簡単なフランス語が読める)
  • 人物について: 英語版ウィキニュースでビューロクラット、チェックユーザー、仲裁委員を務めています。メタと英語版ウィキブックスでは管理者です。Wikinews Print editionを創設し、過去18ヶ月ほぼ毎晩編集してきました。IRCに(CraigSpurrierとして)良く出入りしています。依頼ページと許可ページに積極的に関わるなど何かしら役に立ちたいです。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (geboren Engels spreker, gemiddeld in Duits, ben in staat simpel Frans te lezen)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben bureaucraat/checkuser/arbcom-lid op de Engelstalige Wikinews. Ik ben moderator hier op Meta en op de Engelstalige Wikibooks. Ik maakte de Wikinews Print edition samen en ik heb bijna iedere nacht voor de afgelopen achttien maanden de editie samengesteld. Ik ben dikwijls beschikbaar op IRC (als CraigSpurrier). Ik ben bereid te helpen met van alles wat gedaan moet worden, inclusief het actief in de gaten houden van de Permissions Pagina.
Norsk:
  • Språk: en, de-2, fr-1
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg er byråkrat, checkuser og medlem av Arbitration Committee på Wikinytt på engelsk. Jeg er administrator her på Meta, og på Wikibooks på engelsk. Det var jeg som opprettet trykkutgaven av Wikinytt, og har samlet sammen denne hver kveld de siste 18 månedene. Jeg er ofte tilgjengelig på IRC (som CraigSpurrier). Jeg er villig til å hjelpe til der det er nødvendig, inkludert å overvåke Requests for Permissions-siden.
Português :
  • Línguas: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (inglês como língua-mãe, nível intermediário em alemão, leio francês básico)
  • Informações pessoais: sou burocrata/checkuser/membro do arbcom na Wikinews em língua inglesa. Sou administrador aqui, na MetaWiki, e no Wikibooks em língua inglesa. Eu criei o Wikinews Print edition (Wikinews para impressão), de cuja compilação participo quase todas as noites há quase 18 meses. Estou disponível no IRC regularmente (como CraigSpurrier). Estou disposto a ajudar com qualquer coisa que precise ser feita, inclusive com o monitoramento da página requests for permissions.


Türkçe:
  • Diller: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Anadilde İngilizce, orta seviyede Almanca, basit seviyede Fransızca)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: İngilizce Wikinews'te bürokrat/denetçi/tahkim komitesi üyesi olarak görev yapıyorum. Meta'da ve İngilizce Wikibooks'ta da yönetiyim. Wikinews Baskı Sürümü'nü oluşturdum ve son 18 ay boyunca aşağı yukarı her gece derlemesini saptım. Sıklıkla IRC'de CraigSpurrier adıyla bulunuyorum. İzin sayfasındaki isteklerin takibi de dahil olmak üzere, yapılması gereken herşeye yardım etmek istiyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Korg + + 22:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Brian Wikinews / Talk 04:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Danny 15:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Eloquence 17:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mailer Diablo 21:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yann 23:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tbone 22:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. I don't know him, but after looking through his contributions I think he'd make a good steward. He maintains an unfailingly polite and friendly attitude; I know of many users who would be more agitated than he was if someone removed their bureaucrat and administrator access without explanation, for example. He does seem to be in touch with the wider Wikimedia community despite his little activity on Meta; he reports relevant developments to his home projects and is idling in #wikimedia at the moment of this post. Various comments demonstrate an unusual enthusiastic friendliness, a good respect of privacy, and an understanding that policy should be enforced in spirit rather than to the letter. I'd like to see him become more active in inter-project coordination, but presumably he will when he becomes a steward. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 06:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  26. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Delta Tango 15:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Divol 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Andre (talk) 03:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Per Cool Cat. Jahiegel 06:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support--10caart 13:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I have been informed that this vote had been placed in the wrong place. It looks like it's now in the right one; however, for the sake of clarity, I am pleased to confirm this support.
  32. Support--Moch 18:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. strong support --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 23:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. strong support 65.11.167.77 07:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Opps wasn't logged in Terinjokes 07:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Definitly would make an excellent steward. Bawolff 06:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Based on others opinions Bastique 15:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Alnokta 01:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Vote was removed - revote Strong Support --82.153.135.69 19:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC) re-sign - was not logged in. --Skenmy 19:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I would like to see more experience in other language projects (and Meta) for stewards. Thanks for your understanding. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Shyam (T/C) 07:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects, especially on meta. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Seems comparatively inexperienced. — Dan | talk 22:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I'm unsure you have enough multilingual experience Phe 86.196.233.130 17:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Not logged in, informed in talk. (yeps I was not logged, vote corrected)[reply]
  4. Benjism89 12:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: fr (native), en-3
  • Personal info:
    • A little history : I began my involvment with Wikipedia in mid-november 2004. Rather than writing articles, I've always prefered doing maintenance work (see fr:wp editcount), so I soon requested adminship (march 2005). Why do I prefer maintenance ? It's because I think there are many many article writers in a wiki, but too few people preventing it from becoming a total mess : there is much need of people adding categories, reorganizing, checking image licences... and related to sysop status, easy-reverting, deleting sandbox-like pages, and blocking vandals. On the same principle, I applied for bureaucratship a few months ago (july 2006) because there was a shortage Recent Changes chan)
    • availability, I'm often on IRC on evenings (GMT+1), to chat and take care of vandalism (via the RC chan)
    • Why do I want to become a steward ? It's more or less the same reason as when I requested sysop and bureaucrat status : I merely wish to help maintain the Wikimedia project some more with theses new tools.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr (Muttersprache), en-3
  • Informationen zur Person:
    • Eine kleine Geschichte : Ich begann meine Teilnahme an der Wikipedia Mitte November 2004. Zunächst zog ich Wartungsarbeiten dem Artikelschreiben vor. (siehe fr:wp editcount) Warum dies? Ich denke, dass es jederzeit tausende Leute gibt, bereit Artikel zu schreiben, aber Personen fehlen, welche diese kategorisieren, die Urheberrechte von Bildern überprüfen, die Artikel überarbeiten... oder weiters, mit den Administratorrechten, Vandalismus löschen, Seiten oder Vandalen blockieren. Ich habe daher bald um den Administratorstatus angesucht und ihn Mitte März 2005 erhalten. Vor kurzem habe ich mich als Bürokrat aufstellen lassen (Juli 2006), um den Mangel an aktiven unter den Personen mit diesem Status zu mildern.
    • Erreichbarkeit: Ich hänge üblicherweise am Abend (GMT+1) im IRC herum, um zu diskutieren und auch um den Vandalismus zu überwachen (mittels dafür vorgesehenen Kanal)
    • Warum um den Stewardstatus ansuchen? Wegen der selben Gründe für den Status Administrator und den Status Bürokrat: Ich wünsche einfach den Wikimedia-Projekten wieder ein bisschen mehr zu helfen, auf meine Weise, Dank dieser neuen Möglichkeiten.
Français :
  • Langues parlées: fr (natif), en (bon niveau)
  • Informations personnelles :
    • petit historique : J'ai débuté sur wiki à mi novembre 2004. Déjà à cette époque, je me suis trouvé bien plus d'affinité avec la maintenance qu'a l'écriture des articles (voir fr:wp editcount). Pourquoi cela ? Je pense que s'il y a toujours des milliers de gens prèt à écrire des articles, on manque toujours de volontaires pour empecher que cela dégénère en un beau bordel : même actuellement, nous avons grand besoin de personnes catégorisant les articles, vérifiant les problemes de copyvio des images, reorganiation d'article... ou plus spécifique aux outils de sysop, effacer des vandalismes, proteger des pages et bloquer des vandales. J'ai donc rapidement demandé le status de sysop, et l'ai obtenu a mi-mars 2005. Plus récemment, je me suis aussi présenté au status de bureaucrate (juillet 2006), pour pallier à un manque d'actifs parmi les personnes possédant le status.
    • Disponibilités : je traine généralement le soir (GMT+1) sur IRC, pour discuter et aussi surveiller les vandalismes (via le channel adequat)
    • Pourquoi rechercher le status de steward ? Pour a peu près les memes raisons que pour les status de sysop et bureaucrat : je souhaite simplement aider le project mediaWiki encore un peu plus, à ma manière, grace à ces nouveaux outils.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: fr, en-3 (francese di madre lingua, inglese avanzato)
  • Informazioni personali: partecipo a Wikipedia dalla fine del 2004, sono attualmente amministratore e burocrate sulla Wikipedia in lingua francese. Piuttosto che alla scrittura degli articoli, ho sempre preferito dedicarmi al lavoro di manutenzione (vedi fr:wp editcount), per questo motivo ho chiesto di diventare amministratore abbastanza presto (marzo 2005). Perché preferisco la manutenzione? Il motivo è perché ritengo che vi siano molti che già scrivono articoli su una wiki, ma troppo poche persone che sono attente ad evitare che diventi un disordine totale: c'è grande necessità di persone che aggiungono le categorie, riorganizzano, controllano le licenze delle immagini... ma anche dal punto di vista dell'amministratore, che facciano revert, cancellazioni immediate e blocchino in vandali. In base allo stesso principio, ho chiesto lo status di burocrate (luglio 2006) dal momento che mancavano burocrati attivi in quel momento.
    Per quanto riguarda la mia disponibilità, sono spesso su IRC di sera (GMT+1). (not up to date)
日本語:
  • 言語: fr(母語), en-3
  • 人物について: 2004年11月半ばからウィキペディアに参加し始めました。記事を書くよりはいつも維持作業の方が好きでした(fr:wp editcount参照)。それで間もなく(2005年3月)管理者になりました。何故維持作業の方が好きなのか。それはウィキでは記事を書く人が多いが、全体が混乱しかねないと考えたからです。カテゴリーを加え、再編し、画像の合法性を確認することは大いに必要であり、sysopの立場、復帰作業がしやすい、サンドボックスのようなページを削除し、荒らしをブロックすることも、大いに必要な作業です。同じ原則から活動がしやすいために数ヶ月前に(2006年7月)ビューロクラットになりました。夕方は良くIRCにいます。 (not up to date)
Português :
  • Línguas: fr (língua-mãe), en-3
  • Informações pessoais:
    • Pequena história : Meu envolvimento com a Wikipédia começou em meados de novembro de 2004. Mais do que escrever artigos, eu sempre preferi fazer o trabalho de manutenção (veja fr:wp editcount), por isso, eu logo pedi o status de administrador (março de 2005). E por quê eu prefiro a manutenção? Porque eu acredito que haja muitos escritores de artigo em uma wiki, mas poucos a evitarem que a coisa se torne uma confusão total: há grande demanda por pessoas que criem categorias, reorganizem, verifiquem as licenças das imagens... e, no que tange o status de sysop, usando o botão de rollback, apagando páginas de teste e bloqueando vândalos. Pelo mesmo princípio, eu me candidatei a burocrata há poucos meses (julho de 2006), pois havia poucos burocratas ativos naquele momento.
    • disponibilidade: Freqüentemente, estou no IRC à noite (GMT+1), para conversar e resolver problemas com vandalismo (por meio do canal RC)
    • Por quê quero ser Steward? É mais ou menos pela mesma razão pela qual eu solicitei o status de sysop e de burocrata: Eu, apenas, quero ajudar mais na manutenção do projeto da Wikimedia, usando estas novas ferramentas.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can on one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Srikeit 07:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Alastor Moody 17:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Poppypetty 00:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC). Entirely trust this user. He has proven that he is a responsible sysop on fr. Furthermore, we don't have any steward really participating in the French wikipedia and I think it has been a huge problem over the last few months.because he won't have the right to use steward rights on wikipedia fr[reply]
  22. Blinking Spirit 11:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. heMmeR 18:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. M LA1 23:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yann 23:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Bastique 03:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ceedjee 21:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Moumousse13 09:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Alvaro 13:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC) I trust Darkoneko so much... I prefer him to stay on wp:fr, but it would be an egoistic point of view ;D[reply]
  30. J'ai confiance (même si on ne se connait pas vraiment) Kipmaster 14:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Plyd 12:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Divol 16:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Benjism89 12:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Il est plus que capable. Jahiegel 06:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Dmitry Gerasimov 11:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support--10caart 13:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support D'acord avec Jahiegel,--Moch 18:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Strong support - someone has to spin the globe! -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    212.254.27.79 23:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC) User not registered. --Snowdog 01:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Timichal 15:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support - Would make a great steward. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Jon Harald Søby 12:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Elapied 13:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rune Obash 12:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Bien sûr ! Oblic 23:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. agit en censeur autocrate   <STyx 17:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. His trolling and incivility against me here makes it obvious to me that he shouldn't have be trusted with the power and responsiblities the comes with being a steward. -- Karl Meier 19:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - the diff that Karl Meier points out above is troubling; it is never acceptable, regardless of what you think of the person or situation, to mock another user by saying "blah blah blah" in response to their comments. I expect a steward to be able to respond and comment on situations, no matter how frustratring they are, civilly and reasonably. Thanks. Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose- Immature behaviour, as stated above.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 04:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Il n'est pas actif en les projets qui est interlingual interlinguistique ou petit. (Isn't active on small or interlingual projects (like Commons). Pardon my terrible French.) --Rory096 22:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC) (it's "interlinguistique" ou "multi-languages" :)[reply]
    Ah, merci beaucoup. --Rory096 21:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Would like more multilingual interaction; can't oppose on it, though. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Aphaia 05:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Tbone 22:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 23:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Korg + + 15:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Question from Gribeco

What is it that stewardship will enable you to do? Typically, it allows to help out small projects with few admins, but you're not claiming to participate in them...

Well, it's exact I'm not much on small projects... but it can't really prevent me from helping them, since they only need to ask on the IRC channel (I'm often on IRC) or on the dedicaced meta page if they have a problem. DarkoNeko 16:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
answer to the recent "oppose" votes

it's just I don't find a good idea answering just after the vote line, so...)

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 I can use machine translators ie. babelfish
  • Personal info: I have been a member of the Wikimedia commnity for almost 2 year. I have been a bureaucrat on Turkish projects for more than a year. I have been an active Meta user since February 2005 and now visit it daily as an administrator. I am a member of Special Projects Comittee. I am an agent of the email response team and try to help people by answering their questions. I have editing access to the Wikimedia Foundation wiki. Lately, I have started to collaborate with the Translation Subcommittee so we can help to break the language barrier for those people who cannot speak major languages so that they can come to Meta more and maybe even start to contribute. Briefly, I am voluntarily active on not just a single language, but in the Wikimedia community in general and trying to help this community achieve our ultimate goal: free and feasible access to the whole of human knowledge for everyone. I am on-line on IRC regularly, but sometimes I need to sleep :). I want to get this new responsibility to help new and growing projects with my Mediawiki and Wikimedia knowledge and experience. I also believe that, besides regular Steward duties, as a Steward I can (and we should) help and encourage the new and mid-size projects to have a voice on Meta and on Foundation, so that their existence will not be only locally, but here, together with all of us.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 Ich kann Übersetzungsmaschinen verwenden, wie z.B. Babelfisch
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin ein Mitglied der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft seit fast zwei Jahren. Ich bin Bürokrat in türkischen Projekten für mehr als ein Jahr. Ich bin ein aktiver Meta-Benutzer seit Februar 2005 und jetzt komme ich hier täglich als Administrator vorbei. Ich bin ein Mitglied des Special Projects Committee. Ich bin ein Vertreter des E-Mail-Beantwortungsteams und versuche Leuten durch die Beantwortung ihrer Fragen zu helfen. Ich habe Bearbeitungszugang zum Wikimedia-Stiftungs-Wiki. Seit kurzem habe ich begonnen mit dem Übersetzungskomitee zusammenzuarbeiten, sodass wir helfen können die Sprachbarriere für die Leute zu brechen, die keine Weltsprachen sprechen, sodass sie zu Meta kommen können und vielleicht sogar etwas beitragen können. Kurz, ich bin freiwillig aktiv in nicht nur einer einzigen Sprache, sondern in der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft im allgemeinen und versuche dieser Gemeinschaft zu helfen das Endziel zu erreichen: Freier und durchführbarer Zugang zu dem Wissen der Menschen für jedermann. Ich bin regelmäßig online im IRC, aber manchmal muss ich schlafen :). Ich möchte diese neue Verantwortung erhalten, um neuen und wachsenden Projekten mit meinem MediaWiki- und Wikimedia-Wissen und meiner Erfahrung zu helfen. Auch glaube ich, dass ich als Steward neben den regulären Steward-Aufgaben, den mittelgroßen Projekten helfen und sie fördern kann (wir sollten das), sodass ihr Dasein nicht nur lokal sei, sondern hier, bei uns allen.
Français :
  • Langues: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 Je peux utiliser des traducteurs automatiques tel que babelfish
  • Infos personnelles: Je suis membre de la communauté Wikimédia depuis presque deux ans et bureaucrate des projets turcs depuis plus d'un an. Je suis un utilisateur de Méta depuis février 2005 et un administrateur actif. Je suis un membre du Comité spécial de projets. Je suis un agent de l'équipe de réponse d'email et j'essaie d'aider des personnes en répondant à leurs questions. J'ai accès au wiki de la Fondation Wikimédia. Récemment, je collabore également avec le sous-comité de traductions pour aider à briser la barrière linguistique pour les gens qui ne peuvent pas parler les langues principales, qui, par conséquence, peuvent venir à Méta davantage et peuvent peut-être même commencer à contribuer. Brièvement, je suis volontairement actif non sur une seule langue, mais généralement dans tout la communauté Wikimédia pour aider nos effort à réaliser le but final: l'accès libre et faisable à la connaissance humaine entière pour chacun. Je suis en ligne sur fr:IRC régulièrement (mais parfois je dois dormir :). Je veux obtenir cette nouvelle responsabilité d'aider les nouveaux projets en employant mon expérience et connaissance de Médiawiki et de la Fondation Wikimédia. Je crois également que, sans compter les fonctions steward régulières, en tant que steward je peux (et nous devrions) aider et encourager les nouveaux projets et ceux qui croissent à avoir une voix sur Méta et dans la Fondation, et ainsi leur existence ne sera pas seulement locale, mais ici, ensemble avec nous tous.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: tr-A, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 babelfish gibi çeviri programlarını da kullanabiliyorum
  • Kişisel bilgiler : 2 yıla yakın Wikimedia topluluğunun bir üyesiyim. 1 yılı aşkın süredir Türkçe projelerin bürokratıyım. Meta'nın Şubat 2005'ten bu yana aktif kullanıcısı ve yöneticisiyim, günlük gelmekteyim. Özel projeler komitesi üyesiyim. E-posta cevaplama görevlilerindenim ve insanlara sorularını cevaplayarak yardım etmekteyim. Wikimedia Vakfı sitesinde yazma hakkım var. Son dönemlerde Çeviri Altkomitesi ile de çalışma yürütüyorum ve bu sayede çok yaygın dilleri konuşamayanlar ile Meta arasındaki dil engelinin kalkmasına katkımız olacağına ve bunun da sonucu olarak diğer dillerin Meta'ya gelmesine ve hatta katkıda bulunmasına bir yol açabileceğimize inanıyorum. Kısaca, gönüllü olarak genel Wikimedia projelerinde aktifim ve esas amacımız olan, tüm insanlığa tüm bilginin özgürce ulaşması hedefinde, bu topluluğa yardım ediyorum. IRC'ye 24/7 bağlıyım ama ara sıra uyumam gerekiyor :). Yeni ve büyümükte olan projelere, Wikimedia ve Mediawiki bilgi ve tecrübem ile yardım etmek için bu yeni sorumluluğa talibim. Ayrıca inanıyorum ki, normal Steward işleri dışında, Steward olarak, küçük ve orta büyüklükteki projelerin Meta'da ve Vakıfta sesleri olması için onlara yardım edebilirim ve cesaretlendirebilirim. Hatta hepimiz bunu yapmalıyız ki, onları varlıkları sadece lokal kalmasın, burada bizimle birlikte de olsunlar.
Português :
  • Línguas: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 Sei usar tradutores automáticos, i.e., o babelfish
  • Informações pessoais: Sou membro da comunidade Wikimedia há quase 2 anos. Sou burocrata dos projetos em turco há mais de um ano. Sou ativo na MetaWiki desde fevereiro de 2005, administrador e visito o sítio diariamente. Sou membro do Comitê de Projetos Especiais. Sou membro do OTRS, tentando ajudar às pessoas respondendo às suas perguntas. Possuo conta no sítio da Fundação Wikimedia. Recentemente, também comecei a colaborar com o Subcomitê de Traduções, para ajudar a quebrar a barreira lingüística para aqueles que não falam as principais línguas e, como resultado, esperamos que venham à MetaWiki mais freqüentemente e, talvez, até mesmo passem a contribuir por aqui. Em resumo, sou bastante ativo não apenas em uma língua, mas em vários projetos da Wikimedia, e tento auxiliar a comunidade em seu esforço para alcançar seu máximo objetivo: acesso livre a todo conhecimento humano para todos. Estou conectado ao IRC 24 horas por dia, mas às vezes preciso dormir :). Quero esta nova responsabilidade para ajudar os novos projetos e aqueles em desenvolvimento usando minha experiência e meus conhecimentos na Wikimedia e com o MediaWiki. Também acredito que, além das atividades regulares, como Steward eu possa (nós devemos) ajudar e encorajar os novos projetos, bem como aqueles de tamanho intermediário, a terem voz ativa na MetaWiki e na Fundação, para que sua existência não se limite à esfera local, mas que alcance, também, este forum, junto com todos nós.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 I can use machine translators ie. babelfish
  • Informazioni personali: Sono da quasi 2 anni membro della comunità di Wikimedia, burocrate sui progetti in lingua turca da oltre un anno, utente attivo e quotidianamente assiduo su meta dal febbraio 2005. Sono membro dello Special Projects Committee. Rispondo su OTRS cercando di essere d'aiuto a chi scrive rispondendo ai loro messaggi. Ho accesso in scrittura al sito della Foundation. Ultimamente ho iniziato a collaborare con il Translation Subcommittee per aiutare a superare la barriera linguistica e consentire anche a chi non parla le lingue più diffuse di frequentare meta più spesso e magari anche di iniziare a collaborare. In breve, sono per scelta attivo non su una sola lingua ma in generale sui progetti Wikimedia e cerco di aiutare questa comunità nel suo sforzo di perseguire il suo scopo ultimo: conoscenza libera e accessibile per tutti. Sono on-line su IRC 24 ore al giorno e 7 giorni la settimana, anche se ogni tanto ho bisogno di dormire :). Vorrei questo nuovo incarico per aiutare i nuovi progetti in crescita attravreso la mia conoscenza di MediaWiki e Wikimedia. Credo inoltre che, oltre ai compiti di routine, come steward potrei/(dovremmo) aiutare i progetti nuovi e minori ad avere maggior peso su meta e nella Foundation, in modo che la loro esistenza non sia un mero fatto locale, ma che anch'essi siano qui con tutti noi.
日本語:
  • 言語: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 機械翻訳、例えばbabelfishが使えます。
  • 人物について: 2年近くwikimediaに参加してきました。1年以上トルコ語版でビューロクラットをしています。2005年2月からメタの利用者であり、現在管理者として毎日覗いています。Special Projects Committeeの委員です。Email返答班に属していますし、疑問に答えることで参加者の手伝いをしようとしています。Wikimedia Foundation wikiへの接続を編集しています。最近翻訳小委員会と協力し始め、その結果、主要言語が話せない人にとっての言語障壁を取り除く手助けができ、こうした人々がもっとメタを訪れることができるようになり恐らく投稿を始められるようにさえなります。端的に言うと、一つの言語だけでヴォランティア活動をしているわけではないですが、一般的にウィキメディアで最終目的を(つまり全ての人のためにあらゆる人知に無料且つ適度に接することができる)成し遂げられるよう手助けしています。IRCの常連ですが、時々睡眠が必要です:)。メディアウィキとウィキメディアで得た知識と経験を生かして新しく成長する各プロジェクトの手助けができるように新たな役職に就きたいです。通常のスチュワード職のほかにもスチュワードとして新規の中規模のプロジェクトにあるメタと財団の声を反映できる(そして反映すべきです)と考えています。その為にこの人たちの存在は私たちと共に(ここでは)特定の地域に限られるものではないでしょう。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 Ik ben in staat gebruik te maken van machinevertalingen enz.
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben lid van de Wikimedia-gemeenschap sinds twee jaar. Ik ben langer dan een jaar bureaucraat op de Turkse projecten. Ik ben actief op Meta sinds februari 2005 en bezoek meta nu dagelijks als moderator. Ik ben lid van het Special Projects Committee. Ik ben een medewerker van det e-mail helpdesk en probeer mensen te helpen door hun vragen te beantwoorden. Ik heb schrijftoegang tot de Wikimedia Foundation wiki. Laatst ben ik begonnen mee te werken met het Translation Subcommittee zodat we kunnen helpen de taalbarrière te verbreken voor de mensen die niet een van de grote talen speken, zodat ze naar meta kunnen komen en misschien zelfs kunnen bijdragen. Kortom, ik ben vrijwillig actief, niet slechts in één enkele taal, maar in de Wikimedia-gemeenschap in het algemeen, en ik probeer de gemeenschap te helpen om haar uiteindelijke doel te bereiken: Vrije en bruikbare toegang tot de som van de menselijke kennis voor iedereen. Ik ben regelmatig online op IRC, maar soms moet ik slapen :). Ik wil deze nieuwe verantwoordelijkheid dragen om nieuwe en groeiende projecten te helpen met mijn kennis van en ervaring met MediaWiki en WikiMedia. Ik geloof oo dat, naast de algemene Stewardtaken, ik als steward de nieuwe en middelmatige projecten kan (en zou moeten) helpen om een stem te hebben op Meta en naar de Foundation, zodat hun bestaan niet alleen lokaal zal zijn, maar hier, samen met ons allemaal.
Русский:
  • Языки: tr-M, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1 Умею пользоваться автоматическими переводчиками вроде babelfish
  • Обо мне: я являюсь членом сообщества Викимедиа на протяжении почти двух лет. Я — бюрократ турецких проектов фонда с более чем годовалым стажем. Я активен на Мете с февраля 2005 года, а с недавних времён посещаю её ежедневно в роли администратора. Я — член Комитета специальных проектов и команды OTRS, в составе которой отвечаю на вопросы, приходящие по почте. Имею аккаунт на сайте фонда. Недавно я начал работу в Подкомитете по переводам, чтобы помочь преодолеть языковой барьер участникам, не знакомым с основными языками Меты. То есть я активен не на каком-то отдельном языке, а на уровне всего сообщества Викимедиа и пытаюсь помочь сообществу в достижении его конечной цели: свободного и простого доступа ко всем знаниям человечества. Я постоянно онлайн в IRC, однако иногда и мне бывает необходимо поспать :). Я хочу возложить на себя эту новую ответственность с тем, чтобы помочь новым или растущим проектам своими знаниями Mediawiki и Викимедиа. Мне также кажется, что кроме выполнения обычных функций стюард, в этой роли я (и все мы) должны поощрять маленькие и средние проекты к тому, чтобы они участвовали в работе Меты, и не варились в собственном соку, а сосуществовали со всеми нами.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Vikiwiki 08:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --kibele 09:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Kipmaster 09:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Lighterside 13:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Frank Schulenburg 00:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Pinar 03:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 04:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Shyam (T/C) 07:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. bainer (talk) 07:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Doruksal 08:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Renegade 14:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support --- gildemax 21:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. fcn Ø 01:27 30 November 2006
  63. Danny 15:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Eloquence 17:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Phe 17:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Gac 06:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  67. Effeietsanders 13:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC) - Yes, I think we can trust Dbl2010 with stewardship[reply]
  68. Thiras 20:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Purodha Blissenbach 12:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Thogo 17:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Tbone 22:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. User:Oscar/Sig 09:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  73. Support--clamengh 17:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. yes. drini 03:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Benjism89 12:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Izumi5 14:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Jahiegel 06:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support--Moch 18:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Strong support - someone has to be knowledgeable with the problems of small wikies as they are quite different from big ones. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. While I still have the same concern, his lack of experience in larger wikis to experience the difficulties there, I decided to change my vote to support on consideration of his time on meta and on OTRS. --Cat out 23:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. --Azh7 12:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Dan | talk 22:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --:Bdk: 21:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Seems well-qualified and trustworthy. Alai 22:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対

While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
I want to thank you all for your supports. :) --Dbl2010 00:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: es, en-5. (native spanish, advanced english)
  • Personal info: I've been very active helping wikimedia projects. I'm sysop at commons:, en: (where I got around 30k edits), admin and bureaucrat on es: . On en: I've also helped on the Mediation Comittee and as Arbitration Committee clerk. I also help dealing with OTRS (anything spanish) on the queues info-es, info-en and permissions. I've also been helping translating WMF related pages here on meta.
Español :
  • Idiomas: es, en-5. (español nativo, inglés avanzado)
  • Información personal. He sido un colaborador activo de Wikipedia Soy biblio y burócrata en la wiki española, administrador (biblio) en commons y en la wiki inglesa, en donde tengo más de 30mil ediciones. En la wiki inglesa he sido también miembro del comité de mediación y como asistente del comité de arbitraje. También ayudo al departamente de relaciones públicas respondiendo correo en OTRS con todo lo relacionado a idioma español (con acceso a las listas info-en, info-es, permissions). También ayudo a traducir páginas en meta, especialmente las relacionadas con la fundación Wikimedia.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: es, en-5. (Muttersprache: Spanisch; fortgeschritten: Englisch)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin ein aktiver Teilnehmer der Wikipedia. Ich bin Administrator auf Commons und in der englischen Wikipedia, wo ich mehr als 30.000 Bearbeitungen durchgeführt habe. In der englischen Wikipedia bin ich Mitglied des Vermittlungskomitees und Assistent des Arbitragekomitees gewesen. Auch helfe ich der Abteilung für Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, indem ich Post in OTRS in Zusammenhang mit der spanischen Sprache beantworte (mit Zugang zu den Listen info-en, info-es, Permissionen). Weiters helfe ich Seiten auf Meta zu übersetzen, vor allem die mit der Wikimedia-Stiftung zusammenhängenden.
Français :
  • Langues : es, en-5. (espagnol langue maternelle, anglais avancé)
  • Infos personnelles : J'ai été très actif pour aider les projets wikimédia. Je suis admin sur commons, en: (où j'ai environ 30k contributions), admin et bureaucrate sur es: . Sur en: J'ai aussi aidé le comité de médiation et le comité d'arbitrage. Je m'occupe aussi d'OTRS en espagnol sur info-es, et info-en et les permissions. J'ai aussi aidé à traduire les pages liées à la WMF ici sur méta.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: es, en-5. (spagnolo di madre lingua, inglese avanzato)
  • Informazioni personali. Sono molto attivo nella partecipazione ai progetti di Wikimedia. Sono amministratore su commons: e su en: (dove ho circa 30.000 edit). Sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese ho anche partecipato al Mediation Comittee e come membro dell'Arbitration Committee. Mi occupo inoltre del sistema OTRS (per la parte in lingua spagnola) sulle code info-es, info-en e permissions. Mi sono interessato anche della traduzione di pagine relative alla WMF qui su meta.
日本語:
  • 言語: es, en-5.(母語はスペイン語、英語は上級)
  • 人物について: 非常に活動的にウィキメディアのプロジェクトに協力しています。Commonsと英語版のsysopです(3万くらい編集しています)。英語版では仲裁委員会にも協力し、調停委員としても活動しています。スペイン語版や英語版などのOTRSにも協力しています。メタのページに関して財団にも協力しています。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: es, en-5. (Geboren Spaanstalig, vergevorderd in Engels)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben zeer actief geweest in het helpen van Wikimediaprojecten. Ik ben moderator op Commons en de Engelstalige Wikipedia (waar ik rond de 30.000 bewerkingen heb). Op en: heb ik ook meegeholpen aan het Mediatiecomité en als griffier voor het arbitratiecomité. Ik help ook met OTRS (alles in het Spaans) in de queues info-es, info-en en permissions. Ik heb ook geholpen met het vertalen van WMF-gerelateerde pagina's hier op Meta.
Português :
  • Línguas: es, en-5. (espanhol como língua-mãe, inglês avançado)
  • Informações pessoais: Sou muito ativo em minha participação nos projetos da Wikimedia. Sou sysop no Commons: e na en: (onde fiz cerca de 30 mil edições). Na en:, participei do Comitê de Mediação e como auxiliar do Comitê de Arbitragem. Também ajudo no OTRS (com qualquer coisa em espanhol), nas seções info-es, info-en e permissions. Também tenho ajudado na tradução de páginas sobre a Fundação Wikimedia aqui, na MetaWiki.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: es, en-5. (İspanyolca anadil, İngilizce ileri düzey)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Wikimedia projelerine aktif bir biçimde katkı sağlıyorum. Commons: ve en:'de yöneticilik yapıyorum. 30 bin civarı değişiklik yaptığım en:'de Uzlaştırma Komitesi'nde görev yaptım ve Tahkim Komitesi'ne katip olarak katkı sağladım. Ayrıca OTRS'ye de info-es, info-en ve permissions bölümlerinde (İspanyolca olanlara) katkıda bulunuyorum. Ayrıca meta'daki WMF'yle alakalı sayfaların çevirisinde de yardımcı olmaya çalışıyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Yann 23:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ!) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  44. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. DamianFinol 19:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Titoxd(?!?) 03:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Gizmo II 05:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Shyam (T/C) 07:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Stifle 20:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Tomatejc 23:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Danny 15:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Phe 18:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Gac 06:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  61. Kordas 13:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Equi 18:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Sarah Ewart 03:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Tbone 22:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. DVD R W 01:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. en:user:freakofnurture 01:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Georgewilliamherbert 01:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --Shreshth91 04:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Benjism89 12:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Ecemaml 15:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Lmbuga 21:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. CrzRussian 02:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Zzyzx11 05:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Siabef 06:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Eagle 101 01:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Andre (talk) 03:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. riana_dzasta 13:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Steel en:Steel 17:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. cj | talk 08:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Benn Newman 19:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support. --Gmaxwell 17:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Axxgreazz (talk?) 20:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Nilfanion 22:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Not sorry. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 17:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. badlydrawnjeff talk 12:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Irpen 06:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oops. --Ghirlandajo 07:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No, because of several incidents. -- Grafikm fr 20:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Frequent controversy and actions that prevent support or neutrality. Geogre 10:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tizio 14:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No. Occasionally gruff. Xoloz 17:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per AmiDaniel. -Coredesat (en.wp) 06:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jahiegel 06:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I agree with AmiDaniel. Would make a great steward were it not for the controversy. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I think the point of view is wrong. Certainly stewards will have to be involved on meta much more than before, but raw numeric count is not the way to determine if a candidate will be able to help or not, but the disposition and quality of the edits, the willing to help the foundation, etc. Besidesm stewards should also remain active on their native projects, meta shouldn't be an isolated island, but should be deeply connected to the local projects, and people on the local projects should be more aware of meta work. drini 17:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 and common sense and fuzzy logic helps a lot :)
  • Personal info: I am a user originating from the Dutch language Wikipedia (active there since feb. 2005), and now also active on the Dutch Wikibooks and sometimes a small edit on the English Wikipedia, but I watch also a lot of the things happening here on meta. I am sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia, Wikibooks and Wikisource, and also helping out on the Tswana Wikipedia (although tn-0) for some time. I am helping out on the e-mail helpdesk for the Dutch language and active as boardmember of the Dutch chapter. I am familiar with the Foundation, and willing to help people with all kind of general housekeeping, especially for the part that is limited to stewards.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 und gesunder Menschenverstand und krause Logik helfen viel :)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin ursprünglich ein Benutzer aus der niederländischen Wikipedia (dort aktiv seit Feb. 2005) und jetzt auch aktiv in Wikibooks auf Niederländisch und manchmal kleine Bearbeitungen in der englischen Wikipedia, aber ich beobachte ebenfalls eine Menge der Geschehnisse hier auf Meta. Ich bin Administrator in der niederländischen Wikipedia, Wikibooks und Wikisource, außerdem helfe ich ein wenig in der Tswana Wikipedia (trotz tn-0) für einige Zeit aus. Ich helfe im E-Mailsystem für die niederländische Sprache aus und bin aktives Mitglied des niederländischen Gremiums. Ich bin vertraut mit der Stiftung und gewillt Leuten mit sämtlichen Arten von allgemeiner Organisation zu helfen, insbesondere mit dem für Stewards limitierten Teil.
Français :
  • Langues : Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 et le sens commun et la logique floue aident beaucoup :)
  • Infos personnelles : Je suis un utilisateur originaire de la Wikiépdia en néerlandais (actif depuis février 2005), et je suis maintenant aussi actif sur Wikibook en néerlandais et parfois quelques modifications mineures sur la Wikipédia en anglais, mais je surveille beaucoup de qui se passe ici sur méta. Je suis un admin sur la Wikipédia, Wikibooks et Wikisource en néerlandais, et j'ai aussi aidé la Wikipédia en Tswana (même si je suis tn-0) depuis quelques temps. Je fais partie de l'équipe OTRS pour la langue néerlandaise et je suis un membre actif du chapitre en néerlandais. Je suis familier avec la fondation, et désireux d'aider les autres pour toutes sortes de tâches ménagères, particulièrement pour la partie réservée aux stewards.
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 en algemeen inzicht en fuzzy logic helpen al een heleboel :)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben een oorspronkelijk een gebruiker van de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia (aldaar actief sinds feb. 2005), en nu ook actief op de Nederlandstalige Wikibooks en soms doe ik een kleine bewerking op de Engelstalige Wikipedia. Ik ben moderator op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia, Wikibooks en Wikisource. Daarnaast help ik ook al een tijdje zo nu en dan op de Tswana Wikipedia (hoewel mijn kennis van het Tswana nul is). Ik help op het e-mailsysteem voor de Nederlandse taal en ben actief als bestuurslid van de Nederlandse chapter. Ik ben bekend met de Foundation en zeker bereid om mensen te helpen met allerlei huishoudelijke taken, vooral die taken die alleen door stewards kunnen worden uitgevoerd.
Português :
  • Línguas: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 e bom-senso e lógica mais-ou-menos ajudam bastante :)
  • Informações pessoais: Sou usuário originário da Wikipédia em língua neerlandesa (ativo por lá desde fevereiro de 2005) e, agora, ativo, também, no Wikibooks em língua neerlandesa; e, às vezes, edito um pouco na Wikipédia em língua inglesa, mas eu observo muitas das coisas que acontecem por aqui, na MetaWiki. Eu sou sysop na Wikipédia, no Wikibooks e no Wikisource em língua neerlandesa, e também, há algum tempo, ajudo na Wikipédia em língua seTswana (ainda que não conheça nada do idioma). Eu ajudo no OTRS, na seção em língua neerlandesa, e sou membro do Conselho Administrativo da sucursal neerlandesa da Wikimedia. Estou familiarizado com a Fundação e disposto a ajudar as pessoas com qualquer tipo de manutenção, especialmente com os aspectos que são limitados aos Stewards.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1 il senso comune e la fuzzy logic aiutano molto :)
  • Informazioni personali: provengo dalla Wikipedia in lingua olandese, dove sono attivo dal febbraio 2005, sono inoltre attivo su Wikibooks in lingua olandese e a volte, con piccoli contributi, sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese, ma mi interesso anche molto delle discussioni che si svolgono qui su meta. Sono amministratore sulla Wikipedia, Wikibooks e Wikisource in lingua olandese ed inoltre aiuto sulla Wikipedia Tswana (sebbene tn-0). Collaboro con l'helpdesk di OTRS per la coda in lingua olandese e sono membro del Consiglio Direttivo nel Capitolo olandese di Wikimedia. Sono al corrente del funzionamento della Wikimedia Foundation, mi farebbe piacere aiutare con ogni tipo di faccende correlate al funzionamento generale, specialmente per la parte che è propria degli steward.
日本語:
  • 言語: Nl-M、en-2 de-1、fr-1、la-1、常識、詭弁の手助け :)
  • 人物について: オランダ語版ウィキペディアが始まった当初からの利用者で(2005年2月から参加)、現在オランダ語版ウィキブックスにも参加し、時々英語版ウィキペディアで少々編集もしますが、メタで起きていることも沢山見ています。オランダ語版ウィキペディア、ウィキブックス、ウィキソースのsysopで、Tswana語版ウィキペディアを手助けすることもあります。e-mail helpdeskでオランダ語のために協力し、オランダ支部では理事として活動しています。財団とは親しく、特にスチュワードに限定される部分でのあらゆる業務で皆さんを手助けしてゆくつもりです。
Türkçe:
  • Diller: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1; sağduyu ve fuzzy mantığın da epey bir yardımı oluyor :)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Hollandaca Wikipedia orijinli (Şubat 2005'ten beri aktifim) bir kullanıcıyım ve artık Hollanca Wikibooks ve biraz da olsa İngilizce Wikipedia'da da aktifim. Yine de Meta'da olagelen bir çok şeyi de takip ediyorum. Hollanca Wikipedia, Wikibooks ve Wikisource'da yöneticilik yapıyorum ve bir süredir Tswana dilindeki Wikipedia'ya yardımcı olmaya çalışıyorum (tn-0 olmama rağmen). Hollandaca e-posta yardım masasında ve Hollanda yerel bölümünün yönetim kurulunda da görev yapıyorum. Vakıf'ı tanıyorum ve başta stewardlara özel görevler olmak üzere, bakım ve temizlik işleriyle insanlara yardımcı olmak istiyorum.
中文(臺灣):
  • 語言: Nl-M, en-2 de-1, fr-1, la-1; 在常識及邏輯上幫助了不少。 :)
  • 個人資料: 我是來自荷蘭語維基百科的用戶 (自2005年2月起加入) ,現時亦活躍於荷蘭語維基教科書,偶爾會到英文版維基百科貢獻一下,但我也在元維基這裡看到不少事情。另外本人為荷蘭語維基百科、教科書及文庫的管理員,雖然本人不懂茨瓦納語 (tn-0) ,但我有時仍會到茨瓦納語的維基百科協助。我現於電郵求助台接受荷蘭語的求助,同時亦是荷蘭分部的活躍板友。我對本基金會熟悉,希望能以全部的一般總務幫助人們,尤其為局限於監管員的部份。
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
  44. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. JoJan 19:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Frank Schulenburg 00:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Titoxd(?!?) 03:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Shyam (T/C) 07:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. bainer (talk) 07:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. pfctdayelise 12:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Chris 19:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mbimmler 20:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Danny 15:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Eloquence 17:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Phe 18:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Gac 06:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  60. piero tasso 16:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Tbone 22:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. User:Oscar/Sig 09:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  64. Support--clamengh 17:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Alvaro 21:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Belinzona 14:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ucucha 16:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Ninane 16:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. aleichem 17:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Zzyzx11 05:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Husky 22:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. O E P 22:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Roepers 06:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Annabel 09:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 14:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. TeunSpaans 16:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Otto ter Haar 00:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. MartinD 09:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Language skills aren't amazing, it's true, but he makes up for it by working really hard... and he manages! He's got contacts in many wiki-communities. Kim Bruning 17:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support - I agree with Kim: while not a language whiz, he's definitely good material and can get things done. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Valhallasw 15:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC
  84. Support --Kemmótar 21:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. --BirgitteSB 00:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Brya 21:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --:Bdk: 21:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I think a little more of interlingual implication is necessary for stewards. Benjism89 12:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: fr-M, en-3, can read basic: de, es, nl
  • Timezone: CEST (Central Europe)
  • Personal info: I'm mainly working on the French-language Wikipédia and here on meta, I'm a sysop on both of them. I'm also a sysop on en: and beta: Wikiversity. I am proposing the Wikimedia community to serve it and help it as a steward because I think there aren't enough of them (due to the size of the community growing). I am often available on IRC for emergencies, and I am willing to help projects with a small community.
Čeština:
  • Jazyky: fr-M, en-3, na základní úrovni přečtu: de, es, nl
  • Časové pásmo: CEST (střední Evropa)
  • Osobní informace: Edituji hlavně francouzskou Wikipedii a metu; na obou projektech jsem správce. Správce jsem také na en: a beta: Wikiverzitě. Navrhuji komunitě Wikimedia své služby a pomoc, protože si myslím, že v současnosti není kvůli růstu komunity stewardů dostatek. Jsem často dostupný na IRC, takže při naléhavých případech je možné se mnou počítat, a jsem ochotný pomáhat projektům s malou komunitou.
Dansk:
  • Sprog: fr, en-3, kan læse grundlæggende: de, es, nl
  • Tidszone: CEST (Centraleuropa)
  • Jeg arbejder for det meste på den franske Wikipedia og her på Meta, og er administrator begge steder. Jeg er også administrator på Beta- og engelsk Wikiversity. Jeg vil gerne hjælpe Wikimedia-fællesskabet og hjælpe til som steward fordi jeg mener der ikke er nok stewarder (på grund af det voksende antal medlemmer). Jeg er ofte at finde på IRC og er villig til at hjælpe projekter med få medlemmer.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr-M, en-3, grundlegende Lesekenntnisse in Deutsch, Spanisch und Niederländisch
  • Zeitzone: MEZ (Mitteleuropäische Zeit)
  • Persönliche Informationen: Ich arbeite hauptsächlich in der französischen Wikipedia und hier auf Meta und bin in beiden Projekten auch Administrator. Ich bin ebenfalls auf en: und beta: Wikiversity Sysop. Ich schlage der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft vor, sie als Steward zu unterstützen, da ich denke, dass es nicht ausreichend viele Stewards gibt (wegen der stetig wachsenden Gemeinschaft). Ich bin häufig per IRC für Notfälle verfügbar und ich möchte Projekten mit einer kleinen Gemeinschaft helfen.
Español :
  • Idiomas: fr-M, en-3, puedo leer cosas básicas de: de, es, nl
  • Zona horaria: CEST (Europa central)
  • Información personal: Trabajo principalmente en Wikipedia en francés y aquí en Meta; soy administrador en ambas. Soy además administrador en las versión beta de Wikiversidad, así como en la actual versión en idioma inglés. Me estoy postulando para ayudar a la comunidad porque pienso que no existen suficientes stewards (Debido al crecimiento de la comunidad). Suelo estar disponible en el IRC para emergencias y estoy dispuesto a ayudar a los proyectos con comunidades sean pequeñas.
Français :
  • Langues parlées : français langue maternelle, anglais courant, je peux lire des échanges simples en : allemand, espagnol, néerlandais
  • Fuseau horaire: CEST (Europe centrale)
  • Informations personnelles : Je travaille principalement sur Wikipédia francophone et ici sur meta, je suis admin sur ces deux projets. Je suis également sysop sur Wikiversity en: et beta. Je propose à la communauté wikimédienne de l'aider et de la servir en tant que steward car je pense qu'ils ne sont pas assez nombreux (en particulier avec l'augmentation de la taille de la communauté). Je suis souvent disponible sur IRC en cas d'urgence et je souhaite aider les projets ayant une petite communauté.
Italiano: Thanks to M/
  • Lingue: fr-M, en-3, posso leggere delle semplici frasi: de, es, nl
  • Fuso orario: CEST (Europa Centrale))
  • Informazioni personali: In prevalenza sono attivo sulla Wikipedia in lingua francese e qui su meta, sono amministratore su entrambe. Sono inoltre amministratore su Wikiversity en: e beta:. Mi propongo di servire la comunità di Wikimedia e di aiutarla come steward, dal momento che penso che non ve ne siano a sufficienza (a causa della crescita della comunità stessa). Sono spesso reperibile su IRC per emergenze e sono disponibile ad aiutare i progetti con una comunità più piccola.
日本語:
  • 言語: fr-M, en-3, 簡単な de, es, nl を読むことができる
  • タイムゾーン: CEST (中央ヨーロッパ)
  • 人物について: 私は主にフランス語ウィキペディアとメタでsysopとして活動しています。また、英語・ベータウィキバーシティでもsysopを勤めています。コミュニティーが大きくなるにつれ、スチュワードの数が不足しているなか、私はウィキメディアコミュニティーをスチュワードとして助けたいと考えています。私は多くの時間帯、IRCにおり、緊急事態があれば対処することができます。また、小さなコミュニティーをも助けたいと考えています。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: fr-M, en-3, ben in staat te lezen: de, es, nl
  • Tijdzone: CEST (Centraal Europa)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik werk grotendeels op de Franstalige Wikipedia en hier op Meta. Ik ben moderator op beiden. Ik ben ook moderator op en: en beta:Wikiversity. Ik stel de Wikimedia-gemeenschap voor haar te dienen en helpen als een steward, aangezien ik het idee heb dat er niet genoeg zijn (aangezien de grootte van de gemeenschap groeit). Ik ben dikwijls beschikbaar op IRC voor noodgevallen, en ben bereid de projecten met een kleine gemeenschap te helpen.
Norsk:
  • Språk: fr, en-3, kan lese grunnleggende: de, es, nl
  • Tidssone: CEST (Sentral-Europa)
  • Jeg jobber for det meste på Wikipedia på fransk, og her på Meta, og er administrator begge steder. Jeg er også administrator på Beta- og engelsk Wikiversity. Jeg vil gjerne hjelpe Wikimedia-samfunnet og hjelpe til som steward fordi jeg mener det ikke er nok stewarder (på grunn av den økende medlemsmassen). Jeg er ofte tilgjengelig på IRC, og er villig til å hjelpe prosjekter med få medlemmer.
Polski:
  • Języki: fr-M, en-3, rozumie podstawy: de, es, nl
  • Strefa czasowa: CEST (Europa Środkowa)
  • Informacje osobiste: Głównie pracuję przy francuskojęzycznej Wikipedii oraz na Meta, jestem sysopem na obu projektach. Jestem także sysopem na en: i wersji beta: Wikiversity. Chcę zaproponować społeczności Wikimedii swoją pomoc oraz wykonywać obowiązki stewarda, ponieważ uważam, że obecnie nie jest ich wystarczająco wiele (z uwagi na wciąż rosnącą społeczność). Jestem często dostępny na IRCu w razie problemów, i jestem gotowy pomóc projektom z małymi społecznościami.
Português :
  • Línguas: fr-M, en-3, leitura básica de: de, es, nl
  • Fuso horário: CEST (Europa central)
  • Informações pessoais: Eu trabalho principalmente na Wikipédia em língua francesa e aqui, na MetaWiki. Sou sysop em ambos. Sou sysop também na en: e na beta: Wikiversity. Me proponho a servir à comunidade Wikimedia na capacidade de Steward porque acredito não haver Stewards em número suficiente (devido ao tamanho da comunidade em crescimento). Estou freqüentemente disponível no IRC para emergências e estou disposto a ajudar projetos com comunidades pequenas.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: fr-M, en-3, şu dillerde basit metinleri okuyabilirim: de, es, nl
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Ağırlıklı olarak Fransızca Wikipédia ve Meta'da aktifim. İkisinde de yöneticilik görevini yürütüyorum. Ayrıca en: ve beta: Wikiversity'de de yöneticilik yapıyorum. Wikimedia topluluğuna hizmet vermek ve bir steward olarak yardım etmek istiyorum, çünkü şu an yeterli sayıda olmadıklarını (büyüyen topluluk nedeniyle) düşünüyorum. Acil durumlar için genelde IRC'de bulunuyorum ve küçük toplulukları olan projelere yardımcı olmak istiyorum.
Русский:
  • Языки: fr-M, en-3, основы (умение читать) на de, es и nl
  • Временной пояс: Центральноевропейское время
  • Личные данные: Главным образом работаю в французской Википедии и здесь на Мете, являюсь администратором в обоих проектах. Я администратор на en: и beta: Wikiversity. Предлагаю вики-сообществу свои услугив роли стюарда, потомучто считаю, что из-за возрастающего числа участников не хватает стюардов. Со мной можно связаться по IRC и я готов помочь проектам с маленькой численностью участников.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hillgentleman 08:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Terence Ong 13:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Frank Schulenburg 00:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. pfctdayelise 12:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Shyam (T/C) 21:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Danny 15:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Gac 06:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  51. -- Perky 12:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Effeietsanders 13:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC) - I know guillom as trustworthy and with a heart for the wiki. He would be a good steward.[reply]
  53. Edward Chernenko 14:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Blinking Spirit 11:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. heMmeR 18:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Mailer Diablo 21:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Purodha Blissenbach 12:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Gribeco 23:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. .anaconda 02:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. User:Oscar/Sig 09:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  61. --Bertrand GRONDIN 17:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Michael Billington 10:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  63. Plyd 12:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Divol 16:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support--clamengh 17:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Benjism89 12:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Yes Changement de vote --Fmaunier 08:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. +1 David Berardan 14:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. I like your use of the fraze "to serve" in you statement --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. cj | talk 08:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    212.254.27.79 23:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC) User not registered. --Snowdog 01:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Elapied 13:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. M LA1 15:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support--Kemmótar 21:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. --BirgitteSB 00:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Moumousse13 12:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Rune Obash 12:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Surely. +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Oblic 23:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Shyam (T/C) 07:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC) I change my vote after hearing nice answers from the candidate. See Support, Shyam (T/C)[reply]


Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tbone 22:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 23:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Optional questions from Shyam Bihari for the candidate (not necessary to answer)
  1. Do you have enough time for stewardship?
    Thanks for your questions. I devote much time to Wikimedia and currently I'm quite much active on meta, where requests for permissions happen. I am also much available on IRC for emergencies and stewards tools would be useful for fighting/cleaning vandalism on small projects (see #wikimedia-swmt on freenode).
  2. If a bureaucrat does not follow the proper procedure for sysoping a candidate and the candidate gets the tools, even he does not deserve them according to RfA procedure. What would you do? You will de-sysop the user? You will take action against the bureaucrat? or any other action, please mention.
    What would I do? Nothing. Stewards are not cops. If the sysop starts mass-deleting content, then there would be an emergency and if someone from the local project asks it, I would desysop him. If there isn't any emergency, this is a local problem. The local community has to organize a vote or something to decide if the bureaucrat has abused his powers, if his bureaucratship should be removed, if the adminship should be removed, and so on. Stewards apply decisions from the local comunities, they don't make decisions. guillom 10:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
    Hello. I don't think it's mandatory, I think it's a good thing for a steward to be aware of what happens in the Wikimedia community, and Meta, as a coordination wiki, is a good place for this. Meta is also a good place to deal with multilingualism. This said, bastique's editcount on meta isn't high but I know he will be a good steward because he is a very active user and bureaucrat on Commons, which is also a good place to deal with users from many projects. guillom 12:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    And i would like to add that I had written this answer before Bastique did ;) guillom 08:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en-N, de-1. (Native English speaker and I spoke a little German as a child. I still remember some and can be minimally useful in it, especially with a little Babelfish help)

Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, de-1. (Muttersprache Englisch und ich konnte etwas Deutsch als Kind. Ich kann mich noch an einiges erinnern und kann ein wenig hilfreich damit sein, besonders mit ein bisschen Babelfisch-Hilfe)

Français :
  • Langues : en-N, de-1. (anglais langue maternelle, et j'ai parlé un peu allemand quand j'étais enfant. Je peux encore me débrouiller dans cette langue, notamment avec l'aide de Babelfish)

Merci pour votre considération.

Italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, de-1. (Inglese di madre lingua, un po' di tedesco, che ho imparato da piccolo. Ancora ricordo qualcosa, che può tornare utile, magari con un aiutino di Babelfish)

日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, de-1.(母語は英語で、ドイツ語は子供が話す程度はなせる。今もいくらかは覚えていて、特にBabelfishにいくらか助けになる程度のものである。)

Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: En-N, De-1. (Van oorsprong Engelstalig, en ik sprak een beetje Duits als kind. Ik herinner me er nog steeds een deel van, en het kan op minimale wijze bruikbaar zijn, in het bijzonder met een beetje hulp van Babelfish)

Português :
  • Línguas: en-N, de-1. (inglês como língua-mãe e, quando criança, falei um pouco de alemão. Ainda me lembro um pouco e posso ser minimamente útil nesse setor, especialmente com um pequeno auxílio do Babelfish)

Türkçe:
  • Diller: en-N, de-1. (Anadil olarak İngilizce konuşuyorum, çocukluktan kalma temel seviye Almanca bilgisine sahibim. Hala bir kısmını hatırlıyorum ve Babelfish'in de desteğiyle işime yarayacağını düşünüyorum.)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Yann 23:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Of course drini 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Srikeit 07:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Kingboyk 13:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 17:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Llywrch 23:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Mackensen (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 04:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Shyam (T/C) 07:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. pfctdayelise 12:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support --- gildemax 21:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Chick Bowen and UninvitedCompany's points bear thought, but I do trust Lar to do the job. It's worth noting that his English beliefs are irrelevant in relation to being a steward, as if elected, he cannot use his powers on the English Wikipedia. Ral315 (talk) 04:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Danny 15:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Warofdreams 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Extremely good judgement and patient. Support. Georgewilliamherbert 05:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Иваныч 13:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Sarah Ewart 03:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Glen S 19:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Yann 23:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. DarthVader 04:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Good luck! Hope to see you doing a LOWBTS! RoscoHead 22:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. I know Lar on IRC, but I was never particularly aware of him on-wiki. After looking through his contributions, though, I do believe that he would be a good steward. Various comments show willingness to discuss and recognize others' efforts and help others, empathy for others' frustrations and the ability to cheer them up, and a good enough sense of humour to welcome cacti. His unilingualism isn't necessarily a disadvantage. I idle in the steward channel, and very often someone who speaks English needs help when there is no steward active; ergo, we need many more English stewards. Although I'd prefer experience with inter-project coordination beyond Commons, presumably he'll get more of that doing his steward duties. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 08:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  64. Walkerma 06:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. IanManka 13:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Shreshth91 04:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Despite possible language limitations, I think that he will be a good steward, since being steward is more than speaking multiple languages only and his answer convinced me, we need translators :)[reply]
  68. --M/ 01:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Helpful and collaborative.[reply]
  69. CrzRussian 02:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Zzyzx11 05:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Eagle 101 01:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. riana_dzasta 13:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Steel en:Steel 17:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Your are not yet long with wikipedia. But that is not a reason for me be against you. Nice job with the mosaic --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 00:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. The lack of multiple languages originally made me pause, as Larry is otherwise an excellent candidate. Since Stewards should not be allowed to use their tools on their home wikis, that could possibly impact his performance in the role. However, as Pathoschild points out, we need more active Stewards, and his answer to Spacebirdy satisfied my concerns fully. Strong support. Titoxd(?!?) 04:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Benn Newman 19:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. After re-reviewing things, I've changed my vote to yes. Mainly per Titoxd, but also because I think that you could should be able to manage despite language limitations. --Coredesat (en.wp) 20:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. DVD R W 18:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. In response to Ghirlandajo's oppose: IRC seems more of a plus to me -- since when is accessibility and efficiency in communication a bad thing? Lar is nothing if not accessible, well-intentioned, intelligent, and helpful. Luna-San 12:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. per Titoxd|Tito. The "no IRC" position is one I understand, but do not feel quick and easy access to others is a minus - only if the actions were similarly "hidden", and they are transparant. KillerChihuahua 15:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Helpful and accessible. Being available on IRC is preferable to sniping from the shadows. —Phil | Talk 16:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support. Note that I shall not be supporting anyone who is not available per IRC. Stewards need to be available on short notice to be able to prevent major problems when they occur. If an admin goes on a rampage, it's a little too late for the steward to find out about it per email the next day. Kim Bruning 17:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. DYK Blnguyen 03:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support even though he could speak more languages, I believe he is trustable enough to become a steward --Nux (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Yes, sí, oui, etcetera. To say he's qualified would be an understatement, I believe. Matt Yeager 05:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. yes--10caart 13:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC) This vote had been placed in the wrong section. I confirm #:yes --10caart 09:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tizio 15:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yes: Lack of experience on meta is fairly a non-factor. Given the apparent shortage of English speaking stewards, the language limitations are a non-factor as well. Those appear to be the only reasons to oppose. I find them non-compelling, and thus no reason to oppose. As to supporting, there's no question of this candidate's experience, given substantial experience and involvement in 14 Foundation projects [6]. Adminship on two foundation projects shows community trust and support. Candidate exhibits a strong willingness and desire to aid the Foundation's efforts. --Durin 15:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Yes. Xoloz 17:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Yes. --Gmaxwell 17:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. はい I'm deeply puzzled by some of the oppose votes. "Little Meta" is a fair enough reason to oppose, although one I disagree with. But IRC? While I strongly oppose it as a decision making channel it's a vital communication tool. And Anglo? The correct way to correct bias is to encourage positve contribution from marginalised/underrepresented groups, not by punishing an otherwise fine candidate for the accident of his birth. More like this one, please. - brenneman 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Cowman109 22:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Nilfanion 22:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --Zephyrus 22:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. I will Support my fellow Michigander. Kjetil r 23:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. --BirgitteSB 00:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  2. Activism at en:Category:Administrators open to recall makes me concerned that he may not respect existing steward policy and practice. UninvitedCompany 23:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm sorry, but I don't see the relationship of an admin willing to stand for voluntary deadminship versus being forced to do so by policy. The statement doesn't appear to mesh with his statement of "I embrace the idea that stewards seek out and act on community consensus and do not decide things for themselves" nor does his position seem to violate Steward policies, as voluntary desysops have been requested in the past and are rather routine. Would you be willing to clarify your position? ~Kylu (u|t) 05:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I would like to see both more experience and activity on Meta (you have less than 30 edits prior to this month); stewards are going to be heavily active on Meta, and time and experience is critical. Also, being able to communicate (through writing) in multiple languages is considered a "bonus" for stewards because of the global nature of the project, and I don't think this role will suit you at the present time. This vote isn't because I don't trust you, it's simply because I prefer more time and experience for stewards. Thanks for your understanding! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not much experience on Meta. Manchot 11:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Language and meta experience (I'd be willing to pass lack of meta experience alone) limitations. Good user on en though. Voice-of-All 16:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Some odd notions about adminship. Chick Bowen 03:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Withdrawn. Chick Bowen 02:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Language limitations. Feydey 17:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gac 06:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    (See User:Gac to contact) ++Lar: t/c 13:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Tbone 22:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Language limitations, quite young in WMF projects and isn't much involved in Meta. Benjism89 12:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Per UninvitedCompany, sorry. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Struck out because I misinterpreted something. --Coredesat (en.wp) 15:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Language. Andre (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    #yes--10caart 13:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC) wrong place[reply]
  11. Strong oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. Feel free to visit a language school and learn some languages, and you may get me on your side next time. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Weak oppose, per language concerns. I don't really care abut meta inactivity, or the cabal that's going around opposing people for "Anglo-American focus". Chacor 02:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose, the candidate is a b'crat at enwiki where his several actions at enwiki raised legitimate questions for which no satisfactory answers were given. --Irpen 06:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose. No IRC guys, please. This is Wikipedia, not Talkapedia. --Ghirlandajo 07:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you going to suggest that the devs communicate via wiki pages rather than the instant availability of IRC? or is there something else to which you object? An explanation of your opposition would be helpful. TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 12:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I oppose threaded talk in voting. My user page says it all. IRC is the social networking that is alien to an encyclopedia, especially Wikipedia: favourable for cults of personality and basically untraceable. IRC regulars normally evolve in the direction of "everything untraceable on IRC so you can be as mean as you want" philosophy. A closed chatroom is poison of every encyclopaedic effort. It is the heartworm of Wikipedia. --Ghirlandajo 14:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You seem to be opposed to everything that makes wikimedia great :-( Kim Bruning 17:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    So, you think that it is IRC that makes Wikimedia "great"? If so many people suppose their spending day and night on IRC (rather than tackling admin backlogs on WP) is imperial for moving the project forward, I advise to shut IRC down for a week and two and see what happens. I suspect that we'll see backlogs eliminated, civility improved, and quality of the articles advanced by scores of IRC regulars who now engage in chit-chatting there all day long. --Ghirlandajo 09:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, this is not Wikipedia. This is Wikimedia Meta-wiki, which supports Wikiquote, Wikinews (which is quite up-to-the-minute responsive), and other projects. The Stewards are functionaries involved in making decisions requiring, at times, immediate access to them. Stewards don't generally make edits on Meta constantly, nor do they continually refresh their Meta talkpage to see if anyone wants them. I'd suggest that anyone wanting to be a Steward who does not have IRC access and the willingness to use it should at the very least subscribe to the RSS feed of their talkpage and keep a weather-eye upon it. If you want to make sure IRC isn't abused, your best bet is to join and watch, not ignore it and tell everyone else they shouldn't be involved either. What people do outside of the Wiki is quite frankly not anyone else's business, nor should it be. ~Kylu (u|t) 00:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    So Kelly Martin insulting fellow wikipedians from her blog is quite OK now? I find this approach deeply hypocritical. Furthermore, the channel is regularly (ab)used to slander on-wiki opponents and to incite their blocks, a situation which you and Lar know better than anyone and seem to approve. For instance, I know that my name was repeatedly abused on IRC, since the channel is not subject to stringent civility requirements that are in effect on-wiki. Unlike many (most?) others here and contrary to your advice, I don't want my IRC logs to be longer than my WP contributions and I don't wish that to Lar. --Ghirlandajo 09:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll reply to this on your talkpage, the threading is getting a bit deep. (Anyone who wants to read it, though, feel free.) ~Kylu (u|t) 06:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose: Language limitations, also I am concerned that so many of his IRC friends above are challenging voters. This may be of sign of things to come if he were elected. Stewards should not need to muster support from IRC channels, but be confident in their own behaviour to stand alone Giano II 13:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's called meatball:DefendEachOther, is it not? --pfctdayelise 13:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above response is typical of the behaviour of Lar and his IRC friends on English Wikipedia. I had decided not to vote but the behaviour of certain IRC members here altered my mind. I do not intend rising to their bait here. I advise other voters when challenged to similarly ignore, and remember this is an election not a place for threaded comment. People must not feel too intimidated to cast their vote freely. Giano II 14:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Giano, I respect your contributions to wikimedia projects greatly, but I think that in this case you're giving terrible advice; for two reasons: Firstly because a steward who isn't also available and has good standing on irc really isn't going to be very useful, and secondly because threaded discussion is what allows us to form consensus. Kim Bruning 17:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Apparently it's a poor man who has friends. What about those of us who are only his friends through wikipedia talk pages? Are we evil too? Do we really want to elect a steward who is a complete unknown to the community? Furthermore, while we're on the matter, do you have any reason to believe that Lar will abuse his position because he uses IRC? I see people a little bit further up on this oppose list who use IRC, and I'm not aware that her judgement has suffered any for it. Mackensen (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This post came about because someone on IRC pointed something out to me. Was that a bad thing? I don't think so at all. But it got me an oppose. I'll stand by my use of IRC anyway. ++Lar: t/c 03:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    How urgent this was? How was IRC needed? There was no urgency whatsoever and the user could have posted the question right here. IRC is needed in very few limited set of instances. It is used and abused for stuff of which vote canvassing and harassing the opponents is not even the most threatening. --Irpen 10:29, 14 December 2006.
    It wasn't necessarily urgent and I agree it could have been communicated a different way. It was just an example of two things... 1) where IRC is useful... someone mentioned it to me that way and I acted. and 2) my approach. Standing up for Giano's right to vote was the correct thing to do for the projects, regardless of the personal impact to me as I had no delusions that doing the right thing would suddenly convert Giano into a supporter. Hope that helps clarify. I would like to note for the benefit of other readers that you've left a long and reasoned explanation of your oppose vote on my en talk page w:en:user:lar which I appreciate. I will respond there. ++Lar: t/c 12:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. -- Grafikm fr 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Insufficient Meta work, in my mind. Geogre 10:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Funnily enough given Aaron Brenneman's comment, "puzzled" was just the word that came to my mind too (mutatis mutandis). Very little meta: involvement, near-monoglot, rather contentious metapedian (in the other sense) track-record on en:. As his pitch seems to be largely "trust my judgement": generally speaking I do not. Take for example, his involvement in the en:Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll, which was in my view heavy-handed, and potentially very-poor-precedent-setting; and his repeated insistence (contrary, and continuing subsequent, to the clarification of intent by the creator of same) on the "serious concept" behind the weak BOFHish humour page "rouge admin" and associated "self-identifying" category. (This latter, as best as I can make it out, seems to be "hardcore IAR", which is also not something I'd especially value in a steward.) Alai 05:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Sorry Lar. I supported you for admin on En:Wiki with the caveat to avoid becoming too political. Advice you politely accepted yet outright rejected. While being political is acceptable for an admin, a Steward must stand above it. I have no confidence you will, plus as Geogre points out, your Meta work is lacking.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 17:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. As above, with regret. — Dan | talk 22:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I respectfully oppose. - Introvert 23:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hoary 07:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Mcginnly 09:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ALoan 22:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Phe 18:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Excellent question, I'm glad you asked it. Obviously I don't personally think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high edit count on Meta (which presumably is what is meant by "activity/experience") since I do not. Why not? The Steward role requires watching some pages where requests come, but it is not, in my view, primarily a Meta centric role like, for example, Sysop on Meta ... What I think is more important is whether the candidate has a history of contribution that indicates dedication to the cause of the WMF, positive engagement with other stewards, and committment to monitoring the few pages where requests do come. None of those things are necessarily demonstrated by having a lot of edits or time on Meta, or disproven by not having a lot of edits or time on Meta, in my view. If I didn't think I had already demonstrated that committment or wasn't prepared to spend the time necessary, or couldn't act with the highest integrity and dispassionateness, putting aside my own personal views, I would not be standing for this position. ++Lar: t/c 12:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from User:Spacebirdy

  • In my personal opinion it is important that stewards know more than one language because we have a lot of projects where English is not the main language and there are people who do not understand English. (I have the impression this topic was more important at the last election). I know, You are not the only candidate this time who does only speak one other language at level 1, but I would like to hear what You have to say about this, thank You. Best regards --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Excellent question, thanks. (If I had my life to live over, I would have paid much better attention to my parents so my German would be better... it still does get better with practice when I use it consistently... but I won't claim it is better than it is.) I think it is mandatory that we have a mix of stewards that, in total, cover all of the major languages. I think it is beneficial, but not mandatory, that any given steward have more than one language that they are proficient in. I don't think it is an insurmountable handicap to only speak English proficiently, given the number of volunteers (such as yourself, thank you for translating my statement in to de for me!) that help translate things, the prevalence of English as a second language especially among those that are in important positions in non english wikis, and the expected workload. (although I can't do stewardy things on en:wp or on commons, as those are my home wikis where I am an admin, there are still a large number of english wikis that need help) If I had thought this was an insurmountable issue I would not have stood. I am confident that we will end up with a good mix of new (and old) stewards to give good coverage of non english as well as english wikis. Hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 18:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Are you going to improve your command in German? Are you willing to learn another language? If so, which would you prefer? --Hillgentleman|User Talk 12:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'm 47... (that's how I got 20+ years of experience in online communities, after all...) and that is rather old to learn new languages well. I have found that using my German (I've done projects in Germany and Switzerland) made it get better, but the improvement was temporary. I'm certainly going to try to start using my German more (I do have an userid at de:wp and have posted there a little) but I can't promise it will get better enough that I can talk about technical matters successfully. That's why I have my de marked as de-1. Hope that helps, thanks for asking.++Lar: t/c 21:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: it-M, en-3, can read: fr, es, de-
  • Personal info: Bureaucrat on meta.wiki and sysop on it.wiki, fairly active on both and willing to give a hand for Wikimedia general housekeeping as well. I'm an editor on the Foundation site where I've tried to help with translations and fund raising. I was one of the founder members of Wikimedia Italia and I'm serving as a member of the Board and treasurer. --M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch:
  • Languages: it-M, en-3, ich kann lesen: fr, es, de-
  • Persönliche Informationen: Bürokrat auf Meta und Administrator in der italienischen Wikipedia, ziemlich aktiv auf beiden Projekten. Ich möchte Wikimedia auch im organisatorischen Sektor unterstützen. Ich bin ein Autor auf der Foundation-Seite, wo ich versuche, beim Übersetzen und bei Spendenaktionen zu helfen. Ich war einer der Gründungsmitglieder von Wikimedia Italia und ich fungiere als Mitglied des Boards und als Schatzmeister. --M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Español :
  • Idiomas: it-M, en-3, puedo leer: fr, es, de-
  • Información personal: Burócrata en meta.wiki y administrador en it.wiki, bastante activo en ambas y deseoso de dar una mano con las tareas de la casa en Wikimedia también. Soy editor en el sitio web de la Fundación donde he ayudado con traducciones y la recolección de fondos. Soy uno de los miembros fundadores de Wikimedia Italia y sirvo como miembro del Consejo de Administración y tesorero. --M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Français :
  • Langues parlées : it-N, en-3, je peux lire: fr, es, de-
  • Informations personnelles: Je suis bureaucrate sur Meta et admin sur la Wikipédia italophone, je suis assez actif sur les deux et donnerai aussi un coup de main pour le ménage global sur Wikimedia. Je suis éditeur sur le site de la Fondation où j'essaye d'aider pour les traductions et les collectes de fonds. Je suis l'un des membres fondateurs de Wikimedia Italia, membre du Conseil d'administration et trésorier.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: it-M, en-3, posso leggere: fr, es, de-
  • Informazioni personali: sono burocrate su meta e amministratore sulla Wikipedia in lingua italiana, abbastanza attivo su questi progetti, sono disponibile a dare una mano per le funzioni relative ai progetti di Wikimedia in generale. Sono editor sul sito della Wikimedia Foundation, dove ho cercato di rendermi utile con alcune traduzioni e con i fund raising. Ho partecipato alla costituzione dell'Associazione Wikimedia Italia, di cui sono membro del Consiglio Direttivo e tesoriere.
日本語:
  • 言語: it-M, en-3, fr, es, de は読むことができる
  • 個人的な情報: 私はメタのビューロクラットであり、イタリア語ウィキペディアのsysopです。両方でアクティブに活動しており、ウィキメディアの総合的な管理(ハウスキーピング)もやる気があります。ウィキメディア財団ホームページでも編集者として翻訳・募金活動を進めてまいりました。私は Wikimedia Italia の創設者の一人でもあり、Wikimedia Italiaの役員及び財務担当を勤めています。
Norsk:
  • Språk: it, en-3, kan lese: fr, es, de-
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg er byråkrat på Meta og Wikipedia på italiensk, og aktiv på begge, og er villig til å hjelpe Wikimedia generelt også. Jeg er en redaktør på Foundation-siden hvor jeg har hjulpet til med oversettelse og innsamlinger. Jeg var en av grunnleggerne av Wikimedia Italia, og er styremedlem og økonomiansvarlig der.
Polski:
  • Języki: it-M, en-3, zna podstawy: fr, es, de-
  • Informacje osobiste: Biurokrata na meta.wiki oraz sysop na it.wiki, całkiem aktywny na obu projektach oraz gotowy pomóc w generalnym sprawowaniu porządków na projektach Wikimedia. Jestem edytorem na stronie Fundacji, gdzie starałem się pomagać w tłumaczeniach i zbiórkach pieniężnych. Byłem jednym z członków założycieli Wikimedia Italia i jestem obecnie członkiem zarządu oraz skarbnikiem.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: it-M, en-3, şu dilleri okuyabilirim: fr, es, de-
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Meta.wiki'de bürokratlık ve it.wiki'de yöneticilik yapıyorum. İki projede de aktif sayılırım ve Wikimedia'nın genel düzeni konusunda da yardımcı olmak istiyorum. Çeviri yaparak ve bağış toplayarak yardım etmeye çalıştığım Vakıf sitesinde editörlük yapıyorum. Wikimedia Italia'nın kurucu üyelerinden biriyim ve Yönetim Kurulu üyesi ve veznedar olarak hizmet veriyorum.
Русский:
  • Языки: it-M, en-3, умею читать по-француски, испански и немецки
  • Обо мне: я бюрократ на Мете и администратор Википедии на итальянском языке и довольно активный участник этих проектов, я с удовольствием помогал бы проектам Викимедиа. Я редактор сайта фонда Викимедиа, где я помогал с переводами и сбором средств. Я участвовал в создании итальянской секции WMF, в которой я член правления и казначей.
Čeština:
  • Jazyky: it-M, en-3, dokážu přečíst: fr, es, de-
  • Osobní informace: Jsem byrokrat na meta.wiki a správce na it.wiki, poměrně aktivní na obou a ochotný pomoci s udržováním pořádku v projektech Wikimedia všeobecně. Příspívám také na stránky nadace, kde se snažím pomoci s překlady a peněžními sbírkami. Jsem jeden ze zakladatelů Wikimedia Italia, člen její rady a pokladník. --M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Português :
  • Línguas: it-M, en-3, leio: fr, es, de-
  • Informações pessoais: Burocrata na meta.wiki e sysop na it.wiki, bastante ativo em ambas e disposto a dar uma mão, também, na manutenção geral da Wikimedia. Sou editor no sítio da Fundação, onde procuro ajudar com traduções e no levantamento de fundos. Fui um dos fundadores da Wikimedia Itália e sirvo como membro de seu Conselho Administrativo e como tesoureiro. --M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: It-M, En-3, ik kan lezen: Fr, Es, De-
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Bureacraat op meta.wiki en moderator op it.wiki, behoorlijk actief op beiden, en tevens bereid om een hand te helpen in de algemene huishoudelijke taken van Wikimedia. Ik ben een bewerker op de Foundation site, waar ik heb gebrobeerd te helpen met vertalingen en fund raising. Ik was een van de oprichters van Wikimedia Italia en ik ben bestuurslid en penningmeester.
--M/ 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Константин Косачев 14:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Manchot 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. User:.mau. 09:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. --Urby2004 21:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Titoxd(?!?) 03:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 04:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Shyam (T/C) 07:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Mbimmler 20:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Delta Tango 00:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Danny 15:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Feydey 16:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Phe 18:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Gac 06:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  82. piero tasso 16:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Elitre 18:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Archenzo 18:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Yann 23:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. --Tbone 22:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:Oscar/Sig 09:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  88. DracoRoboter 00:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Frieda 18:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Steel en:Steel 17:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 05:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Enthusiastic Support --Moch 10:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC) (see also below)[reply]
  94. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 18:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. --Coredesat (en.wp) 20:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support--Belinzona 12:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Pietrodn · talk with me 19:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Dear sir, I am happy I Support you. This is due to a simple equation: helping to build Sicilian wikipedia+Pippu's support+Belinzona's support= Clamengh's support.

    I hope you will honour me by reading the following little note. I would be honoured as well by any user who will decide to spend some minutes of her/his time to read it.

    Lombard community is seeking collaboration with both CH and ITA chapters (no matter whatever idea each user may have about the concept itself of national chapter), without making damage to its own tongue: and with appropriate counterparts, it will eventually succeed. So, the correct approach to discuss this issue is starting a calm discussion here on meta. I am afraid there will be a lot of disagreement (or maybe there will not: but we should be ready to this) in this discussion, so I trust you as a steward. Also, there are some obstacles more along this way: the way to cope with them will have to be found, in a collaborative spirit. I do appreciate your statements about recently created projects, so I will submit you the following issue about the recently approved (but not yet created) Ladin wikipedia.

    Ladin speakers are about 30.000, fragmented into five dialects. Probably, LLD wikipedia will be small for a bit, and there will be a little number of edits. This is a simple matter of numbers, i.e., e.g.:

    • Lombard tongue has a basin of potential speakers consisting in 10.000.000 people. Due to language devastation, you should count around 10% of them. All in all, that's always 1.000.000 fluent speakers, i.e. more then 30times Ladin tongue.
    • Linguistic self consciousness of Lombard people is much lower than Ladin's: so, please, count about 300.000 fluent and Ladin-equivalent self conscious speakers: 10 times more than Ladin (BTW, I am not happy of this, for both Lombard and Ladin).

    This community will need a lot of help, even much more than Cisalpine wikipediae.

    But they are likely to refuse any explicit link with the Italian chapter, since they traditionally refer to the German-speaking area, and since they have undergone several attempt of assimilation to Italian culture, alas, duri--Kemmótar 15:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)ng the fascist period: so you can guess by which kind of methods. All in all, at the moment LMO community refuses such a link as well, though for different reasons. (At present collaboration with the CH chapter seems to be made difficult by this obstacle: the portal [www.wikipedia.ch www.wikipedia.ch] dos not even mention Francoprovençal and Lombard: either this is a careless-mistake (and thus it should be soon corrrected) or it is explicit discrimination: in this case this should be soon reported to the board.) But LMO community seems to be strong and compact, even to a larger extent than one could have expected. Needless to say LLD.WP community is likely to be weak instead, even if much more self conscious. So a particular surveillance against vandalism should be set up (needles to say, I am ready to help). And the notion of vandalism should be clearly stated: i.e. I think we should state that, given the existing approved 'XXX' project, one could criticise it on meta or everywhere appropriated, but saying, within that project (and only there)[reply]

    • "the language XXX does not exist"
    • there should be a wikipedia for each one of the YY dialects of XXX

    should be considered vandalism (On the contrary, the last sentence should of course be allowed here on meta as a request for new languages). Why? Well, that's simple: users will be in general attempted to reply, and the situation will be likely to degenerate, so users will not be writing articles or they will get bored or annoyed with the project, which will die.

    It should be also stated that each project is meant in a specific language (even if most users are likely to speak another language), while for multilingual collaboration the correct place is meta. Thank you for the time you spent. Best regards,--clamengh 13:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC), sorry I did not sign.[reply]

  100. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support--10caart 10:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support NoSeptember 13:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support I'm glad to give you my support. See discussion under neutral. --Kemmótar 15:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support of course! εΔω 17:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  105. You mean he wasn't one already?  :-) +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. If we can't trust Mario, we're already hosed, so I might as well pile on. Alai 22:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. --Massimiliano Lincetto 23:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対


Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  • Neutral I could transform this neutral vote into a support if I knew that you explicitely support wikiprojects in minority languages, and that you are aware that many mistakes (in good faith, even raising flames) could be done by everybody while a minority is defending itself from attempts of assimilation. Thank you.--Moch 18:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Really a posh answer. I feel honoured by your attention and your behaviour. M7 for president! Thanks to Pippudoz as well. I will add a personal note: probably people like you allow a bit of optimism about the future of Italy (which at present, in my view, is short, due to compression of wages. Short, with respect to the historical scale of course.)[reply]
    I support Wikimedia projects in minority languages. I felt necessary, in order to avoid speaking up for myself, to ask for a word by one of the bureaucrats at scn.wiki. Thank you for your attention. --M/ 01:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Moch, as M7 has said above, he left a message with me to speak directly to this issue. I helped set up scn.wiki just over 2 years ago. I did so as someone who was completely new to wikipedia, so I remember to this day most of the users from around the traps who were very helpful in those bewildering early days. Speaking from my own experience, I have found M7 to be extremely supportive, being very generous with his time to provide both technical and moral support, and also being welcoming to the project as a whole. It should be understood that the concept of a Sicilian language wikipedia was, and in some circles remains still, a controversial concept. So I can assure you that M7's support meant a lot to me, and my colleagues, at the time. We have now grown to over 7,200 articles and pretty much are self-contained these days. There are about 10 wikipedians from outside scn.wiki who helped us reach this standard, and I definitely include M7 amongst that number. Thanks. pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 05:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it would be interesting to know something more explicit about M7's attitude towards Wikipedia projects such as the Ladin, Friulian, Ligurian, Lombard or Piedmontese Wikipedia.--Kemmótar 02:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    M7 loves all Wikimedia projects indistinctly. --Snowdog 12:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    These projects are even more recent, so I think that they deserve a high level of support from the whole Wikimedian community. --M/ 12:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with you. You have my support (but I'll write it in the proper place :-) )--Kemmótar 15:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MaxSem (Max Semenik)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: ru, en-2, can read most slavic languages as they're mutually intelligible with Russian, can use machine translation:)
  • I'm an administrator on ru: and here on Meta, also I contribute on en: and sometimes visit de: and cu:. I feel I can be helpful as a steward.
MaxSem 19:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Русский:
  • Родной язык — русский, владею английским на среднем уровне, понимаю до определённой степени большую часть славянских языков, так как они родственны русскому, умею пользоваться автоматическими переводчиками:)
  • Я администратор русской Википедии и на Мете, регулярно участвую в английской Википедии, иногда появляюсь у немцев и на старославянской вике. Как мне кажется, я буду полезен в качестве стюарда.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: ru, en-2, ich kann die meisten slawischen Sprachen lesen, da sie Ähnlichkeiten mit meiner russischen Muttersprache aufweisen, ich kann auch Maschinenübersetzungen nutzen:)
  • Ich bin Administrator in der russischen Wikipedia und hier in der Meta, arbeite in en: mit und besuche manchmal de: und cu:. Ich glaube, daß ich als Steward nützlich sein kann.
Español :
  • Idiomas: ru, en-2, puedo leer la mayor parte de las lenguas eslavas pues son mutuamente intelegibles con el ruso, puedo usar tranductores también:)
  • Soy administrador en ru: y en Meta, además contribuyo en en: y algunas veces visito de: y cu:. Yo siento que puedo ser útil como steward.
Français :
  • Langues : ru, en-2, je peux lire la plupart des langues slaves car elles ressemblent beaucoup au russe, et je peux utiliser un traducteur automatique :)
  • Je suis administrateur sur ru: et ici sur Meta, je contribue aussi sur en:, je visite parfois de: et cu:. Je pense que je peux aider en tant que steward.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: ru, en-2, Rusça'yla benzeştikleri için çoğu Slavik dili okuyabilirim ve makine çevirisi kullanabilirim:)
  • ru:'da ve Meta'da yöneticilik yapıyorum, ayrıca en:'e katkıda bulunuyorum ve bazen de: ve cu:'yu ziyaret ediyorum. Steward olarak yardımcı olabileceğime inanıyorum.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: ru, en-2, posso leggere gran parte delle lingue slave in quanto mutuamente intelleggibili con il russo, posso utilizzare un traduttore automatico:)
  • Sono amministratore su ru: e qui su Meta, inoltre contribuisco su en: e talvolta visito de: e cu:. Sento di poter essere utile come steward.
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: Ru, En-2, kan de meeste Slavische talen lezen, aangezien ze begrijpelijk zijn met een Russische achtergrond, ik ben bekend met machinevertalingen:)
  • Ik ben moderator op Ru: en hier op Meta, daarnaast draag ik ook bij op En: en soms bezoek ik De: en Cu:. Ik heb het idee dat ik behulpzaam kan zijn als steward.
Norsk:
  • Språk: ru, en-2, kan lese de fleste slaviske språk siden de er gjensidig forståelige med russsisk, kan bruke maskinoversettere :)
  • Jeg er en administrator på Meta og på Wikipedia på russisk, og bidrar også på Wikipedia på engelsk, og besøker av og til Wikipedia på tysk og på gammelslavisk (cu:). Jeg føler at jeg kan gjøre nytte for meg som steward.
Čeština:
  • Jazyky: ru, en-2, dokážu přečíst všechny slovanské jazyky, protože jsou podobné ruštině, umím používat strojový překlad :)
  • Jsem správce na ru: a tady na Metě, také přispívám na en: a občas chodím na de: a cu:. Myslím si, že bych byl jako steward užitečný.
Polski:
  • Języki: ru, en-2, potrafi zrozumieć większość słowackich języków póki są zbliżone w składni do rosyjskiego, może korzystać z automatycznego tłumacza:)
  • Jestem administratorem na ru: oraz tutaj, na Meta, ale edytuję także en: i czasami odwiedzam de: oraz cu:. Myślę, że mogę być pomocny jako steward.
Português :
  • Línguas: ru, en-2, sei ler a maioria das línguas eslavas, pois são mutualmente inteligíveis com o russo; sei usar tradutores automáticos:)
  • Sou administrador na ru: e aqui, na wiki Meta, e também contribuo para a en:. Visito esporadicamente de: e cu:. Considero-me capaz de ser útil como steward.
日本語:
  • 言語: ru, en-2, スラヴ系の言語は相互に理解できるので、殆どは読める。
  • ロシア語版とメタの管理者であり、ドイツ語版とcuに顔を出すこともあります。スチュワードとして協力できるものと考えます。
中文:
  • 语言能力: ru,en-2,有能力通过机器阅读大多数slavic语言。:)
  • 我是ru:和meta的管理员并且有时也在en:做点编辑,有时也去de:和cu:,我觉得我会对大家有所帮助。
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ПБХ 20:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Vote recalled, see below in "oppose". Edward Chernenko 12:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)two days too short active :S Effeietsanders 08:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  14. Guardian 1 18:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Andy. You were told several times. If you like to share your opinion as a absolute truth with everybody then share the big picture as well. I mean, for example, your voting statistics, which illustrates which percentage of ruwiki active users really trust you. Andyvolykhov PRO 44,31% CONS 55,68%.--205.128.224.6 00:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Speak for yourself.[reply]
    Dear Poa, that is lie. That was not voting about trust me. I hadn't say any opinion, I had only shown block log. That is truth. --AndyVolykhov 16:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who voted "support" of MaxSem :-) [7], [8], [9], [10] . They are "the most reasonable and reliable members of Russian wiki community" (c) Andrei Romanenko (see below) :-) Nevermind 23:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The first one is funny, first block by mistake and the second one was cancelled after less than an hour. And no one of them was blocked for long time. Compare Smartass (was blocked for a week), Poa (for a week), ГСА (infinite), Nevermind (for a year), Dart evader (infinite).
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Not long enough active on ru: Effeietsanders 08:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) one day too short active, I'm sorry :S Effeietsanders 08:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  33. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    We have many good sysops here, so I would support any of them as our representative. MaxSem was simply the first one that came forward. Assume good intentions, my dear Dart! As for the "rifle" - that was a figure of speech. Or can you produce a dead body to match my declaration? You are going to make reasonable public scared. Wulfson 18:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I cannot "produce" a dead body, of course. However, the threats looked very ugly. And Maxsem is not so good as a sysop, I'm afraid. The problem is that he just likes to exercise his sysop powers. He likes to block people for a week or a month for petty (or even non-existent) offences. He likes to look bold. And all these qualities are not good for a steward, in my opinion. Dart evader 19:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's funny to see you both hiding here after you appeared to be unable to live in peace with other RuWP users - but I think you are wasting your resources, for it is not me or my character this voting is about - by the way, ask your buddy Dart Evader how it happened that he, of all men, proposed me for a sysop last August after all the bad things about me he seems to be recalling now - human memory is a strange thing, isn't it? Wulfson 18:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Firstly you and sysop's gang are not "RuWP users". Secondly, "Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare"("каждому человеку свойственно ошибаться, но только глупцу свойственно упорствовать в ошибке" =) Nevermind 19:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, I was assuming good faith, as usual. And I know now that I was mistaken. And I'm not going to assume good faith in the case of MaxSem. It would be too stupid of me to repeat such a cruel mistake. Dart evader 19:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    For those who are interested in the details, here is the ruling of the Arbitration Committee that clearly warns Wulfson and CodeMonk that the next time they organize illegal investigations against the users they will be out: [11]. --SA ru 15:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    And here is the ruling against MaxSem: [12] . This story is actually quite revealing. MaxSem blocked me for "agitation" in favor of an Arbitration Committee candidate. (Someone whom he personally did not like.) The Arbitration Committee concluded that he clearly violated the rules. --SA ru 15:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local account. Yann 17:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. OckhamTheFox 10:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Pauk 13:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Lone Guardian 13:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Kaganer 14:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC) (sorry, my previous neutral vote has been submitted by mistake )[reply]
  46. Torin-ru 14:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Torin)[reply]
  47. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Taichi - (あ!) 15:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Can I also vote? If so, ZA. --Paul Pieniezny 16:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Kuda 04:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Snaq 09:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. MioMyMio 13:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Antipin 14:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. This voting is very important for ru:wiki as far as here we can see our obscure and strongly xenophobic minority trying to black-list one of the most reasonable and reliable members of Russian wiki community. Andrei Romanenko 19:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's standart manner of "the most reasonable and reliable members of Russian wiki community" :-) Opponents are accused as "xenophobic" to stop a discussion, yeah... Dear Andrei, stewards are not working in their own wiki-projects; if MaxSem is so good sysop as you approve you ought to vote againt him to save him for RuWiki =) Nevermind 20:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. He is dedicated and reliable admin on ru.wiki. I'm shure he'll be good steward. V. Volkov / В. Волков (kneiphof) 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Ilana 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    nejron 08:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Not logged in, informed in talk.[reply]
  59. Burn ID 11:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --VPliousnine 12:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Danny 15:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Rory096 19:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Khoikhoi 21:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Putnik 23:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. nejron 09:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support--clamengh 17:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    --BeautifulFlying 17:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC) less then 3 months active with the start of the vote on both ru: as en: Effeietsanders 08:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  67. CrzRussian 02:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support--Dmitry Gerasimov 11:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. riana_dzasta 13:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support--Moch 18:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Good, reponsible admin Alex Bakharev 06:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support. No doubt whatsoever. --Irpen 06:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support. No problems here. --Ghirlandajo 07:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support. --Morpheios Melas 09:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support --Ergil Osin 13:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Varnav 13:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Atorero 13:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Very good admin on ru. I think he'll be good as a steward. --Jaroslavleff 14:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC) not long enough active on ru: (<3 mnts) Effeietsanders 08:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC) — I've unstruck this vote at Effeietsanders' request. Dmcdevit 11:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  80. Support --AndyTerry 17:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Very Strong Support, per all above and per his role in restoring the integrity of wiki by destroying xenophobes. --Kuban kazak 17:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. True. Dj shoo 17:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support --Фэлкон 21:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Strong Support. --Mitrius 01:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Levgr 07:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support. --Dmitry Petuk 10:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Shargin 16:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support --Антон Буслов 16:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support --Kaliy 16:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support. --Ace^eVg 17:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support. --Angryxpeh 17:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC) (forgot to login first time)[reply]
  92. support. #!89.104.121.156 17:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC) (ru_wiki user:ru:Участник:George Shuklin, IP confirmation at the end of userpage [13]).[reply]
  93. Support Wind of change 17:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Конст. Карасёв 18:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Андрей Лапшин 18:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)less then 3 months active on ru: Effeietsanders 08:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  95. Support -- ShiSha_34 Голосую за MaxSema!!! Ура-Ура! =)
  96. Support 87.248.164.10 19:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Aximas 21:48, 13 December За русских)[reply]
  97. Support Ambidexter 20:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Impu1se 21:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Not three months active on ru: Effeietsanders 08:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Sunix 21:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support User:Zac allan Zac allan 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Dzerod 22:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Not three months active on ru: Effeietsanders 08:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Jinma 02:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Afonin 06:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support babayanav 8:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  103. Support Gordon01 09:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Satarsa 11:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Russians are going![reply]
  105. Support--Jannikol 12:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Shizoo 13:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Islendigur 15:49, 14 Desember 2006
  108. Support Ilyadok 14:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Mackseem 15:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Mackseem, en:User:Mackseem)[reply]
  110. Support Away 17:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Z-term 18:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Krr 18:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Support --Andron-kun 10:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC) not three months actiev on ru: Effeietsanders 08:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
    2. Support --Юкатан 10:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC) not three months active on ru: Effeietsanders 08:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
  113. Support Bastique 17:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I would like to clarify for those who do not know Russian well enough that the above Russian phrase represents a personal insult (slightly changing the family name to get a word with a suggestive connotation) - this is exactly the kind of personal attacks (using obscenities against GLBT users) for which our free-thinking Nevermind was banned from RuWP. When using English, he appears (or tries being) more civilized than he truly is - Wulfson 11:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Really? I have been assured it's him native last name, maybe I'm wrong. But why did you lie, Wulfson(кстати, Ваш ник кажется можно перевести как "сукин сын" ))? Who is GLBT user - Boleslav1 or CodeMonk who blocked me because I had changed title in discussion page? Nevermind 20:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Your assumptions are wrong - Wulf is a wolf, and not a dog. Anyway, I don't care about what you call me - I've already been called too many different names to care about one more. As for personal attacks in RuWP, I think you are aware what I'm referring to. 195.16.63.126 13:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, you have been writing anonymous letters? :-) Nevermind 18:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Just forgot to log in. It means I've got nothing to hide Wulfson 07:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, and I think he may bring more harm than use--Ottorahn 09:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shyam (T/C) 07:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose. Steward is a too big hat for him.--MariusM 14:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. I do not believe he can be an effective steward, regardless of his personal qualities. --Benn Newman 02:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose, because of associated history of what looks very much like repeated administrative rights abuse at ru-wiki (it may be considered okay there, and it's their right, but I'd rather not have such trigger-happy people granted adminsitrative power on other wiki projects). --int19h 11:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose because of his support vote in RfA request on ruwiki for user OckhamTheFox who seriously violated privacy policy by publishing private information about another user Asp in Wikipedia (OckhamTheFox was not indefinetly blocked only because Asp agreed not to demand block for this). So, MaxSem thinks that privacy policy violation isn't serious? We needn't such a steward. Edward Chernenko 12:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That is lie, that was not personal information, he linked at this project himself, and no administrator wanted to block him. --AndyVolykhov 16:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    His foto, his name and information about his work place is not personal information. Ha-ha-ha. Жжоте. Serebr 12:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clear, AndyVolykhov is one of the supporters of Wikipedia in so-called "Siberian language", which is vandalism and stupid joke. That means he simply doesn't know (or don't want to know) basic Wikipedia policies. Edward Chernenko 19:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I think we should forget about conflicts of ruWiki on Meta. Это уже слишком. То, что Волыхов поддерживает Сибиропедию, ещё не позволяет характеризовать его однозначно отрицательно. --Altes 18:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Что самое смешное: официальная позиция сибвики - против МаксСема. Так что Черненко эту дурь тут ляпнул совершенно ни к селу ни к городу. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 05:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Too much controversy. --Tbone 22:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose - I would say his adminship is not bad but far from being outstanding. He is way too yound, and lacks the needed diplomacy and patience to deal with complex problems. Call back in 5 years. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Too much of an iron fist for a steward, good work on ru.wp though Ashibaka 18:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot [reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Regardless of all the socks and troll votes, I still am not sure on this one. Voice-of-All 16:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Phe 18:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Too much controversy for me to support, but I don't want to oppose, either. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Neutral at this point. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Doubting very much. He seems to be very controverse, but on the other hand he seems to have a huge amount of supporters? I don't know... Effeietsanders 10:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (can read: da, et, hu, no - I'm able to use Babelfish etc.)
  • Personal info: I'm sysop here on Meta, and in two Finnish projects. I'm visiting here quite daily and I'd like to help as steward. I'm staying at IRC channels the biggest part of time. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Español :
  • Idiomas: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (puedo leer: da, et, hu, no - También uso Babelfish etc.)
  • Información personal: Soy administrador en Meta y en dos proyectos finlandeses. Visito Meta casi diariamente y me gustaría ayudar como steward. Me encuentro en los canales de IRC la mayor parte del tiempo -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Suomi:
  • Kielitaito: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2 (pystyn lukemaan: da, et, hu, no - mutta osaan käyttää Babelfishia jne.)
  • Henkilökohtaista: Olen toiminut ylläpitäjänä täällä Metassa sekä kahdessa suomenkielisessä projektissa. Käyn täällä päivittäin ja olisin halukas auttamaan ylivalvojan tehtävissä. Olen myös IRC-kanavilla tavoitettavissa suurimman osan ajasta. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch:
  • Sprachkenntnisse: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2 (ich kann da, et, hu, no lesen - aber ich kann Babelfish usw. benutzen)
  • Persönliche Auskunft: Ich bin als Administrator hier auf Meta und in zwei finnischen Projekten tätig. Ich besuche Meta täglich und ich möchte gerne als Steward helfen. Man kann sich mit mir per IRC in Verbindung setzen, wo ich meistens bin. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Русский:
  • Знание языков: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2 (могу читать da, et, hu, no - и умею пользоваться программой Babelfish для перевода)
  • Личные данные: Я администратор на Мете и в двух финнских проектах. Заглядываю на Мету ежедневно и хочу помочь в качестве стюарда. Со мной можно связаться через IRC, я там часто в онлайне.
Svenska:
  • Språkkunskap: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2 (jag kan läsa också da, et, hu, no - und jag kan använda Babelfish )
  • Personlig information: Jag är administratör här i Meta, och i två finska projekt. Jag besöker här nästan dagligen och jag skulle vilja hjälpa till som funktionär. Jag är inne på IRC channels den mesta tiden. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Français :
  • Langues: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (je peux lire: da, et, hu, no - Je sais utiliser Babelfish etc.)
  • Infos personnelles : Je suis sysop ici sur Meta et sur deux projets finnois. Je viens ici à peu près tous les jours et je voudrais aider en tant que steward. Je suis sur IRC la plupart du temps. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Türkçe:
  • Diller: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (şu dilleri okuyabilirim: da, et, hu, no - Babelfish vs. kullanabiliyorum.)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Meta'da ve iki Fince projede yöneticilik yapıyorum. Hemen hemen her gün geldiğim bu siteye Steward olarak yardımcı olmak istiyorum. Günün büyük bir bölümünde IRC kanallarında ulaşılabiliyorum. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Italiano:
  • Lingue: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (posso leggere: da, et, hu, no - Sono in grado di usare Babelfish etc.)
  • Informazioni personali: Sono sysop su Meta, e in due progetti in finlandese. Passo di qui quotidianamente e mi piacerebbe aiutare come steward. Frequento i canali IRC per gran parte del tempo. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Norsk:
  • Språk: fi, en-3, sv-2, de-2 (kan også lese: da, et, hu, no – kan bruke maskinoversettere)
  • Personlige informasjon: Jeg er en administrator her på Meta, og på to finske prosjekter. Jeg kommer hit dalig, og vil gjerne hjelpe til som steward. Jeg er ofte på IRC-kanelene. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Čeština:
  • Jazyky: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (dokážu přečíst da, et, hu, no - umím používat překladače atd.)
  • Osobní informace: Jsem tady na Metě a také ve dvou finských projektech správce. Navštěvuji Metu prakticky každý den a rád bych pomáhal jako steward. Skoro vždycky jsem k zastihnutí na IRC kanálech. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Polski:
  • Języki: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (potrafi zrozumieć: da, et, hu, no - mogę używać Babelfish, itd.)
  • Informacje osobiste: Jestem sysopem tutaj na Meta, oraz na dwóch innych fińskich projektach. Odwiedzam to miejsce prawie codziennie i chciałbym pomóc jako steward. Jestem dostępny na kanałach IRCowych przez większość czasu. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Português :
  • Línguas: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (leio: da, et, hu, no - Sei usar o Babelfish etc.)
  • Informações pessoais: Sou sysop aqui, na MetaWiki, e em dois projetos em finlandês. Visito este sítio diariamente e gostaria de ajudar como Steward. Estou em canais do IRC boa parte do tempo. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (kan lezen: da, et, hu, no - ik ben in staat Babelfish te gebruiken enz.)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben moderator hier op Meta, en op twee Finstalige projecten. Ik kom hier bijna dagelijks langs, en zou graag helpen als steward. Ik verblijf het grootste deel van de tijd in IRC-kanalen. -- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
日本語:
  • 言語: fi-N, en-3, sv-2, de-2, (読める言語: デンマーク語、エストニア語、ハンガリー語、ノルウェー語。Babelfishなどが使える。)
  • 人物について: メタでsysopでありフィンランド語のプロジェクト2つでsysopをしています。毎日メタに来ていて、スチュワードとして協力したいです。IRCで費やす時間が最も多いです。-- mzlla 22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Titoxd(?!?) 03:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Agony 19:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mbimmler 20:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danny 15:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --Taulapaa 17:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Iirolaiho 12:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support--clamengh 17:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Vilu 20:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Belinzona 14:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Gordon01 09:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support--Kemmótar 21:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Yann 21:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not so much experience on any wikis. Manchot 11:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Next year perhaps Phe 18:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Have to agree with Tbone. --Joonasl 14:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose - It's way too early. The user started contributing in March 2006 and I cannot find a project with at least 1000 edits on it. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Good user but still very limited experience in eg. Finnish Wikipedia (659 edits). --Tbone 14:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Not a lot of experience. Feel free to try again next year, though. --Coredesat (en.wp) 20:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose - Would make a great steward in the future, but needs a lot more experience before that time. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No. Xoloz 17:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Dan | talk 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Lack of experience. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Yann 00:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Shyam (T/C) 07:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Seems to have limited experience. --Spangineerwp ws (háblame) 00:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. After discussion with this user. --Tbone 07:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. A very potential new user. I have worked a bit with him/her in fi-wiki and have had absolutely no problems whatsoever. However, virtually nonexistant experience in any larger project makes it impossible for me to vote support. The stewardship is, after all, one of the most crucial roles in the whole Wikimedia universe. The user will most likely become a good steward in the future, probably already in the next elections. --Jannex 22:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think Tbone and Joonasl has no valid reasons to vote against Mzlla. Their votes is placed only because Mzlla found evidence of Joonasl's personal attacks in fi.WP. Mzlla is more active in other finnish projects. --Taulapaa 17:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Taulapaa. Wikipedia is not only wikimediaproject--Tigru 06:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am an admin, byrocrat and check user for fi.wikipedia. I want that the Finnish steward will have knowledge of using fi.wiki. For me, it means that for stewardship one must be at least as qualified as an admin. Other Finnish Wikimediaprojects have their own merit but unfortunately those projects have totally only a handful of contributors. As said, Mzlla is a good user, possible future steward. And note: I take Taulapaa's comment as a personal insult against me. --Tbone 20:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mzlla is an admin at least in 2 fi.wikis, and a bureaucrat in one, so I think that Mzlla has enough experience as an admin in these projects. They are smaller than fi.wikipedia, but with users like Mzlla, they can be at least as succesful as fi.wikipedia. --Icepenguin 18:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly mzlla is an admin in 3 fi.wikis (mzlla get adminship in fi wikiquote.), this meta-wiki and bureaucrat in one.--Tigru 06:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ups, I don not noitice that, that Icepenguin count this , so mzlla is an admin in 2 fi.wikis (mzlla get adminship in fi wikiquote.), this meta-wiki and bureaucrat in one.--Tigru

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
Deutsch:
Español :
Français :
Italiano:
日本語:
Nederlands:
Norsk:
Polski:


Português :
Русский:
Türkçe:
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ!) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Davilla 07:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Srikeit 07:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Versageek 19:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Titoxd(?!?) 03:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 04:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Shyam (T/C) 07:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. bainer (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Looks good. Voice-of-All 16:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Mbimmler 20:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Jonathan Webley 22:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Eloquence 17:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    67.79.113.179 18:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) someone not logged Phe 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Phe 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Danny 20:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. piero tasso 16:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Glen S 19:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Tbone 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Gribeco 23:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. DVD R W 01:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. User:Oscar/Sig 09:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  87. Evrik 16:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support--clamengh 17:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. --Shreshth91 04:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Alhen 04:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Robert Ullmann 08:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Zzyzx11 05:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Eagle 101 01:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Andre (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Steel en:Steel 17:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Az1568 05:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. cj | talk 08:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support --Shrieking Harpy Talk|Count 21:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Raul654 02:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Helpful and friendly. —Phil | Talk 16:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support - From everything that I can see, would make a great steward. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Yes. Xoloz 17:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Nilfanion 22:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Introvert 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. --BirgitteSB 00:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. support --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 15:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Surely. +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. sure --:Bdk: 21:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Moved here from User talk:Bggoldie (please do not split the discussion into multiple pages)
    • Hello Bggoldie. Could you please explain your vote about 'Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects'? I'm a bilingual Canadian from the francophone province of Québec. Although I am North American (the continent), I don't consider myself to be American (the nation, which I assume you mean). Canada is a very multicultural country, and I do not think living here provides a bias towards any one culture. Shanel, whom you've also voted against, is an anglophone Canadian. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 05:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      Common, lets use common sense. In the beginning of the voting section I read "Languages: en, fr-3" (bold text preserved). So you are native English-speaker, right (anglophone, sorry). Quick lookup at French Wikipedia returns 10 (yes, ten) edits, and 7 of them (wow, that's 70% ;)) are in your userspace. Unless you prove somehow a First Nations descent, the multiculturalism is caried by someone else, and not by you.
      As per the term "American", I see in your post only a proof for that twisted mindset. For me, living on the other side of The Great Pond, "American" means any citizen of the Americas. In that aspect the Canadians are rather funny - it seems that you try to deny all the time any influence by US-culture, and at the same time the equation "American=U.S.A." is engraved in your minds. So living in Canada, which AFAIK is in N.America, you ought to be American, and not some sort of FSM (I hope you will understand the latter as a friendly joke, and will not get so offended as from the discussed term).
      For me, "Anglo" is the main carrier of the meaning, and it includes all countries where English language is a major cultural influencer. Beyond UK and US, for me it is as wide as the British Commonwealth. I am adding the redundant "-American" part just to complete the name of that familiar topic in Wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 09:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
    Activity on Meta often shows an interest in multi-project and multilingual coordination, since most pages are intended for that, and that is a very useful trait in a steward. However, it's quite possible for a user to have many edits on Meta yet have no experience whatsoever with multi-project or multilingual coordination (for example, users editing extension pages). Similarly, it's quite possible to have no edits at all on Meta yet have much multi-project or multilingual experience (for example, a user active on the Wikimedia Commons). Much like edit counting in general, it's a good indication only if it is considered intelligently rather than as a simple metric. —{admin} Pathoschild 17:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (plus some reading of: nl, da)
  • Personal Info: My home wiki is the English-language Wikipedia (registered in March 2004 — see my user page), where I am an Administrator, Bureaucrat, CheckUser and Oversight (see Listuser), which provides a relevant background for this job. I view Stewardship as an opportunity to extend this kind of commitment to the smaller projects. I have been working on Meta since April 2006, and I have been regularly active since then, mainly on translations and maintenance work. In translations, I focus on translations into Portuguese, since there are not too many users doing this job; For maintenance work, my main areas are tagging entries for speedy deletion and participating in discussions on Requests for Deletion. I also answer questions and participate in discussions regularly on Meta:Babel. I also work on OTRS, answering the Foundation’s mail — mainly the queues info-pt, info-es, info-it and sorting out junk mail. I am regularly on IRC (always as “Redux”) as well, mainly on #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser and #wikipedia-en-admins.
Português :
  • Línguas: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (e leitura elementar de: nl, da)
  • Informações pessoais: Meu principal projeto é a Wikipédia de língua inglesa (registrei-me em março de 2004 — ver minha página de usuário), onde sou Administrador, Burocrata, CheckUser e Oversight (ver Listuser) . Estes níveis de acesso permitiram-me acumular experiência útil para o bom desempenho do papel de Steward, o qual vejo como oportunidade para levar aos projetos menores o mesmo compromisso e a mesma seriedade que sempre marcaram o meu trabalho junto à Wikipédia em inglês. Eu tenho trabalhado regularmente na MetaWiki desde abril de 2006, dedicando-me, principalmente, a traduções e à manutenção do sítio. No que se refere às traduções, tenho me concentrado em traduzir para o Português, já que há poucos usuários por aqui a realizar esse serviço regularmente; No que tange a manutenção da MetaWiki, as tarefas das quais me tenho ocupado consistem da localização e marcação de páginas para eliminação rápida e de participação regular nas discussões na página Requests for Deletion (páginas para eliminar). Eu também respondo a perguntas e participo de discussões proposatas na página Meta:Babel. Estou presente, também, no OTRS, respondendo à correspondência da Wikimedia Foundation — principalmente nas seções info-pt, info-es e info-it, além de identificar e remover spam. Finalmente, estou regularmente no IRC (sempre como “Redux”), principalmente nas salas #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser e #wikipedia-en-admins.


Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (ich kann ein bisschen nl und da lesen)
  • Persönliche Informationen: Ich bin hauptsächlich in der englischen Wikipedia aktiv (angemeldet im März 2004 — siehe meine Benutzerseite), wo ich Administrator, Bürokrat, CheckUser und Oversightberechtigter bin (siehe Listuser hier). Ich glaube, dass dies eine gute Basis für den Stewardstatus bildet. Ich sehe den Stewardstatus als eine Möglichkeit, diese Pflichten auch auf andere, kleinere Projekte zu übertragen. Seit April 2006 bin ich regelmäßig auf Meta aktiv, vor allem widme ich mich den Übersetzungen und der Instandhaltung. Ich übersetze hauptsächlich auf Portugiesisch, weil es nicht viele Benutzer gibt, die sich daran beteiligen, ebenso wie die Schnelllöschkandidaten, wo ich ebenfalls mitarbeite. Weiterhin nehme ich an Diskussionen auf den Requests for Deletion (Löschkandidaten) teil. Ich beantworte auch Fragen auf Meta:Babel. Ebenso bin ich im OTRS, um E-Mails an die Wikimedia Foundation zu beantworten — hauptsächlich info-pt, info-es, info-it, außerdem sortiere ich Spam aus. Zudem bin ich per IRC (“Redux”) erreichbar, hauptsächlich auf #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser und #wikipedia-en-admins.
Español :
  • Idiomas: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (alguna comprensión de: nl, da)
  • Información personal: Mi proyecto principal es Wikipedia en Inglés (registrado en marzo de 2004 — ver mi página de usuario), donde soy bibliotecario, burócrata, checkUser y oversight (veer Listuser). Creo que estos niveles de acceso me han permitido obtener conocimientos y experiencia importantes para el buen desarrollo de la función de steward. Veo a este trabajo como la oportunidad para llevar a los otros proyectos, los más pequeños, la misma dedicación que siempre he tenido con la Wikipedia en Inglés. Trabajo con MetaWiki desde abril de 2006, lo hago regularidad y me dedico a traducciones y al mantenimiento de la página. En las traducciones, mi actividad está concentrada en traducir al portugués, ya que no hay muchos por aquí dedicados a esta tarea; En el mantenimiento, identifico y marco páginas para borrado rápido así como participo de las discusiones en la página Requests for Deletion (páginas para borrar). También participo de discusiones y contesto preguntas hechas en la página Meta:Babel. Trabajo también en el equipo OTRS, contestando la correspondencia de Wikimedia Foundation — principalmente en info-pt, info-es y info-it, pero también para identificar y eliminar spam. Estoy regularmente en el IRC (siempre como “Redux”), principalmente en #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser y #wikipedia-en-admins.
Français :
  • Langues parlées : pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (je peux lire un peut de: nl, da)
  • Informations personnelles : Je travaille principalement sur Wikipédia anglophone (enregistré en mars 2006 — voir ma page utilisateur), oú je suis Administrateur, Bureaucrate et j’ai les permissions de CheckUser et Oversight (voir Listuser) . Je crois que toutes ces permissions d’accès m’ont donné des expériences qui sont importantes pour bien comprendre le rôle que jouent les Stewards. Ça serait pour moi l’oportunité pour étendre aux autres projets la même dédication que j’ai consacrée à mon projet principal. Je travaille sur Meta depuis avril 2006 et je suis actif surtout en traductions et en maintenance de Meta. Pour les traductions, je me dédie surtout à traduire en portugais, car il n’y a pas beaucoup d’utilisateurs qui s’occupent de cela. À propos de la mantenance, je travaille sur l’identification des pages qui doivent être supprimées immédiatement et je participe aux discussions sur Requests for Deletion (pages à supprimer). Autrement, je réponds aux questions posées en Meta:Babel. Je travaille aussi sur OTRS, pour répondre à des messages envoyés à la Wikimedia Foundation — surtout les sections info-pt, info-es et info-it, mais aussi pour trouver et éliminer le spam . Je suis souvent sur IRC (toujours comme “Redux”), surtout sur #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser et #wikipedia-en-admins.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (posso leggere un pò di: nl, da)
  • Informazioni personali : Il mio progetto principale è la Wikipedia in inglese (registrato in marzo 2004 — vedere la mia pagina d'utente), dove sono Amministratore, Burocrate ed ho i permessi di CheckUser e Oversight (vedere Listuser). Credo che questi livelli d'accesso mi abbiano permesso di avere un'esperienza che è di grande importanza per il ruolo di Steward. Per me questa è l'opportunità per apportare agli altri progetti la stessa dedizione che ho sempre avuto sulla Wikipedia in Inglese. Lavoro su Meta da aprile 2006, ed ho contribuito regolarmente durante tutto questo tempo, dedicandomi alle traduzione ed alla manutenzione della MetaWiki. Sulle traduzioni, mi sto dedicando a tradurre al Portoghese, perché non ci sono molti utenti che si dedicano a ciò. Sulla manutenzione, mi dedico ad identificare ed a segnalare pagine che rientrano nei criteri per la cancellazione immediata e partecipo alle discussione sulla pagina Requests for Deletion (pagine da cancellare). Un'altro lavoro che svolgo è quello di partecipare alle discussioni e rispondere alle domande fatte sul Meta:Babel. Lavoro anche sull'OTRS, dove rispondo alla corrispondenza della Wikimedia Foundation (soprattutto info-pt, info-es ed info-it, ma anche identificando ed eliminando spam). Sono spesso sui canali IRC (sempre come “Redux”), soprattutto su #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser e #wikipedia-en-admins.
日本語:
  • 言語: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (加えてオランダ語デンマーク語がいくらか読める)
  • 人物について: 英語版ウィキペディアを中心に活動し(登録は2004年3月 - 利用者ページ参照)、ここでは管理者、ビューロクラット、チェックユーザー、監督者であり、スチュワードに適した背景があります。スチュワードになることはこうした貢献を小規模なプロジェクトに広げる良い機会と捉えています。2006年4月からメタで活動していて、このときから常連となり、主に翻訳と維持活動をしています。翻訳ではポルトガル語への翻訳を手掛ける人が少なすぎるので、ポルトガル語への翻訳を中心にすえ、維持活動では即時削除を貼り付けRequests for Deletionに関する議論に加わっています。私も質問に答え、Meta:Babelで通常議論に参加しています。私もOTRSで活動し、財団のメール(主としてinfo-pt、info-es、info-it)に応え、ジャンクメールを取り除いています。普段は主としてウィキメディア、ウィキメディアOTRS、ウィキメディアチェックユーザー、英語版ウィキペディア管理者同様IRCで(いつも「Redux」で)参加しています。
Norsk:
  • Språk: pt, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (pluss at jeg kan lese litt nl og da)
  • personlig informasjon: Jeg er for det meste aktiv på Wikipedia på engelsk (registrerte meg i mars 2004 – se brukersida mi), hvor jeg er administrator, byråkrat, checkuser og oversight (se Listusers), noe som gir en god bakgrunn for denne jobben. Jeg ser stewardskap som en mulighet til å utvide denne hengivenheten til de mindre prosjektene. Jeg har vært på Meta siden april 2006, og har vært aktiv regelmessig siden da, for det meste innen oversettelse og vedlikehold. Angående oversettelser, fokuserer jeg for det meste på oversettelser til portugisisk, siden det ikke er mange som driver med det. Vedlikehold gjør jeg for det meste ved å merke artikler som skal hurtigslettes og deltagelse i diskusjonene på Meta:Requests for deletion. Jeg deltar også regelmessig på Meta:Babel. Jeg er også en deltaker i OTRS, og svarer på eposter for Foundation, for det meste på køene info-pt, info-es, info-it og rydding av søppelpost. Jeg er ofte på IRC (alltid som «Redux»), på kanalene #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser og #wikipedia-en-admins.
Русский: * Языки: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (и ещё немного понимаю nl и da)
  • Личные данные: мой родной проект — англоязычная Википедия (зарегистрировался в марте 2004 года, см. мою личную страницу), там у меня есть права администратора, бюрократа, чек-юзера и оверсайта. (см. список), благодаря чему у меня имеется достаточный опыт для выполнения функций стюарда. Эта должность видится мне возможностью поработать и на более мелкие проекты. Я регулярно работаю на Мете с апреля 2006 года, занимаюсь в основном переводами и текучими работами. Я перевожу в основном на португальский язык, так как этим занимается не так много народу. При работе по поддержанию сайта в надлежащем состоянии я в основном выставляю страницы на быстрое удаление и участвую в обсуждениях запросов на удаление. Кроме того, я участвую в дискуссиях на странице Meta:Babel и участвую в работе OTRS, отвечая на приходящие на адрес фонда письма — в основном в info-pt, info-es, info-it и отфильтровываю мусор.
Кроме того, я регулярно присутствую в IRC (всегда под ником «Redux»), главным образом в каналах #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser и #wikipedia-en-admins.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: pt-N, en-4, es-3, fr-3, it-3, de-2, la-2, cs-1, ro-1 (ayrıca şu dilleri biraz da olsa okuyabiliyorum: nl, da)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Asıl vikim Yönetici, Bürokrat, Denetçi ve Oversight olarak (Listeye bkz) görev yaptığım ve Mart 2004'te kayıt olduğum İngilizce Wikipedia (kullanıcı sayfama bkz). Bu arkaplanın stewardlık görevi için iyi bir zemin hazırladığına inanıyorum ve stewardlığı, bu hizmeti daha küçük projelere de götürebilmek için bir fırsat olarak görüyorum. Nisan 2006'dan beri katkı sağladığım Meta'da o zamandan beri aktifim ve genelde çeviri ve bakım işleriyle katkıda bulunmaya çalışıyorum. Portekizce'ye çeviri yapacak fazla kullanıcı bulunmaması nedeniyle bu konuya odaklandım. Bakım işi olarak da girdileri hızlı silinmeleri için etiketlemeye ve Silinme İsteği tartışmalarına eğildim. Ayrıca Meta:Babel'daki tartışmalara düzenli olarak katılıyor ve soruları cevaplıyorum. OTRS'de de görev yapıyor ve Vakıf'ın e-postalarını cevaplıyorum (ağırlıklı olarak info-pt, info-es ve info-it bölümleri, ek olarak gereksiz e-postaların ayıklanması). Düzenli olarak IRC'deyim (her zaman "Redux" adıyla) ve #wikimedia, #wikimedia-otrs, #wikimedia-checkuser ve #wikipedia-en-admins kanallarında hazır bulunuyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ!) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Srikeit 07:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. I don't know him, but we need multilingual stewards! (most of the other candidates speak only 2 languages :-( ) Kipmaster 09:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Aksi great 10:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. I'm slightly concerned about the effect stewardship would have on his availability for bureaucrat duties in enwiki, but I trust him fully. Titoxd(?!?) 03:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 04:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Shyam (T/C) 07:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. bainer (talk) 07:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Lost(talk) 08:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support.--MariusM 14:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support --- gildemax 21:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Definitivamente (did I get that right?). Chick Bowen 03:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Feydey 16:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Warofdreams 17:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    67.79.113.179 18:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC) user not logged in Phe[reply]
  65. Phe 19:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Danny 20:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Gac 06:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC) See User:Gac.
  68. DarthVader 04:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Clearly helpful to more than just English users. Trustworthy. Voice-of-All 17:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Tbone 22:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. DVD R W 00:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Misza13 12:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Evrik 16:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support I do appreciate you are multiligual. --clamengh 18:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. --Shreshth91 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Benjism89 12:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. The large variety of languages you know is a big plus. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. CrzRussian 02:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Zzyzx11 05:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Eagle 101 01:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Andre (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. riana_dzasta 13:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Steel en:Steel 17:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support I agree with clamengh --Moch 18:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. cj | talk 08:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Raul654 02:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support in general as I think he'd do a great job, and because he likely drinks Antarctica Guarana. I love the stuff! 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support --Mido 19:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support NoSeptember 13:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Tizio 15:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Yes. Xoloz 17:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Generic vote against Anglo-American focus... would be a vote for you. :) Ashibaka 17:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. In my one direct dealing with Redux as a functionary I found him to be very helpful and efficient. Languages are a major plus. I don't know what more one could really expect in a candidate. --W.marsh 19:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Nilfanion 22:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Alai 22:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anglo-American? You did notice I'm Brazilian and my native language is Portuguese... Redux 13:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[(!)So you are Southern American and probably not Anglo.-Hillgentleman|User Talk ]
I am Brazilian, and my native language is Portuguese (hence the pt-N in my nom). I learned English as a foreign language, same as with the other 9 languages (other than Portuguese) that I have knowledge of (on various levels). Redux 14:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, you are the the only person smart enough to hold the discussion public, replying here instead of stealthy tactics on talk pages!
Unfortunately you've passed successfully only the minor test but failed on the main one: you donated between 250 and 500 edits to Portugese Wikipedia, less than 50 edits to Spanish one, and have negligible contributions to all other projects. Honestly I was surprised to see in your matrix the rows about Portugese Wiktionary with 1 edit to your own user page and Romanian Wikipedia with 0 (zero) edits. It is even weirder that your pt.wikt page is formatted as a good dictionary entry while there is no article for redux/Redux!
I really admire your devotion to learn many languages. However my conclusion is that out of over 180 mln. Brazilians we got one striving to be English. It seems that Hillgentleman and I share the same view what American means, and hopefully you will understand why I am accusing you of being Anglo-one. Sorry for saying anything about personal details but to achieve (and maintain) near-native level of English you have to live somewhere outside Brasil. -- Goldie ± (talk) 12:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I respect your opinion, but not being heavily active on certain projects, or not being highly active on many projects, or even regularly active on said projects, doesn't mean necessarily that someone doesn't relate to them. I'm quite familiar with many smaller projects, particularly with those in languages where I have X-2 or higher proficiency (and especially with all the projects in Portuguese, with which I'm very well acquainted, even if not editing regularly).
About the accounts you mentioned, they are in the Matrix because they exist, even if inactive. I created accounts on many projects where I would be able to understand and move around in case I should ever want/need to do any kind of work there. I was laying the ground for a cross-project identity. Naturally, this was made somewhat obsolete by the perspective of the Single Login specification, but by then, I had already created most of the accounts.
Finally, I do not live outside of Brazil; if you check my userpage on enwiki, you'll see that I inform that my timezone is GMT −3, which is Brazil's timezone (or rather, one of them). Redux 17:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am very satisfied with Redux's openness and politeness, and am considering him a rather good candidate for a steward. My objections of him being Anglo-centric still do apply, and I hope he will not increase the inevitable bias of the stewards team. So am changing my vote to neutral. -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Changing my vote to neutral (see discussion above). -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I believe that an edit count is being used by participants as a possible indicator of the candidates' acquaintance with their prospective place of work, and with the work itself. Whether or not the candidates know the place where they would be working is a question that is part of a larger question, which is whether or not the candidates understand the job, what it entails and how to perform it well. In answering that, experience on Meta can be important, since it is the place where all projects meet, and it is a place for coordinating efforts that can affect a larger number of projects. But this is a part of the equation, and other factors are relevant, such as trustworthyness, experience and commitment to the Foundation. In light of that, I do not believe that the editcount itself should be mandatory, rather it is an element that participants may or may not use to decide. Redux 14:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)[edit]

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en, fr-2 (fluent in English, can have a basic conversation in French)
  • Personal info: I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia (edits/logs) and on the English Wikisource(edits/logs). I typically contribute to the main namespace, using my sysop tools to revert vandalism, block vandals or inappropriate user names, and delete pages. I answer emails with OTRS, concentrating on the info-en queue and sometimes the permissions-en queue. On Meta I mainly revert vandalism and tag pages for speedy deletion, although I've recently busied myself with depopulating Category:Uncategorized. I am in the UTC-5 timezone, and am regularly available on IRC. I am interested in serving smaller projects, as well as helping out with areas like Requests for permissions.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, fr-2 (Englisch fließend, Französisch)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin Administrator in der englischen Wikipedia (Beiträge/Logbücher) und in der englischen Wikisource(Beiträge/Logbücher). Ich bearbeite für gewöhnlich den Hauptnamensraum, verwende meine Administratorwerkzeuge zum Rückgängigmachen von Vandalismus, zum Blockieren von Vandalen oder unpassenden Benutzernamen, und zum Löschen von Seiten. Ich beantworte E-Mails mit OTRS, mit dem Schwerpunkt auf info-en und manchmal permissions-en. Auf Meta mache ich hauptsächlich Vandalismus rückgängig und markiere Seiten für Schnelllöschungen, obwohl ich mich seit kurzem damit beschäftige die Kategorie:Nichtkategorisierte Seiten zu verkleinern. Ich befinde mich in der UTC-5 Zeitzone, und bin regelmäßig im IRC erreichbar. Ich bin an kleineren Projekten interessiert, sowie daran, in Gebieten wie Anfragen für Erlaubnisse (bezogen auf Benutzerrechte) auszuhelfen.
Español :
  • Idiomas: en, fr-2 (Inglés fluido, Francés)
  • Información personal: Soy administrador en la Wikipedia en inglés (contribuciones/registro) y en Wikisource en inglés(contribuciones/registro). Típicamente contribuyo en el namespace de artículos usando las herramientas de administrador para revertir vandalismos, bloquear vándalos o nombre inapropiados y borrar páginas. Respondo parte de la correspondencia de OTRS, concentrandome en info-en y algunas veces en permissions-en. En meta mayormente revierto vandalismos y marco páginas para destruir, aunque recientemente he estado ocupado despoblando Category:Uncategorized. Me encuentro en la zona horaria UTC-5 y regularmente estoy disponible en el IRC. Estoy interesado en ayudar a los proyectos pequeños así como también ayudar en areas como Requests for permissions
Français :

Langues: en, fr-2 (éloquent en anglais, peut avoir une discussion simple en français)

  • Infos personnelles: Je suis administratrice sur la Wikipédia anglaise (modifications/journaux) et le Wikisource anglais (modifications/journaux). Je contribue typiquement dans l'espace de noms principal, utilisant mes outils d'administrateur pour contrer le vandalisme, bloquer les vandales ou les noms d'utilisateurs malicieux, et effacer les pages inappropriées. Je réponds aux e-mails en tant que membre de l'OTRS, me concentrant sur la file info-en et parfois la file permission-en. Sur Méta je participe principalement à contrer le vandalisme et à marquer des pages inappropriées pour la suppression immédiate, bien que je me sois récemment occupé du nettoyage des pages non-catégorisées. Je suis dans le fuseau horaire UTC-5, et je suis régulièrement disponible sur fr:IRC. Je m'intéresse aux petits projets de la Fondation, et j'aimerai également aider pour des travaux tels que les Demandes de permissions.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en, fr-2 (Inglese avanzato, francese)
  • Informazioni personali: sono amministratore sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese (edit/log) e su Wikisource in lingua inglese(edit/log). Generalmente contribuisco nel namespace principale, utilizzando gli strumenti di amministratore per eliminare vandalismi, bloccare vandali o nomi utente non appropriati e cancellare le pagine. Rispondo alle email con il sistema OTRS, concentrandomi sulla coda info-en e a volte sulla coda permissions-en. Su Meta provvedo manualmente all'eliminazione dei vandalismi ed a contrassegnare con gli appositi tag le pagine che devono essere cancellate immediatamente, inoltre mi sono recentemente occupata dello svuotamento della Category:Uncategorized. Mi trovo nel fuso orario UTC-5 e sono abituamente reperibile su IRC. Sono interessata ad aiutare i progetti più piccoli, così come con sezioni quali le Requests for permissions.
日本語:
  • 言語: en, fr-2 (英語は完璧、フランス語は少々しゃべれます)
  • 人物について: 私は英語版ウィキペディア (投稿/ログ) と 英語版ウィキソース(投稿/ログ) で管理者として活動しています。メインスペースに頻繁に投稿し、荒らしの編集の差し戻し、投稿ブロック、及び不適切な名前のアカウントのブロックや、ページの削除を行っています。OTRSチームのメンバーでもあり、info-en及びpermissions-enのアドレスに来るメールに返信しています。メタでは主に荒らしの差し戻し、削除すべきページのタグを行っています。また、最近ではCategory:Uncategorized内のページのカテゴリーを探す作業も行っています。私はUTC-5タイムゾーンにおり、IRCには頻繁に顔を出しています。小さなプロジェクトのニーズに応えるのにも興味があり、Requests for permissionsなどのページでもスチュワードとして活動したいと思います。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: En, Fr-2 (spreek vloeiend Engels, Frans))
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben moderator op de Engelstalige Wikipedia (bijdragen/logs) en op de Engelstalige Wikisource(bijdragen/logs). Gewoonlijk draag ik vooral bij aan de hoofdnaamruimte, waarbij ik mijn moderatorhulpmiddelen gebruik om vandalisme terug te draaien, vandalen of ongewenste gebruikersnamen te blokkeren, en pagina's te verwijderen. Ik beantwoord e-mails via OTRS, waarbij ik me concentreer op de info-en rij en soms op de permissions-en rij. Op Meta draai ik voornamelijkvandalisme terug, en markeer ik pagina's voor directe verwijdering, hoewel ik me recent heb bezig gehouden met het ontvolken van Category:Uncategorized. Ik zit in de UTC-5 tijdzone, en ben regelmatig te vinden op IRC. Ik ben geïnteresseerd in zowel het helpen van kleinere projecten, als het helpem met gebieden als Requests for permissions.
Português :
  • Línguas: en, fr-2 (fluente em inglês, francês)
  • Informações pessoais: Sou administrador na Wikipédia em língua inglesa (edits/logs) e na Wikisource em língua inglesa (edits/logs). Tipicamente, edito o namespace principal, usando as ferramentas de sysop para reverter vandalismo, bloquear vândalos e nomes de usuário inapropriados e apagar páginas. Respondo à correspondência da Fundação no OTRS, concentrando-me na seção info-en e, às vezes, atuo na seção permissions-en. Na MetaWiki, minhas principais atividades são reverter vandalismo e marcar páginas para eliminação rápida, embora eu tenha, recentemente, passado a acupar-me do desafogamento da categoria Category:Uncategorized. Meu fuso horário é o UTC-5, e eu estou disponível no IRC regularmente. Estou interessado em servir aos projetos menores, assim como em ajudar em locais como a página Requests for permissions.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: en, fr-2 (anadilde İngilizce, Fransızca)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: İngilizce Wikipedia'da (katkılar/kayıtlar) ve İngilizce Wikisource'da (katkılar/kayıtlar) yöneticilik yapıyorum. Vandalizm örneklerini geri almak ve vandalları/uygunsuz kullanıcı adlarını engellemek ve sayfaları silmek için yönetici fonksiyonlarımı kullanıyor ve genelde madde katkılarında bulunuyorum. OTRS'nin info-en ve bazend e permissions-en bölümlerinde e-postalara cevap veriyorum. Son günlerde Category:Uncategorized ile uğraşmış olsam da, Meta'da genelde vandalizm örneklerini geri alıyor ve sayfaları hızlı silme işlemi için etiketliyorum. UTC-5 zaman dilimindeyim ve düzenli olarak IRC'deyim. Küçük projelere hizmet etmek ve İzin istekleri gibi alanlarda yardımda bulunmak istiyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Yann 23:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Srikeit 07:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Aksi great 10:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --Versageek 19:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. UninvitedCompany 23:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Titoxd(?!?) 03:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 04:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. bainer (talk) 07:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Shyam (T/C) 07:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Lost(talk) 08:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Delta Tango 01:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    67.79.113.179 18:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)user not logged Phe[reply]
  73. Phe 19:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Danny 20:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Blinking Spirit 11:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --Celestianpower (en, wikt) 15:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Glen S 19:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Bhadani 19:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Tbone 22:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Gribeco 23:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. DVD R W 00:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Kemmótar 16:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. en:user:freakofnurture 01:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Walkerma 06:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support--clamengh 17:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Shreshth91 04:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Alvaro 21:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Belinzona 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. CrzRussian 02:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Zzyzx11 05:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Eagle 101 01:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. riana_dzasta 13:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Yes--10caart 14:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Upon trust! Support--Moch 18:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Luna-San 20:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. cj | talk 08:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Siri68 21:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Siri68 appears to be a sockpuppet of Kemmótar. --Snowdog 21:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    --Siri68 15:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Siri68 is not a sockpuppet of Kemmótar as insinuated by Snowdog. Here I am confirming from a new IP.--Siri68 15:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Identity confirmed, no sock puppet, but not eligible to vote as not yet fulfilling the three months rule --Kemmótar 17:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. --82.153.135.69 22:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Re-sign, wasn't logged in! --Skenmy 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. KillerChihuahua 15:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Definitely one of the good guys (and accessible also) —Phil | Talk 16:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. As stated by others as well: well accessible, good candidate. Kim Bruning 17:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Blnguyen 04:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Flavi 13:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Nilfanion 22:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. --BirgitteSB 00:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Oblic 23:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対

Langauge limitations. I'd rather have at least fr-2. Voice-of-All 16:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, she sold herself short :). Voice-of-All 04:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Language limitations. Otherwise ok user. Feydey 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Per discussion. Feydey 00:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    She's not American shes from canada, your votes against Americans just because they are Americans are disruptive and this is not a place to place your Anti-American views Jaranda | wat's

sup 02:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. No. I want more stewards whose native languages are not English. I do not want more stewards from the English Wikipedia. Five of the 16 active stewards are from the English Wikipedia. If we take the hypothetical analogue of united nations security council, then I would vote against Canada if Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Great Britain, and the United States were already represented. See my discussion page.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I also think that your anti-English Wikipedia POV is not appropriate here. Yann 14:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yann, I am not sure what your anti-English Wikipedia POV means. I am not sure if it refer to my position. But let me clarify my position: I love the English Wikipedia. I appreciate all the contributions. I use it often. However, the English Wikipedia is already well represented in the team of active stewards. We need more representatives from elsewhere.---Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Denying English speaking stewards will not bring more non English speaking stewards. To me, this kind of requirements is a discrimination against English speaking candidates, just because of their mother tongue. Yann 15:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • No. For example, Shanel is an Indian. If her language proficiency said "English-N, Hindi-4" (or even better, "English-N Hindi-N") then I would have voted for her. I want more point of views represented in the team of stewards. Lacking the language profiency makes the candidate incapable of understanding other cultures deeply. If some of the active native-English stewards resigns, I would reconsider.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 15:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • As you know it well, the stewardship is not a prize for outstanding achievement. It is a job to be done. It should go to competent hands. I consider language as an important indicator of competence.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 15:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It is not about discrimination, it is about value. I personally deny that increasing the number of English-speaking stewards will bring in any significant value. Moreover, from my POV it would provide fake impression of having enough stewards while there is actually a lack of them. Theoretically (and only in theory) if the stewards were supposed to be some sort of bookkeepers just counting the icons with plus and minus signs, IM(nsH)O the Foundation is having no need for more stewards (please avoid to assume I am accusing the stewards in anything). I assume the stewards have to understand, sometimes even investigate, before taking any action. To understand something a person needs knowledge, experience, and a way to communicate. So the obstacle is in the latter - how can one knowledgeable in English-only communicate with non-English speakers. I hope you do not proclaim that the only official language is English, and all comments expressed in other languages are void!? -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en, hi-1 or 2 possibly, es-1 or 2 possibly (native english, basic Hindi, basic Spanish), though those levels are for contributions and I can read and converse in Hindi and Spanish better than I can contribute in writing. I can also read some basic Portuguese and Italian and make some sense of Marathi. I plan to learn the Urdu script soon, which would give me access to another project.
  • Personal info: I've been a Wikipedian for three years and an admin on the English Wikipedia for almost two years. I'm one of the most active bureaucrats on the English Wikipedia for administrator promotions and one of the users with the most uses of oversight rights. I enjoy helping the Wikimedia projects and I'd like to do what I can to help all language projects.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, hi-1 oder vielleicht 2, es-1 oder vielleicht 2 (Muttersprache Englisch, Basiswissen Hindi, Basiswissen Spanisch), allerdings betreffen diese Einstufungen die Beiträge und ich kann Hindi und Spanisch besser lesen und sprechen als schreiben. Auch kann ich einfaches Portugiesisch und Italienisch lesen und einiges in Marathi sinngemäß verstehen. Ich plane die Urdu-Schrift bald zu erlernen, was mir den Zugang zu einem weiteren Projekt gewähren würde.
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin ein Wikipedianer für drei Jahre und Administrator in der englischen Wikipedia für fast zwei Jahre. Ich bin einer der aktivsten Bürokraten in der englischen Wikipedia für die Vergebung des Administratorenstatus und einer der Benutzer mit den meisten Aufsichts-Rechten. Ich genieße es Wikimedia-Projekten zu helfen und würde gerne tun, was ich kann um Projekten in allen Sprachen zu helfen.
Español :
  • Idiomas: en, hi-1 o 2 posiblemente, es-1 o 2 posiblemente (Inglés nativo, Hindi básico, Español básico), pero estos niveles son para contribuciones, puedo leer y conversar en hindi y en español mucho mejor que escribir. También puede algo de portugués e italiando y un poco Marathi. Planeo aprender urdu dentro de poco lo cual me dará acceso a otro proyecto.
  • Información personal: He sido wikipedista por tres años y administrador en la Wikipedia en inglés por al menos dos años. Soy uno de los burócratas más activos dando los botones a los nuevos admins y también soy el usuario con más usos de los derechos de oversight. Disfruto mucho ayudando en los proyectos de Wikimedia y me gustaría hacer lo que se pueda para ayudar a los proyectos en todos los lenguajes.
Français :
  • Langues : anglais (langue maternelle), hindi basique (hi-1 ou 2), espagnol basique (es-1 ou 2), mais ces niveaux sont pour les contributions, et je peux lire et parler l'hindi et l'espagnol mieux que je peux écrire. Je peux aussi lire le portugais et l'italien basique et comprendre vaguement le marathi. J'ai l'intention d'apprendre l'alphabet ourdou bientôt, ce qui me donnera accès à un autre projet.
  • Infos personnelles : Je suis un Wikipédien depuis trois ans et un admin sur la Wikipédia en anglais depuis presque deux ans. Je suis un des bureaucrates les plus actifs sur la Wikipédia anglaise pour la promotion des admins, et un des utilisateurs qui utilise le plus les droits d'oversight. J'aime beaucoup aider les projets Wikimédia et j'aimerais faire mon possible pour aider les projets dans toutes les langues.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en, hi-1 o 2 probabilmente, es-1 o 2 probabilmente (inglese di madre lingua, hindi di base, spagnolo di base), i livelli si intendono per i contributi, dal momento che posso leggere e conversare in lingua hindi e spagnola meglio di quanto non mi riesca a farlo per iscritto. Posso leggere un po' di portughese e di italiano e comprendere a grandi linee il marathi. Ho in mente di imparare presto la grafia urdu, che potrebbe darmi la possibilità di accedere ad un altro progetto.
  • Informazioni personali: sono un Wikipediano da tre anni e amministratore sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese da quasi due. Sono uno dei burocrati più attivi con le promozioni degli amministratori e uno tra i più attivi nell'utilizzo dei permessi di oversight sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese. Mi fa piacere aiutare i progetti di Wikimedia projects e desidero mettere a disposizione il mio aiuto per i progetti in tutte le lingue.
Português :
  • Línguas: en, hi-1 ou talvez 2, es-1 ou talvez 2 (inglês como língua-mãe, hindu básico, espanhol básico), mas estes níveis referem-se a contribuições, pois eu leio e me comunico em hindu e espanhol melhor do que posso contribuir por escrito nessas línguas. Também leio português em nível básico e consigo entender um pouco de Marathi. Pretendo aprender a linguagem Urdu dentro em pouco, o que me daria acesso a outro projeto.
  • Informações pessoais: Sou Wikipedista há três anos e administrador na Wikipédia em inglês há quase dois anos. Sou um dos burocratas mais ativos na Wikipédia em inglês e também um dos usuários mais ativos no uso da permissão de oversight. Eu gosto de ajudar projetos da Fundação Wikimedia e gostaria de fazer o que puder para ajudar projetos nas demais línguas.
日本語:
  • 言語: en, hi-1または恐らく2, es-1または恐らく2(母語は英語、簡単なヒンドゥー語と簡単なスペイン語)だが、投稿する際の能力であり、ヒンドゥー語とスペイン語は、投稿するよりも読んだり会話する方がやりやすい。簡単なポルトガル語とイタリア語も読め、Marathiもいくらかできる。ウルドゥー文字もいずれ勉強したいし、アクセスできるようになりたい。
  • 人物について: 3年前からウィキペディアンであり、2年近く前から英語版ウィキペディアで管理者をしています。英語版ウィキペディアで最も活動しているビューロクラットの一人であり、oversightの権利を最も行使している利用者の一人です。ウィキメディアの助けになりたく、あらゆる言語版のプロジェクトの手助けになることをしたいです。
Türkçe:
  • Diller: en, hi-1 or 2 belki, es-1 or 2 belki (anadilde İngilizce, temel düzeyde Hindu dili, temel düzeyde İspanyolca). Bu seviyeler katkılar için aslında, zira Hindu dilinde ve İspanyolca'da yazıya oranla çok daha iyi bir şekilde okuyabilir ve sohbet edebilirim. Ayrıca temel düzeyde Portekizce ve İtalyanca okuyabilir ve Marathi dilinde derdimi anlatabilirim. Urdu yazısını öğrenmeyi ve bu sayede bir diğer projede de daha katılımda bulunmayı planlıyorum.
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Üç yıldır bir Wikipedia kullanıcısıyım, iki yıldır da İngilizce Wikipedia'da yöneticilik yapıyorum. İngilizce Wikipedia'daki yönetici terfileri konusunda en aktif bürokratlardan ve oversight yetkilerini en sık kullanan kullanıcılardan da biriyim. Wikipedia projelerine katkıda bulunmaktan zevk duyuyorum ve tüm diğer dillere de yardım edebilmek için elimden geleni yapmak istiyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[14], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Simetrical (talkcontribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  23. समर्थन Srikeit 07:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Has proved to be an excellent 'crat on enwiki, have no reason to believe he would not be an excellent Steward. Cynical 10:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Aksi great 10:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 17:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Same concern as with Redux, but again, not enough to sway me. Titoxd(?!?) 03:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 04:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Shyam (T/C) 07:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Samir धर्म 02:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Chick Bowen 03:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Warofdreams 17:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    67.79.113.179 18:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC) not logged Phe[reply]
  37. Sarah Ewart 04:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Glen S 19:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Bhadani 19:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. DarthVader 04:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Tbone 22:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Piotrus 04:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Misza13 12:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. IanManka 13:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. - After watching his comments on en:Wikipedia:Requests for Adminship (among other things), and how he has dealt with some difficult situations, I think he would be a good choice for stewardship. - Jc37 18:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Shreshth91 04:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Belinzona 14:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Eagle 101 01:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Yes, --213.140.11.135 14:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) --10caart 14:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC) problems with my computer: it 'logs out' by itself...[reply]
  51. Steel en:Steel 17:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support--Moch 18:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. DVD R W 18:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Raul654 02:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Ghirlandajo 07:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. KillerChihuahua 15:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support - A very useful user, always willing to help out. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 18:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Blnguyen 03:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support NoSeptember 13:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support Yann 21:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. While I'm not sure copious use of oversight is a great qualification, especially given that we necessarily can't verify their necessity and appropriateness, record as a 'crat seems OK. (Am also curious as to what the long list of terse opposes have as a concern...) Alai 22:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Yann 23:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. badlydrawnjeff talk 12:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Langauge limitations. Good user though. Voice-of-All 16:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. CrzRussian 02:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Zzyzx11 05:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andre (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Moreschi 10:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. hi-N & en-2 would have been much better. -- Goldie ± (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Chacor 02:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Delta Tango 06:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Irpen 06:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. No. -- Grafikm fr 20:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Tizio 15:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. No. Xoloz 17:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. No/Non/Nein/Przeciw/Hayır/Против!--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 17:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Giano II 17:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Phe 19:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Danny 20:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benjism89 12:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Good bureaucrat on en.wp, though. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Neutral at this point. Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I've always thought edit count is at best a moderate indicator of experience; quality of edits and intangibles such as trustworthiness are much more important. But also many if not most other types edits on meta don't translate very closely to the activities of a steward. Bureaucrat activities on active projects have a bit more correlation so that helps, but those also do not have full overlap. Trustworthiness and dedication to furthering the foundation's causes is much more important. - Taxman 20:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]