Jump to content

User talk:XXBlackburnXx

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Xaosflux in topic ticket to check
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 30 days.

Special:AbuseFilter/388

[edit]

Hello. It seems that this on french Wikipedia is a false positive. Maybe you can except fr.wikipedia ? Or if not a false positive, explain why. Thank you. Supertoff (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

The existence of this filter is based on a request from the SBL talk page: Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2025-01#c-XXBlackburnXx-20250106124800-TheSandDoctor-20250101165500. Normally, this link would have been added to the global spam blacklist.
That said, the edit itself looks fine, so let me see how I can fix the issue... XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Supertoff: I've set the filter to log-only for now and will monitor the hits. With my steward rights coming in less than 2 days, managing the abuse aspect should be a bit easier. Apologies for the inconvenience.. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Supertoff (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spam

[edit]

Beans & all, but would it be worth more aggressively disallowing spam? For instance, look at User:Terrapinelect's contribs. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

For a filter? Sure! Though I have other priorities at the moment, but I'll make sure to take a look when I can. Thanks! :) XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for taking a look. No rush. JayCubby (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-10

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Talk page

[edit]

Hey there, I noticed yesterday that you deleted my talk page for G1, but I don't recall ever making in one in the first place. Was wondering what was going on with that, cheers! Sophisticatedevening (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Just trolls being trolls. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User+talk%3ASophisticatedevening. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh gotcha. Thanks for that, he was doing the same thing on enwiki. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-11

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dowder

[edit]

Hi. In Steward requests/Global/2025-w10#Global lock for Dowder about Dowder, you wrote "I see no recent spam" and Aqurs1 wrote "What do you mean by 'knowledge of Taiwanese Traditional Chinese a plus'?". Please look at the abuse filter logs, user talk pages, and deleted contributions on Commons and Chinese Wikipedia zh.wikipedia.org. I believe it was Google Translate that determined that the language of the spam in c:File:葉直育.jpg (deleted by Túrelio under c:COM:CSD#F10 and c:COM:CSD#G10) and the abuse filter hits were in English, the Taiwanese dialect of Chinese, or "Chinese (Simplified)". The spam itself was in the form of a Wikipedia article promoting the accomplishments of the person "葉直育", translated as "Ye Zhiyu". Their spammy article zh:葉直育 has been deleted three times (by Ch.Andrew, Wing, and SCP-2000) under zh:WP:G11. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 11:34, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes, and that occurred a year ago. I don't believe it's appropriate to take action after such a long period, especially when the only recent edits they've made are on commonswiki, which are well-capable of handling issues on their own. A lock seems unnecessary in this case. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
The upload was a year ago, but the latest abuse filter hit was 04:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC), the latest article creation was 03:22, 12 March 2025 (UTC) and the latest article deletion was 03:28, 12 March 2025 (UTC), just six minutes later. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 12:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Still I don't believe a lock is necessary at this point. If zhwiki and commonswiki wants to block them, that's totally fine. But this doesn't reach the level that warrants a immediate lock IMO. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Plus what typically happens is that users who want to upload a photo are redirected to commonswiki, which many newcomers may not be familiar with. These users typically do not intend to engage in cross-wiki abuse or spam, which I believe is the situation here. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I warned them on the other projects. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 18:21, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Special:CentralAuth/AllenDikson

[edit]

Hello, a recently locked LTA has added many links to nlwiki, you may want to consider reverting their edits. I hope this can help you. MathXplore (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reporting! How did I miss that... XXBlackburnXx (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Special:AbuseFilter/72

[edit]

I am sysop on dewiki and found this edit blocked by this filter. I have no informations about the rules behind that filter but it looks like a false possitive for me. I am contacting you because you made the last edit on that filter. Could you please inspect that issue. Thank you.  @xqt 09:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

This is one of those old filters that's become a dumping ground for random stuff over the years and nobody knows anymore what to do with it. I've made a change to reduce most false positives this filter has, but in the end I'm afraid we'll need to prune that filter and probably rewrite it from scratch to completely eliminate the issue. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Greetings and...

[edit]

Hi XXBlackburnXx! Just in case you're too busy to have spotted it, there's a noticeable pattern in the edit summaries of these two users, both of whom you have just blocked globally, User:Wór z Arabami, and whose first edit summary was similar to the half-dozen edit summaries by User:Arabski Wikipedysta. If you are already aware of it, I'm sorry you were bothered. No need to reply to this message, as your time can be better employed elsewhere. Thanks for being out there! Regards, Technopat (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and no worries! They were already locked, but if you do happen to find more, don't hesitate to report them! XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-12

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

ticket to check

[edit]

Hello XXBlackburnXx, please see ticket:2025031910004784. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 10:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Xaosflux: That ticket is about sulutil:NyandaI (with a uppercase "i"), I locked sulutil:Nyandal (a different account, with a lowercase L, belonging to Wikinger). The second account was abusively impersonating the first and actually managed to get their account renamed, which I've actually reverted an hour ago due to their edit on Talk:IRC, see User_talk:DreamRimmer#NyandaI as well. It seems they are trying to log in into Wikinger's account but they obviously can't due to the lock. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I wasn't considering an unlock - just sorting for they why it is a reject. — xaosflux Talk 12:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply