Jump to content

User talk:XXBlackburnXx

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 20 hours ago by ~2025-40425-50 in topic Related Global account "Prism-Breaker" Locked: yes
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days.

ticket to check

[edit]

Hi XXBlackburnXx, when you get a chance please see ticket:2025110510020553. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 13:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I’ve added a note. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Assigning CU for one week

[edit]

Is it normal? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=62170468

Normally it's for hours, not days... Leaderboard (talk) 06:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

False positive ?

[edit]

Hello. I asked Epic about global filter 324 but I didn't receive any answer. Can you check that ? Supertoff (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Supertoff: I'll look into this over the weekend. It doesn't seem easily fixable without removing that part of the whole regexp, but I'll see what I can do. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Supertoff (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Supertoff, the filter is not set to disallow, I just configured it to show a CAPTCHA, along with some improvements. Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 20:01, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possible to Check?

[edit]

Hey XXBlackburnXx, Local community is discussing about the feasibility of checking the relationship between 佩奇君 and LBLaiSiNanHai and XZPeiQi. However, when looking at zh.wiki local data, we (by we, I mean myself and other local SPI clerks) noticed that local data is stale. An admin is asking if it's possible to look at login.wiki data, but I doubt those data haven't stale as well. Please let me know if using login.wiki to check is still possible. Since this is not like a formal CU request as I'm not asking for any relationship, I'm posting it here. Thanks for taking your time to read it :) )dt 19:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@ATannedBurger: Loginwiki’s CU data only lasts 3 months from account creation. So if it’s stale on zhwiki, it’s almost certainly going to be stale on loginwiki. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
"3 months from account creation" sounds unbelievable. Is that the result of SUL3 migration?
Nevertheless, each login still has to be logged somewhere to power mw:Extension:LoginNotify. Srapoj (talk) 21:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
The original question was whether there could be non-stale log entries for those users. Saying loginwiki was due to the assumption that log entries for logging in are stored there, which seems no longer the case after SUL3 (if my understanding of phab:T348388#10723564 and phab:T363695 is correct). The check should be performed on the wikis where the user has logged in. (Not sure if it includes autologin domains). Srapoj (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikivikipediya user

[edit]

Hello dear Stewards,

My account Wikivikipediya was globally locked with the reason “long-term abuse”. I believe this is a mistake.

I am an active contributor mainly on Uzbek Wikipedia, with more than 6500 constructive edits in only 28 days. I create and translate articles, help other users, and never vandalize or disrupt any wiki.

I kindly request a review of this lock. I assure you that I use only one account and I always follow Wikimedia rules. If needed, I can provide any additional information.

Please reconsider the lock, as I only want to contribute constructively.

Thank you very much for your time.

Best regards, Wikivikipediya ~2025-38722-14 (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm seeing a {{tallyho}} match with a prominent sockpuppeteer in the technical data (also noting Wikivikipedia (talk · contribs · CA) popped up in my queries).
The lock stays in place as long as that doesn't change. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
FYI ticket:2025120510007629 where I suspect this same user is trying to file vague appeals. — xaosflux Talk 15:46, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I blocked them locally as they tried to edit your user page then (trying to) blank your user talk page, XXB. Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 16:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2025-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

We request that Prism-Breaker's account be locked out immediately, as Prism-Breaker's account is currently inaccessible. ~2025-40425-50 (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply