User talk:XXBlackburnXx

Unblock the user Jobinamol3456

Please unblock User Jobinamol3456 in Metawiki. We are conducting an event at AJCE Kanjirappilly. This user is participating in this event. Please unblock this user other wise this user cannot participate in a Hackathon conducted by Wikimedians of Kerala User Group. Please consider this request is very urgent. Ranjithsiji (talk) 06:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ranjithsiji: I forced their account creation on this wiki and they should be able to edit normally now. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 06:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick action Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

hi . XXBlackburnXx

There are many sites that are referenced in quotes on Wikipedia. There are many that have nothing to do with the articles. Why is my editing considered spam unconditionally? What is the exact basis? I quoted helpful or referenced articles in the same way as other edits. Now you've even blocked the sites I'm referring to, what is the exact reason and basis? Yesterday, I sent a spam link to another administrator and asked for an answer, but you couldn't answer anything and just another administrator came and treated you so unfairly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightlife_in_Bangkok

References no3 ,5 ,7

What's the difference between this quote and the quote I posted? Jkjk0914 (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, feel free to appeal at WM:SBL. That being said, your linking - despite being told by 4 different people to stop - was not the sole reason for the listing. There were also instances of block and lock evasion which ultimately led to listing. I strongly recommend reviewing the guidelines and policies on external linking, the use of reliable sources, and using multiple accounts if you wish to continue contributing. Best, XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I've never blocked or evaded lockdown. I only used 2 IDs separately in English and my native language. By what standards should I look at using external links, trusted sources? Is this link I sent you correct Wikipedia policy ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightlife_in_Bangkok

References no3 ,5 ,7

Please tell me the Wikipedia policy on this part. what is differs from that part and my editing? Do you want me to send you another link to refer to? There are links that are completely unrelated to the article. Are you witch-hunting without being able to explain why? Wouldn't I have to understand to admit my mistake and improve it? Jkjk0914 (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop engaging in POINTy behavior. It’s certainly not going to benefit you. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Isn't this Wikipedia for neutral, objective, and impartiality? You can't answer my question. You know I only do pointy action. As you can see from my editing, links to spam casinos were also quoted. I'm not going to link them anymore. The web is not even mine anyway. I'm just continuing to ask because I'm being discriminated against. Jkjk0914 (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

You replaced valid citations with links to thainight1.com, even after being warned 5 times to stop. After these warnings, you continued adding links to thainight1.com across multiple wikis. One of your accounts was recently blocked because of this.

Your actions suggest that your primary intent is to promote thainight1.com rather than to contribute meaningful content, which constitutes spam and is prohibited. Using multiple accounts to evade scrutiny is also prohibited. I explained how you can appeal the listing in my first message. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I understand that this is your 5th strike, and the fact that I kept quoting from other articles seems like advertising. Then why did you spam my edits in the first place? Is it the credibility of the source? Should the source be news or magazines? Or the period of the quoted article? If you had explained it from my first edit, I wouldn't have quoted from multiple articles, and it wouldn't have been perceived as me only trying to promote. Anyway, you can't answer the question about the difference between the link I sent and my edits. But i ignored the administrator's warning, so it seems like advertising. Jkjk0914 (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

지금 저는 차단 및 잠금 회피를 할 정도의 기술을 갖고 있지도 않습니다. 편집중에 철자가 틀리거나 혹은 아무 설명도 없이 그냥 편집을 되돌리고 스팸이라고 차단하면 저는 당연히 위키피디아 정책에 위반으로 알고 재편집을 하였을 뿐입니다. 그리고 같은 URL을 전혀 다른 기사에 추간한 적도 없으며, 각기 다른 기사에 각기 다른 내용의 인용문을 참조했습니다. 제가 앞으로라도 기여하려면 이 부분은 명확히 설명을 해주셔야 되지 않을까요 ? Jkjk0914 (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)