User talk:Xavier Dengra

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archived messages until 2014

Invitation to Met Open Access Artworks Challenge (15 May - 30 June)[edit]

We'd like to invite UNESCO participants to join a new challenge on the same model, the Met Open Access Artworks Challenge. You can contribute by illustrating with images using some of the 375k photos now under CC0, starting or improving articles (try our new Mbabel tool!), or creating translations (if your language isn't listed, please ask!). You can sign up here: Met Open Access Artworks Challenge/Participants. --Pharos (talk) 18:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template Wizard script available for testing[edit]

Hello. I'm contacting you because you voted for the Infobox Wizard in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey.

The Infobox Wizard has gotten an upgrade - it's now a Template Wizard which works for infoboxes and all other templates. The feature is being developed as an extension (which will allow for localization) but there is a prototype user script which works well.

The Wishlist Team would love it if you could take a few minutes to try the Template Wizard prototype script out and give us feedback on whether it lives up to your expectations. This feedback will help build the script into an extension. To get started, add the following to your Special:MyPage/common.js -

mw.loader.load( '' );

The Template Wizard will show up as a puzzle-piece icon in the 2010 WikiEditor. You can click on the icon to insert a template. Your thoughts are needed on whether it makes sense for the wizard to be available for all users by default or if there should be a preference for it. If it's a preference, what should the default be? Please leave your feedback here. Thank you! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 22:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SVG Translate Community wishlist survey project[edit]

Hello! Thank you for voting for the SVG Translate project that was proposed in the 2017 Wishlist survey. The Community Tech team in the Wikimedia Foundation is beginning to start their work on the project. We're currently looking for feedback on some open questions which will allow us to come up with preliminary designs for the tool. If you are interested in being involved, you can watch the project page and join in the discussions on the talk page. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and learning from your experiences. Thank you. -- NKohli (WMF), Product Manager, Community Tech (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Community Wishlist Survey[edit]


You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.

You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Extended to Dec: Wikipedia Asian Art Month with Metropolitan Museum of Art[edit]

Suzuri-bako, now in 11 languages!

I'd like to invite you to join Wikipedia Asian Art Month in the December extension of the sub-contest; if you write or translate just one article and include one of our images, you'll get a special Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard. And if you're one of the grand prize winners, you'll get a Met guidebook or Asian art publication.--Pharos (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your voting on the RfC[edit]

I had to comment your vote a bit out, as it destroyed the counting in the RfC. I've tried to use #:, |, and more such stuff, but failed to get a working syntax, that included the pictures. If you know one, please use it, or simply put those pictures somewhere under Discussion. Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 16:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sänger: Yes check.svg Solved. Danke schön! --Townie (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have edited your comments on a recent grant proposal because they are in conflict with our behavioral expectations around grant proposals. Accusations that someone is proposing a grant based on "personal lucrative" reasons was the primary reason for this action. There is no evidence this is the case, and it is not inherently problematic or concerning for people to request compensation to support movement activities that are not ordinarily done by movement volunteers. Furthermore, I also do not think it is particularly surprising or necessarily problematic to see a participant in movement strategy proposing this kind of work. In fact, having someone familiar with movement strategy and the somewhat idiosyncratic, high level language and concepts it contains is likely beneficial for the work. I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]