Jump to content

Talk:Spam blacklist

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from WM:SBL)
Latest comment: 56 minutes ago by Sàádî in topic Proposed additions
Shortcut:
WM:SPAM
SBL
The associated page is used by the MediaWiki Spam Blacklist extension, and lists regular expressions which cannot be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any Meta administrator can edit the spam blacklist; either manually or with SBHandler. For more information on what the spam blacklist is for, and the processes used here, please see Spam blacklist/About.

Proposed additions
Please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis. Spam that only affects a single project should go to that project's local blacklist. Exceptions include malicious domains and URL redirector/shortener services. Please follow this format. Reports can also be submitted through SBRequest.js. Please check back after submitting your report, there could be questions regarding your request.
Proposed removals
Please check our list of requests which repeatedly get declined. Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. Please consider whether requesting whitelisting on a specific wiki for a specific use is more appropriate - that is very often the case.
Other discussion
Troubleshooting and problems - If there is an error in the blacklist (i.e. a regex error) which is causing problems, please raise the issue here.
Discussion - Meta-discussion concerning the operation of the blacklist and related pages, and communication among the spam blacklist team.
#wikimedia-external-linksconnect - Real-time IRC chat for co-ordination of activities related to maintenance of the blacklist.
Whitelists
There is no global whitelist, so if you are seeking a whitelisting of a url at a wiki then please address such matters via use of the respective Mediawiki talk:Spam-whitelist page at that wiki, and you should consider the use of the template {{edit protected}} or its local equivalent to get attention to your edit.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment. This leaves a signature and timestamp so conversations are easier to follow.


Completed requests are marked as {{added}}/{{removed}} or {{declined}}, and are generally archived quickly. Additions and removals are logged · current log 2026/08.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 7 days.

Proposed additions

[edit]

beacons.ai/

[edit]


Extensively spammed landing-page site. A beacons.ai/foobar page is similar to a Linktree page. Linktree is blacklisted; so should this one.

As with linktr.ee, only subpages need to be blocked, hence the trailing backslash. However, the company/tool itself doesn't yet have an article on any site, only a Wikidata item (Beacons (Q117798095)), so blacklisting the entire domain is also an option.

Since the domain is added by non-spammers as well, I'm not making a decision on my own. Let's give this discussion a week or so. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Added Added NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 07:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

atmosphereswitch.com

[edit]


Spammed cross-wiki by several TAs and one named. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 22:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Added Added NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 22:51, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

mitwix.com

[edit]


Extensively spammed by many accounts across 17 wikis. The latest edit was made in March and the earliest in September 2025. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Added Added NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:05, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

888starz.co.ke

[edit]


cross-wiki gambling spam on enwiki and swwiki, see also [1]. Icodense (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Icodense: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Codename Noreste (talkcontribs) 13:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

mmcgbl.com

[edit]


Cross-wiki spam. Harry Mitchell (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@HJ Mitchell: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Codename Noreste (talkcontribs) 13:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

scand.com

[edit]


Extensively spammed on multiple wikis. Not seen for a few months but goes back years. Harry Mitchell (talk) 13:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@HJ Mitchell: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Codename Noreste (talkcontribs) 13:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

rarible.com

[edit]


Cross-wiki spam. Some may be good-ish faith but most of the ones that aren't intentional spam are junk. Harry Mitchell (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@HJ Mitchell: Added Added to Spam blacklist. – DreamRimmer 15:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

elguardiandelamusica.es

[edit]


Link spammed by at least the following accounts:

















All these accounts are sockpuppets of Claudio1098 (talk · contribs), a user that, for two years, has attempted to inflate Coldplay sales. The website was apparently created (I can't confirm) around the time the account Claudio1098 was created. This website has only 4 articles, three related to Coldplay or their albums released >20 years ago. There is no indication of who runs this website, so this persistent addition is likely related to that website. This also occurs in other Wikipedias.

...in the following English Wikipedia diffs: [2], [3], [4], [5]. Other Wikis include the Spanish and German versions. Tbhotch (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: Added Added NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 17:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

free-calculator.org

[edit]


Cross-wiki spam. Additions weren't especially recent but some of the links were long-lived (I've only just removed some of them). Harry Mitchell (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@HJ Mitchell: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Ternera (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

casssinoo.com

[edit]


casino spam by several sockpuppets on small wikis today. Icodense (talk) 11:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Icodense: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Count Count (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

mrp.com.bd

[edit]


Crosa-wiki spam. See Spamcheck. Sàádî ✉️ 17:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Sàádî: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Codename Noreste (talkcontribs) 17:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I've removed all the remaining spam links. Please double-check for any remaining links when processing requests:) 𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷기나ㅏㄴ(T/C) 18:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. It has been added to the bnwiki spam list too. Sàádî ✉️ 07:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed removals

[edit]

Archive.today

[edit]


Please reconsider this. When users using the Translation tool get blocked because an archive link is the culprit, they would not understand the reason behind blocking the domain. And if viable, shouldn't there be a possible way to whitelist those domains one at the time at all costs? At least there should be a removal because new users are getting slapped in the face and eventually head to the help desk, which can sometimes require some digging from the frequent helpers. ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

qiuwen.wiki

[edit]


(continuation of Talk:Spam blacklist/Archives/2026-05#qiuwen.wiki) There is a local consensus on zhwiki: Qiuwen Baike has nothing to do with the Wikimedia movement, which means it can't be interpreted as a "Wikimedia-related space" in the T&S employee's statement (https://w.wiki/45Kd) in the context of the WMF Global Ban Policy. Specifically, it does not claim to be part of the movement, nor is there any indication that globally banned individuals use it to participate in the movement.

Although this domain used to point to content made by the WMCUG, it was already hosting Qiuwen Baike by the time it was added to this list in January 2022. Qiuwen Baike still claims it as one of its official domains. Therefore, I believe there is no basis for keeping this domain on the global blacklist any longer. --Srapoj (talk) 02:00, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Srapoj: This was declined just a week ago, and nothing has changed since then, so the original decline reason still stands. I noticed that zhwiki has already whitelisted it locally, so there shouldn't be any issue there. – DreamRimmer 02:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have addressed your closing reason in this request. The implied background information on zhwiki is that these domains have been controlled by the same group of people throughout the time, therefore nobody took the ownership question seriously. Qiuwen Baike was under closed beta test from around 2021-10 until 2022-06, during that time it was on the qiuwen.wiki domain. Therefore I disagree with your rationale.
The whitelist you saw is an artifact of an admin's 2022 decision to implement this invented ban with an abuse filter instead. It is not too relevant here. Srapoj (talk) 02:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Troubleshooting and problems

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]