Steward requests/Bot status

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by 124.11.189.243 (talk) at 04:54, 6 February 2011 (Undo revision 2346670 by 124.11.189.243 (talk)). It may differ significantly from the current version.
For bot status on MetaWiki, see the bot policy and request page.
Shortcut:
SRB
This page hosts requests for a bot flag on a Wikimedia wiki with no bureaucrats. Please read the instructions before posting a request. Do NOT post your request here until you get community approval (ie, don't list your bot here if you haven't consulted the local wiki for at least a week, or whatever local policies dictate).

Previous requests are archived.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Instructions

Before posting here

If there is a bureaucrat on the local wiki, please ask them to fulfill your request using Special:UserRights on the relevant wiki. Before requesting access here, make sure to obtain consensus on the local wiki if there is a community (see the index of request pages). If there is no local community, request on this page with a note to that effect. You can ask local bot flag directly here for some wikis in some cases (see automatic approval).

Remember to read the local project's bot policy. This should be linked from the local bot request page; a few are listed below. DO NOT post your request here without having fulfilled the local policies first, and having waited for at least a week to gauge community opinion.

Project Languages
Wikipedia

af an ar ast az bar bat-smg bcl be be-x-old bg bn br ca ce co cs da de dv en eo es eu fa fi fr frp frr ga gl hak he hi hif ht hu hy ia id ie ig io is it iu ja ka kab km ko krc ksh ku kw lad lb lmo ln lt lv map-bms mg mhr mr ms mt myv nap nds ne nl nv oc os pdc pl ps pt rmy ro ru si sk sl so sr su sq sv szl to tr uk uz vec vi vo wo wuu yi yo zea zh zh-classical zh-min-nan zh-yue

Wikisource

en it ru vi zh

Wiktionary

af br de en es fr fy ga gd gl id is it ka ko lt ms nl no ro tr uk vo wa zh

Wikibooks

cs de en es fr fy ko zh

Wikinews

ar en es fa fr ru tr

Wikiquote

en fr it ka ru zh

Wikiversity

en fr de it el

Wikimedia

Commons Meta Wikispecies

Making a request

  1. Place the following code at the bottom of the "Bot status requests" section below: 
    ===Bot name@xxproject===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = 
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

    You can use following form when applying global bot status: 

    ===Global bot status for <yourbotname>===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~
  2. Fill in the values:
    • 'domain': the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
    • 'user name': the bot's user name (like "ExampleBot"). Leave it blank if you're requesting access for multiple bots.
    • 'discussion': a link to the local vote or discussion about the bot (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Bots#ExampleBot]]"). Notes: If there is no local vote or discussion, please say so below the template and explain why not. If there's no community, implement the standard bot policy instead.
  3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.


Global bot requests

Global bots are enabled on most wikis using the standard bot policy (see list of global bot wikis and global bot access requirements). Request will typically be left open for several days to allow comments. Please add requests at the bottom of this section.

Global bot status for ChuispastonBot

Status:    Done

ChuispastonBot is a bot written in python (pywikipedia framework) whose purpose is interwikis. It works on the toolserver. Its owner is Grimlock, and is able to discuss in french, english or spanish (one day, perhaps, in german). As it is possible to check it with the SUL tool of vvv, it has more than 40 bot flags on different wikipedias and wiktionaries and more than 150 000 edits. Grimlock 15:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Mercy 09:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Global bot status for WikitanvirBot

Status:    In progress

Hello, I am requesting global flag for my bot. Though the account was created in January 1, 2010, but It has been running since the end of October, 2010, and it's been 3 months. It did almost half a million edits on 200+ projects, and flagged on over 190+ wikis. Now, I think it can be trusted with a global flag. Thanks, for your consideration. — Tanvir • 04:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Global bot status for DEagleBot

Status:    Not done

This bot is written in python (pywikipedia framework), and mostly works with interwikis. Now bot mainly is using in lv.wp (because don't have any others flags), but future aim: to become as main bot for early Latgalian Wikipedia (now in incubator) --Dark Eagle 16:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marking as not done. Too few bot flags and edits. --Mercy 08:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of global bot status

Please see the policy for global bots for the requirements that must be met for global bot access.

General discussion on the requests for removal of global bot status below

General discussion on the requests below should continue here: Talk:Bot policy#Inactive global bots should lose their global bot status. --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:AHbot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After May 24, 2010, this bot made edits on only four wikis (is.wikipedia until June 2010, commons until August 2010, ru.wikipedia [local bot flag] and uk.wikipedia [local bot flag]).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is inactivity a reason for removal status? Does the bot status disturb you?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ahonc, I stated my reasons on Talk:Bot policy#Inactive global bots should lose their global bot status: Inactive bots (obviously) do not need a flag, and the bot flag makes them an attractive target for password crackers with the risk that linkspam or, worse, malicious (sophisticated) vandalism is not noticed for a relatively long time. So, yes, the bot flag for an inactive bot disturbs me to some extent. Of course, whenever you plan to restart your bot, I would advocate re-granting of the global bot flag to your bot. Greetings, --UV 22:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Devs have stated in the past that inactive accounts are actually safer than active ones. So there is no safety improvement involved in removing the flags. Atleast not to the extent you think there is. -Djsasso 02:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Djsasso, can you provide the proof link ? --Movses 07:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I understand en:Principle of least privilege, inactive accounts should not be or remain endowed with sysop, bureaucrat, bot or similar privileges. --UV 21:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to search, but I know its come up alot on en for example whenever discussing if inactive admins should lose their flag. Personally it doesn't matter to me either way if they are removed. I just don't think we should be removing them until we have a clear idea from the community of what constitutes inactive. To me personally I think inactive is no edits in a year. (which is what we use on simple wikipedia for admins). So when I see bots up here that have edited in the last 12 months I don't consider them inactive. Just feels like this is being done a bit hap hazard. -Djsasso 21:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:AkhtaBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

This bot last edited in 2009 and was never active on more than five wikis.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the operator of User:AkhtaBot bot, and yes, the bot is not active now, you can remove the global access. Thank you. --Bassem JARKAS 07:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rights removed. --Mercy 14:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlnoktaBOT

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to 2009.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:BodhisattvaBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After December 4, 2009, this bot made edits on only two wikis (bs.wikipedia and hr.wikipedia – bot has the local bot flag on both wikis).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChtitBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to May 16, 2010.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I stopped running my bot several months ago because of a problem with the pywikipedia framework (it automatically deleted links to edit-locked - but still accessible - projects such as simple.wikiquote, which was unacceptable on en.wikiquote). See for example this bot which was permanently banned for removing links to simple.wq. I planned on asking the pywikipedia developers to correct this but never got around to doing it. Please give me a few days to check if this has been corrected, or to ask for a fix, as wq badly needs an interwiki bot. Thanks, chtit_draco talk page 07:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I withdraw my request for removal for now. --UV 22:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have you tried -ignore:simple? This may perhaps help you. --Mercy 07:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Darkicebot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After February 13, 2010, this bot made edits on only one wiki (simple.wiktionary until July 11, 2010).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:DragonBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After August 26, 2009, this bot made edits on only five wikis (ml.wikisource, ml.wikipedia [local bot flag], ml.wiktionary [local bot flag], ru.wikipedia [local bot flag] and pms.wikipedia [local bot flag]).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request retention of Global bot status as I plan to restart the bot. --Jacob 17:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Question: When approximately do you plan to restart the bot? Is it a matter of several days, or is it rather a matter of several months? In the latter case, I would suggest that you re-apply for global bot status once you actually restart the bot. --UV 22:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In a couple of weeks. --Jacob 17:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drinibot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

This bot last edited in 2009 (exception: es.wikipedia, where the bot has the local bot flag) and was never active on more than five wikis.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:DumZiBoT

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

This bot last edited in 2009 (exception: fr.wikipedia and de.wikipedia – the bot has the local bot flag on both these wikis).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I agree. That's a safe, sound and reasonable request for an inactive bot.
Regards,
NicDumZ 15:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:EivindBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to 2008.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove this global bot flag as the bot is not operative anymore. I'm sorry for not asking for this removal at the time I quitted my bot. EivindJ 07:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rights removed. --Mercy 14:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Estirabot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to January 13, 2010.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:GnawnBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to September 25, 2009.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:MSBOT

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to September 4, 2009.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: According to User:Ladsgroup, User:Meisam (this bot's operator) has "left wiki". --UV 23:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maksim-bot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After February 13, 2010, this bot made edits on only one wiki (eo.wikipedia, where the bot has the local bot flag, until April 25, 2010).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:MelancholieBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After November 28, 2009, this bot made edits on only three wikis (als.wikipedia, de.wiktionary, and is.wiktionary – bot has the local bot flag on all three of these wikis).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:OKBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After June 6, 2009, this bot made edits on only one wiki (ar.wikipedia, where the bot has the local bot flag).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:SpaceBirdyBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to January 3, 2010.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:SpillingBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After October 18, 2009, this bot made edits on only one wiki (is.wikipedia until March 6, 2010).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:TinucherianBot II

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After December 12, 2009, this bot made edits on only three wikis (uz.wikipedia until January 10, 2010; simple.wikipedia, where it has the local bot flag, until the same date and en.wikipedia, where it has the local bot flag, until April 11, 2010).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There were some pywiki issues earlier because of which I stopped the bot since some time. Will restart the bot today. Retain the global bot status Tinucherian 01:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I withdraw my request for removal. --UV 22:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a ton Tinucherian 02:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:TuvicBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to October 10, 2008.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:VVVBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After August 6, 2008, this bot made edits on only two wikis (test.wikipedia and ru.wikipedia – bot has the local bot flag on both of these wikis).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to restart bot within one month. I am sorry I had to stop it. vvvt 11:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I withdraw my request for removal. --UV 22:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:WeggeBot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

After January 31, 2010, this bot made edits on only one wiki (da.wikipedia, where the bot has the local bot flag, until February 17, 2010).

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me. -- /Wegge 06:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rights removed. --Mercy 14:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zxabot

This bot currently is not “active” (“on several wikis”) for the purpose of maintaining interlanguage links and/or fixing double-redirects as would be required for global bot access per the policy for global bots:

The last edit of this bot dates back to September 2, 2009.

I therefore request removal of the global bot status for now. (Of course, it is possible to re-apply for bot status if the requirements are again met in the future.) --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot operator was notified here. --UV 23:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General discussion on the above requests for removal of global bot status

General discussion on the above requests should continue here: Talk:Bot policy#Inactive global bots should lose their global bot status. --UV 22:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot status requests

Please add new requests at the bottom of this section.

Bot operators making bulk requests, please consider applying for global bot status and helping implement the standard bot policy on small wikis to simplify and streamline the bulk request process.

Movses-bot@pt.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please, grant local bot status. I can't make 100 edits because it's restricted before I have bot flag. But they can't give me bot flag, because pt-wiki doesn't have bureaucrats and my request in pt-wiki can't be answered. There are some test edits of bot in pt-wiki. --Movses 04:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Movses 04:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

local policy says "You must wait for at least a week ...". You added your local request on December 12th. Merlissimo 06:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yeah. My bad. What my action in that case ? Just wait one week ? Or I must add a new request 21-dec-2010 ?--Movses 12:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That period is refered to the test fase, that takes at least a week. If the stewards allow, you may start the tests. I can check the edits localy, and say if everithing is ok, that if the stew agree. Alchimista 10:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC) (per diff)[reply]

Wait Wait 

Let's wait until the one-week test period is over. --Mercy 10:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mercy, infortunelly i was wrong. The week i was talking was referring to the test phase, which starts only after a local crat gives permission to the test edits. Only now i saw that a change was made on the bot request page, but it has no support on local policies or was decided by community. I've opened a discussion to try solve the bots approval while we have no crats. My apologies to all of you. Alchimista 13:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The term in one week has ended. --Movses 23:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I ask you to stop the bot edits for now. We are discussing some changes on our local policy after the absence of crats. If it depends on a local approval, the flag can not be given at this moment, but I think we are not too far from a definition. Sorry about it.” TeleS (T PT @ C G) 19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now bot stopped. And I will wait again :-)--Movses 20:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FiriBot@thwikiquote

Status:    In progress

Runs the Pywikipedia script for interwiki links. I couldn't find my way to the Bot Request page as it doesn't have anything in English. Thank you, Firilăcroco discuție / talk 20:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try the talk page of their main page or a central discussion page like a village pump or cafe. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FiriBot@mrwikiquote

Status:    In progress

Runs the Pywikipedia script for interwiki links. I couldn't find my way to the Bot Request page as it doesn't have anything in English. Thank you, Firilăcroco discuție / talk 20:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FiriBot@mlwikiquote

Status:    In progress

Runs the Pywikipedia script for interwiki links. Same, I couldn't find my way to the Bot Request page as it doesn't have anything in English. Thank you, Firilăcroco discuție / talk 20:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot needs to edit for at least a week or make 100 edits on mlwikiquote. Shanel 05:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For the records, it is here. This request here is fine. --Jyothis 05:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed link. Shanel 09:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Link Available here, I made the changes on Embassy page --Kiran Gopi 10:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FiriBot@hrwikiquote

Status:    In progress

Runs the Pywikipedia script for interwiki links. Wiki has no users to fulfill requests. There are requests since 2009. Thank you, Firilăcroco discuție / talk 20:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of a lower threshold of activity on a wiki that prevents the need for making a local request. Please do so; we set bot flags all the time based on unanswered local requests. Respect for local communities, however small, must be maintained; it is their choice to not answer within the week timeframe. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FiriBot@cywikiquote

Status:    In progress

Runs the Pywikipedia script for interwiki links. Page for requests is protected Thank you, Firilăcroco discuție / talk 21:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I unprotected the page. Please list your request on that page now. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikitanvirBot@pcd.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per auto approval. — Tanvir • 06:49, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki has no bureaucrat. — Tanvir • 02:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Automatic approval seems not to be allowed at the abovementioned project. If so, please kindly point us to the policy there. Thanks, -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing. There is a community portal, but no admins, no crats.. It seems maybe no one asked for granting the the standard bot policy yet. It's all up to you to granting the flag or not. :) — Tanvir • 18:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I've made a request locally, if that helps to grant the flag. — Tanvir • 09:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikitanvirBot@mrj.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per auto approval. — Tanvir • 06:49, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki has no bureaucrat. — Tanvir • 02:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Automatic approval seems not to be allowed at the abovementioned project. If so, please kindly point us to the policy there. Thanks, -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per this, there is an agreement to implement Standard bot policy, I think it can be considered as implemented (since there is no oppose after a long time). — Tanvir • 18:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikitanvirBot@koi.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per auto approval. — Tanvir • 06:49, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki has no bureaucrat. — Tanvir • 02:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Automatic approval seems not to be allowed at the abovementioned project. If so, please kindly point us to the policy there. Thanks, -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per this, automatic approval is granted. — Tanvir • 18:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done –SJ · talk | translate 03:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@hy.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ht.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@gn.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@gu.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@bh.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ce.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@dsb.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 15:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@th.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 07:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@eu.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 07:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@cy.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 15:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@ka.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 15:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mjbmrbot@rue.wikipedia

Status:    Done

-- Mjbmr Talk 20:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can not see any discussion there. -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Someone changed the location. The new location is here. — Tanvir • 18:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Tanvir, the location of discussion was changed two times ! [2] Mjbmr Talk 20:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jyothis 14:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@oc.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 12:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikitanvirBot@rue.wikipedia

Status:    Done

This wiki has no crat. — Tanvir • 07:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can not see any discussion there. -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Someone changed the location. The new location is here. — Tanvir • 18:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jyothis 14:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@an.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 07:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@tl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 07:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@hy.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 07:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@nap.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 20:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@uz.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 20:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@su.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 20:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@new.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week. --Movses 20:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shanel 04:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CompBot@ba.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

The bot made almost 300 edits in the main namespace (see this). All its deleted edits are because of marking the page for deletion (e.g wrong category names). Comp1089 12:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UPD: Above there's the link to the task list for CompBot@ba.wikipedia, that proves the community approval. Comp1089 12:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Did you make a request asking if the bot could edit? If so, could you give us a link to it? Shanel 04:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of bot status

If a specific user is abusing his/her bot status, you may request removal of the status on his account here. Please be sure to provide a short explanation on the current situation, along with links to the bot's contribution and an announcement in your community of the abuse. Previous requests are archived.

See also

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Bot_status&oldid=2346671"