Kampeni/Timu ya Bidhaa ya Shirika/Ugunduzi wa Matukio

Community Content Campaigns

• Main
• Learn How to Organize
• Connect with the Foundation Program team
• Connect with the Foundation Product team

Mradi wa ugunduzi wa matukio unalenga kuunda au kuboresha zana ambazo zinarahisisha wahariri kugundua matukio ya kampeni kwenye wiki. Tunakisia kwamba, ikiwa wahariri wengi wanaweza kukutana na kugundua uwepo wa matukio fulani, basi wahariri zaidi watajiunga na matukio na kwa hivyo kuboresha idadi ya makala kuhusu mada zenye athari kubwa. Kazi hii ni sehemu ya juhudi katika mpango wa mwaka wa 2023/2024 kushughulikia mapungufu ya maudhui kwenye Wiki.

Utangulizi kuhusu mradi & uchanganuzi wa tatizo

Je, kwa sasa kuna matatizo gani kuhusu ugunduzi wa tukio?

Katika harakati za Wikimedia, inaweza kuwa vigumu kugundua kuhusu uweo wa matukio ya kampeni. Suluhu za sasa za ukuzaji wa tukio zina angalau moja ya changamoto zifuatazo:

• Hazipatikani kwa waandaaji wote.
• Hazipatikani kwenye wiki zote.
• Hazifikii watu wengi.

Tunaamini kuwa masuala yanayohusiana na ukuzaji na ugunduzi wa tukio huleta matatizo yafuatayo:

• Matukio hupokea viwango vya chini vya ushiriki.
• Matukio hutoa michango kidogo kwenye mada zenye athari kubwa (kutokana na ushiriki mdogo).
• Washiriki na waandaaji wanaweza kuhisi kuwa na motisha ndogo (kutokana na ushiriki mdogo).
• Wahariri hukosa fursa za kujiunga na matukio yenye athari na kuungana na wahariri wengine wanaojali mada zinazofanana, na hivyo kuhisi kuunganishwa kidogo katika harakati za Wikimedia.
• Kuna uelewa mdogo kwa mapana ya kazi inayofanywa na aina za matukio yanayoundwa katika harakati kwa ujumla.

Je, ni njia zipi za sasa zinazopatikana za kukuza na kugundua matukio kwenye wiki mbalimbali?

Hivi sasa, njia kuu za kukuza na kugundua matukio ni kama ifuatavyo.

Notice Central: Hili ni bango ambalo linaoneshwa juu ya ukurasa wa wiki. Waandaaji hupata matukio yao kuoneshwa kwenye bango la Notisi Kuu kwa kutoa ombi kwenye ukurasa wa Ombi. Zaidi ya hayo, waandaaji wanahitaji kuorodhesha maombi yao kwenye Kalenda ya Notisi ya Kati. Ni wajibu wa mratibu kuhakikisha kuwa hakuna migongano na kampeni nyingine za mabango zinazolenga eneo moja na/au lugha. Maombi hukaguliwa na kampeni za mabango huwezeshwa na idadi ndogo sana ya Wasimamizi wa Notisi Kuu. Muundo wa bango mara nyingi hufanywa na wasimamizi wa Notisi Kuu pia.

• Manufaa: Notisi Kuu inaweza kugundulika kwa urahisi, kwa hivyo ni nzuri sana katika kuleta wahariri kwenye matukio makubwa ya kampeni.
• Matatizo: Notisi kuu inakuza baadhi ya matukio pekee. Idadi kubwa ya matukio hayawahi kuingia kwenye kalenda au itakuwa vigumu kusaidia kwa Notisi Kuu (yaani, matukio yanayolenga mada au jiografia mahususi). Ili kutumia Notisi kuu, waandaaji wanahitaji kuelewa mienendo tata ya kiufundi na kiharakati.

Mfano wa bango la Notisi Kuu na Islahaddow kwenye Wikimedia Commons

Mfano wa Notisi Kuu kwenye Wikisource, na Steinsplitter kwenye Wikimedia Commons

Mfano wa bango la Notisi Kuu kwenye Wikipedia, na Benoit Rochon kwenye Wikimedia Commons

MassMessage: Ikiwa mratibu ana haki ya MassMessage (ona WatumaMassMessage), anaweza kutuma ujumbe kwa wingi kwenye kurasa za majadiliano ya watumiaji kuhusu matukio yajayo. Watumiaji wengi hupokea barua pepe za kiotomatiki wanapopata ujumbe wa ukurasa wa mazungumzo, kwa hivyo wanaweza pia kutumiwa barua pepe wanapopokea ujumbe wa ukurasa wa mazungumzo.

• Manufaa: Huu ni utaratibu wa kuwafikia watu ndani na nje ya wiki mbalimbali (ikiwa wahariri wameseti kupokea barua pepe za ujumbe kwenye kurasa zao za majadiliano).
• Matatizo: Hii inafanya kazi tu kwa watu ambao tayari wanaweza kuwa "wanajua," kwa kiwango fulani, kwa sababu wamejiandikisha kwa masasisho kutoka kwa jumuiya inayoratibu kuhusu mada (yaani WikiProject, Jarida , na kadhalika). Waandaaji wanatakiwa kujumuisha utendakazi tata wa kiufundi katika mpango wao wa mawasiliano.

Mfano wa ujumbe kwenye ukurasa wa majadiliano, unaosambazwa na MassMesssage, ili kukuza tukio la Wanawake in Red July 2023

SiteNotice'ː Hili ni bango ambalo linaonyeshwa juu ya ukurasa wa wiki, na linadhibitiwa na wasimamizi wa tovuti husika.

Manufaaː Ni mchakato rahisi wa ombi kuliko CentralNotice, na mara nyingi ni rahisi kwa wasiozungumza Kiingereza kutoa maombi. Wasimamizi ni wa ndani, kitu ambacho kinaweza kuwa muhimu katika baadhi ya miktadha.

Matatizoː Hakuna ulengaji unaozingatia hadhira tofauti, na haitumiki sana katika baadhi ya wiki.

Ujumbe wa Kikanda: Hii ni ilani kwenye Special:Watchlist ukurasa wa Wikipedia ya Kiingereza kwa watumiaji walio katika eneo mahususi sawa na kimataifa MediaWiki:Watchlist-summary. Waandaaji wataorodhesha ombi kuwa na ujumbe wa kikanda.

• Manufaa: Huu unaweza kuwa mkakati madhubuti wa kuwaruhusu wahariri hai (ambao wana uwezekano mkubwa wa kuangalia orodha zao za kutazama mara kwa mara) kujua kuhusu matukio yajayo, hasa kwa edit-a-thon na matukio madogo madogo.
• Matatizo: Ipo kwenye Wikipedia ya Kiingereza pekee, na haifai kwa matukio yaliyo mtandaoni.

Mfano wa Geonotice na mwandishi asiyejulikana kwenyeWikimedia Commons

Matangazo ya ukurasa wa nyumbani: Baadhi ya wiki hutangaza matukio kwenye ukurasa wao mkuu.

• Manufaa: Inawafikia watu wengi.
• Matatizo: Huu si mkakati wa utangazaji unaofanywa na Wiki zote, na inategemea bidii za watu kutembelea mara kwa mara kwenda kwenye ukurasa wa nyumbani wa wiki husika.

Mfano wa mwito wa kuchukua hatua kwenye shindano la picha kwenye ukurasa wa nyumbani wa Wikimedia Commons, picha kwenye Wikimedia Commons

Kalenda: Kwa sasa kuna kalenda nyingi katika harakati ambazo huenda zinashughulikia matukio, lakini zinatofautiana kiasi ambacho kila moja inashughulikia. Baadhi ya kalenda hizi ni pamoja na: Kalenda katika nafasi ya majina ya mradi (kama vile Wikipedia Meetup Calendar kwa Wikipedia ya Kiingereza na Wikipedia:Editatón kwa Wikipedia ya Kihispania), Orodha ya Matukio kwenye ukurasa mkuu wa Meta-Wiki, kiungo cha Matukio kwenye Meta-Wiki, Events list kwenye Mediawiki.org, na kalenda za kimada, kama vile Kalenda ya Siku ya Kimataifa ya Wanawake.

• Manufaa: Wahariri wanaweza kupata matukio ambayo yanaweza kuwavutia (lakini ambayo bado hawayajui kiundani) kwenye kalenda za matukio.
• Matatizo: Hakuna kalenda ya matukio kuu au ya wiki ambayo inapatikana kwenye wiki, matukio mengi hayaingii kwenye kalenda, mchakato wa kuongeza matukio unaweza kutatanisha, kalenda nyingi hazifanyi hivyo. kuwa na vichungi vyovyote vya utafutaji au mifumo ya arifa/usajili.

Ukurasa wa mkutano kwenye Wikipedia ya KiingerezaWikimedia Commons

Ni chaguzi zipi za kukuza na kugundua matukio nje ya wiki?

Barua pepe: Ikiwa mtu yuko kwenye barua pepe au mail list ya mratibu au mshirika, anaweza kupokea barua pepe kuhusu tukio lijalo.

• Manufaa: Wanafikia kundi lengwa la watu ambao wana uwezekano mkubwa wa kupendezwa na kampeni.
• Matatizo: Ni rahisi kupuuza au kusahau barua pepe, na zinawafikia tu watu ambao tayari wamejijumuisha katika mawasiliano. Waandaaji wanahitajika kuelewa mtandao changamano wa orodha za usajili na hadhira ili kutumia kwa mafanikio.

Vikundi vya gumzo: Kuna vikundi mbalimbali vya gumzo kwenye Whatsapp, Signal, Facebook na majukwaa mengine ya nje ya wiki ambayo huleta pamoja Wanawikimedia. Vikundi hivi vya gumzo vinaweza pia kuwa mahali pa kutangaza matukio:

• Manufaa: Wanafikia kikundi cha watu walengwa ambao wana uwezekano mkubwa wa kupendezwa na tukio.
• Matatizo: Hainasi watu ambao tayari hawako kwenye kikundi, na ni rahisi kusoma ujumbe na kisha kusahau kabisa kuhusu tukio hilo.

Utangazaji kupitia mitandao ya kijamii: Waandaaji wa matukio wanaweza kutangaza kwenye majukwaa ya nje ya mitandao ya kijamii.

• Manufaa: Hii inaweza kusaidia kuleta wageni ambao tayari hawapo kwenye wiki mbalimbali, au inaweza kusaidia kuwagusa ambao wanaweza kuvutiwa na tukio lakini hawajafanikiwa kutia sahihi.
• Matatizo: Njia hii inaweza isiwe na ufanisi sana. Data yetu ya [1] inaonyesha kwamba mitandao ya kijamii ni injini ndogo ya kuwavuta watu kwa kuangalia kurasa za tukio. Mawasiliano ya mitandao ya kijamii kutoka kwa washirika na programu zingine huwa ya kujiimarisha, kuwasiliana tu kati ya vikundi vilivyopo vya Wikimedia na sio kufikia hadhira mpya.

'Kalenda za waratibu wa nje ya wiki (kama vile Kalenda ya Diff, Kalenda ya Sanaa+ya Ufeministi):

• Manufaa: Wanaweza kuonekana vizuri na wanaweza kuwa na mtaalamu anayelipwa ambaye anayezitunza kikamilifu, kwa hivyo zinaweza kuwa katika hali nzuri kwa ujumla.
• Matatizo: Haziko kwenye wiki, kwa hivyo huwa hazichukui aina nyingi za shughuli. Kwa kuwa nje ya wiki na nje ya mfumo mkubwa wa ikolojia wa harakati, mwonekano wa kazi unapotea kwa wachangiaji wengine wa harakati, haswa miongoni mwa watu wanaochangia kwenye Wiki mbalimbali pekee.

Kifuatacho?

Kama hatua inayofuata, tunataka kusikia kutoka kwako! Tunataka kujua jinsi watu kwa sasa wanavyopata (au hawapati!) matukio kwenye wiki, na tunataka kujua jinsi tunavyoweza kurahisisha watu kupata matukio yanayowavutia. Mara tu tunapopokea maoni zaidi kutoka kwa watu, tutafanya muhtasari wa matokeo yetu na kushirikisha hatua zetu zinazofuata zinazopendekezwa. Kwa sasa, tunawaalika nyote kujibu maswali yaliyo hapa chini, ambayo yatakuwa muhimu katika kutusaidia kuelewa tunachoweza kufanya ili kurekebisha tatizo.

Baada ya kujibu maswali yetu (tazama hapa chini), tunakualika pia kuhudhuria saa zetu za ofisi mnamo Oktoba 7 na/au Oktoba 10 ili kujadili mradi huu na timu!

Maswali huria

1. Je, unajuaje kuhusu matukio ya kampeni ya Wikimedia? Kwa mfano: mabango, orodha za barua pepe, kurasa za mazungumzo, mitandao ya kijamii, n.k.
2. Je, unafikiri ni rahisi kupata matukio yote ya kampeni yanayokuvutia? Kwa nini ndiyo au kwa nini hapana?
3. Kimtazamo, ungependa kusikia nini kuhusu matukio ya kampeni?
4. Je, huwa unaamuaje kuhusu matukio yapi uhudhurie?
5. Je, umewahi kukosa tukio kwa sababu hukusikia kuhusu tukio hilo kwa wakati?
6. Unakumbukaje kuhudhuria hafla ulizojiandikisha?
7. Je, kuna kitu kingine chochote ungependa kuongeza?

Tushirikishe maoni yako kwenye ukurasa wa majadiliano ya mradi!

Sasisho za hali

April 16, 2024

In the last few months, we conducted an experiment to learn more about Event Invitations. We have now wrapped up the experiment, so we would like to now share our findings and next steps.

First, what was the experiment?

We created a model to generate an Invitation List (see T353459 and score calculation documentation). The Invitation List had two main parts: a list of editors to potentially invite, and a score assigned to each editor (i.e., high, medium, or low recommendation on whether to invite them to an event). The editors were identified because they had contributed to specific Wikipedia articles in the last three years. The score was determined based on the number of bytes they had contributed to the article(s), the number of edits they made to the article(s), their overall edit count on the wikis, and how recently they had edited on the wikis.

We decided to conduct a light-weight experiment to determine the usefulness of Event Invitations. This way, we could learn if Event Invitations were effective in bringing new audiences to events. We also wanted to learn what people liked, what they didn’t like, and what could be improved about the tool. With this information, we could make an informed decision about next steps, including whether or not to continue with the project.

Here’s how the experiment worked: We reached out to event organizers who were conducting events between December 2023 and March 2024. We collected the worklists of their events. From these worklists, we generated Invitation Lists (see T357007), which we shared with the organizers. The Invitation Lists did not display the scores, but we indicated if editors received higher scores or lower scores. Then the organizers made their own judgment calls about who to invite. The invitations were sent via talk page messages or wikimail tools such as massenmail. Then, the organizers shared data with us on who they invited, and we compared their finalized Invitation Lists with their registration lists.

To provide support, we held a 4-session office hour training. The first office hour introduced the project, the second office hour provided training on generating and sharing worklists (see some of the worklists shared), the third office hour provided training in sending out invitations via wikimail, and the final office hour focused on collecting user feedback on the tool.

What were the results & learnings?

First, we learned that organizers were interested in testing out the tool. We conducted a survey of organizers in the early stages of the project, and when we asked if they would be interested in testing out Event Invitations, we received the following results:

• 32 respondents said “Yes”
• 1 respondent said “No”
• 7 respondents provided no answer

Then, we launched the experiment, and had the following rates of participation:

• We worked with 19 different events to generate 20 Invitation Lists.
  • One event focused on 2 wikis, so it received 2 lists.
  • Note that 1 of the Invitation Lists (in December 2023) used an older model, and the remaining 19 (between January and March 2024) used an improved new model.

• 12 processes were completed, meaning the invitations were sent and we could compare invitation data to their registration list.
• 7 organizers did not complete the process (i.e., no invitations were sent or not all necessary data was shared with the team). This did not surprise us, since sending invitations and reporting on the invitation data is currently a labor-intensive process.

We were also able to learn what we wanted to learn through the experiment, which was: Do some editors respond to Event Invitations and join events—and, if yes, at what rates? Here is what we found (see T357827):

• 338 editors total were invited to 12 different events
• Of the invited editors, 42 of the invited editors registered for the events
• While this breaks down to 12.43% of the invited editors joining the events, there is large variation in the results from each event. Here is a breakdown of the performance of these 12 events:

Event	Total number of editors invited	Total number of invitees who registered
Event 1	18	14
Event 2	14	2
Event 3	8	1
Event 4	10	1
Event 5	40	5
Event 6	49	1
Event 7	58	1
Event 8	29	2
Event 9	10	1
Event 10	47	11
Event 11	22	0
Event 12	22	3

As displayed in the table above, some events had higher success rates and some had lower success rates with Event Invitations.

• The events with the highest success rates tended to have event pages with images, clear objectives, and clear timelines of the event.
• The events with lower success rates tended to have basic event pages, without images and/or clear objectives or timelines of the event.

On the qualitative side, when we talked to organizers who used Event Invitations, we generally heard positive feedback and interest in using the tool again for future events. Organizers told us that the tool provided an automated way of doing work that they previously did manually or did not have the time or resources to do at all. However, there were also requests for improving the experience, including:

• More information on the editors in the Invitation List
  • Such as: links to their user page, their edit count
  • We also heard requests to share more sensitive information on the editors, including their gender and location
• An easier way to send mass emails to invite editors
• A way for editors to opt out of receiving invitations

We also learned about some general user behaviors when using Event Invitations, such as:

• Organizers did not invite everyone from the Invitation Lists. They made their own judgment calls about who to invite.
• There was no one invitation method chosen by all organizers. Some organizers emailed invitations, some organizers used talk page messages, and some used a combination of methods.
• Some people in the Invitation Lists were already in the community contact lists of the organizers or were the organizers themselves. Some organizers also received their Invitation Lists after the event had started, so they found that some people on the Invitation Lists had already joined their events. For these reasons, the organizers did not invite these editors. This wasn’t necessarily a bad thing, since it indicated that the tool was identifying editors with interest in the event.

What are next steps?

We believe that Event Invitations could be a useful tool for event organizers who want to identify audiences to invite to their events, provided those events focus on Wikipedia articles. This is for two primary reasons:

• The quantitative data showed promise: The 12.43% average rate demonstrates that the tool can help identify some editors who are interested in attending editing events. Furthermore, we plan to incrementally improve the scoring model over time (see T358526 for early ideas), which could make registration rates in a similar test or experiment potentially higher in the future.
• The qualitative feedback generally showed interest in the tool among organizers, who said that they would like to test out the tool and/or use the tool again in the future

However, there is some potential sensitivity around the usage of the tool, since it allows organizers to generate lists of editors who edit certain articles (which could be articles on controversial or sensitive topics). For these reasons, we think it makes sense for Wikipedia communities to decide whether or not they want Event Invitations, if they have the CampaignEvents extension enabled.

Furthermore, we think it makes sense for usage of Event Invitations to be restricted to only those who are trusted to use it, which can be users with the Event Organizer right (which is controlled by local wiki admins). For example, here is the documentation of how the right is handled on Meta-Wiki. This way, we can empower organizers to have new ways of reaching audiences for their events, while also giving local admins the power to assess if and how such tooling is appropriate for their wiki communities.

Note that the CampaignEvents extension is currently only available on Meta-Wiki, but we are planning to begin releasing it on some Wikipedia wikis soon. Once it is enabled on Wikipedia wikis, we can engage with those communities to see if they are interested in enabling Event Invitations, when it is ready for general usage.

As next steps, we will develop some designs of how a simple version of Event Invitations can look. You can follow this work in T361029. We will share these designs on this project page and ask for feedback when they are ready. After we have collected feedback on the designs, we will start building the first early version of Event Invitations, in collaboration with the communities and organizers who are interested in the tool.

So, please do let us know what you think of our experiment, findings, and next steps. Do you think Event Invitations could be a useful tool for organizers? How can we potentially improve it? Please share your feedback on our talk page!

Novemba 27, 2023ː Jaribio la Mialiko ya Tukio

Habari nyote! Tunafurahi kuwashirikisheni sasisho kuhusu mradi huu. Kwanza, tumeamua eneo la kwanza la kuanza nalo ni: Mialiko ya Tukio.

Kwa Mialiko ya Matukio, tunataka kusaidia waandaaji wa hafla kufikia hadhira mpya ya wahariri ambao wanaweza kupendezwa na hafla zao. Kwa njia hii, tunafikiri kuwa watu zaidi wanaweza kujiandikisha kwa matukio na kutoa michango yenye matokeo. Ili kufanya hivyo, tunapanga kutengeneza Orodha ya Mwaliko, ambayo ni orodha ya wahariri ambao mratibu anaweza kuwaalika. Orodha ya Mialiko inaweza kutegemea baadhi ya vigezo kama vifuatavyo:

• Kuvutiwa na eneo la mada: Tunaweza kuchagua wahariri ambao wametoa mchango mkubwa (kwa mfano, idadi fulani ya chini ya baiti) ndani ya muda fulani (kwa mfano, ndani ya miaka 2 iliyopita) kwa angalau moja ya makala zinazofanyiwa kazi wakati wa hafla hiyo. Vinginevyo, tunaweza pia kuchagua wahariri ambao wanatazama ukurasa kwa muda usiojulikana ambao uko kwenye orodha ya kazi ya mwandaaji wa tukio.
• Shughuli ya karibuni ya uhariri: Kutoka kwa kikundi hiki, tunaweza kuchagua wahariri ambao wamefanya angalau hariri moja ambayo haijarejeshwa kwenye wiki katika siku 90 zilizopita, kama mfano.
• Historia yenye tija ya uhariri: Kutoka kwa kikundi hiki, tunaweza kuchagua wahariri ambao wamefanya idadi fulani ya chini zaidi ya michango (kwa mfano, mabadiliko 500 ambayo hayajarejeshwa) kwenye mradi wa tukio, kama mfano.

Kwa orodha hii, mratibu anaweza kuchagua kuwaalika wahariri kwenye tukio. Mbinu ya mwaliko bado haijabainishwa, lakini tunaweza kuwa na waandaaji kutumia mbinu za mawasiliano ambazo tayari zinapatikana kwao kama jaribio la kwanza (kama vile ujumbe wa ukurasa wa mazungumzo au wikimail). Matarajio ni kwamba kwa kuwa kikundi hiki cha wahariri walioalikwa kina tija, amilifu, na kina uwezekano wa kuvutiwa na mada mahususi ya tukio, baadhi ya wahariri walioalikwa wanaweza kutaka kujiunga na tukio.

Ili kutathmini kama Mialiko ya Matukio ni muhimu, tutakuwa tukiuliza maswali kama vile:

• Ni asilimia ngapi ya wahariri walioalikwa wanajiandikisha kwa matukio?
• Ni asilimia ngapi ya wahariri walioalikwa hutoa michango yoyote wakati wa tukio?
• Ni asilimia ngapi ya wahariri walioalikwa hutoa michango mikubwa wakati wa tukio?
• Je, waandaaji wana maoni gani kuhusu Orodha ya Mialiko? Je, wanaona kuwa ni muhimu? Kwa nini ndiyo au kwa nini hapana? Je, watatumia tena orodha ya Mialiko ya Tukio kusaidia kutangaza matukio yao?

Kwa taarifa hii, tutaamua ni hatua gani zinazofuata tutakazozichukua. Tukiona matokeo mazuri, tunaweza kuendelea kuchunguza Mialiko ya Tukio. Kwa mfano, tunaweza kuchunguza jinsi tunavyoweza kuboresha miundombinu ya mawasiliano inayopatikana kwa waandaaji, ili iwe rahisi kwao kutuma ujumbe kwa wahariri walioalikwa moja kwa moja. Tunaweza pia kuangalia jinsi tunavyoweza kuunda zana ya jumla kwa waandaaji, ambayo inaweza kuwa na njia za washiriki kujiondoa kwenye mialiko ya tukio (kwa ujumla au kutoka kwa mwandaaji fulani). Vinginevyo, ikiwa hatuoni matokeo yenye manufaa, tunaweza kuchagua kuendeleza mradi tofauti kabisa na mradi wa Ugunduzi wa Tukio.

Timu ya wahandisi imeanza kuchunguza jinsi tunavyoweza kutengeneza Orodha ya Mialiko. Unaweza kuangalia ubao wetu wa Event-Discovery kwenye Phabricator ili kuona baadhi ya kazi ambazo tutakuwa tukifanya sasa na siku zijazo.

Kwa sasa, ikiwa ungependa kujiunga nasi katika jaribio kama mwandaaji wa tukio, tafadhali wasiliana nasi! Tunataka kuungana na waandaaji ambao watakuwa wakitengeneza matukio ya kampeni mwaka wa 2024 ambao wangependa kualika watazamaji wapya kwenye matukio yao. Ikiwa wewe ni mmoja wao, tafadhali tembelea kwenye ukurasa wetu wa Majadiliano au katika kikundi chetu cha mazungumzo kwa waandaaji wa matukio.

Hatimaye, ikiwa una maoni yoyote kuhusu wazo la Mialiko ya Tukio, tafadhali yashirikishe kwenye ukurasa wa majadiliano!