Content Partnerships Hub/Software

Content Partnerships Hub

Improving the Wikimedia movement’s work with content partners

Software

Software
Description Supports key Wikimedia tools, ensuring sustainable maintenance, development, and affiliate collaboration.
↓
How to participate Talk with us!
Current agenda: TBA

The Software project supports Wikimedia content partnership tools (ISA Tool, OpenRefine, Pattypan), ensuring sustainability, maintenance, and development, while engaging affiliates to strengthen technical capacity and collaboration.

Description

Wikimedians and their partners rely upon many custom pieces of software (tools) that are crucial for effective content partnerships. Such tools take care of different aspects of the content partnerships process, including:

large scale (mass/batch) uploads – batch uploading media files to Wikimedia Commons or data to Wikidata
using, enriching and improving content on Wikimedia projects – for instance via campaigns or crowdsourcing/tagging
reporting – statistics of the impact of content partnerships, for instance the number of views that images have received.

See the list of tools that are currently on the (general) radar of the Content Partnerships Hub.

Many of these tools are created and maintained by volunteer developers in the Wikimedia movement. Sometimes, these tools are not actively maintained and improved. Sometimes new developments in the Wikimedia movement create a need for new features or even entirely new tools (for instance: tools that support Structured Data on Commons, which was deployed for the first time in 2019).

Projects

The project has enlisted key software tools supporting Wikimedia content partnerships, such as ISA Tool, OpenRefine, and Pattypan, highlighting their roles in batch uploads, data cleaning, and media contributions, emphasizing the need for sustainable maintenance, development, and community involvement to ensure long-term usability and impact across Wikimedia projects.

Development

2022-2023
Log

When	What	More info
December 2022 – January 2023	Content partnerships tool survey (77 responses by Wikimedians and staff of partner organizations)	Report / summary of the survey
September 15, 2022	Workshop at European GLAMwiki Coordinators meeting in Prague: What are the must-know tools? And which ones are most important for everyone?	Etherpad that shows which affiliates use which tools + which tools people think should be prioritized / backup on Google Drive
September 6, 2022		On-wiki version / Add your feedback
August 13, 2022	Wikimania group discussion: Volunteer developers and improving content partnership software in the Wikimedia environment	More info about this session / recording / Etherpad notes
June 9, 2022	Blog post: Assisting strategically important tools for content partnerships	Blog post on WMSE blog
Late 2021 – February 2022	Improvements to the Pattypan batch upload tool	More about the hub's work with Pattypan.
August 2021 – April 2022	Various updates to the ISA Tool	More about the hub's work with the ISA tool
June 2021 – October 2022	Supporting OpenRefine's development process (Wikimedia Commons / Structured Data on Commons batch editing and uploading)	More about the hub's work with OpenRefine

2021-2022 Early work
In 2021 and 2022, the hub has started contributing hands-on developer time and general advice to several existing developer communities and teams: the ISA Tool, OpenRefine and Pattypan. See the log in the table below for more info. Sometimes new developments in the Wikimedia movement create a need for new features, or even entirely new tools. The hub also wants to investigate how these can be put into place and supported. Some examples are listed in a subpage of tools and functionalities on the radar for possible future support. In order to help Wikimedians and their partners work on effective partnerships, the content partnerships hub is experimenting with ways to improve sustainable support and maintenance of these tools. For this purpose, the hub wants to initiate and facilitate movement-wide conversations in 2022, that focus on various aspects of this task, including but not limited to: Which tools and functionalities should be prioritized? What are the core needs of Wikimedians, GLAMs and other content partners? How do these needs differ around the world? How will the Wikimedia movement make decisions on further prioritization? Which governance processes can we put into place so that these decisions are made on a well-argumented and equitable basis? How will the Wikimedia movement financially support the necessary development and maintenance of key content partnerships software? Who will work on improving and maintaining the tools? What is the role of tool owners, software partners, volunteer and paid developers and potentially decentralized teams? What kind of support is needed and useful? This work on tools is closely related to necessary work on end-user documentation, support and training. These are covered in the capacity building and helpdesk parts of the content partnerships hub.