Meta:Requests for adminship/Dferg

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Dferg

RESULT: Promoted. es:Drini 17:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to all for participating. —Dferg (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

It keeps surprising me Dferg is not an admin. He is very active on RC patrol and the anti-spam pages, and is one of the more active editors around here. He's also a bureaucrat on Spanish Wikipedia and is trusted. Majorly ^talk 13:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I accept the nomination - edit conflict with Anonymous Dissident —Dferg (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Majorly ^talk 13:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Uh, has Dferg been notified about this? —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per nom., Dferg is helpful, active and trustworthy. Finn Rindahl 13:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• indeed --Melos 13:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per Majorly. --Erwin 14:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 15:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 15:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support good choice (& of course should do the same on Commons :)) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good Option :) Weclome to the admin band , keep up your good works --Mardetanha ^talk 17:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support great interactions with the user! He will do just fine here on Meta. --Kanonkas 17:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Cbrown1023 talk 18:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support — str4nd ⇌ 18:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - reviewed his contribs last night. Active, helpful, and experienced. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Az1568 (talk) 08:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Great user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 12:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Marbot 12:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Lucien leGrey ( m · es ) 17:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 17:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Thogo (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Huib talk 18:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --OosWesThoesBes 18:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support MBisanz ^talk 01:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
• support, of course! :) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thoughtful and active on cross-wiki spam issues. I'm sure he will use the tools with care. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} (en: U, T) 11:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Meno25 08:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support sure --FiliP × 10:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yep, have no problems with this user becoming an administrator here. This user has been doing good work and the contributions for this user are fine. Cheers, Razorflame 17:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support –Juliancolton ^(talk) 22:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Positive contributor, already trusted on another project, thanks for helping out in this added capacity. Cirt (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I gave him my support on es.wiki when I nominated him and gave him the flag. --Góngora _(T•ES) 23:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• Comment I'd like to make a personal request. If this request succeed, please, let Drini promote me. I've talked to him yesterday and he agreed to do so. Thanks. —Dferg (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
• Support Daniel (talk) 13:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)