This language has been verified as eligible. The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
Once the criteria are met, the language committee can proceed with the approval, will verify the test project content with a reliable neutral source, such as a professor or expert and notify the Board of Trustees for a possible veto.
If you think the criteria are met, but the project is still waiting for approval, feel free to notify the committee and ask them to consider its approval.
A committee member provided the following comment:
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikisource talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
Apparently there is a large collection of Qing Dynasty resources in Manchu language, like according to http://www.xuehuile.com/thesis/17bed6acbb1b49b68f7aba5a195117fe.html and http://www.zgdazxw.com.cn/news/2015-03/19/content_91310.htm there're more than 2 million Manchu language file exist in China alone. I've also read that studying Manchu-language-based material have already become a new trend in Qing Dynasty study. Personally I don't know the language nor was I into Qing study, but I think it'd be suitable for the establishment of Manchu wikisource to host existing Manchu resources. On the ither hand, there's quite a few obstacles exist that need to be resolved before such a wikisource project can success, like 1. many of these resources exist only in their physical form, which mean people must go to those museum/library/archive to copy them down to wikisource, 2. Even if some resources have been digitized, some might not be available via internet, and even if they are, most of them exist in image form, so manual copying would still be required, and 3. To copy those text manually from physical/image form, which require peopke who actually know the language to do so. According to one of the previously linked webpage there are <50 researchers in China know Manchu language and this amount of Manchu-user is subpar to other nations, so there're quite a few researchers around the world who could read Manchu text but then how to let them help with wikisource is another question.
C933103 (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Support, even if there won’t ever be a Manchu Wikipedia, a Manchu Wikisource is definitely a must. There’s an extensive body of works in the Manchu language created during the Qing Dynasty and many major treaties of the Qing Dynasty were also written in Manchu. I do suggest that we should use both the Manchu script and Latin script (Möllendorff/Moellendorff, preferably) with the Manchu script being used predominantly and the Möllendorff romanization only being used as a point of reference for those unfamiliar with the vertical script. --Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 😒🌏🔒) (My global unlock 😄🌏🔓) 10:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Strong support --Assoc (talk) 08:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
I personally do Support this proposal. In Ching/Qing Dynasty, there were thousands of thousands of archive written by Manchu, and till now, none of the Wikisource do support to put those insides. It is a massive regret if the emperors' edict could not be kept in the Wikisource. --だ☆ぜ𓋹 謹此敬上 09:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)