Discuss the creation of this language project on this page. Votes will be ignored when judging the proposal. Please provide arguments or reasons and be prepared to defend them (see the Language proposal policy).
Ensure the requested language is sufficiently unique that it could not exist on a more general wiki.
Ensure that there are a sufficient number of native editors of that language to merit an edition in that language.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikivoyage talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin").
Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
Belarusian is the official language of Belarus, a country in Eastern Europe. There's a vibrant Belarusian-speaking Wiki community represented by the two Belarusian Wikipedias (one using the official orthography, and the other Taraškievica) and some other Wiki projects. In my opinion, Wikivoyage seems to be an appopriate extension to the Belarusian-speaking Wiki world which is yet to be created and developed. --Zariecki (talk) 03:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Support. Althouth this section is not called "voting", I'll give my voice in favor. I will definitely support the project with my contributions. However I have at least two concerns. First is that the strength of the community is not enough for the wikivoyage in Belarusian language to develop consistently. Second is the existence of two spelling varieties of Belarusian. This might be a problem. --Jarash 21:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)