Điều khoản Sử dụng/Creative Commons 4.0/Những câu hỏi thường gặp

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0/FAQ and the translation is 39% complete.
Other languages:
Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎suomi • ‎русский • ‎العربية • ‎हिन्दी • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Nâng cấp lên giấy phép Creative Commons 4.0

Những câu hỏi thường gặp

(Help with translations!)

Việc này sẽ ảnh hưởng như thế nào tới Wikipedia?

Nội dung trên Wikipedia vẫn sẽ là nội dung mở với yêu cầu ghi công và chia sẻ tương tự. Nội dung trên Wikipedia vẫn sẽ tương thích với giấy phép phiên bản 3.0, ngoài ra việc nâng cấp này sẽ cho phép những nội dung được bổ sung sau này được phát hành dưới phiên bản 4.0 của giấy phép. Những người sử dụng nội dung từ Wikipedia vẫn sẽ phải ghi công như miêu tả trong Điều khoản Sử dụng của Wikimedia.

Có gì khác biệt giữa Creative Commons 3.0 với 4.0 ?

The license will continue to have the same basic requirements—providing appropriate credit and distribute remixes under the same license.

In the legal note, we highlight some of the most important differences for Wikimedia, including new official translations, increased readability, a revised description of the attribution requirement, an opportunity to correct license violations, and more. Creative Commons has also published a comparison of the changes in the license.

Làm thế nào chúng ta có thể "nâng cấp" giấy phép?

If we choose to amend the Terms of Use, the 4.0 version of the license will apply to new edits submitted to Wikimedia projects. After a page has been edited, it can be reused under the latest version of the license according to the attribution requirements in the Terms of Use. Revisions of pages before the upgrade to the 4.0 version will continue to be available under the version 3.0 of the license.

Có phải phiên bản 3.0 có sẵn trong các ngôn ngữ khác?

CC BY-SA 3.0 did not have official translations of the unported license text, although it had translated license deeds and a number of international ports. The ported versions of CC BY-SA 3.0 were substantially similar to each other, but included some legal modifications to reflect the local jurisdiction. Creative Commons' new license translation policy will allow them to set official translations of the version 4.0 license. CC BY-SA 4.0 International is intended to be legally effective everywhere.

How will this affect English Wikinews and other projects that don't currently use CC BY-SA 3.0?

English Wikinews may upgrade to CC BY 4.0 International, without adopting the version 3.0 of the license. Projects may continue to opt-out of the default license where appropriate.

Làm sao để thứ này có ảnh hưởng đến Wikidata (khi hiện tại đang sử dụng CC0)?

Wikidata will continue to use CC0 for contributions, which will make it easy to add and share factual data on the project.

Why do the proposed amendment to the terms of use mention sui generis database rights?

CC BY-SA 4.0 International includes new requirements for database rights, in jurisdictions where those rights exist. To avoid introducing new ambiguity around the requirements for factual contributions of data sets, which may be covered by database rights in certain jurisdictions, we've proposed waiving these rights under the license. This is outlined in more detail in the legal note.

Tôi có thể sử dụng phiên bản 4.0 để đóng góp hỉnh ảnh hay các thứ phi văn bản không?

Yes! You can upload media to Wikimedia Commons under the 4.0 version of the license.

Why does Wikipedia use a "sharealike" license like CC BY-SA?

The sharealike clause in the CC BY-SA license helps promote the values of free culture. It asks users to continue to share their improvements and modifications to works that are offered to them freely under the Creative Commons license.

If the license were just CC BY (without a sharealike clause), people would be able to use content from the Wikimedia projects for any purpose, but if they made changes, they could put those changes under additional copyright restrictions and forbid others to use them. The ideal is to make the world's knowledge available for everyone, and using a license that makes sure contributions to that knowledge remain available for everyone helps work toward that goal.

When deciding which license to use, the Wikimedia community for the most part chose CC BY-SA instead of BY because the CC BY-SA license helps promote the values of free culture, as described in Creative Commons's statement of intent for the attribution-sharealike licenses. For historical reasons, the CC BY-SA license was also chosen for its compatibility with Wikipedia's previous GNU Free Document License. Some other projects, such as English Wikinews, choose to use the use the CC BY license.