使用條款/創用CC 4.0/常見問題
| 創作共用 4.0升級 |
常見問題
這會如何影響維基百科？
維基百科將會繼續於創用條款下使用並免費混創。此升級將不會影響普通人的使用，因為此升級只是包括更多內容的授權
創用CC 3.0與4.0之間的差異為何？
兩者的基本授權時一樣的：賦予適當的標注及於同一個條款中繼續混創。
In the legal note, we highlight some of the most important differences for Wikimedia, including new official translations, increased readability, a revised description of the attribution requirement, an opportunity to correct license violations, and more. Creative Commons has also published a comparison of the changes in the license.
我們會如何「升級」授權條款？
如果社群同意更改授權條款，4.0版本將會使用在新的編輯中。在所有頁面更新後，根據使用條款，將會更新至4.0。所有在4.0版本升級前的頁面修訂將會繼續以3.0的條款提供。
3.0版本的授權是否在其他語言中能夠看到？
CC BY-SA 3.0 did not have official translations of the unported license text, although it had translated license deeds and a number of international ports. The ported versions of CC BY-SA 3.0 were substantially similar to each other, but included some legal modifications to reflect the local jurisdiction. Creative Commons' new license translation policy will allow them to set official translations of the version 4.0 license. CC BY-SA 4.0 International is intended to be legally effective everywhere.
這將會怎樣影響中文維基新聞及其他現時不是使用CC BY-SA 3.0的維基計劃？
中文維基新聞可能將升級到CC BY 4.0國際版，而跳過3.0版授權條款。如有需要，計劃可以繼續指定預設條款。
這回怎樣影響維基數據？（現時使用CC0）
維基數據將繼續使用CC0用於貢獻，這將使其更容易加入并分享事實資料至專案。
Why do the proposed amendment to the terms of use mention sui generis database rights?
CC BY-SA 4.0 International includes new requirements for database rights, in jurisdictions where those rights exist. To avoid introducing new ambiguity around the requirements for factual contributions of data sets, which may be covered by database rights in certain jurisdictions, we've proposed waiving these rights under the license. This is outlined in more detail in the legal note.
我可以使用4.0版用於圖片及其他非文字貢獻么？
是的！您可以上傳媒體至維基共享資源，依據4.0版本授權。
The sharealike clause in the CC BY-SA license helps promote the values of free culture. It asks users to continue to share their improvements and modifications to works that are offered to them freely under the Creative Commons license.
If the license were just CC BY (without a sharealike clause), people would be able to use content from the Wikimedia projects for any purpose, but if they made changes, they could put those changes under additional copyright restrictions and forbid others to use them. The ideal is to make the world's knowledge available for everyone, and using a license that makes sure contributions to that knowledge remain available for everyone helps work toward that goal.
When deciding which license to use, the Wikimedia community for the most part chose CC BY-SA instead of BY because the CC BY-SA license helps promote the values of free culture, as described in Creative Commons's statement of intent for the attribution-sharealike licenses. For historical reasons, the CC BY-SA license was also chosen for its compatibility with Wikipedia's previous GNU Free Document License. Some other projects, such as English Wikinews, choose to use the use the CC BY license.