User talk:Ankry

Witamy na Meta!

Cześć Ankry, witaj w projekcie Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ta strona została stworzona do koordynacji i dyskusji nad wszystkimi projektami Fundacji Wikimedia. Proszę Cię o przeczytanie naszych zasad. Jeżeli chcesz się zająć tłumaczeniem stron, odwiedź Meta:Babylon. Możesz również zostawić notkę na stronie Meta:Babel, Wikimedia Forum (proszę jednak, abyś najpierw przeczytał instrukcje na górze tej strony). Jeżeli będziesz potrzebował pomocy, zostaw komentarz na mojej stronie dyskusji. Miłego edytowania! --Bugoslav 03:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Hi,

You’re getting this message because you participated in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey and we want to make sure you don't miss it this year – or at least can make the conscious choice to ignore if it you want to. The 2015 survey decided what the Community Tech team should work on during 2016. It was also the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and work by other developers. You can see the status of wishes from the 2015 wishlist at 2015 Community Wishlist Survey/Results.

The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey is now open for wishes. You can create proposals until November 20. You will be able to vote on which wishes you think are best or most important between November 28 and December 12. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: job queue and email notifications

Re your question on #wikimedia-tech, email notifications fall in the group of highest priority jobs and are usually executed within few minutes, in the worst case a couple hours. If not, something is wrong. Was this your concern? --Nemo 13:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

No. It was just my guess. Now, I hope the current phab:T151196 problem diagnostic by Matmarex & Joe goes in right way. Ankry (talk) 14:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please be more careful...

Hello, Ankry. Although your efforts to help with the election are certainly appreciated, please leave adding requests to the check page to the bot. Your addition here included a duplicate template (I have already been checked previously on the list). Additionally, I noticed this seemingly accidental duplicate addition. Although I appreciate your willingness to maintain pages, your attempt here filed a duplicate vote. I have merged the votes (by the same non-eligible user) to resolve the aforementioned issue. Please be more mindful moving forward. --JustBerry (talk) 07:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Vote twice

Sorry!. I will vote only once, but I've changed the vote.--Agremon (talk) 20:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• I'd made it. Thank you!--Agremon (talk) 20:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

MUltiple task

Dear Ankry/ Dzien dobry

I looking for help to proceed with OTRS to confirm copyright of photos related to a scientific Prize and deletion of an article from English wikipeda. An editor nominated our article for deletion; he published another article with contradictory facts related to one laureate of the Prize. Requested scientific Referee Report will indicate that the editor published unacceptable scientific ideas, wrong historical data, and many other gross errors. Our article was prepared by a team of students and teachers experts in the field. Students used University shared IP during winter semester 2017-2018. Surprisingly, we were accussed of sockpuppetry. An experienced wiki editor can readily nominate article for deletion using 'strange' arguments which are simply, let say, frankly, 'funny' from the scientific point of view. Since we are not experts in wikipedia I am looking for a wiki expert who is able to communicate in English and Polish.

Sytuacja jest skomplikowana i poszukujemy pomocy oraz zapewne prostych wyjaśnień w języku polskim ponieważ musimy podjąć działania w których nie mamy żadnego doświadczenia. Edytor, skrytykował nasz artykuł kwestionując oczywiste dla naukowców i studentów fakty. W naszej ocenie, edytor ten nie posiada dogłębnej wiedzy w ramach omawianej dziedziny nauki (inżynieria materiałowa i fizyka). Odkryliśmy również, że ten właśnie edytor opublikował w kwietniu 2018 swój artykuł 'Warren P. Mason', który jest w paru punktach całkowicie sprzeczny z naszym artykułem. Edytor kwestionuje łatwe do udowodnienia fakty, a jego tekst zawiera kilkanaście bardzo poważnych blędów merytorycznych. Z analizy jego tekstu można łatwo wywnioskować, że nie jest on ekspertem z omawianej dziedziny (może byc wynajętym writerem). Nasz zespół (10 studentów pod opieką naukowców) jest bezradny w walce z takim edytorem, który szybko potrafił spowodować zablokowanie naszych kont, usunięcie zdjęć i artykułu. Chcemy podjąć następujące działania: (1) odzyskać poprzez Commons:OTRS jednego zdjecia Gold Medal, którym został nagrodzony m.in. pierwszy Polak w 2017 roku (Zdjęcie to jest wykorzystane również w 10 wersjach językowych naszego artykułu), (2) odzyskanie 23 zdjęć laureatów Nagrody od 1965 do 2017 roku, (3) opublikowanie w wikipedia Referee Report na temat artykułu edytora oraz (4) odzyskanie i poprawienie artykułu (dodanie nieużytych referencji, które okazały się ważne). Opublikowanie Referee Raportu wykaże, że ten edytor powinien być wręcz zawieszony w działaniach na rzecz wikipedi. Poprawność jego tekstu jest zapewne zgodna z wymaganiami technicznymi wikipedia, ale zawiera kardynalne błędy. Z kolei nasz artykuł zapewne zawiera wiele niedociągnięć edytorskich, które można łatwo usunąć, ale pod wzgledem merytorycznym nasz artykuł jest na najwyższym profesjonalnym poziomie. Wersja niemiecka naszego artykułu została skrupulatnie sprawdzona i poprawiona przez edytorów z niemieckiej wersji wikipedia. Musze zaznaczyć, że studenci używali podobne IP uniwersytetu i z tego wzgledu zostalismy zablokowani jako 'socks' (dopiero teraz poznaliśmy dokładne znaczenie tego słowa). Czy dobrze adresuję swoją prosbę? Czy możliwym jest uzyskanie fachowej pomocy w walce z nierzetelnym edytorem (native speaker). Czy możliwym jest nawiązanie kontaktu przez e-mail? aby podać szczegóły. Czy mogę wysłać odwołanie do OTRS w języku polskim? Będziemy wdzięczni za jakiekolwiek wskazówki i pomoc. Pozdrawiamy OmegaMS

@OmegaMS: OTRS nie służy do rozstrzygania sporów. Jedynym sposobem rozstrzygania sporów jest merytoryczna publiczna dyskusja na stronach dyskusji Wikipedii. Do OTRS mogą ewentualnie autorzy opublikowanych już materiałów przysłać zgodę na wykorzystanie tych materiałów na wolnej licencji umożliwiającej ich wykorzystanie np. w Wikipedii (jeśli takiej zgody nie da się udzielić w miejscu oryginalnej publikacji, bo np. była to już wydana publikacja papierowa). Ankry (talk) 04:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Translation admin

Done :). Matiia (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The Community Wishlist Survey

Hi,

You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.

You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

The Affiliate-selected Board seats process welcomes your support

Hello. You are receiving this message because you are active in the field of translations <3 The movement needs you! The Nominations phase has started for the ongoing selection process of two Board members, and the timeline is quite tight.

A Translation Central is available to help translators figure out what's been covered and what's left to do. Over the course of the next few weeks, your attention on candidates' profiles is particularly welcome.

While there are four languages that are especially relevant for multiple affiliates (namely Arabic, French, Russian and Spanish), you can also add others. If you can't help: please see if you know anyone in your circle who could, and spread the word :) Thank you! Elitre (WMF) and Facilitators of ASBS 2019, 13:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Not lo.ws

In your remark: "They can be deleted from lo.ws if you find this appropriate", you meant "lo.wp". Your meaning is clear from the context, but I thought you might want to fix that. [grin] - dcljr (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The Research team could use your help

Hello. You are receiving this message because of your recent activity in the Translations namespace.

The Wikimedia Research team is developing a new algorithm that automatically recommends sections for editors to add to articles. Translations have already occurred for some of the few languages that we are testing in, except for Spanish and Russian. If you have some time in the next few days, please consider translating the short message (only 6 items) we aim to send out soon, in one or both of these languages. (And if you feel like you want to support your tester peers even more, you can do so by taking care of the related instructions page.)

Thank you! Jonathan Morgan & Diego Saez-Trumper, Wikimedia Foundation Research - 18:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Polish Wikisource event

Hi Ankry, can you remind me when the Polish Wikisource event is going to be? Thanks, Nemo 13:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@Nemo bis: it is planned 19-20 October in Warsaw. Ankry (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Hi there, translator! Here's a little token of appreciation for a recent effort you contributed to. Surprised? Well, the best is yet to come.

• We'd love to send you this badge as an actual sticker. If you want, you can use this Google Form to communicate your address so we can ship it to you. Note that we will close the form on October 13, 2019, and all data will be removed shortly afterwards. Details about this external site are provided at the top of the form.
• We also have this badge waiting for you on Wikimedia Space. You can use the form linked above to let us know what your username is on this brand new hub, so that you can get the award there as well. If you don't have an account yet, just go ahead and enjoy joining via Wikimedia login in just a few clicks. (And in case you hadn't heard yet, you can join the community of translators there as well).

Again, thanks for everything you are doing to make this movement a better (and multilingual!) place: please do not hesitate to reach out if you have questions, and I hope to hear from you soon. --Elitre (WMF), 13:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2020

Hello!

You are getting this message because you've previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey, in either the Wikisource or Wiktionary categories. I wanted to let you know that this year's survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until November 11. Unlike previous years, we are only accepting proposals for non-Wikipedia content projects with no dedicated teams (i.e., Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversity, Wikispecies, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews). You can learn more on the survey page.

You can vote on proposals from November 20 to December 2. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won't send out a separate reminder to you about that. We look forward to your participation. Thank you! IFried (WMF) (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Regarding MassMessage sender

Granted. Thank you for volunteering! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2019 - Section Name in Diff

Hello!

The Community Tech team (WMF) has officially started the project for Section Name in Diff, the #9 wish from the 2019 Community Wishlist Survey!

You previously voted for this wish, so we are now contacting you. We invite you to visit the project page, where you can read a project analysis and share your feedback.

We hope to see you on the project talk page, and thank you in advance!

-- IFried (WMF), 14:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021: Invitation

The 2021 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on 30 November, or comment on other proposals to help make them better. The communities will vote on the proposals between 8 December and 21 December.

The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

18:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021

We invite all registered users to vote on the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. You can vote from now until 21 December for as many different wishes as you want.

In the Survey, wishes for new and improved tools for experienced editors are collected. After the voting, we will do our best to grant your wishes. We will start with the most popular ones.

We, the Community Tech, are one of the Wikimedia Foundation teams. We create and improve editing and wiki moderation tools. What we work on is decided based on results of the Community Wishlist Survey. Once a year, you can submit wishes. After two weeks, you can vote on the ones that you're most interested in. Next, we choose wishes from the survey to work on. Some of the wishes may be granted by volunteer developers or other teams.

We are waiting for your votes. Thank you!

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

16:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

UCoC: ich wersja plwiki a en- i meta

Ahoj, Ankry,

Jestem na plwikiwakacjach (zgodnie z deklaracją sprzed miesiąca) i rzadko tam zaglądam klikając interwiki z Commons, meta czy es-, fr- etc. wik (gdy np. klawiatura całkiem mnie zaświerzbi :), ale komentując przed chwilą w plwiki słuszną propozycję stosowania poprawnych cudzysłowów, zauważyłem i twoje: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Zasady#c-Ankry-2021-08-21T11%3A27%3A00.000Z-dyskusja.

FYI, dwa dni temu sporządziłem byłem obszerniejszą listę uwag o PZP, ale szybko ją z plKawiarenki usunąłem, gdyż:

A. Przypomniałem sobie poniewczasie, żem na tych plwikiwakacjach.

B. Uwagi może zbyt kontrowersyjne: Nadzik by doświadczył deja vu.

C. Tak jak i ty uważam, że to sprawa meta, a nie poszczególnych projektów. (O samych PZP/UCoC sądzę o wiele, wiele więcej, patrz mój plprofil czy dyskusje w plKawiarence, mniej więcej 2021-02, ale kwestię pomińmy: mniej więcej to, co enwikowcy, szczególnie admini-wyjadacze znający sztuczki LTA).

D. Przeczytałem potem "diabeł tkwi w szczegółach", czyli nowe głosy w enwiki, prowadzące do wersjihttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Enforcement_draft_guidelines_review z ich dodatkowymi Enforcement draft guidelines review itp.

Ukłony, Zezen (talk) 12:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to ratify the Wikimedia Movement Charter

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously voted in the 2021 Movement Charter Drafting Committee (MCDC) election.

This is a reminder that if you have not voted yet on the ratification of the final Wikimedia Movement Charter draft, please do so by July 9, 2024 at 23:59 UTC.

You can read the final text of the Wikimedia Movement Charter in your language. Following that, check on whether you are eligible to vote. If you are eligible, cast your vote on SecurePoll.

On behalf of the Charter Electoral Commission,

RamzyM (WMF) 15:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)