Jump to content

User talk:Fifelfoo

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

I reply wherever the conversation started. If you do the "talk back" replying method, you'll find that the conversation gets disjointed with me.

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Fifelfoo, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing! Tempodivalse [talk] 00:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Diffs of edits in violation of consensus on en., with explanations and outcomes[edit]

Diffs of edits in violation of consensus on en., with explanations and outcomes
Time Diff Problem Discussion Cause Outcome
03:13 diff Non-steward edit (vandal reverted) at meta User unaware of Steward only editing Resolved, user now made aware of need to not conduct non-steward edits
11:56 diff Non-steward edit (improved content) at meta Unaware of powers, SOPA block specifics Resolved, user now aware of powers, need to not conduct non-steward edits
07:38 diff Non-steward edit (improved content linkages) at meta Manual timezone calculation plus editor doesn't use java Resolved, user aware of need to not conduct non-steward edits
06:12 This edit summary: "06:12 . . Nyttend (Talk contribs) changed event visibility of "(Deletion log)": hid username for 1 event (Is it possible to do RevDel when Wikipedia is engaging in blatant WP:POINT violations?)" Editorialising edit summary without right of reply at meta At en. At en. AN
05:30 diff Non-steward edit (reverted vandalism) at meta Vandalism immediately prior to close, revert requested Resolved, counselled

Tentative analysis: two minor incompetence errors with a probable third (and we're all incompetent sometimes), plus one error of judgement in editorialising at an inappropriate moment. This is a fairly good outcome for a "picket line." All other edits so far appear to be essential maintenance, appropriate WMF blackout connected, or user space tinkering. Fifelfoo 00:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

More over, all of these edits would otherwise be "legitimate," if the encyclopaedia were open to general editing. None were problematic edits by themselves, but only became problematic due to the context of the blackout and site lock. Numerous other Steward edits occurred within the ambit of Steward edits that would be appropriate at any time (copyright, legal, etc.) Fifelfoo 01:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fuller discussion of this table is occurring at en. AN now that it is open to normal user editing. Fifelfoo 05:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply