Jump to content

User talk:OTAVIO1981

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Peteforsyth in topic Superprotect letter update

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta!


Hello OTAVIO1981, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

- Ottava Rima (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply



Só para avisar que esatarei trabalhando ao longo do dia nisso e amanhã. :) Depois responso lá! Abraços, --Tom (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply



Desculpe. Não percebi que estávamos na minha talk page e respondi por lá mesmo. Pelo que me falaram, achava que tinha sido concluído. Era a pesquisa feita pela Daniela Feijó. E tem essa também. Era para ter apresentado métodos de resolução de disputas e políticas? Não sei mesmo. Sei que chegaram a essas sugestões: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Portuguese_Wikipedia_trends_and_behavior/Suggestions

Estou tentanto trazer outras páginas que li ao longo dos meses. Mas se for confundir mais do que ajudar, podemos tirar. --Oona (WMF) (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Entendi. Estou mais tranquila nessa e na próxima semana, sim. Pode marcar. Quarta-feira é um bom dia pra você?--Oona (WMF) (talk) 19:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

PAC da Wikipédia


Gostei do nome, haha! --Ezalvarenga (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lista dos verbetes essenciais


Obrigada! Muito útil isso. Principalmente para o Wikipédia na Universidade, não acha?--Oona (WMF) (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Google Doodle


Just saw your results from the Google Doodle banner – you're using the {{under construction}} banner, right? I suspect that most readers don't notice cleanup templates or things that look like cleanup templates, because they're everywhere on Wikipedia and are probably causing some amount of banner blindness.

Did you see the Tamil banner project? I don't know how the pt.wiki folks would feel about sticking their faces on banners :) but it's something to think about. After all, there's a reason we use them for fundraising: they work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Aprendizados


Oi, Otavio. São esses pontos, sim (supondo que o segundo link seria esse). Aqui está a apresentação com alguns pontos que destaquei sobre a Wikipédia e como andava a primeira fase do piloto. Dei ênfase na questão dos 1. direitos autorais (mencionei os cados em que estudantes simplesmente copiavam trechos dos livros), 2. citação em linha (nesse ponto acho importante destacar a diferença entre a natureza de uma enciclopédia tradicional e a Wikipédia) e 3. imparcialidade.

Também contei o que ocorreu quando deixam as atividades no wiki para o final do semestre, ocorrendo o risco de termos verbetes parados em páginas de teste, após ter explicado rapidamente o que era uma página de teste, explicando a importância de ter claro um cronograma das atividades no wiki. --Ezalvarenga (talk) 11:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rollbackers call to arms


Hello, if you want I can use Global message delivery to quickly send a message to all pt.wiki rollbackers reminding them there's an increased need of help with RC patrolling and something is better than nothing. A couple lines are enough I guess, you can write them and the bot delivers them. --Nemo 18:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Participation Support Program survey


Hello, the Wikimedia Foundation would like your feedback on the Participation Support Program! We have created a brief survey to help us better understand your experience participating in the program and how we can improve for the future. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you submitted or commented on Participation Support requests in the past.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback! And we hope to see you in the Participation Support Program again soon.

Happy editing,

Siko and Haitham, Grantmaking, Wikimedia Foundation.

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 21:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar and a request for feedback

Individual Engagement Grant Barnstar
Thank you for commenting on Individual Engagement Grant proposals during this recent round! We really appreciate that you took the time to share your thoughts.

To help us improve the IEG program for future participants, would you mind taking this quick 3-question survey?

Thanks again for your help,

--Siko and Haitham, Wikimedia Foundation Grantmaking

Superprotect letter update


Hi OTAVIO1981,

Along with more hundreds of others, you recently signed Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer, which I wrote.

Today, we have 562 signatures here on Meta, and another 61 on change.org, for a total of 623 signatures. Volunteers have fully translated it into 16 languages, and begun other translations. This far exceeds my most optimistic hopes about how many might sign the letter -- I would have been pleased to gain 200 siguatures -- but new signatures continue to come.

I believe this is a significant moment for Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Very rarely have I seen large numbers of people from multiple language and project communities speak with a unified voice. As I understand it, we are unified in a desire for the Wikimedia Foundation to respect -- in actions, in addition to words -- the will of the community who has built the Wikimedia projects for the benefit of all humanity. I strongly believe it is possible to innovate and improve our software tools, together with the Wikimedia Foundation. But substantial changes are necessary in order for us to work together smoothly and productively. I believe this letter identifies important actions that will strongly support those changes.

Have you been discussing these issues in your local community? If so, I think we would all appreciate an update (on the letter's talk page) about how those discussions have gone, and what people are saying. If not, please be bold and start a discussoin on your Village Pump, or in any other venue your project uses -- and then leave a summary of what kind of response you get on the letter's talk page.

Finally, what do you think is the right time, and the right way, to deliver this letter? We could set a date, or establish a threshold of signatures. I have some ideas, but am open to suggestions.

Thank you for your engagement on this issue, and please stay in touch. -Pete F (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply