User talk:Odder

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives: 1

Tech News[edit]

FYI [1] --Nemo 07:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Nemo bis: Entirely predictable and yet a still bit disappointing. I predict Tech News will transform into a one-way method of communication, and then slowly die, just as Wikimedia Quarto and others had done before. odder (talk) 11:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

You're awesome[edit]

Thanks for taking care of this, and a zillion other community requests. You are wonderful. --Ori Livneh (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, @Ori. It feels very nice to be appreciated. odder (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

European trade mark[edit]

Things are moving a bit it seems, incidentally the same day when the Reda report is going to be voted. --Nemo 10:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, @Nemo —¸this is all very interesting. odder (talk) 19:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

translation adminship[edit]

Hello, I have granted you the right. Enjoy. Matanya (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

WMF promises[edit]

QED: phabricator:T44894. --Nemo 18:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the link, @Federico. I fear I can't form an informed opinion on this at the moment due to lack of any hard data (of the kind you were able to provide with regards to the Portuguese Wikipedia), but in general I would say this is a pretty bad solution to a rather solvable problem. On the other hand, we're again here seeing an issue of a small wiki community not being able to manage huge amounts of spam and bad faith edits that are affecting their wiki and having a very negative effect on their ability to improve their projects — and that's hugely saddening to witness happen over and over again. odder (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
To be precise, there is no indication that there are huge or unusual amounts of anything. It seems the community mostly wanted to force a couple persons to register in order to educate them better. --Nemo 19:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

What is your point[edit]

Hoi, I fail to see your point. What we have is tldr. It does not do what is expected to do. I provide you with an argument why and you are not courteous in that way. Thank you for failing to understand what is needed. GerardM (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

What future IdeaLab campaigns would you like to see?[edit]

IdeaLab logo dark orange.png

Hi there,

I’m Jethro, and I’m seeking your help in deciding topics for new IdeaLab campaigns that could be run starting next year. These campaigns aim to bring in proposals and solutions from communities that address a need or problem in Wikimedia projects. I'm interested in hearing your preferences and ideas for campaign topics!

Here’s how to participate:

Take care,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 03:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Future IdeaLab Campaigns results[edit]

IdeaLab badge 1.png

Last December, I invited you to help determine future ideaLab campaigns by submitting and voting on different possible topics. I'm happy to announce the results of your participation, and encourage you to review them and our next steps for implementing those campaigns this year. Thank you to everyone who volunteered time to participate and submit ideas.

With great thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 23:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

I didn't participate, though. odder (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

ASBS - Question to Christophe[edit]

Hey Odder, I hope you're fine. Just so you know I just answered your question on the talk page. Happy to follow-up :) Schiste (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Should FuzzyBot remove all potentially outdated translations?[edit]

Hello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations?. Nemo (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)