Stewards/elections 2006-2: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Eraser (talk | contribs)
11 edits
Line 526: Line 526:
#[[:en:User:NSLE|NSLE]] <sub>([[:en:User talk:NSLE|T]]+[[:en:Special:Contributions/NSLE|C]])</sub> 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
#[[:en:User:NSLE|NSLE]] <sub>([[:en:User talk:NSLE|T]]+[[:en:Special:Contributions/NSLE|C]])</sub> 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Eraser|Eraser]] 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Eraser|Eraser]] 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Precender|Precender]] 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


; No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
; No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対

Revision as of 06:23, 28 November 2006

==Candidates==


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[1], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[2], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[3], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[4], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[5], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Candidates


Bastique (Cary Bass)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. stv ✉ 08:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Nick1915 12:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andrea.gf 13:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Korg + + 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bastique 19:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mskyrider 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Nous 19:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Delamorena 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ugur Basak 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Cruccone 00:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Since we're both from tr.wiki, you may think that i'm advertising, but i'm gonna be pretty honest about his qualities a person and a wikimedian. He is the most devoted Wikimedian i've seen yet and i've seen noone more (including myself) loyal to the wikiphilosophy than him. He sticks to it so much, he becomes even annoying time to time. He cares for the small projects, watches out for them and as an organizer (yet another word for sysop) he always tries to resolve the disputes, instead of slapping both sides and telling them not do repeat it. He has done more than enough for meta and cross-project relations. Although there are wonderful candidates, i strongly believe that giving him the job is a right thing to do.--Vito Genovese 15:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nerval 16:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -Tembelejderha 22:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. (:Julien:) 00:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Baylan 06:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Nosferatü 09:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Mont 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. While I trust his abilities, I feel he is too new for the job. Any steward candidate should have more experience on the much larger wikis as well as commons to taste interwiki affairs which is what stewardship is all about. He has neither. --Cat out 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Drini

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lar 01:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fmaunier 09:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Grimlock 13:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Danntm 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. With experience on two larger wikis (en, es) as well as commons I feel he is more than qualified to be a steward. --Cat out 17:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bastique 19:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zscout370 19:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tawker 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Cruccone 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Rory096 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Zephyrus 18:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Prevert 19:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Mahadeva 12:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. guillom 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --85.85.67.189 20:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Jorgechp 21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. A bit too prone to controversy, but I can't bring myself to oppose. AmiDaniel 01:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Effe iets anders

Effeietsanders / Maletwasanderes / Fojeioalia / Unefoisautrechose / Efkeswatoars / Efkeswatoars / Evegetaanders / foretøyeblikknoeannet / chwilowocośinnego / Altcevadeastădată / натренутакнештодруго / Unratoalgodistinto / företögonblicknåt


Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Helland 10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Nick1915 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Active on muiltiple larger wikis as well as commons, I am confortable supporting this candidate. --Cat out 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M/ 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Siebrand 21:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. .Koen 22:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cruccone 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Shanel 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 03:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Troefkaart 04:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Terence Ong 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. the wub "?!" 12:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Emmelie 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) ;)[reply]
  34. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Willemo 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Effe is a trustful user and a friend. Don't forget to pay me with a stroopwafel for this vote... guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Erwin85 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Londenp 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC), hoewel ik niet weet of het goed voor je is, vergeet niet te studeren.[reply]
  43. Adnergje 16:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC), of course![reply]
No / Non / Nein / Nee / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Neutraal / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not totally sure about amount of experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

guillom (Guillaume Paumier)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I do not understand the opposes, I have been told perhaps they are people who hold a grudge over an RfA vote, or some vandalism reversion, or something similar. I think oppose votes should if possible give some reason so that the candidate can improve, or at least understand the issues... Lar 19:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Failed RfAs and one was desysop'd by Ant following a feud w/ guillom. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You'd better saying nothing than such things. I personally asked Ant to desysop me because of personal attacks aimed at me, which you were not unknown (ie mostly responsible for), and this had absolutely nothing to see with guillom. Manchot ☺ 17:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This assertions are incredible. Once again, an user from WP fr dares to give this type of biasful interpretation of a vote against a appliance. I strongly suggest him (because it's not the first time I can see that) to go down to read his friend comment on my vote, which is unacceptable. You can not assume that an user does not agree with your point of view. For my own case, you can see that I support the Darkoneko appliance ... And he has voted against my appliance on WP fr. You should think about it before writing such thing. Grimlock 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry for this export of our sad fr:wikipedian practices ;D Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah people love seeing Frenchmen argue over and over. Mudslinging is fun and it's a traditional french practice (and no one would want to ruin such a tradition). (:Julien:)
  4. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. —Pill δ 11:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Andrea.gf 13:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kipmaster 13:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lots of interwiki experience, good candidate. Also, likes Sunday cartoons! :) --Cat out 18:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yann 19:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bastique 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. M/ 19:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Fabexplosive 19:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bayo 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Excellent Moez 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wart Dark 13:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Phe 16:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Messire Hephgé 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  28. Good work on meta: and on fr:. Mmenal 21:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active Wikimedia-wide and familiar with communities and rules. (:Julien:) 00:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bib 06:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Aphaia 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Korg + + 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sebmol 17:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. He's been very helpful with a lot of cross-project issues, and sensitive to the need for quick assistance on smaller projects. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 17:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. JWSurf 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cruccone 20:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alvaro 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fmaunier 13:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Leoman3000 13:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Tooby 14:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EyOne 13:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Manchot ☺ 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lar (Larry Pieniazek)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hoopydink 01:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --FloNight 07:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Benon 08:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Grimlock 13:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tangotango 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gurch 15:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Manchot ☺ 16:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Guinnog 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Dakota 17:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Danntm 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Beign an admin on en.wikipedia as well as commons, the community of communities, user more than qualifies for stewardship. --Cat out 18:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zscout370 19:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Connel MacKenzie 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Shanel 00:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmiDaniel 01:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Tarawneh 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mailer Diablo 04:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Terence Ong 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I've got 2 very good reasons to vote for you, and you know them. guillom 19:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yessir. You'd do good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bryan 18:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Of course drini ☎ 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Doc glasgow 04:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Sorry. Bishonen 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could certainly be trusted but I'm not sure about meta experience. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aphaia 08:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M7 (Mario Benvenuti)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. FloNight 07:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hellisp 11:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jollyroger 11:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Nick1915 12:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Filnik 12:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Andrea.gf 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Leoman3000 13:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Civvi 13:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Olando 13:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Valepert 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Tooby 14:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Iardo 14:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Tangotango 14:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PullToOpen 16:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 16:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Korg + + 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- bs (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Danntm 17:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mamamia! Foundation work, meta work and it.wikipedia work. More than qualified. --Cat out 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bastique 19:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. of course! Helios89 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes! --Fabexplosive 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Grande M7 Alexander VIII 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tawker 21:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Connel MacKenzie 21:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cruccone 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Rory096 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AmiDaniel 01:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Kal-El drop me a line! 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Terence Ong 05:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. the wub "?!" 12:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Gvf 12:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mailer Diablo 13:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. EyOne 13:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Very good meta sysop. I trust him. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sbisolo 17:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. [[:it:Utente:.mau.|.mau. <font size=" +1">[[:it:Discussioni utente:.mau.| &#x2709;]]</font>]] 08:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Berto 09:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Jacopo86 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Sannita 13:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

MaxSem (Max Semenik)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Obersachse 07:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --DmRodionov 08:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Croaker 09:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MaxiMaxiMax 09:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fmaunier 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Barnaul 12:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Edward Chernenko 11:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HungerGhost 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rombik 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC) (also known as ru:User:Rombik, en:User:Rombik)[reply]
  15. —Pill δ 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Andrea.gf 13:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Vladimir Volokhonsky 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uuu87 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Iskin 16:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Look at block log of Russian Wiki for users who are against MaxSem: Poa, Dart evader, Nevermind, Иваныч, MountainBlueAllah(ГорныйСинийАллах), SA ru (Smartass) AndyVolykhov. 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. The oppose votes aren't convincing Jaranda | wat's sup 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Greenvert 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. MaxSem is one of the most useful sysops of ruWiki. We need at least one native Russian-speaking steward. Altes 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Azh7 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. APL 20:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AKA MBG 20:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --ajvol 20:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Valodzka 22:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. Не знаю, имею ли я голосовать, но на моих пользовательских страничках тут и на ру-вики стоят взаимные ссылки.--Nikolay Kolpakov 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. CodeMonk 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wulfson 07:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC) As far as I can see, many of the current votes against MaxSem come from RuWP users that at one time or another happened to break certain rules and received a warning or were blocked by MaxSem, who acted in his capacity as sysop and was supported in his actions by the overwhelming majority of the RuWP sysop community.[reply]
    Overwhelming being an apt term. Well put, Wulfson. But perhaps the Wikimedia Foundation would not like to see one of their stewards trying to overwhelm his or her opponents every so often, and in a habitual manner of the RuWP sysop community, too. --Dart evader 08:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm glad to see, dear Dart, that you happen to be able to make yourself understood here without using as many obscenities as you were apt to do in RuWP before you were blocked indefinitely for a second time within a year. Oh yes, I recall - it was MaxSem that did it. Perhaps this is the true reason for your activity. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, yes, of course. My true reason is not worse than yours. Tell me: why, oh why would the RuWP sysop community so fervently desire to make one of their own a Wikimedia steward? I daresay I know the answer: a pocket steward, with his absolute IP-checking abilities, is an ideal weapon for tracking down opponents, and, perhaps, even pursuing them, legally or illegally. I can remember that you, Wulfson, personally threatened to find some user at his home and, perhaps, punish him somehow. I can even remember the word винтовка (a rifle) having been blurted. Dart evader 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true Wulfson is well-known as check-user who makes checking without any reason ) If RuWiki sysop's gang will have a pocket steward then RuWiki will be branch of KGB-FSB :-) Nevermind 22:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The picture that Wulfson is trying to paint is misleading. According to the Arbitration Committee judgement, MaxSem clearly violated the rules by blocking a user for one week without any reasonable justification. Wulfson himself and user Codemonk (see above) were recently pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for violating the privacy policy. In addition, Wulfson, Codemonk, MaxSem and Andyvolykhov are the fans of "Spartak", so they always vote for each other. SA ru 05:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Applause. Sorry I didn't catch your first name - but the last time I recall anyone accusing me for being a fan of the same team with anyone else it was someone known in RuWP by the name of Smartass. The similarity is too obvious. As for being pronounced guilty by the Arbitration Committee for anything, that's a lie, intended for people who are not aware of what is actually going on. Produce a diff or take back your words. Wulfson 17:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Wulfson, there is no need for guessing his name. Look at his personal page. He is Smartass, and he makes no secret of that. Dart evader 21:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yms 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Dennis Myts (117) 12:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trustful user. Good sysops have enemies, so I see the contra votes as an evidence of MaxSem's good work. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- Acf 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. changing my vote from neutral to yes since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺ 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Eraser 06:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Precender 06:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Serebr 11:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is not to be trusted with stewardship. --Dart evader 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unrestrained, rough, suppresses heterodoxy. --Egor 16:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Иваныч 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose. This guy cannot be trusted. SA ru 17:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Strong oppose. I don't trust this guy. Семенникам вообще доверять нельзя ) Nevermind 18:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. While he seems to have an impressive amount of contribution in a smaller wiki (ru.wikipedia) and here on meta, I do not see a lot of experience in commons or any of the larger wikis. --Cat out 18:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. For sure, no, regarding his role in persecution of free Siberian Wikipedia --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --A1 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong oppose, user has done many unconstructive actions at ruwiki as admin, he can't stand NPOV, didn't grow up enough to be a steward. MountainBlueAllah 20:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account was blocked by MaxSem, see also AstroNomer-ru below, who is apparently a sockpuppet of him. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Strong oppose, user is not to be trusted--Ottorahn 20:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    To make things clearer, User:Ottorahn is a "Siberian" wiki activist too (see the vote page). --Yms 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. This candidate does not understand/follow nature and spirit of the project.--Poa 00:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose. While I don't think that this guy clearly breaks rules or spirit or something else, I have strong impression that many of his actions are not well thought over before done. That's why his activities often raise disputes and protests, even though I'm sure he has good intentions in most cases. I wouldn't want person of this kind to be a steward, sorry Maxim. AstroNomer-ru 10:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This account is apparently a sockpuppet of already voted above MountainBlueAllah, blocked by MaxSem. MaxiMaxiMax 05:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not true. I of course agree to be checked if needed. AstroNomer-ru 11:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC) changing my vote since it seems that there are some abusing votes against him (cf. this comment) Manchot ☺[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 20:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 22:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Terence Ong 05:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mailer Diablo 13:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC) for now. I heard him busy directly from him recently. Stewardship is better to go to those who are always around there. I would like to know if something new happened since then and he thought he would be frequently available or situations don't change so much.[reply]
    stassats 14:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) mistakenly placed vote here. stassats 14:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kaganer 17:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mzlla

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[6], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Yes / Kyllä / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Helland 10:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jollyroger 11:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Nick1915 12:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Tigru 12:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Manchot ☺ 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Korg + + 17:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bastique 19:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. M/ 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cruccone 00:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Civvi 08:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Icepenguin 12:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Connel MacKenzie 18:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Smart people caring about the projects and not about their ego tend to be rare. guillom 19:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --TeVe 21:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Ei / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. No visible experience on any of the larger wikis, some meta experience, but too early for stewardship. --Cat out 18:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Per Cool Cat —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Tyhjä / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. Benon 08:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. FloNight 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 09:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kipmaster 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Dart evader 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Korg + + 17:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Danntm 17:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Somewhat weaker support. I wish he had more commons experience, but I guess OTRS should compensate. Great deal of experience in larger wikis and sister projects. --Cat out 18:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bastique 19:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yann 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. M/ 19:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Tawker 21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Support[reply]
  33. --Rory096 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Shanel 00:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. AmiDaniel 01:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Terence Ong 05:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. the wub "?!" 12:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Nice and friendly guy. Would never abuse his powers.--Vito Genovese 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Krzysiu Jarzyna 15:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Very good sysop. Trustful and willing to help. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. VIGNERON 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bib 06:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Tohru 00:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Redux

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hoopydink 01:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. FloNight 07:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Obersachse 07:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Paginazero - Ø 09:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fmaunier 09:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. —Pill δ 12:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Grimlock 13:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Iardo 14:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Petr K 15:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Manchot ☺ 16:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alphax 17:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Korg + + 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Danntm 18:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Already a defacto steward with that much access and experience. :) --Cat out 18:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 18:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Helios89 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Zscout370 19:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. M/ 19:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Rory096 00:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cruccone 00:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Terence Ong 05:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. AmiDaniel 11:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. the wub "?!" 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aphaia 17:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bryan 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Connel MacKenzie 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC) En.wiki duties are diluted by the enormous number of others there with flags. Language count makes Redux a natural shoo-in for stewardship.[reply]
  46. --Taichi - (あ！) 22:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Doc glasgow 04:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对
  1. Aphaia 11:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)OMG, I placed my signature in a wrong place ...[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

# Looking at the current responsibilities of this user, I think adding stewardship would be way over the top. No one can sustain that many requests from all over, without burning out. --Connel MacKenzie 21:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel (Shanel Kalicharan)

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Benn Newman 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lar 01:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pschemp 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tangotango 05:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Naconkantari 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. FloNight 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Benon 08:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stv ✉ 08:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Helland 10:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Grimlock 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gurch 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Dakota 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Korg + + 17:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Danntm 17:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Although I have a few reservations (not a whole lot of interwiki experience), I feel she'd be a good battery to the steward system. --Cat out 17:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bastique 19:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yann 19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M/ 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tawker 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hydkat 21:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bayo 00:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AmiDaniel 01:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Rory096 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Terence Ong 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Padawane 09:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. the wub "?!" 12:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. EyOne 13:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Shanel is a very trustful and nice person. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Zephyrus 18:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Khoikhoi 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Uuuuf! (:Julien:) 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Az1568 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ♥ —{admin} Pathoschild 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. Uuf! Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. eats drini ☎ 19:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --Doc glasgow 04:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立

Taxman

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Lar 01:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. FloNight 07:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bertrand GRONDIN 09:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fmaunier 09:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Guinnog 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Korg + + 17:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Although I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience), I think he would be a good steward. --Cat out 18:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I'm not sure what you mean by interwiki experience then. I've worked on almost all of the different projects, including Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Meta, and a bit on others, along with working on different language projects, especially Hindi[7], though also a bit on Simple English, Spanish, and a couple edits on various other languages. Or are you saying the numbers of contributions aren't what you're looking for? - Taxman 16:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Has been a good bureaucrat on en.wp. Bastique 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Connel MacKenzie 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC) very helpful visitor on en.wikt:...understands that different projects have different rules![reply]
  12. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Shanel 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AmiDaniel 01:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Zephyrus 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. for me is ok :) --Dario ^_^ (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Good. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Certainly. Bishonen 21:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. Hoopydink 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benon 08:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Not this time. --Terence Ong 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Pill δ 11:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Grimlock 13:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Manchot ☺ 16:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. the wub "?!" 12:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Aphaia 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates awaiting confirmation

These candidates have not yet submitted proof of identity (see the application guidelines).

Darkoneko

Stewards/elections 2006-2/statements2

Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За / 支持
  1. Oui des 2 mains Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bayo 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fmaunier 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Meodudlye 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Manchot ☺ 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bonne candidature--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tu as mon soutien --Padawane 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. le Korrigan bla 12:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Good luck ;) Wart Dark 12:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ludo29 13:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Phe 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Grimlock 17:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC) WP fr est assez grand pour avoir besoin d'un "steward attitré" / WP fr size is enough to have a "specific steward".[reply]
    This remark (which is a joke) can be misunderstood by some people, I prefer avoid this from now Grimlock 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the silliest worst comment I've read. Stewards are precisely asked not to change status of people from their own wiki to avoid biaised POV. guillom 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm, I don't think it's that "silly" since it occurred recently (cf. Hégésippe Cormier's case). Anyway, I think Grimlock was just trying to say something funny. :-) Manchot ☺ 00:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I can read one more time on a wiki media what can be considered as a personal attack from guillom. But I am not surprised to see that this user is definitely unable to consider that people which are not of his "wikifriends" can form one hand READ and UNDERSTAND the rules and recommandations of wikiprojects, and, on the other hand, can proceed with fun. Should I have to add warnings next time ? This confirms my vote on his appliance. By the way, good luck, Darkoneko ! Grimlock 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think that comment silly but meaningless and somehow funny, since 1) Wikimedia community is not going to assign stewards to a specific project, so it cannot happen either he is elected or not, 2) Each french project is enough big to have its bureaucrat so there is no need to have a steward for this purpose and 3) for one exception and sysop only priviledge, their ino steward is considered to be permitted to use his or her priveldge of desysopping on their project. If Darkoneko desysop a French project sysop, he will lose his whole priviledge. That comment expects so what cannot happen. --Aphaia 08:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure, I knew the conditions :). What I (really) meant is that WP is big enough to give the whole wikicommunity a steward. But the humoristic form of my remark seems to be unclear for some people, that is why I "suppressed" it. Grimlock 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Messire Hephgé 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. はい! Known hollow. :) --Cat out 19:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    lucas thierry 21:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (not logged in)[reply]
  16. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bib 06:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против
  1. Darko is not involved enough in projects other than fr:wp: (:Julien:) 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sorry but I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Нейтраль
  1. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. J'ai confiance en toi, mais tu n'es pas très actif sur meta ni (à ma connaissance) sur les « petits projets ». guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2006-2&oldid=479679"