Stewards/elections 2006-2

From Meta

Jump to: navigation, search
This page is obsolete or no longer maintained, and kept for historical interest. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you can use the talk page or start a discussion on the community discussion page.
Stewards (2nd 2006 elections)
This is the archived 2nd 2006 steward elections (see the last version before the closure). Please do not post new comments on this page.

Following the election, the Board of Trustees appointed 12 users having over 80% support to stewardship. Neutral votes were not counted for the statistics.

  1. M7 100%
  2. Redux 100%
  3. Effeietsanders 100%
  4. Dbl2010 100%
  5. Shanel 98%
  6. Pathoschild 97%
  7. Guillom 95%
  8. Bastique 91%
  9. Drini 91%
  10. Darkoneko 90%
  11. Cspurrier 87%
  12. MaxSem 84%

Contents

Introduction

The text below was in the header during the election.
edit multilingual text
English:

New stewards are elected roughly once per year. If you are interested in becoming a steward, see Stewards/Application guidelines (feel free to discuss the rules on the talk page). To discuss the status of current stewards, see Stewards/confirm.

The voting will start on the 25th November 2006 and it will end on the 15th December 2006. Applicants must meet the criteria (see Stewards/Application guidelines) and obtain at least 30 votes in favour with an 80% support ratio. The Board of Trustees will select stewards from the applicants in this election (expected to be about 10 to 20).

In order to be eligible to vote, users must have a valid account on Meta with a link to at least one account on a project where the user has participated at least three months. In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, a CheckUser verification will be carried out and sock puppet votes canceled.

See also:

Deutsch:

Neue Stewards werden zirka einmal pro Jahr gewählt. Wenn du ein Steward werden möchtest, lies die Richtlinien für die Kandidatur (du kannst diese Regeln bei Bedarf auf der Diskussionsseite diskutieren). Die Seite Stewards/confirm dient dazu, Diskussionen über die derzeitigen Stewards zu führen.

Die Abstimmung beginnt am 25. November 2006 und endet am 15. Dezember 2006. Die Bewerber müssen die erforderlichen Kriterien erfüllen und mindestens 30 Prostimmen erhalten, wobei 80 % aller Stimmen Prostimmen sein müssen. Das Wikimedia-Kuratorium wird die Stewards aus den Kandidaten in dieser Wahl auswählen (es werden zirka 10 bis 20 erwartet).

Um wahlberechtigt zu sein müssen die abstimmenden Benutzer ein Benutzerkonto auf Meta mit einem Link zu mindestens einem Projekt haben, auf dem sie bereits seit über drei Monaten aktiv sind. Sollte der Verdacht aufkommen, dass in dieser Abstimmung Sockenpuppen verwendet werden, können Checkuser nach einer Überprüfung Stimmabgaben durch Zweitaccounts entfernen.

See also:

Español:

Nuevos stewards son elegidos aproximadamente una vez por año. Si estás interesado en ser uno de ellos ve a Stewards/Application guidelines (Siéntete libre de debatir acerca de las reglas en la página de discusión). Para discutir el estado de los stewards actuales, ver Stewards/confirm.

La votación empezará el 25 de noviembre de 2006 y terminará el 15 de diciembre de 2006. Los postulantes deben cumplir los requisitos (ver Stewards/Application guidelines) y obtener al menos 30 votos a favor con un 80% de índice de aceptación. El Consejo de Administración seleccionará stewards de los postulantes en esta elección (se espera entre 10 a 20 postulantes).

Para poder votar, los usuarios deben tener una cuenta válida en Meta con un enlace a al menos una cuenta en un proyecto donde el usuario haya estado participando por al menos tres meses. En caso de existir la sospecha de usuarios títeres, se puede realizar la consulta respectiva a un checkuser y cancelar los votos en caso de ser necesario.

See also:

Français:

Les stewards sont élus plus ou moins une fois par an. Si vous êtes intéressé pour devenir steward, voyez Stewards/Application guidelines/fr (vous pouvez discuter sur la page de discussion). Pour discuter le statut des stewards courants, voyez Stewards/confirm.

Le vote commencera le 25 novembre 2006 et finira le 15 décembre 2006. Les candidats doivent se conformer aux critères (voyez Stewards/Application guidelines/fr) et recevoir au moins 30 voix en faveur avec un taux de soutien de 80%. Le Conseil d'administration choisira environ 10 à 20 candidats à l'issue de cette élection.

Afin d'être en droit de voter, les utilisateurs doivent avoir un compte valide sur Méta avec au moins un lien vers un compte sur un projet où ils ont participé pendant au moins trois mois. En cas de soupçon de faux-nez, une vérification CheckUser sera menée et les voix des faux-nez seront disqualifiées.

Voyez aussi:

Interlingua:

Le nove stewards es eligite circa un vice per anno. Si tu ha interesse in devenir un steward, vide Stewards/Application guidelines (sia libere de discuter le regulas in le pagina de discussion). Pro discuter le stato del stewards actual, vide Stewards/confirm.

Le votation comenciara le 25 de novembre 2006 e concludera le 15 de decembre 2006. Le candidatos debe correspnder al criterios (vide Stewards/Application guidelines) e obtener al minus 30 votos in favor con un ration de supporto de 80%. Le consilio administrative del Fundation Wikimedia seligera le stweards del candidatos in iste election (le numero es expectate de esser inter 10 e 20).

A fin de esser eligibile a votar, le usatores debe haber un conto valide in Meta con un ligamine a un projecto al minimo in que le usator ha participate durante al minus tres menses. In caso de suspicion de contos multiple pertinente a un singule personas, un verification de usator essera exequite e le votos duplicative essera cancellate.

Vide tamben:

Italiano:

Gli steward vengono eletti circa una volta l'anno. I requisiti per avanzare la propria candidatura sono esposti in Stewards/Application guidelines/it (chi ha osservazioni sulle regole può porle nella pagina di discussione). Per gli steward attualmente in carica è possibile presentare commenti sulla loro attività, si veda Stewards/confirm.

Le votazioni si apriranno il prossimo 25 novembre 2006 e termineranno il 15 dicembre 2006. Per superare l'elezione, il candidato deve ottenere almeno 30 voti a favore, i voti a favore devono essere almeno l'80% dei voti totali. Tra coloro che supereranno l'elezione il Board sceglierà a suo giudizio i nuovi steward, in numero tale da averne complessivamente tra 10 e 20.

Votanti: può votare chiunque dimostri di essere registrato su Meta ed abbia nella propria pagina utente un link ad almeno una sua pagina utente di un altro progetto a cui partecipa da almeno tre mesi. In caso di sospetto uso di sockpuppet verranno chiesti gli opportuni check user e i relativi voti annullati.

See also:

日本語:

新しいスチュワードは概ね年に1回選出します。スチュワードになることに関心のある人は、Stewards/Application guidelines/jaをご覧ください（the talk pageで規則を議論するのは、自由です）。現在のスチュワードが適任かを議論する場合は、スチュワードの信任をご覧ください。

投票は2006年11月25日から2006年12月15日まで行われます。立候補者は基準に合致していなければならず（Stewards/Application guidelines/ja参照）、最低30票、80％の支持が必要です。理事会ではこの選挙で立候補者の中からスチュワードを選任します（10-20人程度を予定しています）。

投票権については、利用者は利用者が少なくとも3ヶ月参加しているプロジェクトに少なくとも1つのアカウントへのリンクがメタで有効なアカウントになければなりません。ソックパペットの疑いがあれば、チェックユーザーによる確認が行われ、ソックパペットであれば、投票は無効です。

こちらもご覧ください。

Nederlands:

Nieuwe stewards worden grofweg eens per jaar gekozen. Als u geïnteresseerd bent in het stewardschap, kijk dan op De aanmeldingsprocedure (voel u vrij de gestelde regels te bediscussiëren op de overlegpagina). Om mee te praten over de status van de huidige stewards kunt u kijken op Stewards/confirm.

De stemming zal op 25 november 2006 beginnen en zal eindigen op 15 december 2006. Kandidaten moeten voldoen aan de criteria (zie de aanmeldingsprocedure) en ten minste 30 voorstemmen verzamelen, met daarnaast ten minste 80% steun. Het Bestuur van de Wikimedia Foundation zal de stewards kiezen uit de kandidaten in deze stemming (vermoedelijk tussen de 10 en 20 stewards).

Om te kunnen stemmen moeten gebruikers een geldige gebruikersnaam hebben op Meta, met een link naar ten minste een account op een project waar de gebruiker ten minste drie maanden aan heeft deelgenomen. Wanneer er een vermoeden is van sokpopperij, zal een CheckUser verificatie worden uitgevoerd, en sokpopstemmen zullen ongedaan worden gemaakt. See also:

Polski:

Nowi stewardzi wybierani są mniej więcej raz w roku. Jeśli chciałbyś/chciałabyś zostać stewardem, zapoznaj się ze wytycznymi dotyczącymi kandydatur (możesz też podyskutować o tych zasadach na stronie dyskusji). Wątpliwości co działalności aktualnych stewardów można przedyskutować na stronie: Stewards/confirm.

Głosowanie rozpoczęło się 25 listopada 2006 i będzie trwało do 15 grudnia 2006. Kandydaci muszą spełniać określone kryteria (zobacz Stewards/Application guidelines) i zdobyć co najmniej 30 głosów za oraz mieć przynajmniej 80% poparcia. Board of Trustees wybierze stewardów spośród kandydatów w tym głosowaniu (ma to być około 10 do 20 osób).

W głosowaniu mogą wziąć udział osoby, które: posiadają konto na Meta z przynajmniej jednym linkiem do konta w innym projekcie, w którym biorą udział co najmniej od trzech miesięcy. W razie podejrzenia o używanie pacynki, może zostać wszczęta procedura weryfikacyjna CheckUsera i głosy pacynek nie będą brane pod uwagę.

Zobacz także:

Português:

Novos stewards são eleitos uma vez por ano, aproximadamente. Se você estiver interessado em tornar-se Steward, leia Stewards/Application guidelines/pt (sinta-se à vontade para discutir as regras da eleição na página de discussão). Para debater sobre o status dos Stewards atuais, veja Stewards/confirm.

A votação começará em 25 de novembro e terminará em 15 de dezembro de 2006. Os candidatos precisarão satisfazer os critérios (veja Stewards/Application guidelines/pt) e obter, pelo menos, 30 votos a favor, com porcentual de apoio de, pelo menos, 80%. O Conselho Administrativo selecionará Stewards dentre os candidatos nesta eleição (espera-se algo entre 10 e 20).

Para poder votar na eleição, os usuários terão de ter conta válida na MetaWiki, com um link para, pelo menos, uma conta em um projeto do qual estejam participando por, pelo menos, três meses. Em caso de suspeita de uso de sock puppets, executar-se-a verificação por CheckUser, e ditos votos serão cancelados.

See also:

Русский:

Новые стюарды избираются примерно раз в год. Если вам хотелось бы стать стюардом, прочитайте страницу Stewards/Application guidelines (правила можно обсудить здесь). Обсуждения текущих стюардов проходят на странице Stewards/confirm.

Голосование начнётся 25 ноября 2006 года и продолжится до 15 декабря. Кандидаты должны проходить по определённым критериям (см. Stewards/Application guidelines) и получить не менее 30 голосов «за» при общей поддержке не менее 80%. Совет поверенных выберет стюардов из числа кандидатов (ожидатся, что будут выбраны 10—20 человек).

Для того, чтобы участвовать в голосовании, участники должны быть зарегистрированы на Мете, и на их странице участника должна присутствовать ссылка как минимум на один проект, в котором он участвовал не менее трёх месяцев. При подозрениях на кукловодство чекюзерам может быть подан запрос на проверку, по итогам которой подставные голоса будут аннулированы. See also:

Türkçe:

Yeni stewardlar aşağı yukarı yılda bir seçilir. Steward olmak istiyorsanız, başvuru yönergesini inceleyebilirsiniz (tartışma sayfasında kurallarla ilgili görüşlerinizi açıklamaktan çekinmeyin). Mevcut stewardların statüleriyle ilgili görüşlerinizi ise onay sayfasında paylaşabilirsiniz.

Oylama, 25 Kasım 2006'da başlayacak ve 15 Aralık 2006'da sona erecektir. Adaylar gerekli kriterleri (bkz: Başvuru yönergeleri) tutturmak, en az 30 olumlu oy almak ve %80'lik bir oran yakalamak zorundadır. Mütevelli Heyeti adaylar içerisinden stewardları seçecektir (10 - 20 kişi arası olması beklenmektedir).

Oy verebilmek için kullanıcıların, en az üç aydır katkıda bulunulan bir Wikimedia projesine bağlantı verilmiş bir Meta hesabına sahip olmaları gerekmektedir. Kukla kullanıcı şüphesi oluşması durumunda Denetçi doğrulaması gerekecek ve kukla oyları iptal edilebilecektir.

Ayrıca:

中文:

新监管员的选举每年举行一次，如果你对此感兴趣，请阅读这个指导(也可在此讨论)。讨论现任监管员的事项请至此。

本次投票自2006年11月25日开始至12月15日结束。候选人必须达到标准且获得30票以上赞成票并且赞成率超过80%才有资格当选(见指引)Board of Trustees将从其中选出一些人任命为监管员(预计10-20人)，

投票人的资格：用户必须在元维基有有效的帐号并且在至少一个维基计划中注册3个月以上。用户验证机制将会在必要的时候使用。

See also:

Bastique (Cary Bass)

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Native English speaker, advanced in French, communicative in Spanish
  • Personal info: I'm a bureaucrat in good standing on Commons and an admin in good standing on the english wiki. I'm familiar with the Wikimedia Foundation and many of its policies, having been involved with Wikipedia since June of 2004. I'm available on IRC a good deal of the time, and am familiar with a multitude of users cross-project. I actively work with correspondence to the Wikimedia Foundation via OTRS.
Česky:
  • Jazyky: en-N, fr-3, es-2 angličtina - mateřský jazyk, pokročilá francouzština, komunikativní úroveň španělštiny
  • Osobní informace: Jsem aktivním byrokratem na Commons a aktivním správcem na anglické Wikipedii. Jsem dobře obeznámen s nadací Wikimedia a mnohými jejími pravidly - jsem na Wikipedii aktivní už od června 2004. Velmi často jsem k zastihnutí na IRC a znám mnoho uživatelů na různých projektech. Odpovídám také na e-maily pro nadaci Wikimedia docházející do systému OTRS.
Dansk:
  • Sprog: en, fr-3, es-2 (Engelsk som modersmål, meget god til fransk, rimelig god til spansk)
  • Personlig information: Jeg er aktiv som bureaukrat på Commons og administrator på den engelske Wikipedia. Jeg er bekendt med Wikimedias regler og retningslinjer, og har vært aktiv på Wikipedia siden juni 2004. Jeg er ofte på IRC, og er kender mange brugere fra flere projekter. Jeg er også en af dem som svarer på epost vha. OTRS.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Englischer Muttersprachler, Französisch fortgeschritten, Spanisch mittelmäßig
  • Persönliche Info: Ich bin Bürokrat in Commons und Admin in der englischen Wikipedia. Ich bin mit der Wikimedia Foundation vertraut und mit vielen der Grundsätze, die in der Wikipedia seit Juni 2004 eingeführt wurden. Ich bin im IRC einen Großteil der Zeit erreichbar und bin projektübergreifend vertraut mit vielen Benutzern. Ich korrespondiere aktiv mit der Wikimedia Stiftung via OTRS.
Español:
  • Idiomas: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglés como lengua materna, francés avanzado, español intermedio
  • Información personal: Soy burócrata en Commons así como también soy administrador y colaborador activo en Wikipedia en inglés. Me encuentro familiarizado con la Fundación Wikimedia y sus políticas, siendo que estoy relacionado con Wikipedia desde junio de 2004. Estoy disponible una buena parte del día en el IRC y también estoy familizarizado con una multitud de usuarios que trabajan en diferentes proyectos. También trabajo activamente con la correspondencia que llega a la fundación vía OTRS.
Français:
  • Langues parlées : en-N, fr-3, es-2 anglais langue maternelle, français courant, espagnol simple courant.
  • Informations personnelles : Je suis bureaucrate actif sur Commons et admin actif sur la Wikipédia anglophone. Je suis familier de la Wikimedia Foundation et de ses règles, étant impliqué dans Wikipedia depuis juin 2004. Je suis souvent disponible sur IRC, et je connais de nombreux utilisateurs sur les autres projets. Je travaille activement sur OTRS (gestion des emails reçus par la Wikimedia Foundation).
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglese di madre lingua, francese avanzato, spagnolo di base
  • Informazioni personali: sono burocrate attivo su Commons e amministratore frequentemente presente sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese. Ho acquisito familiarità con la Wikimedia Foundation e le sue politiche, dal momento che mi occupo di Wikipedia dal giugno 2004. Sono spesso disponibile sui canali IRC, conosco molti dei partecipanti ad altri progetti. Sono attivo nella gestione del servizio OTRS, che si occupa delle email ricevute dalla Wikimedia Foundation.
日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, fr-3, es-2 英語を母語とし、フランス語は上級、スペイン語は会話ができる。
  • 人物について: Commonsで上級のビューロクラットであり、英語版ウィキペディアでは上級の管理者です。ウィキメディア財団とは良い関係を築き、政策にも多く関わっていて、2004年6月からウィキペディアに関わっています。多くの時間をIRCに割いていて、様々なプロジェクトの参加者とも親しいです。OTRSを通じてウィキメディア財団への連絡を積極的に行っています。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: En-N, Fr-3, Es-2 Moedertaal is Engels, gevorderd in Frans, en in staat te communiceren in het Spaans.
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben een bureaucraat met een goede reputatie op Wikimedia Commons en een moderator op de Engelse Wikipedia. Ik ben bekend met de WIkimedia Foundation en veel van haar beleid, aangezien ik betrokken ben bij Wikipedia sinds Juni 2004. Ik ben een groot deel van de tijd beschikbaar op IRC, en ken met veel gebruikers van andere projecten. Ik ben actief op het e-mailsysteem OTRS met het beantwoorden van e-mails aan de Wikimedia Foundation.
‪Norsk (bokmål)‬:
  • Språk: en, fr-3, es-2 (Engelsk som morsmål, meget god i fransk, passe god i spansk)
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg er er aktiv som byråkrat på Commons, og administrator på Wikipedia på engelsk. Jeg er kjent med Wikimedias regler og retningslinjer, og har vært aktiv på Wikipedia siden juni 2004. Jeg er ofte på IRC, og er kjent med mange brukere fra flere prosjekter. Jeg er også en av de som svarer på epost vha. OTRS.
Polski:
  • Języki: en-N, fr-3, es-2 język ojczysty angielski, zaawansowany francuski, stopień komunikatywny w hiszpańskim
  • Informacje osobiste: Cary Bass. Jestem aktywnym biurokratą na Commons oraz aktywnym administratorem na angielskiej wiki. Jestem obeznany w Fundacji Wikimedia oraz jej zasadach, jako że uczestniczyłem w Wikipedii od czerwca 2004 roku. Jestem dostępny na IRC-u przez większość czasu, oraz znam wielu użytkowników na różnych projektach. Jestem także aktywnym korespondentem w mailach do Fundacji Wikimedia na OTRS.
Türkçe:
  • Diller: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Anadilim İngilizce, Fransızca ileri düzeyde, İspanyolca konuşabiliyorum.
  • Kişisel bilgiler: Commons'ta bürokratlık ve İngilizce Wiki'de yöneticilik yapıyorum. 2004 haziranından beri Wikimedia'yla ilgilendiğim için Wikimedia Vakfı ve çoğu politikasına aşinayım. Çoğu zaman IRC'den ulaşılabiliyorum ve bir çok projede sayısız kullanıcıyı tanıyorum. OTRS sayesinde Wikimedia Vakfı'yla uyumlu ve aktif olarak çalışmalarımı sürdürüyorum.
Português:
  • Línguas: en-N, fr-3, es-2 Inglês como língua-mãe, francês avançado, comunicativa em espanhol
  • Informações pessoais: Sou burocrata de reputação ilibada no Commons e administradora em igual condição na Wikipédia em inglês. Estou familiarizada com a Fundação Wikimedia e suas políticas, pois estou envolvida com a Wikipédia desde junho de 2004. Estou disponível no IRC boa parte do tempo, e conheço vários usuários em vários projetos distintos. Trabalho ativamente com a correspondência da Fundação Wikimedia por meio do OTRS.
Русский:
  • Языки: en-N, fr-3, es-2 английский — родной, французский на хорошем уровне, испанский знаю средне
  • Обо мне: я — активный бюрократ на Commons и активный администратор английской Википедии. Занимаясь Википедией с июня 2004 г., я хорошо знаком с фондом Викимедиа и его правилами. Очень часто можно меня найти на IRC, я познакомился со многими участниками из многих проектов. Я активно отвечаю на получаемые Викимедиа письма через систему OTRS.
中文:
  • 语言能力: en-N, fr-3, es-2 本土英语使用者，熟练使用法语，可用西班牙语交流.
  • 个人资料: 我是维基共享的官员并且也是英文百科的管理员。我对维基媒体基金会及其政策十分了解。我从2004年6月起接触维基百科，我IRC经常在线并且我也和很多跨计划的用户十分熟悉，我目前为基金会的OTRS服务。
العربية:
  • اللغات: إنجليزية (اللغة الأم)، فرنسية (مستوى متقدم)، إسبانية (مستوى متوسط)
  • معلوملت شخصية: أنا بيروقراط في مشروع كومنز, و إداري في ويكيبديا (النسخة الإنجليزية). أشعر بأنني متمكن من مساهماتي و عملي في مؤسسة ويكيمديا و متابع و مدرك لمعظم الأنظمة، حيث أنني كنت قد بدأت العمل منذ مايو 2006. أنا موجود على الأي آر سي معظم الوقت، و أعرف الكثير من المستخدمين في عدة مشاريع. و أنا اعمل بصورة جادة مع المؤسسة من خلال تلقي إتصالات الأفراد و إستفساراتهم و إيصالها أو الرد عليها.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持 / مع الترقية
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Jon Harald Søby 01:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Lar 01:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Hoopydink 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 01:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Pschemp 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. FloNight 07:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. le Korrigan bla 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Fmaunier 09:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  12. .anaconda 10:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  13. Helland 10:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  14. —Pill δ 11:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  15. Grimlock 13:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  16. Cnyborg 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  17. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  18. Gurch 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  19. Manchot ☺ 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  20. --Shizhao 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  21. Korg + + 16:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  22. --Dakota 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  23. Alphax 17:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  24. Danntm 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  25. Reasonable, smart. Being an admin at a larger wikipedia (en), and a burocrat at commons, the community of communities, can't think of a better candidate. --Cat out 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  26. Jaranda | wat's sup 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  27. Yann 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  28. Zscout370 19:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  29. M/ 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  30. DarkoNeko 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  31. -- Tawker 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  32. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  33. --Rory096 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  34. Cruccone 00:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  35. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  36. Bayo 00:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  37. --Shanel 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  38. AmiDaniel 01:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  39. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  40. Did Banjo Vote yet? Known him for some time now, helpful, trustworthy, you name it.... I do believe that Bastique is the best choice. --Tarawneh 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  41. Cyde Weys 04:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  42. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  43. Terence Ong 05:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  44. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  45. the wub "?!" 12:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  46. Emmelie 12:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  47. —Xyrael / 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  48. EyOne 13:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  49. Datrio 15:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  50. Phe 16:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  51. Trustful and nice. He has done a great work on commons to improve multilingualism. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  52. --Zephyrus 18:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  53. The fact that he was an OTRS agent for a long time and still manages not to bite off people's heads is a very good indication that he is well suited for stewardship. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 19:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  54. --Prevert 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  55. Khoikhoi 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  56. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  57. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  58. I am not active here, but I'll support him in everyway. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington 10:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  59. Angela 11:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  60. --Taichi - (あ！) 12:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  61. --Mahadeva 12:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  62. Bryan 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  63. the most important voteof all drini ☎ 19:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  64. FrancoGG ( talk ) 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  65. --Jorgechp 21:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  66. EugeneZelenko 03:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  67. --Doc glasgow 04:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  68. Srikeit 07:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
    208.100.195.84 13:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)talk (Not logged in)
  69. --Thogo 14:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  70. Ingoolemo talk 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  71. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  72. Nishkid64 02:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  73. Titoxd(?!?) 03:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  74. Gizmo II 05:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  75. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  76. Shyam (T/C) 07:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  77. bainer (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Guests 10:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC) No link to local project. Jon Harald Søby 10:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  78. pfctdayelise 12:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  79. Voice-of-All 17:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  80. Mbimmler 20:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  81. Support --- gildemax 21:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  82. Digitalme 23:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  83. Danny 15:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  84. Eloquence 17:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  85. Kordas 13:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  86. Glen S 19:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  87. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  88. --Tbone 21:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  89. Gribeco 23:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  90. DVD R W 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  91. Benn Newman 01:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  92. Moumousse13 09:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  93. —en:user:freakofnurture 01:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  94. Michael Billington 09:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  95. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  96. Alvaro 13:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  97. Support--clamengh 17:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  98. Albertsab@cawiki 23:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  99. --Shreshth91 04:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  100. Until he turns evil, bastique will be a good steward. So I support him until then. DS 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  101. --Alhen 04:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  102. Benjism89 12:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  103. --Coredesat (en.wp) 06:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  104. Rakela 16:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  105. --Lmbuga 21:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  106. --Filip (§) 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  107. CrzRussian 02:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  108. Zzyzx11 05:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  109. Eagle 101 01:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  110. Andre (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  111. Bishonen 05:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC).
    Jahiegel 06:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Moved to oppose.
  112. riana_dzasta 13:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  113. Steel en:Steel 17:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  114. --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 23:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  115. --JARU 00:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  116. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  117. Support BeatrixBelibaste 22:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  118. Michał P. 19:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC) (ro)
  119. Support--Shrieking Harpy Talk|Count 21:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
    212.254.27.79 23:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC) User not registered. --Snowdog 01:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  120. Raul654 02:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  121. --Alnokta 12:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  122. Menasim 14:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  123. One of the good guys. —Phil | Talk 16:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  124. Support --Gmaxwell 16:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  125. Aram33 17:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  126. Support --Mido 19:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  127. نعم - Strong Support --Chaos 19:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  128. Support --Фэлкон 21:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  129. --Mimouni 21:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  130. Cowman109 00:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Bishonen 18:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC). Oops, too many supports from me, sorry. Perhaps if I register an Oppose as well? Bishonen 04:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
  131. Nilfanion 22:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  132. I see no reason why my dear Bastique should not be a steward. Kjetil r 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  133. Oui. TheCustomOfLife 22:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  134. — Dan | talk 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  135. Don't think he'll be a bad steward. Effeietsanders 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  136. +sj | help with translation |+ 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  137. yo --:Bdk: 21:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  138. ElC 23:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية
  1. This is not because I don't trust Bastique or think that he is not a great Wikimedian (he is); it's simply because I would prefer more experience on Meta for stewards. Bastique has less than 100 edits here on Meta prior to this month, and because stewards will have to be primarily active here, I would like to see more time and activity on Meta. You have my full confidence, however, and I will gladly support you if elected. Thanks for your understanding. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Strong Oppose - recent events at en.wik have made me uneasy, but it doesn't seem as though it's going to make a difference anyway. I am also uneasy about calling people bigots. Even if you are correct, it's undiplomatic and shows poor judgement. Moreschi 21:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Strong oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
    Discussion moved to "Discussion moved from election page" on User talk:Bggoldie. —{admin} Pathoschild 08:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
    Part of the discussion is moved back below, under the subheading #Part of the discussion which Pathoschild moved from above to bggoldie's talk page, but whose correct location is here, where it belongs.--Hillgentleman|User Talk 08:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
    I, Zlatko Krastev, moved this discussion back here where it was held and where it belongs! Pathoschild, please take into consideration that the stewards are having rather high-power in Wikipedia and other WMF-projects, and at least I expect them to behave as public persons. -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Your anti-English Wikipedia POV is not appropriate here. Yann 14:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    OK, maybe my command of English is not good enough and I failed to explain it clear: I have nothing against Wikipedia in general, or English Wikipedia in particular. It is all about balance and representativeness. How did it came to your mind that it is me with an anti-something POV? -- Goldie ± (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    Moved here from User talk:Bggoldie (please do not split the discussion into multiple pages)
    • This is a unusual vote against me considering what I've done and where I've contributed. Essentially, you are voting against me because I'm American. Never mind that I contribute to other language Wikipedias, speak French fluently, have contributed toward the Haitian-Kreyol wikipedia. You're only reason for voting against me is because I am American. This seems bigoted. Bastique 20:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
      OK, from all candidates your name is the one out of two which rings a bell. I've seen it here and there on en.wiki but nothing memorable. Lets see what have you done so much then? Visiting French Wikipedia I find that you've made 250 edits since May 2005, and the total is less than 500. The toolserver is down desperately waiting for new DB dumps, so I cannot check how many of them are in main namespace. Your contributions to Spanish Wikipedia is between 50 and 100 in total (counter opt-in does not help too), and on Haitian/Portuguese the mileage is less than 50 edits. Only on Gaelic WP you can meet the suffrage criteria. The conclusion - the topmost position you can get support from me is admin or bureaucrat on en.wp. You have the admin rights, call me when you apply for bureaucrat.
      Given the vast number of edits on your personal page on fr.wiki, it seems that you managed to forget a simple fact - Wikipedia is not a webspace provider. On your home wiki the case is even worse! I do not see the need to comment further.
      As for the "bigot" (later "softened" to bigoted) - I dunno! Till now I was under the impression that I am the center of the world and held the corresponding MPOV. Till now it was me being the victim of the Cabel, and now thanks to Hillgentleman I might be accused of becoming a member of a Cabal against you. Feel free to accuse me in anything you like, any time you like, and using any words considered most suitable by you!
      Going back to the main topic: you speak English (language), you live in English (culture), your mindset is English, ... so you are redundant - there are 6 more of that same stuff in the current stewards list. You have no chances of getting my support before living several years outside East/West Coast (of whatever you call America). Given that you are writing and not reading, talking and not listening, I've reconsidered my vote indeed! -- Goldie ± (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
      Please accept my sincerest apologies (here, as you prefer, and on your talk page). As I mentioned to HillGentleman on his talk page, I was in shock that I was considered Anglo-American centric in spite of what I have accomplished on Wikimedia Commons in involving other language projects and cultures. Therefore, I apologize for my choice of words and regret that I cannot get you to change your mind. Bastique 15:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
      Apology accepted! It seems that I have to degrade my language skills to en-2 (or lower) - I failed to communicate a simple but important message. -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Bastique, thank you for appology here[1]. However, I cannot accept it. I do not know for what you were appologising. ----Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. cj | talk 08:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects, especially on meta. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 13:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
    Strongly Oppose-I cannot trust him after reading his comments on my talk page. For historical purposes, here are the links:[2][3]. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Oppose I believe this makes it obvious, that Bastique should be not given the power and responsibility being a Steward on Wikipedia. -- Karl Meier 20:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
    Note, User:Karl Meier has had ongoing and highly controversial disputes with Cool Cat, a user I have recently been mentoring on the Commons and to some extent on en.wp. If anyone wants to consider the single edit to which he has linked, I urge them to investigate the complete situation prior to voting. Bastique
    Quit making ad hominem attacks against me. Who I am and what I have or have not been involved in doesn't matter to this discussion, and because of that I am not going to waste anyone's time here, defending myself against any such irrelevant accusations or insinuations. What matters is that I believe that you shouldn't be trusted with the powers as a steward, when you are unable to use your admin powers in a reasonable and neutral way, dealing with editors that you personally have had a disagreement with. Here is another link to discussion, this time on AN/I, where several editors are questioning Bastique's actions as a ordinary editor and in his role as an admin: [4] -- Karl Meier 22:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Oppose Only because he is not active here.--Sir James Paul 23:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Not "old" enough. Jon Harald Søby 10:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Weak Oppose based on the threats to block users and persistent defence of a troll made on en: ANI. I will not have such a user as a steward. recent events at enwiki that have been disappointing and have slightly compromised what trust I had in Bastique. I hope this is simply a one-off incident, hence, changed to weak oppose. Chacor 02:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. With regret - I like Bastique, he has made substantial contributions. However, accusing people of bigotry because they hold the position that we need people from a wider range of backgrounds in order to conter inadvertant bias via societal conditioning shows an unhappy difficulty in seeing things from others' perspectives - precisely the concern these people had, which only confirms their concerns. This is too troubling to overlook. KillerChihuahua 15:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Strong Oppose based on recent actions on English Wikipedia. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Oppose now. I don't oppose because he is anglo-centric. Even I am sometimes anglo-centric; I tend to begin communication with someone in English without question if it is the best language we are going to talk with, and in my opinion it is an anglo-centric attitude. In another occuasion, I am japano-centric or christianity-centric but I wouldn't argue about that. My own view and attitude should not be in NPOV, even if I long for not being so. People are necessarily influenced by their cultural background, and it is inevitable. However it is different that someone is influenced by his background and that someone is unconscious about that. And from my view, his attitude is still anglo-centric even if weakly and he himself tries to take it over. Specially when he accused someone who pointed it out with a harsh word. I had a good impression on his apologies about that, but rushing people who pointed out and accused them showed his vulnerability. He seems good, but I expect him maturity and self-conciousness in much a higher level appropriate for multicultured community. --Aphaia 20:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. With regret as KillerChihuahua and Aphaia, but I feel I can not vote differently :(. --Nux (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Moved from support. As Chacor, et al., I have long thought well of Bastique (such that this is a regretful oppose) but recent en.wiki happenings leave me with concerns that cannot readily be allayed. Jahiegel 06:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. Moved from neutral. Oppose per my previous concerns. With the above statement of mentoring Cool Cat, I have to oppose based on his siding with Cool Cat and blocking another user Cool Cat was in conflict with on en:Wikipedia. This demonstrates poor judgement in terms of avoiding conflict of interest situations. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
NSLE (T+C) 14:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
I share some of the concerns expressed by Moreschi above, but am neutral leaning oppose for now. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 13:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Changed to oppose. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


Question from Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

  • Looks like several candidates have got oppose votes and neutrals because of "limited activity/experience on Meta". Do you think it is mandatory for a steward to have a high editcount on Meta? Why or why not? 12:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Nicholas, good question. While I don't believe it's mandatory, I feel that it's highly beneficial. I don't have a high amount of edits on Meta, but my edit history goes back considerably. This is notably do to my involvement with other cross-wiki projects such as Wikimedia Commons (I have over 6,000 edits at Commons) and my involvement with the OTRS correspondence system. I consider that my involvement on those projects makes up for a reduced edit count directly on meta.wm. Bastique 14:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I myself do not oppose you, Bastique, but I would like to point out a meta convention; stewards act as meta bereaucrats, I don't know it is de facto or de juri, but past stewards did so without argument. From this reason I can understand a meta regular may feel uneasy to have a steward who is not filled meta admin criteria. --Aphaia 22:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
I am more than happy to step into this role. I'm quite familiar with the layout and administration of Meta, even if I don't have an overwhelming edit count directly on Meta itself. Bastique 23:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Part of the discussion which Pathoschild moved from above to bggoldie's talk page, but whose correct location is here
Please accept my sincerest apologies (here, as you prefer, and on your talk page). As I mentioned to HillGentleman on his talk page, I was in shock that I was considered Anglo-American centric in spite of what I have accomplished on Wikimedia Commons in involving other language projects and cultures. Therefore, I apologize for my choice of words and regret that I cannot get you to change your mind. Bastique 15:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Apology accepted! It seems that I have to degrade my language skills to en-2 (or lower) - I failed to communicate a simple but important message. -- Goldie ± (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Bastique, thank you for appology here[5]. However, I cannot accept it. I do not know for what you were appologising. ----Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Canvasing for votes : Candidate talkpageing OPPOSED voters during voting to argue/persuade vote or change of vote, examples HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE. ВорВор 05:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • I think it is natural an normal that Bastique and I should discuss. -Hillgentleman|User Talk 06:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Cspurrier (Craig Spurrier)

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Native English speaker, intermediate in German, can read basic French)
  • Personal info: I am a bureaucrat/checkuser/arbcom member on the English Wikinews. I am an admin here on Meta and on the English Wikibooks. I created the Wikinews Print edition and I have compiled it nearly every night for the past 18 months. I am often available on IRC (as CraigSpurrier). I am willing to help with anything that needs doing, including actively monitoring the requests for permissions pages.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Muttersprache Englisch, Deutsch mittelmäßig, Grundkenntnisse im Lesen von Französisch)
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin Bürokrat/Checkuser/Arbcom - Mitglied in der englischen Wikinews. Hier auf Meta und im englischen Wikibooks bin ich Administrator. Ich gründete die Wikinews-Druckausgabe und stellte sie fast jede Nacht für die letzten 18 Monate zusammen. Ich bin oft im IRC (als CraigSpurrier) erreichbar. Ich möchte überall helfen, wo etwas getan werden muss, inklusive bei der aktiven Überwachung der Seite für Anfragen für Erlaubnisse (bezogen auf Benutzerrechte).
Español:
  • Idiomas: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Inglés nativo, alemán intermedio, puedo leer francés básico)
  • Información personal: Soy burócrata,checkuser y miembro del arbcom en Wikinoticias en inglés. Soy administrador aquí en Meta y en la versión en inglés de Wikibooks. Soy el creador de Wikinews Print edition(versión impresa de Wikinews) y la he preparado cada noche los últimos 18 meses. Me encuentro usualmente en el IRC como CraigSuprrier. Estoy dispuesto a ayudar con lo que sea necesario, incluyendo monitoreo activo en la página Request for permissions.
Français:
  • Langues: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (anglais langue maternelle, intermédiaire en allemand, peut lire le français basique)
  • Infos personnelles : Je suis bureaucrate/checkuser/arbitre sur le Wikinews anglophone. Je suis un admin ici sur Meta, et sur le Wikibooks anglophone. J'ai créé le Wikinews Print edition et je l'ai compilé pratiquemment chaque nuit pendant les derniers 18 mois. Je suis souvent sur IRC (pseudo : CraigSpurrier). Je suis désireux d'aider avec tout ce qui a besoin d'être fait, incluant la surveillance active des pages de requêtes de permission.


Italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Inglese di madre lingua, discreta conoscenza del tedesco, can read basic French)
  • Informazioni personali: sono bureaucrat/checkuser/membro dell'arbcom sulle English Wikinews in lingua inglese. Sono amministratore qui su Meta e su English Wikibooks in lingua inglese. Ho creato la Wikinews Print edition ed ho preso parte alla compilazione praticamente ogni notte negli ultimi 18 mesi. Sono spesso presente su IRC (come CraigSpurrier). Sono desideroso di essere d'aiuto con tutto ciò che c'è bisogno di fare, compreso il monitoraggio della pagina requests for permissions.
日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, de-2, fr-1.（英語を母語とし、ドイツ語は中級、簡単なフランス語が読める）
  • 人物について: 英語版ウィキニュースでビューロクラット、チェックユーザー、仲裁委員を務めています。メタと英語版ウィキブックスでは管理者です。Wikinews Print editionを創設し、過去18ヶ月ほぼ毎晩編集してきました。IRCに（CraigSpurrierとして）良く出入りしています。依頼ページと許可ページに積極的に関わるなど何かしら役に立ちたいです。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (geboren Engels spreker, gemiddeld in Duits, ben in staat simpel Frans te lezen)
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben bureaucraat/checkuser/arbcom-lid op de Engelstalige Wikinews. Ik ben moderator hier op Meta en op de Engelstalige Wikibooks. Ik maakte de Wikinews Print edition samen en ik heb bijna iedere nacht voor de afgelopen achttien maanden de editie samengesteld. Ik ben dikwijls beschikbaar op IRC (als CraigSpurrier). Ik ben bereid te helpen met van alles wat gedaan moet worden, inclusief het actief in de gaten houden van de Permissions Pagina.
‪Norsk (bokmål)‬:
  • Språk: en, de-2, fr-1
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg er byråkrat, checkuser og medlem av Arbitration Committee på Wikinytt på engelsk. Jeg er administrator her på Meta, og på Wikibooks på engelsk. Det var jeg som opprettet trykkutgaven av Wikinytt, og har samlet sammen denne hver kveld de siste 18 månedene. Jeg er ofte tilgjengelig på IRC (som CraigSpurrier). Jeg er villig til å hjelpe til der det er nødvendig, inkludert å overvåke Requests for Permissions-siden.
Português:
  • Línguas: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (inglês como língua-mãe, nível intermediário em alemão, leio francês básico)
  • Informações pessoais: sou burocrata/checkuser/membro do arbcom na Wikinews em língua inglesa. Sou administrador aqui, na MetaWiki, e no Wikibooks em língua inglesa. Eu criei o Wikinews Print edition (Wikinews para impressão), de cuja compilação participo quase todas as noites há quase 18 meses. Estou disponível no IRC regularmente (como CraigSpurrier). Estou disposto a ajudar com qualquer coisa que precise ser feita, inclusive com o monitoramento da página requests for permissions.


Türkçe:
  • Diller: en-N, de-2, fr-1. (Anadilde İngilizce, orta seviyede Almanca, basit seviyede Fransızca)
  • Kişisel bilgiler: İngilizce Wikinews'te bürokrat/denetçi/tahkim komitesi üyesi olarak görev yapıyorum. Meta'da ve İngilizce Wikibooks'ta da yönetiyim. Wikinews Baskı Sürümü'nü oluşturdum ve son 18 ay boyunca aşağı yukarı her gece derlemesini saptım. Sıklıkla IRC'de CraigSpurrier adıyla bulunuyorum. İzin sayfasındaki isteklerin takibi de dahil olmak üzere, yapılması gereken herşeye yardım etmek istiyorum.
Yes / Si / Oui / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持
  1. Slade pt.wp 03:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. --Dario ^_^ (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. --Bertrand GRONDIN 09:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Fmaunier 09:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. --Deprifry 11:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Grimlock 13:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Manchot ☺ 16:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. While I have reservations (virtually no interwiki experience) he does have an impressive record, definitely dedicated. We definitely need his experience with sister projects of wikipedia in our steward ranks. --Cat out 18:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Cruccone 00:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 00:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  12. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  13. —Xyrael / 13:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  14. Hello32020 00:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  15. --Alastor Moody 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  16. Korg + + 22:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  17. Brian Wikinews / Talk 04:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  18. Ral315 (talk) 05:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  19. Danny 15:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  20. Eloquence 17:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  21. Mailer Diablo 21:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Yann 23:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  23. Dmcdevit 20:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  24. --Tbone 22:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  25. I don't know him, but after looking through his contributions I think he'd make a good steward. He maintains an unfailingly polite and friendly attitude; I know of many users who would be more agitated than he was if someone removed their bureaucrat and administrator access without explanation, for example. He does seem to be in touch with the wider Wikimedia community despite his little activity on Meta; he reports relevant developments to his home projects and is idling in #wikimedia at the moment of this post. Various comments demonstrate an unusual enthusiastic friendliness, a good respect of privacy, and an understanding that policy should be enforced in spirit rather than to the letter. I'd like to see him become more active in inter-project coordination, but presumably he will when he becomes a steward. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 06:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  26. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  27. Delta Tango 15:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  28. --Divol 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  29. Andre (talk) 03:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  30. Per Cool Cat. Jahiegel 06:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  31. Support--10caart 13:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
    I have been informed that this vote had been placed in the wrong place. It looks like it's now in the right one; however, for the sake of clarity, I am pleased to confirm this support.
  32. Support--Moch 18:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  33. strong support --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 23:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  34. strong support 65.11.167.77 07:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Opps wasn't logged in Terinjokes 07:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  35. --Snowdog 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  36. Definitly would make an excellent steward. Bawolff 06:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  37. Support Based on others opinions Bastique 15:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  38. Support 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  39. --Alnokta 01:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  40. Vote was removed - revote Strong Support --82.153.135.69 19:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC) re-sign - was not logged in. --Skenmy 19:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
No / Non / Nein / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反対
  1. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. I would like to see more experience in other language projects (and Meta) for stewards. Thanks for your understanding. Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Shyam (T/C) 07:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects. -- Goldie ± (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose - As Goldie, generic vote against Anglo-American focus of all wiki-projects, especially on meta. --Hillgentleman|User Talk 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Seems comparatively inexperienced. — Dan | talk 22:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立
  1. — Timichal 00:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. I don't know you. guillom 16:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. I'm unsure you have enough multilingual experience Phe 86.196.233.130 17:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Not logged in, informed in talk. (yeps I was not logged, vote corrected)
  4. Benjism89 12:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Darkoneko

edit multilingual text
Identity confirmed by Danny.
English:
  • Languages: fr (native), en-3
  • Personal info:
    • A little history : I began my involvment with Wikipedia in mid-november 2004. Rather than writing articles, I've always prefered doing maintenance work (see fr:wp editcount), so I soon requested adminship (march 2005). Why do I prefer maintenance ? It's because I think there are many many article writers in a wiki, but too few people preventing it from becoming a total mess : there is much need of people adding categories, reorganizing, checking image licences... and related to sysop status, easy-reverting, deleting sandbox-like pages, and blocking vandals. On the same principle, I applied for bureaucratship a few months ago (july 2006) because there was a shortage Recent Changes chan)
    • availability, I'm often on IRC on evenings (GMT+1), to chat and take care of vandalism (via the RC chan)
    • Why do I want to become a steward ? It's more or less the same reason as when I requested sysop and bureaucrat status : I merely wish to help maintain the Wikimedia project some more with theses new tools.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr (Muttersprache), en-3
  • Informationen zur Person:
    • Eine kleine Geschichte : Ich begann meine Teilnahme an der Wikipedia Mitte November 2004. Zunächst zog ich Wartungsarbeiten dem Artikelschreiben vor. (siehe fr:wp editcount) Warum dies? Ich denke, dass es jederzeit tausende Leute gibt, bereit Artikel zu schreiben, aber Personen fehlen, welche diese kategorisieren, die Urheberrechte von Bildern überprüfen, die Artikel überarbeiten... oder weiters, mit den Administratorrechten, Vandalismus löschen, Seiten oder Vandalen blockieren. Ich habe daher bald um den Administratorstatus angesucht und ihn Mitte März 2005 erhalten. Vor kurzem habe ich mich als Bürokrat aufstellen lassen (Juli 2006), um den Mangel an aktiven unter den Personen mit diesem Status zu mildern.
    • Erreichbarkeit: Ich hänge üblicherweise am Abend (GMT+1) im IRC herum, um zu diskutieren und auch um den Vandalismus zu überwachen (mittels dafür vorgesehenen Kanal)
    • Warum um den Stewardstatus ansuchen? Wegen der selben Gründe für den Status Administrator und den Status Bürokrat: Ich wünsche einfach den Wikimedia-Projekten wieder ein bisschen mehr zu helfen, auf meine Weise, Dank dieser neuen Möglichkeiten.
Français:
  • Langues parlées: fr (natif), en (bon niveau)
  • Informations personnelles :
    • petit historique : J'ai débuté sur wiki à mi novembre 2004. Déjà à cette époque, je me suis trouvé bien plus d'affinité avec la maintenance qu'a l'écriture des articles (voir fr:wp editcount). Pourquoi cela ? Je pense que s'il y a toujours des milliers de gens prèt à écrire des articles, on manque toujours de volontaires pour empecher que cela dégénère en un beau bordel : même actuellement, nous avons grand besoin de personnes catégorisant les articles, vérifiant les problemes de copyvio des images, reorganiation d'article... ou plus spécifique aux outils de sysop, effacer des vandalismes, proteger des pages et bloquer des vandales. J'ai donc rapidement demandé le status de sysop, et l'ai obtenu a mi-mars 2005. Plus récemment, je me suis aussi présenté au status de bureaucrate (juillet 2006), pour pallier à un manque d'actifs parmi les personnes possédant le status.
    • Disponibilités : je traine généralement le soir (GMT+1) sur IRC, pour discuter et aussi surveiller les vandalismes (via le channel adequat)
    • Pourquoi rechercher le status de steward ? Pour a peu près les memes raisons que pour les status de sysop et bureaucrat : je souhaite simplement aider le project mediaWiki encore un peu plus, à ma manière, grace à ces nouveaux outils.
Italiano:
  • Lingue: fr, en-3 (francese di madre lingua, inglese avanzato)
  • Informazioni personali: partecipo a Wikipedia dalla fine del 2004, sono attualmente amministratore e burocrate sulla Wikipedia in lingua francese. Piuttosto che alla scrittura degli articoli, ho sempre preferito dedicarmi al lavoro di manutenzione (vedi fr:wp editcount), per questo motivo ho chiesto di diventare amministratore abbastanza presto (marzo 2005). Perché preferisco la manutenzione? Il motivo è perché ritengo che vi siano molti che già scrivono articoli su una wiki, ma troppo poche persone che sono attente ad evitare che diventi un disordine totale: c'è grande necessità di persone che aggiungono le categorie, riorganizzano, controllano le licenze delle immagini... ma anche dal punto di vista dell'amministratore, che facciano revert, cancellazioni immediate e blocchino in vandali. In base allo stesso principio, ho chiesto lo status di burocrate (luglio 2006) dal momento che mancavano burocrati attivi in quel momento.
    Per quanto riguarda la mia disponibilità, sono spesso su IRC di sera (GMT+1). (not up to date)
日本語:
  • 言語: fr（母語）, en-3
  • 人物について: 2004年11月半ばからウィキペディアに参加し始