Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎CheckUser access: add Bahamut0013, Courcelles, Keegan @ en.wikipedia
→‎Oversight access: add Bahamut0013, Courcelles @ en.wikipedia
Line 130: Line 130:
* * Do not put links to specific revisions to be oversighted here, please. See the top of this section. Thank you. * *
* * Do not put links to specific revisions to be oversighted here, please. See the top of this section. Thank you. * *
-->
-->
====Bahamut0013@en.wikipedia====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = enwp
|user name = Bahamut0013
|discussion= New member of Audit Subcommittee [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=421665649]. Has already identified [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/?diff=2476364&diffonly=yes].
}}
Thank you, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 23:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
====Courcelles@en.wikipedia====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = enwp
|user name = Courcelles
|discussion= New member of Audit Subcommittee [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=421665649]. Has already identified [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/?diff=2439825&diffonly=yes].
}}
Thank you, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 23:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


=== Removal of access ===
=== Removal of access ===

Revision as of 23:34, 31 March 2011

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Dark Eagle@ltg.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello. Latgalian Wikipedia was opened 4 days ago, and now we need administrator. I was test-admin in the Incubator. So till we don't have big community, please give me a temporary status of the administrator. Thanks! Dark Eagle 16:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

granted for 6 months. expires on 22.9.2011 Matanya 16:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strainubot@ro.wikisource

Status:    Done

Bot requires adminship for around 3 weeks to replace old diacritics to new ones in accordance with similar procedures on ro.wp and ro.news. --Rebel 09:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can you please start a local discussion? or link to one? Matanya 10:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no local discussion, there was one at ro.w but I think it is insufficient. The account has just been created and will also need bot rights. I will start a local discussion and will get back to you.--Strainu 10:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done for one month. Expires on 30 April 2011. Ruslik 07:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

James@ang.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Hi. I created and started the ANG wikipedia, and due to hospital and rehab time, I was unable to contribute for a long period of time, but I am now able to contribute and even type, so I would like to get back to the Ang wiki as an administrator so I can continue contributing to the Wiki. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by JamesR1701E (talk) -- Dferg ☎ talk 20:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please post a confirmation on your angwiki talkpage that you did this request. -- Dferg ☎ talk 20:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: requests should be left open for at least one week on the local project to let the community vote & decide. -- Dferg ☎ talk 20:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Master Shadow@kbd.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello! Please assign to me a permanent status of the administrator of the Kabardian-Circassian Wiki. In my support were all active users. Master Shadow 06:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Matanya 09:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vito Genovese@kbd.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Same as Master Shadow above. Note that my request was joint one for both cratship and adminship, which got full support. I am posting another request below for cratship.--Vito Genovese 09:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

since discussion started on the 26, please wait until april 2nd. Matanya 09:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not? It started a day before by the way, unless you are referring to the first vote. Let's wait, thank you.
Vito Genovese 09:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

Vito Genovese@kbd.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Per succesfull joint request for cratship and adminship (request for admin access is subject to my other post above). I also have bureaucrat rights on Turkish Wikipedia and Turkish Wikimedia, if it matters.--Vito Genovese 09:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

since discussion started on the 26, please wait until april 2nd. Matanya 09:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Bahamut0013@en.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Thank you, –xeno 23:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courcelles@en.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Thank you, –xeno 23:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keegan@en.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Thank you, –xeno 23:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Bahamut0013@en.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Thank you, –xeno 23:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courcelles@en.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

Thank you, –xeno 23:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Rafael, o Galvão@pt.wikisource

Status:    In progress

We recently approved the following policy: "any sysop who stays inactive for a period longer than one year (without edits and administrative actions) will lose his access." adminstats --Lucas Nunes 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And this policy says that any adm who is inactive now will lose the rights? Because i can't see that in the link you pointed. Béria Lima msg 23:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The policy was included here. --Lucas Nunes 00:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Less than 1 hour ago, by you. I'm asking only what the community decided to do with the adms that are inactive now. Wait a year? Make a vote? Give they a month or two to edit? Warn they? Remove the tools? That decision is th:::e one i can't find anywhere in pt.wikisource. Béria Lima msg 00:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like in ptwikipedia, they will be automatically desysoped. I put the talk link in all requests. --Lucas Nunes 10:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not blind Lucas, I see you use the talk page in all requests. What i wanted - and you still don't provide me - is a community decision who says they should lost their tools now. Béria Lima msg 12:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The decision is in that link I provided. The topic was created, discussed for some time, a proposal was made and as two editors supported it, you can consider it as approved, right? We're a very small community and we couldn't expect any more comments on the discussion, unfortunately ptwikisource is abandoned. For instance, when an editor wants to be an admin, we don't create a poll, our process is like a consensus, because without other editors is not possible to be as formal as in Wikipedia. --Lucas Nunes 21:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the lesson, but I edit wikisource since 2008, and I know all that. The approved thing there was that any adm from now on need to have edit in one year or will lose the tools, the topic says nothing about remove tools from people who had it before the discussion was created. And is in this point that you need to find a consensus and bring here to support your requests. Béria Lima msg 22:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, you're seeing the whole thing in a different and wrong way. In wikipedia, wiktionary and wikibooks they have made the same thing and immediately removed some sysops. What I meant is: "who stays one year inactive is desysoped" (the text is absolutely correct), and I'm sure Giro and Helder understood it this way. I understood what you're saying too, but is a very, very private interpretation of the policy, probably something only you think. --Lucas Nunes 23:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you prove that the wikisource community have the same opinion you have? Because i can say Jesus agree with me too (and i'm completely sure about that) but you will need to believe in my word. Béria Lima msg 13:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment Have these admins been contacted? If not please do so and give it a few days to answer. There is no urgency here so we can wait a bit. fr33kman 22:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All were notified yesterday.[11][12][13][14] We can just give it a few days and then remove the rights if nobody objects. Jafeluv 07:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manoel-Rio@pt.wikisource

Status:    In progress

We recently approved the following policy: "any sysop who stays inactive for a period longer than one year (without edits and administrative actions) will lose his access." adminstats --Lucas Nunes 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schultz@pt.wikisource

Status:    In progress

We recently approved the following policy: "any sysop who stays inactive for a period longer than one year (without edits and administrative actions) will lose his access." adminstats --Lucas Nunes 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mateus Hidalgo@pt.wikisource

Status:    In progress

We recently approved the following policy: "any sysop who stays inactive for a period longer than one year (without edits and administrative actions) will lose his access." adminstats --Lucas Nunes 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

SPQRobin @ltgwiki @kbdwiki @sqwikinews

Status:    Done

Hi. I'd like to request temporary import & sysop access to import pages from Incubator to these new wikis. SPQRobin (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, temporary one month adminship to expire 18 April 2011. Please let us know if you need it removed before then. Thanks for your work. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shijualex@sawikisource

Status:    Done

Placing the request here as per above discussion. Request for admin rights and import rights in Sanskrit wikisource.

The Sanskrit wikisource (http://sa.wikisource.org) is created today. I was the person who proposed it and I am involved in building the community for Sanskrit wiki projects.

A huge amount of Sanskrit source text is available in old wikisource (Sanskrit main page in old wikisource, and Sanskrit pages category). I want to import all these pages to newly created wikisource. Also I am involved in the community building program for Sanskrit wiki projects. Admin rights and import rights in Sanskrit wikisource are a must for these tasks. Kindly approve my request for admin right in Sanskrit wikisource. --Shijualex 16:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Temporary sysop and import for one month, expires on 19 April. Jafeluv 17:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=2476831"