Meta:Requests for adminship/Wpedzich

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Wpedzich[edit]

RfA scheduled to end at 20:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)(and not a second early, please:-)

Wpedzich is someone every Meta regular knows. A steward and translator, he's always helping out here, even with a baby to attend to. However, despite his high levels of awesomeness, he is not an admin. Just today he asked for a meta sysop to help him make some fixes to centralnotice. He's well-known, a trusted member of the community, and as a steward and translator he does often need the tools. Plus he gave me a free Nicky, so he definitely deserves them.--Shanel 20:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a self-nomination message I was compiling before an editconflict with Shanel - let it serve as my confirmation. Being an active Polish Wikimedian as well as a Wikimedia Steward I fully appreciate the meaning of Meta as a cross-project coordination site. Being available via IRC on a daily basis allows me to react quite quickly to problem situations when they arise. Since Polish is a complex language, I strongly feel that language matters requiring an administrator's intervention ought to be performed by a person who understands the language - the recent translations and implementation of the 2008 Fundraiser centralnotice are a good example - especially since the notice became displayed on non-Wikipedia projects, creating linguistic havoc in inflected languages. Understanding those needs, but tragically reluctant to use the steward tools to perform such duties, I hereby apply for a Meta adminship. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 20:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator.--Shanel 20:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WTF he isn't yet? Support — vvv 20:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
very supporting. --Thogo (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Erwin(85) 20:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Masti 20:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 20:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Ferrer 20:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good candidate.--Adi4000 20:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Leinad 21:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 21:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support, finally —DerHexer (Talk) 21:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sterkebaktalk 22:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support; no need to comment. --FiliP × 22:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WJBscribe (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support bastique ^demandez! 23:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oh yes--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 00:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1000% sure --Mardetanha ^talk 00:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Support xaosflux ^Talk 02:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ++Lar: t/c 04:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for your helpful contributions to the project. Cirt (talk) 07:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Az1568 (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support without any single doubts! Masur 09:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course.--Kwj2772 09:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support.. - --Comet styles 10:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Alex Pereira ^falaê 13:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support this Huji 21:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, obviously. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support —YourEyesOnly 12:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maikking 14:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--.snoopy. ✉ 14:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Melos 16:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(+) Hillgentleman 17:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kylu 22:09, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Szczepan talk  16:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Herr Kriss 16:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awersowy 17:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - tholly ^--Talk-- 18:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully a bureaucrat closes this at 20:28 purely for the lulz. Oh, and, um, Support. Daniel (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support not yet? --Aphaia 05:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support i think, wpedzich can just ever ;) --Wyksztalcioch 07:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

41:0 ==> promoted. (and not a second too early :p) --Thogo (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]