Talk:Spam blacklist: Difference between revisions
→altervista.org: add |
www.pontiart.com |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
apart from being a free hosting site with no explicit guarantee about the reliability of its content (which makes it unsuitable as source according to wikipedia's standards), the biggest problem is that this site is largely linked and a lot of sites hosted here are spam and dens of malicious software. -- [[User:Blackcat|Blackcat]] ([[User talk:Blackcat|talk]]) 11:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
apart from being a free hosting site with no explicit guarantee about the reliability of its content (which makes it unsuitable as source according to wikipedia's standards), the biggest problem is that this site is largely linked and a lot of sites hosted here are spam and dens of malicious software. -- [[User:Blackcat|Blackcat]] ([[User talk:Blackcat|talk]]) 11:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:This website has 24,652 additions on dozens of projects, and not many are spam. I don't think any global action is warranted at this time, however it is a free hosting site. Pinging [[User:Billinghurst|Billinghurst]] for their opinion. Best regards, [[User:Vermont|Vermont]] ([[User talk:Vermont|talk]]) 21:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
:This website has 24,652 additions on dozens of projects, and not many are spam. I don't think any global action is warranted at this time, however it is a free hosting site. Pinging [[User:Billinghurst|Billinghurst]] for their opinion. Best regards, [[User:Vermont|Vermont]] ([[User talk:Vermont|talk]]) 21:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
=== www.pontiart.com === |
|||
* {{LinkSummary|pontiart.com}} |
|||
;on en.wp: |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.19.143.1}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.24.240.96}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.31.39.204}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.35.126.184}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.37.224.197}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.44.144.192}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.44.183.185}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.44.215.206}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.46.146.9}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.46.179.70}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.47.229.79}} |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.47.234.59}} |
|||
;on it/wp: |
|||
* {{IP summary|151.15.90.29}} etc |
|||
Commercial gallery spamming links to its own promotional materials. Now using a different IP for each edit, so definitely not a good-faith contributor. Range-blocking does not seem to be a possibility. |
|||
This request copied here from [[:w:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist]], per [[:w:Special:Diff/952311972|Special:Diff/952311972]]. [[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 22:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposed additions (Bot reported) == |
== Proposed additions (Bot reported) == |
Revision as of 22:49, 21 April 2020
- Proposed additions
- Please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis. Spam that only affects a single project should go to that project's local blacklist. Exceptions include malicious domains and URL redirector/shortener services. Please follow this format. Please check back after submitting your report, there could be questions regarding your request.
- Proposed removals
- Please check our list of requests which repeatedly get declined. Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. Please consider whether requesting whitelisting on a specific wiki for a specific use is more appropriate - that is very often the case.
- Other discussion
- Troubleshooting and problems - If there is an error in the blacklist (i.e. a regex error) which is causing problems, please raise the issue here.
- Discussion - Meta-discussion concerning the operation of the blacklist and related pages, and communication among the spam blacklist team.
- #wikimedia-external-linksconnect - Real-time IRC chat for co-ordination of activities related to maintenance of the blacklist.
- Whitelists
There is no global whitelist, so if you are seeking a whitelisting of a url at a wiki then please address such matters via use of the respectiveMediawiki talk:Spam-whitelist
page at that wiki, and you should consider the use of the template {{edit protected}} or its local equivalent to get attention to your edit.
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment. This leaves a signature and timestamp so conversations are easier to follow.
Completed requests are marked as {{added}}
/{{removed}}
or {{declined}}
, and are generally archived quickly. Additions and removals are logged · current log 2024/07.
- Information
- List of all projects
- Overviews
- Reports
- Wikimedia Embassy
- Project portals
- Country portals
- Tools
- Spam blacklist
- Title blacklist
- Email blacklist
- Rename blacklist
- Closure of wikis
- Interwiki map
- Requests
- Permissions
- Bot flags
- New languages
- New projects
- Username changes
- Translations
- Speedy deletions
- snippet for logging
- {{sbl-log|20004740#{{subst:anchorencode:SectionNameHere}}}}
![]() |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 15 days.
|
Proposed additions
![]() |
This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the bottom of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users on multiple wikis. Completed requests will be marked as {{added}} or {{declined}} and archived. |
adobe search
adobe.com
Regex requested to be blacklisted: \badobe\.com/cfusion/search
Adobe search function being abused by spambots (GS search) — billinghurst sDrewth 04:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst:
Added to Spam blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 13:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
altervista.org
altervista.org
apart from being a free hosting site with no explicit guarantee about the reliability of its content (which makes it unsuitable as source according to wikipedia's standards), the biggest problem is that this site is largely linked and a lot of sites hosted here are spam and dens of malicious software. -- Blackcat (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- This website has 24,652 additions on dozens of projects, and not many are spam. I don't think any global action is warranted at this time, however it is a free hosting site. Pinging Billinghurst for their opinion. Best regards, Vermont (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
www.pontiart.com
pontiart.com
- on en.wp
User:151.19.143.1(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.24.240.96(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.31.39.204(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.35.126.184(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.37.224.197(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.44.144.192(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.44.183.185(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.44.215.206(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.46.146.9(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.46.179.70(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.47.229.79(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
User:151.47.234.59(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
- on it/wp
User:151.15.90.29(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
(spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)
etc
Commercial gallery spamming links to its own promotional materials. Now using a different IP for each edit, so definitely not a good-faith contributor. Range-blocking does not seem to be a possibility.
This request copied here from MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist, per Special:Diff/952311972. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Proposed additions (Bot reported)
![]() |
This section is for domains which have been added to multiple wikis as observed by a bot.
These are automated reports, please check the records and the link thoroughly, it may report good links! For some more info, see Spam blacklist/Help#COIBot_reports. Reports will automatically be archived by the bot when they get stale (less than 5 links reported, which have not been edited in the last 7 days, and where the last editor is COIBot).
|
The LinkWatchers report domains meeting the following criteria:
- When a user mainly adds this link, and the link has not been used too much, and this user adds the link to more than 2 wikis
- When a user mainly adds links on one server, and links on the server have not been used too much, and this user adds the links to more than 2 wikis
- If ALL links are added by IPs, and the link is added to more than 1 wiki
- If a small range of IPs have a preference for this link (but it may also have been added by other users), and the link is added to more than 1 wiki.
COIBot's currently open XWiki reports
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proposed removals
![]() |
This section is for proposing that a website be unlisted; please add new entries at the bottom of the section.
Remember to provide the specific domain blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as See also recurring requests for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals. Notes:
|
paris-hilton
Hi! Is this record still actual? I'm asking because this regex blocks 17 existing links in ruwiki, details can be found here. It can be that blocking FirstName-LastName in any external link is not longer a good idea. Track13 0_o
- @Track13: I believe that this rule is regarding the domainname, not when it is used in the latter part of the url: http://people.com/celebrity/paris-hilton-says-boyfriend-chris-zylka-has-cutest-smile/ might just be possible. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 13:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Track13: http://www.paris-hilton.com is not: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=spamblacklist&user=Beetstra&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&wpfilters%5B%5D=newusers. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 14:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, it's my fault, I didn't double check results. Thank you Dirk Beetstra Track13 0_o 15:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
casino.guru
casino.guru
guru
Hello! I wanted to know if this site - casino.guru - can be deleted from spam blacklist section. I wanted to add information to roulette page from casino.guru guide to playing and it showed me it's blacklisted. I don't think it should be on this list because it's very useful for anyone who wants to know how to play casino games, whether it's roulette, blackjack, video poker, slot machines or other games. I wanted to quote it, because the information was very relevant to the topic "roulette". Thank you for your response.
Troubleshooting and problems
Discussion
![]() |
This section is for discussion of Spam blacklist issues among other users. |