Meta:Requests for adminship/Mathonius

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Mathonius[edit]

Mathonius (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 11:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Hoi, today I am nominating Mathonius for adminship. He is a very active Meta contributor, does a lot of countervandalism works on Meta and also as a global rollbacker. He fights vandalisms and spams here, and have already nominated enough pages for deletions and asked for prompt blocks to sysops. I believe, now, we can make him a sysop so he can simply do the job all by himself.

As an active Dutch Wikipedia sysop, he is already eligible to get adminship here. I think he is trustworthy and qualified enough to be a Meta administrator. Hope you will agree with me here. Veel succes! — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I happily accept the nomination. Thank you, Tanvir! Mathonius 11:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I say Support as I nominate! — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was planning to nominate you, but Tanvir was quicker. Of course I support this! Trijnstel 12:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tanvir -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 12:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best vandalism fighter I have seen. ^Email Vaibhav ^Talk 12:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
heh you've seen them all I'm sure. Theo10011 21:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all :) micki t 12:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matanya 13:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above — Striker ^talk 13:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support After seeing his contributions here on meta I can say he does a great work but will be more useful with being a sysop. –BruTe ^talk 14:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support No reason not to. Theo10011 21:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 01:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 09:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, of course. Sa vh ^ñ 10:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Qualified candidate. Courcelles 15:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Barras 18:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Fastily. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 14:20, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not - Hoo man (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per above. Great user :-) Ajraddatz
Support definitely. Grunny (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 01:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 12:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support a×p_de ^Hello! 17:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 08:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Didn't see this until now. Either way, Mathonius will make a good sysop so why not. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:25, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sì, support. --M/ 13:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avi 02:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support MoiraMoira 10:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 12:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No opposes, clear consensus to promote. Successful RfA. Alex Pereira ^falaê 12:11, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]