Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Herbythyme 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Herby[edit]

Herbythyme (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

I can be quite impulsive at times...! I saw a rights change on RC and it made me realise there was something I could do with these rights (& I only request rights when I have a use for them). On Commons admins can grant "autopatrolled" rights to save folk have to watch edits and I frequently do that with folk whose edits look ok - it saves work. I can do that here too I guess :) Given I was a 'crat here back in the "olden days" when you actually had to be elected I hope no one will have issues with this request but I'm happy to answer any questions - thanks folk. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support as a ´crat, but as this was your own request, you can get it back without the run. --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I appreciate the comment but it was quite a while ago - hardly any of the folk active then are active now so the views of the community would be good. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NP, you still have my support :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 11:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. But as what Wizard says... -Barras 11:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds 11:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. --Erwin 12:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Hoo man (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I agree with what Wizard said. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support micki t 12:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bureaucrat endorsement --dferg ^{☎ talk} 12:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –BruTe ^talk 15:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support are you going to run for stewardship this year ? Mardetanha ^talk 15:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JenVan (talk) 16:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure, Why not. Theo10011 18:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely! -- Avi 02:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More than the necessary two crats supported. Right granted! -Barras 10:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]