Template talk:Rfc subpage

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abuse cases[edit]

I think [1] is not a good idea. First, it should say "alleged abuse", unless it's meant to be used where there is consensus that there was abuse. Second, most cases of abuse which reach a Meta-Wiki RfC tend to discuss a range of issue which brought to the (perceived or real) abuse. --Nemo 08:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Template broken on "status", anyone got time to check?[edit]

The template is not displaying the chosen parameter from the #switch, it is only showing the #default. I gave it a quick glance and couldn't see anything wrong. Don't have time to post-mortem at the comment, so poking it out there in case someone does.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Where did this issue manifest? I also don’t see anything suspicious, and without knowing an actual failure case, it’s hard to debug. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Requests for comment/Blocking on Russian Wikipedia use of invalid was the case, though others didn't work either. I am guessing that it is the translations that are throwing things out.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
No, it works as intended and as it has always worked: |comment= overrides the switch (the #default branch’s output would be invalid, not RfC cannot impact local blocking). —Tacsipacsi (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)