User talk:Antonio1952

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello, Antonio1952. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

--Meno25 (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Fundraising translation feedback[edit]

Hey Antonio1952, I have a bit of a request to ask from you. We pulled down our banners nearly a fortnight ago for what was a highly successful international fundraiser and brought the curtain down on last years fundraiser. This week however we will be changing payment processors and during the testing of the new system it would be useful to use the time productively on on testing banner text.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to help us improve our italian text using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.


We are going to run the test on tuesday so if you dont see this message till 24 hours after it was sent you can ignore me :) Many Thanks though.

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

don't give up before trying[edit]

i have expanded the lists of List of Wikipedias by edits per article and Wikipedia article depth/Table but you removed those edits stating, It is too difficult to keep updated a long list... i would like to remind you a line from those pages itself stating, Data on this page is automatically updated every day....which means figures are updated automatically and humans only need to sort the rankings which is not so difficult task.....i request you to please have a trial run of this for minimum 3 months, if at all it is difficult task then you can shorten the list.....but please have a trial run before coming to any conclusion....don't give up before trying....Sushilmishra (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sushilmishral, I know well that the variables are automatically updated (I have created the page "Wikipedia article depth/Table"!) but, in my opinion, even simply to sort the rankings is too tiring with a list of 128 items. In any case, it seems to me more meaningful an analysis of Wikipedias with over 100,000 pages!
However, as You suggest, we can do a test unitil the end of the year. --Antonio1952 (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Trust me its not that tiresome, I am doing it for some time now and its very easy, it hardly takes 2 mins to sort(But I am facing Time Zone problem). And since you are talking about meaningfulness then why not analyse Wikipedias with over 1,000,000+ articles as this will be much more easy why only Wikipedias with over 100,000+ articles?....I suggest we try to expand it, not reduce it....
And thanks for taking up the suggestion...and I hope we can improve it and expand it in future instead of reducing it....cheers---Sushilmishra (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
1 million, one hundred thousand or ten thousand: as in all things, the right balance must be sought!!! --Antonio1952 (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

35M[edit]

Really? After all this? - dcljr (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

41M[edit]

Hello! I think that it is too early to say that wikipedia reached 41 M articles. You can verify it at the very bottom of this page (line NUMBEROFARTICLES). With deep respect, Jarash (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hmm… EmausBot has a different opinion. I don't know the cause of the disagreement. (From a user who just happens to be watching this page.) - dcljr (talk) 09:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Wait a minute! Yes, I do (know the cause). This edit you (Jarash) pointed to is over a month old! - dcljr (talk) 09:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@Jarash and Dcljr: Unfortunately the template "NUMBEROF/data" is not updated since July 7 because Acebot is currently not working in Wikimedia and in all Wikipedias. --Antonio1952 (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Tagalog Wikipedia[edit]

Please upload the logo from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagalog_Wikipedia to this site. The logo that represents the 70,000 articles celebration. It will be use onle in June 2017. --Cyrus noto3at bulaga (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)