User talk:Nettrom
Welcome to Meta![edit]
Hello Nettrom!, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 00:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Upcoming IdeaLab Events: IEG Proposal Clinics[edit]
Hello, Nettrom! We've added Events to IdeaLab, and you're invited :)
Upcoming events focus on turning ideas into Individual Engagement Grant proposals before the March 31 deadline. Need help or have questions about IEG? Join us at a Hangout:
- Thursday, 13 March 2014, 1600 UTC
- Wednesday, 19 March 2014, 1700 UTC
- Saturday, 29 March 2014, 1700 UTC
Hope to see you there!
This message was delivered automatically to IEG and IdeaLab participants. To unsubscribe from any future IEG reminders, remove your name from this list
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
[edit]
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Welcome[edit]
Nice to hear about you working for WMF. --Nemo 20:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Stubs[edit]
This is a gentle nudge to say that I'd love to have an updated version of Research:Screening WikiProject Medicine articles for quality/Stub prediction table. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- I’ve updated the table with the most recent predictions. To keep the list shorter, I limited it to those where the “not a stub” probability is more than 50%. Although that doesn’t remove ‘'all’’ the stubs, it does reduce the list considerably. Let me know how it works, I can also update my code to be a little smarter next time around and instead only show articles that are predicted to be C-class or higher. Nettrom (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- It's working pretty well, with the expected problems (e.g., ORES' reliance on the number of bytes instead of readable prose). Thank you for removing the less certain ones; the list is already huge. I'm focusing on the C-class and higher ones to start.
- The GA folks updated their rules earlier this year to essentially demand an inline citation at the end of each paragraph (excepting the usual ==Plot summary== sections and paragraphs that summarize the rest of the article, especially the introduction). This means that the data for GAs is outdated, though I might not suggest refreshing that for another year, so that more GAs can get adopted under the new standard and others will get de-listed because of it, and you'll have a more useful dataset (assuming that ORES is worth updating, given its place in the software life cycle). I'm hoping that B-class will consequently stabilize on a standard of at least one citation per ==Section==, though there are raters who have pushed for years to have B-class follow the (new) GA standard of one citation per paragraph. For my purpose today, none of this matters, because all "B-class and higher" ratings are just B-class at best, because that's the highest that a single editor can rate anything, but it might be something worth looking at.
- BTW, if you are keeping a list of research projects that could be fun if you stumbled across a handful of spare grad students, then comparing the use of inline citations at enwiki, dewiki, and frwiki (=the three biggest Wikipedias) might produce interesting results. The German-language Wikipedia is much more sparing with citations than enwiki. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)