User talk:Yger

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello, Yger. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per-user headers[edit]

Thanks for your talk refactoring. However, I don't like personalisation in talk pages: would you mind if I removed the "Questions by Nemo" header? --Nemo 19:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As all parts came from you, my opinion is that it askas for too much attention if they are with two =, indicating they are all independant. Pine started to gett all his comments udner one heading and it then seems most fair to have it the same way for your Q. --Yger (talk) 19:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are independent questions if they were in separate level 2 headers. Pine is also going to make sections by topic, apparently, but anyway what matters is that the talk page needs to be usable by everyone. We've already have had our first discussion split because of a topic being in two separate sections, hence I've restored the per-topic sectioning.[1] --Nemo 09:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No big thing for me. I you redo I will let it be.--Yger (talk) 11:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

I am not blockt here. Don't mix things up. Next time I ask to block you and put it back! RIGHTNOW! Or is this a normal thing to do on your wiki? This is Meta! This is not your homewiki!

And what for the hell do you know about the Dutch Wikipedia en Wikimedia-NL? Nothing! Realy nothing! Be ashamed! Graaf Statler (talk) 21:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC) dicussion[reply]

The page in question is intended for constructive feedback on WMF budget and with a deadline that has passed. Your criticism on wmnl is not relevant for WMF budget. I also noted the commnet below

Please note: I blocked Graaf Statler on the Dutch Wikipedia for a violation of a decision by the arbitration committee. This decision states that, amongst onthers, Graaf Statler is prohibited to discuss matters relating to Wikimedia/The Foundation. The arbcom-decision restricts itself to the Dutch Wikipedia, but I guess you could see this as importing problems from other projects to meta which I believe is blockable as well. CaAl (talk) 10:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Yger (talk) 04:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not to forget to mention it is also forbidden to edit articles related to Wikimedia and it's (ex)leaders. In fackt, if Jimbo is playing clarinet, I can't edit neigther his article, neighter the articel of Oscar van Dillen. Compleet madness!

The same with that gender bias, nobody understands what the words means, but they started meetings, projects etc. And look, if you have a wikimania with professional speakers, it could be of some value. But to lishen to the nonsens of god knows who is a compleet wasting of money. Anyway, I hope you have a bit of summer in Sweden, and believe me, the best thing to do in summer is to throw your computer out of the window, because it make people stupit. Best regards, Graaf Statler (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, our summer started yesterday with temperatures around 20. Regardning your questions on the WMF Annual plan talkpage. I can read Dutch, Dutch is actually close to Low German being close to Swedish and I have studied German for four years in schoool so read German with ease. For gender issues I have no expertice or special competence in that field and can not help you there. Yger (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same here. It's realy nice weather here in Holland. And yes, Dutch and Swedish are related, I can understand what is writen in Swedish in a way, but not exactly.

Well, maybe you can read this with a little help of google translate. Here I tryed to understand the relation between the gender bias, the gender gab, the systemic bias and the dress of Kate Middleton. I found out that relation is like a clockwork orange, it does't exist. It is complet nonsens, there is no relation. But, it's a very importent goal for Wikimedia to close that gendergab. What ever it may be, I think nobody can explane it to me. Anyway nice to meet you, and go out! Far away from everything what has to do with Wikipedia, Wikimedia and other complet nonsens. And I am not educated at all, my school career was in fackt the same drama like my wiki career. I am thanks to god a handcraftmen. So, sorry for my poor English. Best regards, Graaf Statler (talk) 07:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No responce[edit]

I tryed to discuse the matter with CaAL, but he is remouving everything. I think CaAL is this user, an autistic guy who can't even wright an articel. This is also one of his alter ego's. He even does't deny it if you ask him. Three times arbcom member etc. But, that kind of thinks are fine and normal on Wikipedia-NL. Well, I am glad I have a lot of other hobby's. I am 63 years old, and that is to old to be the toy of some wikimedia users. I think they are students who want to have a free party and a free holyday, that is all. So, lots of succes with your wikipedia, I don't think it is suce a mess like the Dutch. Best regards, Graaf Statler (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A bit difficult to discuss the matters when you literally say "CaAL, je bent een enorme troll en sokpopspeler, geef dat eindelijk eens toe!" (which translates to "CaAl, you are an enormous troll and sockmaster, admit it!"). Blocked this user per his intimidating behaviour on meta. Sa vh ^ñ 08:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on content curation & review Inspire Campaign[edit]

Thanks for your participation in IdeaLab during the Inspire Campaign focused on improving content curation & review processes from February to March 2016. I'm interested in hearing your feedback about your participation during campaign, so if you're able, I invite you to complete this brief survey to describe how you contributed to the campaign and how you felt about participating.

Immediate results of the campaign can be found here. Please feel free to review them and let me know if you have any questions about the campaign or the survey. Thanks! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 02:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions)

Survey on attitudes towards prostitution[edit]

Hi,

could you at least give me a reason for the block? It's really just a small survey. I don't earn any money from it and also it's just to get ideas for a future randomised survey. No reason to indefinitely block someone.--Sparrow (麻雀) 🐧 12:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even check what kind of edits were done before spamming your request? In the last ten years, I have just rolled back vandalism in the article in question. - Tournesol (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now unblocked your account, and given an explanation on your user discussion page om svwp. It was very bad edits that needed to be stopped immediately. But looking further into it, it seems it was done in good faith. Yger (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns[edit]

Hi! In this edit you refer to Taylor49 with he/him pronouns. Taylor's preferred pronouns in English are outlined on eir userpage. Best regards, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 20:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, noted. Yger (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]