Wikimédia France/Groupes de travail/Groupes locaux/Rennes/Logo Erminig

Les photos d'Erminig posant régulièrement des problèmes de droit d'auteur sur Commons, il a été imaginé de créer un logo sous licence libre comme solution plus pérenne.

Après divers appels sur la liste de discussion et sur Twitter, une dizaine de propositions ont été faites. Ces propositions peuvent éventuellement être amendées selon les commentaires des votants.

Les propositions suivantes seront soumises au vote du 7 décembre 2019 au 7 janvier 2020. La proposition recueillant le plus de votes positifs sera choisie.

Le vote est ouvert aux personnes ayant un compte utilisateur sur un projet Wikimedia au début du vote.

Proposition

Proposition 1
Proposition 2
Proposition 3
Proposition 4
Proposition 5
Proposition 6
Proposition 7
Proposition 8
Proposition 9
Proposition 10
Proposition 11

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Avec 10 votes

Support, la proposition 2 est choisie. Merci à tou.*s pour les propositions et la participation au vote ! — Envlh (talk) 07:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Proposition 1

Support -- --Fschwarzentruber (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC) (elle est mimi)[reply]
Neutre -- --Nemokary (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2020 (UTC) c'est mignon[reply]

Proposition 2

Support Trizek ^{from FR} 11:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Si le logo est utilisé en tant qu'avatar, on pourrait enlever les textes (probablement illisibles comme noté ci-dessous) et l'herbe (pour qu'il soit gwenn ha du). — Envlh (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ciell (talk) 15:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support À noter que pour si elle est utilisée en avatar Twitter, les textes seront sans doute trop petits, sans doute à retravailler ou retirer. Auregann (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Aucun souci à mon niveau pour enlever les textes si besoin. Par contre, je ne suis pas pour enlever l'herbe qui apporte une petite touche de couleur. Lepsyleon (talk) 08:38, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jastrow (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hsarrazin (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutre --Nemokary (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC) l'idée est bien, mais ça demande une amélioriation esthétique (anatomique)[reply]
Support-Ash Crow (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean-Fred (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ki7sun3 (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tsaag Valren (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 3

Support Pymouss Tchatcher - 17:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trizek ^{from FR} 11:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Auregann (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Litlok (talk) 20:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jastrow (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chragon (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nemokary (talk) 19:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean-Fred (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ki7sun3 (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 4

Support Même si probablement à retravailler un petit peu ;) — Envlh (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support même avis qu'Envlh --Nemokary (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC) m[reply]
Support mais à refaire en svg ^^ -Ash Crow (talk) 11:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 5

Support Pymouss Tchatcher - 17:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Litlok (talk) 20:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutre j'aime bien l'idée, mais il y a peut-être trop de détails pour un logo --Nemokary (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 6

Neutre l'idée du Tangram est cool, avec quelques formes rondes, c'est original. Les couleurs me semblent cependant un peu tristes --Nemokary (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 7

Support — Envlh (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Auregann (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jastrow (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support je trouve cette version plus joyeuse que la version de la proposition 6 --Nemokary (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support-Ash Crow (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 8

Support Auregann (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chragon (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutre c'est mignon, mais je trouve que ça demanderait une amélioriation esthétique (anatomique)--Nemokary (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 9

Support Toutes les propositions sont super mignonnes, mais celle-là est en plus vraiment spirituelle. Rama (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. C'est très dur de choisir... Kvardek du (talk) 18:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contre Le lobby Wikidata, ça suffit ! :) Trizek ^{from FR} 11:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contre Même s'il est très joli, on cherche le logo de la NCO, pas celui de Wikidata ;) Quelques idées : remplacer les 0 et les 1 par des hermines ou par les logos d'autres projets (Wikimédia, OSM, etc.) — Envlh (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Proposition 9 is most pleasing to the eye. --Gereon K. (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ma préférée, mais je me retrouve totalement dans la remarque et les propositions d'Envlh ! EdouardHue (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Litlok (talk) 20:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contre Design sympa pour Wikidata, pas pour la NCO. Lepsyleon (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutre je rejoins l'avis d'Envlh sur cette proposition --Nemokary (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 10

Support — Envlh (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support VIGNERON * ^discut. 10:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fschwarzentruber (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Nemokary (talk) 16:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support TED (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition 11

Neutre ça ressemble à la proposition 3 avec moins d'originalité --Nemokary (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.