Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate/ko

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate and the translation is 100% complete.

The election ended 31 8월 2021. No more votes will be accepted.
The results were announced on 7 9월 2021. Please consider submitting any feedback regarding the 2021 election on the elections' post analysis page.

Wikimedia-logo black.svg
2021 이사회 선거
메인 페이지
후보자
투표 정보
단기 이양식 투표
결과
토론
FAQ
질문
조직
번역
설명문서
이 박스: 보기 · 토론 · 편집

자신을 이사장 후보로 추천해 주신 후보자들에게 감사드립니다. 후보자는 2021년 이사회 선거 후보자로 자신을 제출하기 위한 틀을 완성했습니다. 다음은 완성된 지원 양식 예시입니다.

지원은 2021년 6월 9일 00:00(UTC)에서 2021년 6월 29일(UTC) 23:59 사이에 접수되었습니다. 후보자는 제출 후 3일 이내 또는 2021년 6월 29일 23:59(UTC)의 지명 기간 종료 전까지만 지원서를 변경할 수 있습니다. 이 시간 외에는 사소한 철자나 번역 수정이 허용됩니다. (제출 수정 사항에 대한 참고 사항을 참조하세요.)

후보자 참고 자료는 2021년 선거 기간 동안 후보자를 지원하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 자세한 내용은 이사회 선거 진행자에게 언제든지 문의하세요.

후보자를 위한 커뮤니티 질문

2021년 6월 9일부터 6월 29일까지 위키미디어 운동 회원들은 이 페이지를 통해 이사회 후보자에게 질문을 제출했습니다. 커뮤니티 회원은 모든 언어로 질문할 수 있습니다.

질문을 제출하는 것 외에도 커뮤니티 회원은 다른 사람이 제출한 질문을 지지하거나 댓글을 달 수도 있습니다.

2021년 6월 30일에 선거 위원회는 목록에서 질문을 수집하고 편집하고 후보자가 7월 7일부터 응답할 짧은 질문 목록을 제시합니다.

이 방법은 후보자, 번역가, 선거 위원회 및 유권자가 이 프로세스를 보다 쉽게 접근하고 관리할 수 있도록 하는 데 사용됩니다. 우리는 사람들이 관련된 모든 사람의 시간을 존중하고 질문 페이지를 사용하여 더 많은 질문이 있는 다른 페이지로 링크하거나 토론 페이지 또는 이메일을 통해 후보자에게 연락하지 마십시오. 여러분의 존경과 예의에 미리 감사드립니다.

후보자

선거 위원회가 2021년 7월 2일에 대조 목록을 게시하기 전에는 질문에 응답하지 마세요.

질문에 대한 답변은 질문 당 약 1600자(공백 제외)를 초과하지 않는 것이 좋습니다. 설명 목적으로 사용되는 관련 링크는 괜찮지만 확장된 답변이 포함된 다른 페이지로 링크는 하지 마세요. 유권자와 후보자의 수가 많기 때문에 이러한 페이지를 읽기 쉽고 유지하고 것이 필요하고, 유권자에게도 유익하고 쓸모가 있습니다.

제출된 질문

후보자에 대한 질문을 제출해 주신 모든 분들께 감사드립니다. 이제 질문 제출 기간이 마감되었습니다. 선거관리위원회에서 후보자가 답변하도록 선택한 질문 목록은 후보자 Q&A 페이지에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

  1. 후보자들은 위키미디어 재단 프로젝트에서 자원 봉사자 수를 늘리는 것에 대해 어떻게 생각하고 어떻게 하면 좋을까요?
  2. 미래에 위키버스의 다른 기관(커뮤니티, 가맹단체 등)과 관련하여 이사회를 개인적으로 어디에서 보고 싶습니까(예를 들어, 의사 결정의 형평성 보장)?
  3. 후보자는 이사회에서 커뮤니티와 어떻게 연결됩니까?
  4. 투명성과 커뮤니케이션에 대한 여러분의 생각을 설명하세요.
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  5. 새롭게 떠오르는 위키미디어 커뮤니티에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?
  6. 당신이 이사회의 자리에 적합한 후보자가 될 수 있는 이유는 무엇이라고 생각합니까?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  7. 여러분의 직업적 또는 재정적 이해관계와 이사회 사이에 연관성이 있습니까? 그렇다면 방해가 되지 않도록 하는 방법을 설명하세요.
  8. 재단은 위키에서 많은 반대를 일으키는 재단이 운영하는 프로젝트를 어떻게 처리해야 합니까?
    1. Endorse. I believe this is, by far, the most serious issue the Foundation needs to resolve. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse in the strongest possible terms. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    3. Endorse absolutely, "on-Wiki oppositions" and/or "over-all community disagreement"... -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    4. Endorse strongly. An important and sensitive issue. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    5. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    6. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  9. 위키미디어 재단의 범위에 한계가 있다고 믿으십니까? 그렇다면 그 한계는 무엇입니까?
  10. 인터넷의 미래를 형성하는 위키를 어떻게 생각하고 있으며, 그 비전을 현실로 만들기 위해 위키미디어 재단이 위키 커뮤니티를 어떻게 지원할 수 있습니까?
  11. 우리 운동에 더 많은 전문가(연구원, 학계, 실무자)를 참여시키려면 어떻게 해야 합니까?
    1. Endorse but might add "while maintaining the ability of non-experts to contribute." Smallbones (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  12. 다른 위키백과 커뮤니티의 자치권 주장과 위키백과가 현재 중앙에서 많이 규제하려는 시도에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  13. 차이점을 모호하게 만드는 위키미디어에서 위키백과로의 브랜드 변경에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    3. Endorse Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    4. Endorse -Killarnee (CTU) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    5. Suggest removing "which is blurring the difference" -- that part makes this a leading question. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    6. Endorse with ProcrastinatingReader's suggested modification. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    7. Endorse this question in either format. -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    8. EndorseAmmarpad (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    9. Endorse strongly. EpicPupper (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  14. 현재 위키백과의 규칙과 절차의 구조가 편향을 효과적으로 방지하고 있다고 느끼십니까? 커뮤니티 리더로서 편견을 없애기 위해 할 수 있는 일이 있다면 무엇이라고 생각하십니까?
  15. 위키미디어 프로젝트가 전 세계적으로 증가하는 질문에 대해 어떻게 생각하며 이에 대해 어떻게 하시겠습니까?
  16. (특히 전문가 커뮤니티에 의해 설립된) 우리와 똑같은 비전(인터넷에 무료 지식 전파)을 가진 여러 운동이 있습니다. 그러나 그들은 그들의 비전을 달성하기 위해 위키백과가 아닌 자체 플랫폼(또는 다른 플랫폼을 사용)을 만들기로 결정했습니다. 이에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까? 그들을 "통합"하여 위키미디어에 가입해야 합니까, 아니면 그냥 그들만의 독립성을 갖도록 해야 합니다.
  17. 가까운 미래(향후 2~3년)에 위키미디어 재단이 남반구 위키커뮤니티와 어떻게 더 효과적으로 참여해야 하는지에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?
    1. Endorse, global south and/or "emerging communities". -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  18. 위키미디어 프로젝트가 유엔 행동의 10년(지속 가능한 개발 목표, 파리 협정, 생물다양성 협약 목표 등을 위해)과 더 관련되어야 합니까? 그리고 위키미디어 재단이 이와 관련하여 어떤 중개자 역할을 할 수 있거나 해야 합니까?
  19. 위키생물종, 위키뉴스, 위키배움터 및 기타 소규모 위키 프로젝트의 미래에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까? 그리고 위키미디어 재단은 그들을 어떻게 지원할 수 있습니까?
    1. Endorse, absolutely, yes please. I'll add Wikisource, Wikivoyage also. These projects often do not get the required support, and I find this question very important. -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse (but fix the capitalization please). --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  20. 위원 임기 동안 달성하고 싶은 구체적인 목표나 성과가 있습니까?
  21. 위키미디어 커뮤니티의 다양성은 당신에게 어떤 의미인가요? 그리고 그것을 어떻게 가시적으로 또는 정량적으로 달성할 수 있는지에 대한 계획이 있습니까? (예시: 데이터 격차 감소)
  22. 수년에 걸쳐 위키미디어 재단 비용이 꾸준히 증가했습니다. 이 문제에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까? 지출에 5년 상한선이 있어야 합니까?
    1. Something like this would be good, but I don't think the question should specifically ask about caps. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  23. 재단 자원 할당과 관련하여 기술 부채 상환과 새로운 전략적 이니셔티브 작업 사이에서 자금의 우선 순위를 어떻게 정하시겠습니까?
    1. Endorse this question. Probably the single one I would choose if only one question was asked. MarioGom (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse the concept but prefer wording/formulation of #50. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  24. What do you think about the WMF using funds for purposes not related to Wikimedia projects?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse - I should note that this should be interpreted as "clearly and directly", as our inherent nature means everything could be claimed to be vaguely related Nosebagbear (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  25. Do you think the WMF should take any active role in relation to undisclosed paid editing?
  26. What do you think about Wikimedia_Enterprise? Do you think its criticsm is justfied?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (CTU) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  27. Given recent comments by ex-staffers, should the new Board conduct an investigation about management misconduct at the WMF, including but not limited to bullying, union busting and discrimination based on sex, race or disabilities?
    1. Endorse. Especially given that multiple individuals raised such complaints, this needs to be investigated and resolved. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    3. (I recommend excluding the "including" part, to keep if brief.) --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    4. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  28. How should the 4 community board seats due to be selected in 2022 be filled?
  29. Have you, or any members of your immediate family, received any financial benefits from the WMF or a WMF affiliate in the past 5 years?
  30. How did you contribute to the Movement Strategy process, the Movement Brands Project, the UCOC process, the proposed Bylaws amendments, and the call for feeback on community board selections?
  31. Under what (if any) circumstances should the board extend the term of community-selected trustees?
  32. When should Foundation projects require explicit approval by the community and how should that approval be assessed?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  33. If you had been a Board member in 2019, would you have supported the Board's statement on the ban of Fram from the English Wikipedia? Would you have proposed any changes or additions to this statement?
  34. Allegations of a hostile workplace environment at WMF have been made by former employees here and here. What is your reaction to this and is there anything that you would do as a board member to change this?
  35. Katherine Maher recently floated the idea of paying contributors. Should the Foundation start discussions on what a model of compensation would look like?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (CTU) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  36. Given the amount of work stewards do, do you think stewards should be paid? Why (not)? If yes, how much?
  37. Should there be a waiting period between the time a Board member leaves the Board, and they take on an employee, consultant, or other paid role with the Foundation?
    1. Endorse. Chico Venancio (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    3. Endorse -Killarnee (CTU) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    4. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    5. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    6. Endorse --RaiderAspect (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    7. Endorse -- though I'd prefer How long should be the waiting period... rather than Should there be a waiting period.... AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    8. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    9. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[]
  38. To reduce the possibility of conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest do you commit to not accept any employed or remunerated position with the Foundation for at least the duration of your stay on the board and 6 months until after leaving the board?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    3. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    4. Endorse -- AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    5. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  39. Non-affiliated volunteers (i.e. volunteers who are not members of any Wikimedia affiliate) do most of the work on the wikis, yet elect only a quarter of board seats. Do you think this is right?
  40. WMF는 다른 국가에서 제안되거나 확립된 중개 책임 규칙을 어떻게 처리하고 정부 기관의 기소로부터 지역 위키미디어 자원 봉사자를 보호할 수 있습니까?
  41. The Foundation rejected repeated calls to make the Movement Strategy a consensus process. I believe none of the resulting projects have an established consensus, including the Code of Conduct. Rebranding was 92% opposed,[1] and an item to undermine our core content quality policies appears to have 100% opposition.[2] I believe those running the process clearly advanced their own agenda, disregarding all opposition. Do you consider the Strategy process legitimate? Do staff have a valid mandate to impose these Strategy projects on us? (Please to not get sidetracked on the merits of any particular project, this is a process question.)
  42. Would you be in favor of hiring an outside firm to do an independent audit of board actions over the preceding two years?
  43. As a board member, would you encourage the board to evaluate the wisdom of close relationships with specific outside groups such as the Tides Foundation?
  44. What are your thoughts on how to handle the competing representation issues between giving "seats in the room" for smaller/medium projects at the expense of reducing the "per-editor" vote of large projects, such as may be a question for the Global Council? An example of a proposal along these lines can be seen here, with issues raised on the talk page.
  45. What do you think about the problem that there are arbitration committees in a few wikis, but not in all, and so the parties can transfer their conflict to other wikis in order not to be punished there, or if the conflict was already on the other wiki, there is no independent dispute resolution body at all? What do you think of a single point of contact for all wikis? Otherwise there would often only be a) abandoning the project to avoid the bullying or b) a civil lawsuit.
  46. How important is privacy for you? Are you in favor of anonymous editors not automatically publishing their IP address, or should Wikipedia continue to lag behind in terms of privacy?
  47. Several severe communication issues have been reported with the iOS and Android mobile apps and the web client, all currently in production. Do you agree with the WMF's response to these? More generally, how can the community ensure the difficulties they experience with the software are prioritised in development resource allocations?
    1. Endorse - Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
    2. Endorse MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  48. Do you feel the current spending and available personnel on development issues (both on building new features and fixing bugs in existing ones) is too low, too high, or about right?
    1. Endorse but I would favor wording of #23. MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  49. Which past Board resolutions or other actions would you vote to overturn, if any?
  50. What percentage of the WMF's annual budget should be allocated among the following categories: (1) maintaining server uptime now and in the foreseeable future, (2) clearing the phabricator backlog, (3) recruiting new participants, and (4) everything else?
    1. Conditional Endorse. Another category should be added: "Improving and modernizing the interfaces for readers and editors" not limited to the current phabricator backlog. DGG (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  51. A number of board members, as well as C-level Foundation employees, have been brought onboard who never provide any clue what their opinions or thoughts about Wikimedia's mission is or should be -- neither at the beginning of their tenure nor at any time afterwards. What thoughts do you have about requiring them to provide some statement to the volunteers on this matter? -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[]
  52. Do you believe that communication with individual editors as a Trustee is important? What are you views on how quickly, and in how much detail, Trustees should be expected to reply to individual queries by editors with regards to issues and their role (as an average across the year/term)?
  53. Do you think a community member can be an effective CEO of the WMF? Should the WMF look within the communities, rather than outside, to fill that vacancy?
  54. Do you think that a larger portion of the board seats should be directly elected by the community?
  55. Wikimedia Foundation has no dedicated accessibility team, do you think we should be doing more given both legal (Americans with Disabilities Act etc.) and ethical ramifications? Should web accessibility be a commitment by the Board of Trustees itself, like with, say, BLP policy?
  56. Name three elephants in the room. How do you propose to deal with them?
  57. From the 8 prioritized Movement Strategy initiaves (letterd A to H on Movement_Strategy), the top priority is creating a Movement Charter whereby a Global Council will be created, and resposibilities will be transfered from the (Board of Trustees) of the Wikimedia Foundation to the Global Council. Please elaborate on this top priority.
  58. Should the Board wait until after the elections to choose the next CEO?
  59. What skills and qualities would you look for in the next CEO?
  60. Should the WMF fundraise in impoverished countries?
  61. Who is ultimately responsible for the Board of Trustees collective ability to follow its own procedures, policies and code of conduct?

조합된 질문 목록

2021년 6월 30일에 선거 위원회는 7월 7일부터 후보자가 응답할 질문을 대조할 것입니다.