Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 13: Line 13:
===Yucazai@pt.wiktionary===
===Yucazai@pt.wiktionary===
{{CU request
{{CU request
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|language code = pt
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= wikt
|project shortcut= wikt

Revision as of 00:37, 15 June 2011

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate> 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
}}

    <translate> For example:</translate> 

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
 |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
}}
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Yucazai@pt.wiktionary

Status:    In progress
List of users
Marina do Carmo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Yucazai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Cabo Henrique (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See below

This is related to a CU request that I did last month. This vandal keeps coming back with many different user names. In the past few days I have already identified and blocked the following users:

Now these three new users listed above have come and done what may seem inocuous changes, but they have his "style", so I'm almost sure it's him. I need CU confirmation to block them as well.

Also, if you could check other recent new users, it would be great, because this vandal is known to keep dozens of sleeper accounts.

If you identify that any of these users come from open proxies, please give me the ranges, so that I can block them locally.

Thanks once again for your help.

--ValJor 10:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user has many different IPs. Nevertheless I can confirm that
  • Cabo Henrique
  • Yucazai
  • Marina do Carmo
  • Fernando Nonemberg
are the same person.

The other  Confirmed group is

  • Mariano de Matos
  • Cpls não seja bobão
  • Liberdade sim, anarquia não!
  • Kagon
These two groups as well as Menesez, Manuel dos Santos, Ricardo S., Daniel Azevedo, Sem geito mesmo and Jorge es un Coitado are Likely Likely to be related to each other. Ruslik 12:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for that. Now I have a new batch to be checked:
The first one is most certainly him (on his first modification he insulted the admins), the second one is probably him, the other three may be innocent bystanders, but I don't want to take a chance, so I would like to ask you to check them all. Thanks.
--ValJor 10:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed
Others looks Unrelated Unrelated from a technical standpoint.
Regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 19:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another one for you to check: Cavaquinho.
I "know" it's him, I just need CU confirmation to block him. Thanks.
--ValJor 12:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not needed anymore, already done via IRC. Thanks.
--ValJor 13:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here is today's list to be checked:
Thanks!
--ValJor 16:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody home?
--ValJor 15:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated Unrelated from the technical point of view. Ruslik 12:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
┌─────────────┘
 I would like you to also check these users:
Striker talk 00:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eltonazul@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Davidsbarros (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
DaSilvaBarros (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Eltonazul (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Desciclopedista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Probable block evasion.Other socks:

Thanks,--Dinho 18:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed all. IPs are already blocked. No new accounts (i.e. they're all blocked). PeterSymonds (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed; also pt:User:Eltonverde. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OBrigada@ka.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
OBrigada (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Diaoha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): My contempt and abuse eject. Thanks. --Jaba1977 02:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see some comments there by OBrigada, nothing by Diaoha. Please specify more clearly:
  1. Why do you think these two might be the same, and (more importantly):
  2. Why would it be a problem if these two are the same?
- Andre Engels 05:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This person (diaoha) is quite an aggressive user, his tactics of such actions. He did not block the Georgian Wikipedia, the administrator because several of his friends. I'm trying to create the post of Checkuser. User verification are strongly against because they want their actions to remain secret. Sorry for bad English. Thanks. --Jaba1977 20:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated Unrelated--Shizhao 07:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Мый_у_пайдаланыше_улам (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Xumepa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Please check this two users. They have voted in the Википедий:Тӱшка while having so little edits (3 edits both). Are they a fake accounts made only for voting? Thanks. амдф 17:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Likely Likely. See also Emperor321. Ruslik 18:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TerrenceHo@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
TerrenceHo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Peggyng556 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vanessa1999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
PinkiWu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kelly456 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
KellyMok (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Due to the same reason in previous CheckUser request: the user in the list, TerrenceHo and Peggyang556 both broke 3RR limits in same articles which the rest of the users in the list did before. If necessary, please set a short term IP range block in case of further vandalism Mys_721tx(talk) 16:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed that all above accounts are the same person. See also RaviWong and QF29. Ruslik 12:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot--Kegns 18:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Adam@pt.wikipedia

The following request is closed: done. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Status:    Done
List of users
Danny Adam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Carina Lanchine (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
David Maticheus (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I believe that the attempted fraud is obvious, since the bill did David Mathicheus issues in the discussion of this editor (a) removing warnings, created after the vote to highlight the item that is of interest to him (a) and turns the two editions. Carina Lanchinetambém would sock puppet editor (a). I do not think an investigation is necessary in this case. As the blockade requires at least consensus that the lock is made, if anyone disagrees with the illicit use of sock, the block should be made according to the rules for improper use of puppets.--Mamonas Assasinas 23:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed fr33kman 23:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops!The user David Mathicheus was created 5 minutes after the original account to take "another" notice in your talk page.Thanks,--Mamonas Assasinas 23:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you ask a ptwiki admin to deal with it. Personally, I find it interesting that your only edits anywhere are to ask for CUs on a project that "you" haven't edited on ;) fr33kman 23:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=2662325"