Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
QuentinvBot (talk | contribs)
4,787 edits
m 3 requests archived
Heb (talk | contribs)
15 edits
→‎Removal of access: Added Mathiaskh@DaWiki
Line 95: Line 95:
:I confirm this is my request. – [[User:Rotemliss|rotemliss]] – [[User Talk:Rotemliss|Talk]] 19:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
:I confirm this is my request. – [[User:Rotemliss|rotemliss]] – [[User Talk:Rotemliss|Talk]] 19:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
::Done. [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|talk]]) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
::Done. [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|talk]]) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

==== Mathiaskh@DaWiki ====
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = da.wikipedia
|user name = Mathiaskh
|discussion= [[:da:Wikipedia:Afstemninger/Inaktive_administratorer_2]]
}}
On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 180 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-10-01 [[:da:User:Sarrus]] posted a warning on this users page ([http://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brugerdiskussion:Mathiaskh&diff=5414773&oldid=5358890 diff]) and the user hasn't responded. Both [[:da:User:Sarrus]] and I are sysops on DaWiki ([http://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciel:Brugerliste&limit=1&username=Sarrus verify Sarrus], [http://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciel:Brugerliste&limit=1&username=Heb verify me]). --[[User:Heb|Heb]] 13:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


=== Miscellaneous requests ===
=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Revision as of 13:10, 14 November 2011

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Teak@hy.wikisource

Status:    Done

Please grant permanent adminship per unanimous community support. Thank you, Chaojoker 02:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-05-08. Your community may not be sizable to warrant permanent adminship yet, per Requests_for_comment/Minimum_voting_requirements#Minimum_requirements_to_elect_permanent_Administrators.-- Jusjih 12:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, finally I see some documented discussion around this issue. Thanks for linking to it! :) Jusjih, according to that discussion, most of the contributors think that a minimum of 5 supports with 2/3 ratio is enough. Here we have 6 supports with 0 against. Also, please take a look at [1], where this community was deemed to be borderline, and permanent adminship was granted. To throw some more weight onto the tipping scales: I am one of the founders of the project [2]; I have been a temp admin on this project on 5 previous occasions (6 months each) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]; I am a permanent sysop on hy.wikipedia and am one of the oldest sysops on the project (since 2007 [8] - although increasingly inactive, since I currently prefer to spend my wikitime on hy.wikisource). Thanks for your consideration. ― Teak 16:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved back the status to "In progress", as apparently this request still needs a review (see diff). I'd like to comment that I granted permanent sysopship one week ago, because I agreed that the community is now large enough. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikisource-project has urgent needs of admins to maintain the namespaces related to the proofread-extension. The conflicts you often find on Wikipedia are rare on this kind of project. So, please, do not compare with Wikipedia. -- Lavallen 10:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done granting regular adminship while reconsidering and understanding your specific reasons similar to Steward_requests/Permissions/2011-11#.D5.8E.D5.A1.D5.A6.D5.A3.D5.A5.D5.B6.40hy.wikisource, without intending to make this the precedent for all kinds of wikis. As Wikisource, Wikipedia, etc. have different situations, whether to grant regular adminship to wikis with limited active users depends on specific situations.--Jusjih 13:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the consideration! ― Teak 20:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beau@szl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like to perform some gadget maintenance tasks on szl.wikipedia. It involves editing MediaWiki namespace, moving pages around and deleting old stuff, so I need sysop privileges for today. Thanks, Beau (talk) 11:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done poke me when done. --Vituzzu 11:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have finished. You can remove my sysop bit now. Thanks, Beau (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed, thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header


Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Jcb@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Please remove the sysop rights of Jcb. Thanks. --Cecil 15:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rotemliss-bot@hewiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights (bot of User:Rotemliss). Rotemliss-bot 19:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm this is my request. – rotemliss – Talk 19:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mathiaskh@DaWiki

Status:    In progress

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 180 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-10-01 da:User:Sarrus posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Sarrus and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Sarrus, verify me). --Heb 13:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=3074709"