User talk:Notafish/Archives03

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki


Is there any benefit in keeping the page "Wikimedia Sudan"? John Vandenberg 01:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LSS[edit]

You are awesome :) I've been meaning to edit the template... thanks. -- phoebe 17:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2009. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before 2009-10-9. Kind regards, —Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nice to meet you[edit]

Hi Delphine, my name is Nevio. I`m going to attend the meeting you are cordinating as WMBr representative. Philippe Beaudette has invited Thomas Souza who discuss on our mailing list and people decided that I should be indicated. Eugene Eric Kim has booked my flight, so i`m arriving wednesday, 4 november.

best, Nevinho 14:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how are you? Could you inform me name and adress of that delicious restaurant you lead people on a cold evening during usability meetings near notre dame? Nevinho 14:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you're talking about the little crêpe place, it was: La Crêpe Rit du Clown - Address:6 rue des Canettes 75006 Paris. Cheers! notafish }<';> 09:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A question about Wikimedia España[edit]

Hi, last days I have posted a question in Chapters committe discussion but nowadays I don't have a response. I don't know if all Chapters commitee members have noticed that message and what´s happen with it. Could you talk with the other members about this question and tell me if it is on discussion?. Thanks on advance, --Elisardojm 16:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¡¡Muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta!! :). Saludos, --Elisardojm 11:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Saludos de nuevo. Ya he revisado tu respuesta y tengo una duda. Actualmente la idea de Wikimedia España es la que comentas de crear una asociación nacional y crear delegaciones en cada autonomía o algo parecido. Yo lo que me pregunto es, así que se cree Wm-es, ¿qué pasará con las preguntas que puse en mi comentario del Chapter si se crea un subcapítulo autonómico?. Gracias por tu atención :), --Elisardojm 23:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If there is a Wikimedia España, "autonomous" chapters for the different provinces will not be allowed. The same way for example no "Wikimedia Bavaria" or Wikimedia Bretagne" would be allowed today, since Wikimedia Germany and Wikimedia France exist. Of course, if there are ideas for an autonomous chapter, we'll need to make sure that we help them "live" within Wikimedia España. notafish }<';> 08:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2010. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before 2010-04-11. Kind regards, Ottava Rima (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, do you have any questions for Toronto's bid? OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was mentioned during you presentation at Wikimania I thought you might be interested in this category where I've collected some related pages. They're very interesting! --Nemo 00:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Video[edit]

Not a fish huh? First I heard it I thought you meant naughty fish. Anyway, your part of the clip has to be my favorite: just saying =) Resident Mario 19:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello Notafish. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2010. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 26, 2024. Kind regards, --dferg ☎ talk 14:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

times[edit]

would 18:00 or 19:00 UTC be better for the Europeans? I was hoping to catch India. -- phoebe | talk 17:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. 19.00 might cut it, but it's late late in India. I understand the need to catch as many people as possible, but to catch India, sometime around 15.00 UTC might be slightly better? Then it's middle of the afternoon in Europe, people might be able to have their chat window on at work/uni? Dunno. notafish }<';> 21:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada[edit]

We are moving the content over to our own site similar to what Wiki UK has done. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They did this once the process was finished, not in the middle of it. So we can do this once the bylaws have been approved and finished. Cheers notafish }<';> 11:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, tu es de Carcassonne! Honnêtement, la plus belle ville fortifiée d'Europe! De tous mes voyages, c'est celle qui a le plus fait rêver l'américain en moi! Cordialement, Antaya 03:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bylaws[edit]

Hi! Thanks for your concern. Currently, Yakoo (our lawyer/member) is working in the changes proposed to the bylaws... but now is taking vacations (february is a difficult month to do anything here in Chile). He will return to La Serena next week and will send us the proposal in the following days. I prefer not to be directly involved with the legal writing... as an engineer, I'm a bit afraid with them, hehehe... I will send a message as soon as we have any news. :) --B1mbo 15:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Individual advocacy and lobbying[edit]

Here you indicated that there was opposition to individual advocacy/lobbying in the Movement Roles group. Who was opposed to this, and why? James Salsman 04:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello Notafish,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2011. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 09, 2011. Kind regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 22:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project[edit]

My name is Victor Grigas and I'm a Storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation. We're exploring new ways to explain why Wikipedia is so special and we’ve started a Wikipedia Stories Project, where we’re chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community, especially editors and active contributors in the movement like you. I'll be traveling to Wikimania next month to collect stories for our 2011 Fundraiser. While there I'd love the chance to meet with you and hear your thoughts about Wikipedia. We’ll have a schedule of available times for you to sign up if you’re interested, but right now, we’d like to make the initial contact to gauge your interest. Please let me know by emailing me at vgrigas@wikimedia.org or responding on my talk page.

thank you,

Vgrigas 21:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Venezuela[edit]

Hello,

I am writing to ask you a question regarding the status of our still pending request of Wikimedia Venezuela to become a local Wikimedia Chapter. We have started gathering people and ideas since October 2010, organised a series of lectures for Wikipedia TEN. Our proposed bylaws have been reviewed by members of the ChapCom as early as May 2011. We were informed that in June-July 2011, our proposal was scheduled to be submitted to voting and, as of October 2, 2011, we are yet to receive a notification, either approval, rejection, suggestions...we have received only silence. What is going on? What has delayed the ChapCom to close the voting on our case? Working groups in other countries have submitted their proposals/requests to form a local WikimediaChapter more or less at the same time that we did, and they have been approved already. Why not Wikimedia Venezuela? What is wrong with us? If we were told what is wrong with us, we could work it out and fix whatever is needed...but with no input, we are left sitting in the waiting room for months..

Could you please tell us what is delaying our approval? What do we have to do?

Our people (37) is anxious and wondering what is going on. We were more people, but we feel dissapointed and discouraged, and this doesn't help us at all. Could you please give us an update?

Many, many thanks in advance from Venezuela.

--Jewbask 01:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2011. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before October 10, 2011. Kind regards, vvvt 17:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh Wikimedia Chapter[edit]

Hi User:Notafish, I am writing regarding you comment on KKWM Chapter page on meta. Could you please clarify or give additional information what is needed from our side? Do you mean we need to provide usernames of all members of our community or anything else? It is not clear for me what do you mean in your comment. We are doing our best to inform people about Wikimedia projects. Currently we are running article writing contest which was supported by Nokia Kazakhstan and Samruk-Kazyna Natioal Fund. Looking forward to hearing from you! --Ashina 13:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am writing this message to get any update relating our application to be recognize as Wikimedia chapter. Is there any news? we have answered to all questions over month ago. Could you please give an update to us regarding this point? If we need any further action please contact me. Kind regards, --Ashina 05:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the summaries...[edit]

on the movement roles talk page, please go on. :-) Ziko (talk) 12:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the thanks. :) notafish }<';> 11:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship[edit]

Hello,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2012. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 08, 2012. Kind regards, —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 12:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for nominating yourself to GAC. And thanks for drawing up the WCA budget. Abbasjnr (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks. And again, sorry about Africa. I promise I'll pay ;-). notafish }<';> 15:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish page for Wikimedia United States Federation[edit]

Delphine, I noticed you are the US contact for Iberocoop. Please take a look at Federación Estadounidense de Wikimedia, the Spanish language page on the US Wikimedia federation that I started. If you wish to expand and/or fix it, please do so WhisperToMe (talk) 23:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please forget...[edit]

This - My fault. I added you in error to the page. Now it's fixed. Regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Brasil[edit]

Hi, Delphine. Could you give another look to Grants:WM BR/Start-up (and also the discussion and this new page)? Thanks, CasteloBrancomsg 17:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

de-wp Wikipedia:Wikimedia[edit]

Hi Delphine, wie beim offenen Sonntag besprochen habe ich jetzt die Diskussion rund um die Schaffung eines internationalen Wikiversum-Portals gestartet. Wenn du magst, beteilige dich doch mit eigenen Ideen oder Wünschen an der Diskussion. Danke sehr! --Nicole Ebber (WMDE) (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fundraising translation feedback[edit]

Hey Notafish,

I wanted to ask for your help. As you may be aware we have been running banners on many language wikis. We have a lot of new content this year and I really want to conduct a thorough review of our translations. This is a combination of feedback from the community, readers, donors as well as those with professional translator experience. This will help us ensure the highest quality of translations used in our messaging.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to give us feedback in french using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Many Thanks

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. notafish }<';> 09:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of review of adminship (April 2013)[edit]

Hello Notafish. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2013. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 08, 2013. Kind regards. -- MarcoAurelio 14:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Distributed via Global message delivery, 14:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Trademark agreements[edit]

Hello Del - happy post-Easter! I hope you have as many interesting leftovers as I do...

As there's been some trademark agreement discussion here lately, two questions for you:

  • Does WMDE have a TM agreement with the WMF, and would you be willing to post it to Meta?
  • Would you mind publishing the original draft "third party trademark agreement" draft from Internal (from 2007) to here?

Hope to see you soon. SJ talk  22:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sam, yes, I do have leftovers. They consist of much chocolate, to be precise. ;-)
Where's the discussion happening? Or are you refering to the whole Community logo debacle?
  • Where should I post the third party thingie (if I post it ;))?
  • WMDE does have a trademark agreement, if nothing else through the Chapter agreement. I'll look into it. notafish }<';> 00:51, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]