Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Editing/Cross-Platform AutoWikiBrowser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Random proposal ►

◄ Back to Editing  The survey has concluded. Here are the results!


  • Problem: As a Apple mac user, I am most concerned that there is no opportunity to utilise AWB when editing
  • Who would benefit: Apple users who are unable to use AWB
  • Proposed solution: further development of T157271 to allow for cross-platform usage of AWB
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets: T157271
  • Proposer: :JarrahTree (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

@JarrahTree: Have you tried JavaScript Wiki Browser at en:User:Joeytje50/JWB?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

thanks for notification - have applied for permission to use the browser :JarrahTree (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: You're welcome. You can use it on other wikis where you are an Admin at will.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Voting[edit]

  • Support Support (as suggestor) :JarrahTree (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Atsme📞📧 15:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support web-based AWB? yes, please czar 21:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support JWB is nice but yes, this would be welcome. ~ Amory (utc) 12:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support This would make me a much more effective gnome. Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Viswaprabha (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support I would like to see AWB become web based and perhaps even have some server side actions. Wikidata integration would also be cool ;) ·addshore· talk to me! 10:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Courcelles 15:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sadads (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Clump (talk) 23:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Shmurak (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Rschen7754 01:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Balajijagadesh (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Hmxhmx 10:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Also Linux distributions need own version of AWB. Gce (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Helder 13:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Ranjithsiji (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 02:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support YFdyh000 (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Framawiki (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Movses (talk) 14:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support, but not a web-based version, rather making AWB Mono compatible. This way the user interface wouldn’t change in any way (same .exe file on Windows, same config file, same desktop application with own window) and the codebase would require fewer changes, while it would work on Mac and Linux as well. Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)