In the meanwhile, Innv has been asked about this issue days ago, but the user has not commented, nor provided a rationale, nor said he will add one soon. Innv has been also emailed privatelly several days ago, but no response has been received upon.
The discussion regarding his global sysop permissions is taking place in request for comments, please do comment on that issue in that place.
After reading the statements provided, consulting with other users, considering this a serious breach of the trust that the meta community deposited in him in the past, the security issues surrounding this, and the irresponsiveness of the user in question I must say that, sadly, I am no longer confortable with Innv having sysop access on this project anymore untill this gets clarified and thus I request his sysop tools to be removed. — Dferg☎ 10:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - per my statement. Sorry, — Dferg☎ 10:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - agree with Dferg. It seems only reasonable given the circumstances. Bastique☎ call me! 10:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove The absence of communication is worrying. Per Dferg --Herbytalk thyme 10:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove After seeing Innv's talk page history and block log, the story seems to check out. Somehow it seems that not many people here on Meta were actually aware of the user's background. Jafeluv 10:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - In particular, the lack of communication is concerning here. Maybe in the future we can revisit this, but removal has to take place now. – mike@meta:~$ 11:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove; Per above arguments. –BruTetalk 11:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove unfortunately for now. Reconsideration is always possible but when credible doubt or issues exist the flag should be removed. Easy come/Easy go (yes I know that isn't always the case, doesn't mean it shouldn't be). James (TC) 21:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure there is anything to reconsider. See DR's statement, in which he provides solid evidence showing Innv was simply an experiment to see how many flags a blocked sock could get. Looks like he got us all. Tiptoetytalk 08:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove must be unquestionable --KrebMarkt 05:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I've been watching this RfDA, and I am not normally one to pile on when I see a situation such as this. However, in this case I feel it is just wrong not to speak up. fr33kmant - c 06:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]