I tend to be slow in replying to requests made on this page, so do feel free to poke me further if I don't appear to be replying to a query that needs an answer on my part. After a thread no longer requires a reply on my part, I will mark it as answered using a template. If you feel the need to re-open a thread, write under the archived section.
If you require a quicker reply, consider contacting me via IRC (I am QueenOfFrance).
Hi Snowolf. I edited your global.js and common.js to update you to the latest versions ajax sysop, force ltr, and StewardScript. The new versions are compatible with the latest MediaWiki changes and reside on the Wikimedia Tool Labs for easier updates. I also updated various deprecated functions and made your scripts HTTPS-compatible.
I noticed a code comment suggesting force ltr hadn't previously worked for you. If the new version doesn't work after bypassing your cache, let me know and I'll fix it for you. :) —Pathoschild 05:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I am contacting you because you have left feedback about VisualEditor at pages like mw:VisualEditor/Feedback in the past. The Editing team is now asking for your help with VisualEditor. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work well for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
More information (including a translatable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.
Support request with team editing experiment project
Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.
Will you please see the strategic planning page on the Botwiki? I tried poking you on IRC a week ago but you never responded. The abuse filter extension is not working and a lot of accounts are being created and not used. I think the wikis captcha has been cracked. And a mediawiki version upgrade would help too. Talk 12:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)