Meta:Requests for oversight/Pathoschild

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Pathoschild[edit]

I routinely hide attack names (and revisions) crosswiki as a steward; local oversight access would be useful for oversighting these names in Special:Log/globalauth. —Pathoschild 00:58:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

  1. ok for me. --.snoopy. ✉ 07:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I fix for you the request :) --.snoopy. ✉ 08:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]
  2. support, of course. Assistance is esp. needed there. Since I became an oversight here, I cleaned more than 3'000 of such log entries. With new CentralAuth interface those actions will be reduced, so that I can finally resign from oversightship. If Pathoschild wants to overtake that position, I'm really fine. In these days I wanted to let my fellows know that I'll resign from oversightship soon because I just requested that access to clean those log entries. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Per myself. Seriously, excellent steward who would be a great help as an oversighter. Pmlineditor ∞ 08:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. No-brainer. Jafeluv 09:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support --Dferg 10:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support--Mardetanha talk 11:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sure --Herby talk thyme 11:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support --WizardOfOz talk 17:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support. vvvt 21:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Suspicious user who I believe to be a spySupport --Charitwo 21:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. support using an evidence-based assessment, he passes. billinghurst sDrewth 05:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Fine by me. --Erwin 15:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. We could use more eyes & hands on the job; no reason lazychild can't do it.  — mikelifeguard@meta:~$  19:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. support -- If he has nothing else to do :D Avi 21:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. support; –BruTe talk 17:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support --თოგო (D) 09:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ok--Nick1915 - all you want 09:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes. --Mercy 09:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sure.--George M. 19:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Sure, people with os access are needed on meta. Barras talk 19:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Fine by me as well. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support - Nifky? 08:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Grunny (talk) 08:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support, np. —Innv {ru-ws} 03:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  25. Support --- @lestaty discuţie 01:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Closed as successful. This has the 25 votes in support as required by the oversight policy, has been open for 10 days, and no dissenting opinions have been given. I will file a request at SRP and await the appropriate steward action. Daniel (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_oversight/Pathoschild&oldid=2609078"