Meta:Requests for deletion
{{subst:RFD2|page name|reasons here. --~~~~}} under the appropriate section to start the deletion discussion. As a courtesy, you may wish to inform the principal authors of the page about the request using {{subst:RfD notice|page name --~~~~.}}. After at least one week, an administrator will close and carry out the consensus or majority decision.
Articles that qualify for speedy deletion should be tagged with {{delete}} or {{delete|reason}}, and should not be listed here. (See also speedy deletion candidates.) Files with no sources should be tagged with {{no source}} and need not be listed here, either. To request undeletion, see #Requests for undeletion. See Meta:Inclusion policy for a general list of what does not belong on the Meta-Wiki.
Previous requests are archived. Deletion requests ({{Deletion requests}}) can be added to talk page to remember previous RfDs.
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation
 |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.
|
Pages
[edit]Submit your page deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Created in error at MediaWiki:Globalblocking-block-reason-dropdown. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Deleteonce MediaWiki:Globalblocking-block-reason-dropdown is fixed. There are several more instances of this typo, which I'll fix as well. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 03:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)- There are "only" 2043 block summaries that need fixing. As @Johannnes89 was the one who introduced the typo, I propose that he carry out the task of fixing them. I'll deliver him a trout too. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Not sure if it's worth the effort changing all those block summaries, how about just leaving this page as a redirect for ~1 year and delete it once most of the blocks are expired? Johannnes89 (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's not really worth fixing that. It'd be a rather pointless work to do. Leave a redirect for some time and have it deleted later. -Barras talk 10:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better choice. Delayed delete per above. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Just curious, when will the last gblock expire? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Minorax: According to this new query, there are 9 indefinite blocks. Another 400+ will expire in 2030, and there are plenty of 2028s. Only to be expected, since these are for open proxies. I guess they still need to be fixed after all. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:07, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm I had hoped for most blocks to expire after 1-2 years. Fixed the indefinite blocks and some more, but unless we want to keep the page as a redirect for five years I guess I need to fix at least the 400+ expiring 2030. Johannnes89 (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: The numbers for each year are: 87 (2025; 33 expired, 17 expiring this month), 329 (2026), 250 (2027), 957 (2028) and 411 (2030) We might as well fix all of them. Can other stewards help? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Any update on this? Maybe you could automate this fix with a script. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- I will try and take a look tomorrow. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry didn't have much time recently. Writing scripts is not really my strong suit, so I'm happy if someone else could help. Johannnes89 (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- I will try and take a look tomorrow. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Any update on this? Maybe you could automate this fix with a script. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: The numbers for each year are: 87 (2025; 33 expired, 17 expiring this month), 329 (2026), 250 (2027), 957 (2028) and 411 (2030) We might as well fix all of them. Can other stewards help? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm I had hoped for most blocks to expire after 1-2 years. Fixed the indefinite blocks and some more, but unless we want to keep the page as a redirect for five years I guess I need to fix at least the 400+ expiring 2030. Johannnes89 (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Minorax: According to this new query, there are 9 indefinite blocks. Another 400+ will expire in 2030, and there are plenty of 2028s. Only to be expected, since these are for open proxies. I guess they still need to be fixed after all. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:07, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Just curious, when will the last gblock expire? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better choice. Delayed delete per above. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's not really worth fixing that. It'd be a rather pointless work to do. Leave a redirect for some time and have it deleted later. -Barras talk 10:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Not sure if it's worth the effort changing all those block summaries, how about just leaving this page as a redirect for ~1 year and delete it once most of the blocks are expired? Johannnes89 (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- There are "only" 2043 block summaries that need fixing. As @Johannnes89 was the one who introduced the typo, I propose that he carry out the task of fixing them. I'll deliver him a trout too. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Unused template, no references. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I also couldn't find any cases where the template was substituted.
𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷 (T/C) 05:15, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
No longer necessary. See Steward requests/Miscellaneous#Two-factor authentication tester group. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 19:04, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep for a while at least. From what I can tell there are external inbound links to this section. The header can be updated to make it clear that this is automatic for now. — xaosflux Talk 19:27, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Do you mean there are links to this template, specifically, or the § Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions section of SRGP? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 19:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- To Steward_requests/Global_permissions#Requests_for_2_Factor_Auth_tester_permissions; when we turn that down we can just speed delete anything left in it as cleanup; right now that is all on hold in case there is regression that requires us to start the process back up. — xaosflux Talk 20:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Do you mean there are links to this template, specifically, or the § Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions section of SRGP? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 19:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
AI-generated description of a project that claims to have something to do with Commons and other wikis. The project seems to only be tangentially relevant. Pages on Commons, Wikisource, Wikibooks and Wikiversity have all been either deleted or tagged for deletion. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. This is AI-generated nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 22:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --
𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓪𝓷 (T/C) 10:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Files
[edit]Submit your image deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Redirects
[edit]Submit your redirect deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Requests for undeletion
[edit]Submit your undeletion request at the bottom of this section.