Meta:Requests for adminship

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
(Redirected from Requests for adminship)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests and proposals Requests for adminship on Meta Archives
Shortcut:
WM:RFA

This page hosts requests for administrator access on the Meta-Wiki; for requesting administrator access on any other wiki, please find the appropriate venue on the index of request and proposal pages. Bureaucrat, checkuser, oversight and bot requests are also made here. Before making a request here, please see the administrator policy.

Most requests should be listed here for at least seven days; bureaucrats should only close after the minimum time foreseen in the relevant policy. Discussions are not closed early. Adminship will be granted by a support ratio of at least 75%. If a request hasn't been addressed by a bureaucrat after a lengthy period of time, please leave a note at Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. Requests may be extended, or put on hold by bureaucrats, pending decision or finding of consensus.

Requests for temporary adminship and bot requests may be less formal and often go for a shorter duration if consensus becomes clear after only a few days of discussion.

All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate. However, more active Meta editors' opinions may be given additional weight in controversial cases.

See below for information on prerequisites on submitting a request, and how to add a nomination.

Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Participate:

Information

Note that this page is for access on Meta only. See the permission request to stewards page for adminship/deadminship requests on other projects.

Regular adminship

  1. Before requesting admin access, please check the policy for requesting adminship.
  2. Use the box below, insert your username:

  1. Place a request on this page, by transcluding the subpage, for example {{Meta:Requests for adminship/Username}}. Please put the newest request on the top. Bear in mind that even if you do meet the criteria above this does not mean that the community will automatically approve a request.
  2. Please note, past administrators who have given up their rights must meet all criteria at the time of the new request. There is no separate process for reinstating past administrators.

Please note: Ill-considered nominations for adminship can be draining and deflating to both the community and the candidate. Any successful candidate will need to be able to demonstrate sufficient experience within the Wikimedia community, in addition to a familiarity with Meta-Wiki. If a candidate is not already a local administrator or holder of advanced permissions on a Wikimedia content project, he or she is less likely to pass a request for adminship here at Meta-Wiki.

Bureaucratship

Add your request below under the bureaucratship section. Please note:

  • Only active administrators can become bureaucrats, and only after at least 6 months of regular adminship.
  • User is endorsed by two current bureaucrats after he/she nominates themselves here.

If you fail any of these requirements, you will not be assigned the bureaucrat flag. For more information see Meta bureaucrat page.

Other access

For these types of access, create a subpage just as you would for regular adminship and add it to the appropriate section of this page.


  • Limited adminship: If you need sysop access for a particular reason (such as ability to edit protected pages), you may request limited adminship on Meta. If granted, the user understands that they will only be allowed to use the tools for the tasks they were approved, and not doing so will be grounds for immediate removal. Temporary sysop access will normally be valid for one month unless requested and granted otherwise.


  • CheckUser: please read the CheckUser policy and add your request below under the checkuser section, in the same way as an admin request.

  • Oversight: please read the Oversight policy and add your request below under the oversight section, in the same way as an admin request.



For these types of access, just ask on Meta request for help from a sysop or bureaucrat page:

  • MassMessage sender: please read about MassMessage, and provide a clear reason for requesting access. Specify a duration, or specifically request ongoing if needed.
  • Uploaders
  • Patrollers

Requests for global renamer permissions are handled at global permission requests to stewards page.

WMF Office Staff and Contractors

  • If you are an WMF Official or Contractor and need rights on Meta-Wiki to perform your duties the process is different. Please have a look at the WMF staff userrights policy on Office wiki[restricted access] and follow the procedure described there. If in doubt, please contact Trust and Safety; or send an email to ca@wikimedia.org.(source)

Requests for regular adminship

Daniuu

Not ending before 14 August 2022 22:43 (UTC)

Hi all, I’m Daniuu and would like to apply to become a sysop here at Meta-wiki. I’m mainly active in the area of counter-vandalism. In that capacity, I often bump into cross-wiki vandals that decide to visit meta. Unfortunately, it happens from time to time that a vandal starts doing their thing and no admin/steward is around to (globally – with an additional block here) block them and/or revdel the mess they leave behind. I’d like to request the admin rights to be able to further assist in these areas. I’m also active in making the life of our spammers harder. As a consequence, I am very well aware of the sensitivity of some of the tools (especially the global abuse filters and the spam blacklist). In the long term, I would like to become more involved in those areas (after gaining sufficient experience without actively editing them myself initially). I do have some administrative experience as a global sysop and on the Dutch Wikipedia (as sysop and abuse filter maintainer). If you would have any further questions, I will be happy to answer them! Finally, I would like to thank you for your attention and for considering this request. Daniuu (talk) 22:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Requests for limited adminship


None currently

Requests for interface adminship

Please see Meta:Interface administrators before applying. Regular administrators may apply directly at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.

None currently

Requests for bureaucratship


None currently

Requests for CheckUser access

"Meta:Requests for checkuser" redirects here. To request checkuser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information.

None currently

Requests for Oversight access

"Meta:Requests for oversight" redirects here. To request oversighting, see Meta:Oversighters#Requests.

None currently

Requests for translation adminship

Eva Martin (WMDE)

As a Wikimedia Deutschland staff member I frequently create and edit project pages on meta (e.g Wikimedia Europe, WIKIMOVE). To ensure equity and transparency, I would like to be able to mark these pages for translation. --Eva Martin (WMDE) (talk) 13:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Discussions

Hello there! I'm the one who encouraged Eva to do this request, and I'm onboarding her with the subtleties of the translation extension. I will make sure that she reads the documentation and we will work together on the new pages she creates with translation.

@Pols12: Can you tell us more about the issues you noticed, so we know where to focus our attention?

@Pppery: I'm curious to know why you think that this request was not needed - is there a better way to allow someone to autonomously prepare and mark documentation pages for translation, without having the admin rights? Lea Lacroix (WMDE) (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not saying this request specifically was not needed. I'm saying that, generically, self-directed translation admin requests are not what's needed because they merely paper over the problem of having too few community-directed translation admins. That is, I want Meta to be like MediaWiki.org where Shirayuki handles nearly all pages needing translation marking and everyone can just let him do so rather than needing to request translation admin rights for themselves. But Meta is clearly not in that state right now, so I supported this request. * Pppery * it has begun 14:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like Eva to prepare a page for translation, complying with our recommendations. These edits, as an example, mess the translate markup up. --Pols12 (talk) 12:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Eldarado

Hi. I'm a sysop and bureaucrat in Azerbaijani Wikipedia and also a Board member of Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group. I constantly have to translate both the administrative pages in Meta-Wiki and various other pages. I'm also an active translator and editor of Meta-Wiki content in different languages and actively follow updated translations. I'm familiar with mw:Help:Extension:Translate/Page translation administration page. Thanks in advance! --eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 10:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

  • Support Support Trusted user. AlPaD (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Please prepare a page for translation and link it here, in order we can review whether you well know how to do it. --Pols12 (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes @AlPaD: you can review this page. --eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 11:35, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
@Eldarado Did you meant to ping @Pols12? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
@Eldarado, they are several issues in your markup, can you fix them, please? I advise you to read our internationalization guidelines before.
  • I think it is safe to exclude attention-bringing syntax (''') from translation unit (this is not safe for idiomatic-text ('') for Korean language, but I’m not sure for attention-bringing).
  • You should not manually add unit markers (<!--T:2-->), they are automatically handled.
  • You should not close a translate tag before opening a new one: an empty new line allow to automatically segment the units.
  • You should add an empty new line after each heading to ensure they will be alone as translation units.
  • You should prefix link targets with “Special:MyLanguage/” and wrap the target in a tvar.
  • You should avoid to include HTML tags inside translation units. If this is needed, you should try to ensure they are balanced (including the closing tag if the opening tag is included and vice versa).
  • You should split tables to get one unit per cell.
  • You should wrap icon images and usernames inside tvars.
Oppose Oppose for now. -- Pols12 (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes @Camouflaged Mirage: I tagged wrong, thanks. @Pols12: thank you for your help. I already updated it. --eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 07:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the improvements, however their still are some issues:
  • It is useless to close a translate tag before opening a new one for distinct paragraphs.
  • The comma , and and word are not universal, they should be localizable (you may eventually use {{list}} template). People real names may be transliterated. If your page is likely translatable in Arabic (or other target language with non-latin script), you should allow translator to localize them.
  • Names of tvar as link target are usually digits (quick to copy in most language), they don’t need to be informative since the display text is the descriptive part of the link.
  • Tvar names must be unique inside their own unit, but each unit can reuse the same tvar names (so the name “1” is the most common).
-- Pols12 (talk) 10:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Requests for CentralNotice adminship


None currently

Requests for bot flags

WikiLearnBot

Not ending before 8 August 2022 12:09 (UTC)

This account was created by WMF's Language Engineering team to be part of the course content translation feature of WikiLearn, the new Open edX-based online learning platform run by the Community Development team. Its goal is to handle the Meta side of the course content translation. It specifically needs the editcontentmodel right, as it needs to be able to change the page content model to Message Bundle. WikiLearnBot (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

I am confirming and endorsing this request on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Development team and the WikiLearn platform. Asaf (WMF) (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Only two user groups, Administrators and WMF Support and Safety has editcontentmodel right. If WMF's Language Engineering team is handling the account then I think they can grant themselves the right to this account. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 12:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Indeed. Bots do not have editcontentmodel permissions. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
The WikiLearnBot account will be used to manage MessageBundles for WikiLearn courses in MetaWiki for localisation purposes.
The code related to MessageBundle will be executed when the editcontentmodel for a page is changed to message bundle, or an existing message bundle is updated. You can review the code here: https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-Translate/blob/master/src/MessageBundleTranslation/Hooks.php#L100
More information about Translating WikiLearn courses can be read here. For localisation issues related to WikiLearn, please contact comdevteam@wikimedia.org. For any functional issues, please contact the Wikimedia Language engineering team.
Regards, APatro (WMF) (talk) 14:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
@APatro (WMF) as noted above, the "bot" usergroup doesn't contain the permissions to change a page's content model (c.f. Special:ListGroupRights). I suggest you check your workflow on this, it seems to be a brand new type of workflow - as such enabling specially titled pages to initially be created in this content model (similar to how pages may be created in SCSS, JS, CS based on other page creation rules) may be the better fix for you. (i.e. why bother creating the pages in the wrong content model, then having to go through this step at all). — xaosflux Talk 15:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
@Xaosflux Thanks for that recommendation. For some reason I was under the impression that to use a non wikitext contentmodel we would need the editcontentmodel right, even while creating a page.
We will ensure that we create the page with the correct contentmodel and that should meet our needs.
Regards, APatro (WMF) (talk) 11:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
@APatro (WMF) so sort of. As noted above, "bot" will not fix this. Users without editcontentmodel can't change a page from one model to another, however, you could work with the extension developers to enable the special pages you need to be initially created directly in the content model that you need. If that won't be possible, the only option right now would be sysop - and you can work with WMF IT team to get that access if it is really needed. — xaosflux Talk 13:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

See also