Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Findings

What we know so far.

This only includes sources that have been posted so far. More content and references will be added as they are posted.

The coding and sorting of each section is being done using a public spreadsheet for efficiency. Please report any inconsistency, misattribution of misunderstanding.

Synthesis

Themes are interconnected

Process

Touchy-feely-sectarian stuff

The sum of all knowledge

Why create free knowledge?

The original promise of the internet

"The greatest potential given by Internet is the diversity possibility -- to confront knowledge, ideas and perspectives different from our own"

Why create free knowledge? References to organize

• "People can be interested in every topic. Every article deserves attention because it is a little part of knowledge."
• "Our way of considering the readers should be writing article of the best possible quality"
• "what was not uploaded on the Internet and Wikipedia, comes to less people and slowly disappear"
• Resilience against authoritarianism and censorship
• better source of reliable information
• "If Wikipedia is not reliable and trusted it has lost its purpose"
• "if we focus on making Wikipedia worthy of everyone's attention, other changes will be able to come more easily"
• "Without data integrity and reliability, wikipedia will no longer be a valuable resource for humanity"
• "we must be able to trust its accuracy, reliability, and relevancy. Knowledge is only as good as the truth that it bares"
• "it is important that Wikipedia not eliminate material that is negative in nature. Very often, it is the negative information that is the most important factor in decisions"
• Reliability is necessary for survival and to serve more people
• knowledge is what has made humanity come so far, so you have to improve access to it and its truthfulness
• "We can not be satisfied with providing knowledge in a free way, we also have to make sure that the knowledge we give is accurate and unbiased."
• "we can’t be more reliable than our sources"
• "if there is no trust in Wikipedia, all the rest is irrelevant"

Communities of knowledge

Representation, knowledge gaps, systemic biases

• "Content, practices and understandings still seem American-centric to users"
• "Without healthy and inclusive communities, content becomes irrelevant in the short term"
• "If there is only one specific group, it doesn't meet the goal of being a broad-based source of knowledge and to report different world views and linguistic diversity."
• "It is the way to ensure diversity of content approaches for all voices to be represented."

Challenges of diversity

• "articles written by people with different backgrounds aren't cohesive and easy to comprehend"
• "There will always be tension between quality and inclusiveness."

Narrow definition of knowledge

• "This is a global publication, but editors often become narrow in their focus"
• "too much effort is spent on deleting content rather than improving or creating content"

• "We have become increasingly viewed as gatekeepers, especially in the social and human domains"
• "Less deletion battles"

Quality and quantity of content

This leads to "more and better content", notably by recruiting subject matter experts and increasing diversity

• "closing the current knowledge gaps by including a truly diverse set of contributors"
• Patience and understanding of knowledge that is unfamiliar to old-timers
• "only a means to an end for ultimately supporting improved content"
• "If there is no community behind, improving and curating, the content loses value because it is obsolete or replaced."
• "Biased information is incomplete, or even wrong. Without members of the community able to recognise bias, Wikipedia just becomes an echo chamber, at best ignoring and at worst actively damaging minority groups and ideas"

• "We can only create a trusted source of knowledge if we are a good community"

This enables us to do more, more quickly

• "cover many projects effectively and on time"
• "a larger number of contributors allows for a larger amount working on specific topics"

Necessary for the sum of all knowledge

• "Broaden people's thinking"
• "Wikimedia projects are a direct reflection of its users and volunteers. […] If we want to keep to the mission of the project to accumulate all of humanity's knowledge then we need to reflect that in our communities. "
• "the platform/database for the knowledge of all mankind"
• "To be the most respected source of knowledge requires many other types of editors"
• "You can't fix the data without including communities."

Knowledge diversity; oral knowledge

• "Collecting different kinds of knowledge is one of our goals in the community"
• "include peoples who predominantly have an oral tradition"
• "We will include more sources of information that include different types of history (e.g., oral histories) in various cultures."

Biases and neutrality

Diversity, openness to points of views, awareness of bias

• "A community that is healthy can accept divergent points of view in a respectful, helpful way"
• "Biases that exist in Wikipedia propagate outward, infecting the world in myriad small ways"
• "We would be able to incorporate knowledge from various communities around the world into Wikimedia"
• "The more inclusive Wikipedia is the more balanced and neutral the Wikis will get."
• "It is necessary to raise the community's ability to deal with different opinions and ideas"
• "it will neutralize various biases"
• “see the world through others’ eyes”
• "We don’t have homogeneity in a single monoculture, but instead "agree to disagree" with respect."
• "the content will reflect differing points of view and be more neutral"
• "without community we are an empty shell. With a deranged community, we could be […] a non-neutral encyclopedia that poses as neutral."

[community health] Essential for neutrality

Communities of knowledge: References to organize

• "contributors don't put themselves in readers' shoes when they write"
• "We write for the readers but […] we write about what we want to write about"
• "some knowledge won't stick, as they do not fit the general, dominant epistemological perspective that runs through the projects. This knowledge bias […] limits the contribution of the marginalized."
• "We need to cooperate with outer organization to widen the range of knowledge."
• assumption that "there is a variety of sources and in many categories/areas/languages that is just not the case"
• "a way to improve the quality of our content is to involve more […] individuals and groups that don't currently contribute[…], as well as to extend the editors community to people from underrepresented communities in terms of gender, profession or geography"
• "Wikipedia needs to include people who represent different or diverse world views"

Infrastructure for knowledge

Beyond the encyclopedia

Dissent:

Infrastructure for knowledge: References to organize

• 3D models
• "bringing on all this content and contributors will require adequate tech tools for scaling with assurance of quality"
• "we will have to determine criteria for reliability and quality that are relevant for types of knowledge we do not cover at the moment (e.g. oral history and traditional/non-academic knowledge systems)"

Participation: Freely sharing in

Why radically open participation?

Collaboration and the wiki spirit

• "An inclusion of communities, and therefore of individuals, will make community collaboration easier."

• "if we have a strong community, we will have the human resources to do anything"
• "it is the engine/heart of everything Wikipedia was and should be"
• "It makes us unique, human-based, diverse and sustainable"
• "It's the community aspect that strengthens the Wikimedia Movement, the set of contributors who build something together."
• "key to the success of the others. In order to make the other advancements, you need the workforce to achieve it"
• "only a functioning community can guarantee a future for Wikipedia. A precondition for this is not that we all 'love' each other. This is not possible. But it should work better. "
• "only a functioning Wikipedia community can guarantee a future. […] the community should be more harmonious for the motivation of the authors."
• "Safe, healthy communities lay the groundwork for all future work on Wikipedia; it is the gatekeeper and the enabler."
• "the community is the critical success factor"
• "Without a healthy community, nothing else would work."
• "without it, Wikipedia will stagnate"
• "culture eats strategy for breakfast. without a healthy community, you will not be able to implement other goals"
• "Credibility lies in exchanges and debates"

Openness, inclusion and diversity

"one of the basic principles of wikipedia […] is the inclusion of communities"

tempting to be less open"become less democratic"

Distributed governance, equity

• "it provides the opportunity for the minority to share their knowledge"
• "The marginalized communities that are most affected by some current policies and practices are the communities whose perspectives are most needed."
• "people from the “global south” are not a problem to be resolved but people with valuable resources to share with the Wikimedia movement"

Equity / efforts to support minorities

• "We should stop excluding the minority"
• "the catalyzing of marginalized communities is done from a top down approach"

Integration is more difficult for newcomers who are different from the majority of the current group

• "It is much easier to be included if you are a white man in a white-man environment, but if you are different it costs a lot"

Ideals, values and wikimedian culture

Transparency and openness, compared to private companies

• "Transparent and open knowledge accumulation"
• "Transparent practices that show why decisions are made (and by who)"

Representation

• "more representative of the global population"
• "The writers of Wikipedia are more representative of the readers"

Self-understanding, identity

• know better what's happening on various wikis
• "understand the encyclopedic needs of the world"
• "change the movement towards a true community"

[community health] Contributors will feel that they are part of a movement that cares about people, not just content."

Make the world a better place

"people always need to be part of a community, of a society - it brings them hope, future, ideas, aim"

Impact beyond Wikimedia sites

Being a leader, a model for others to follow

• "lead the way in collaborative, online digital humanities"
• "The community will be respected better"
• "coffee clubs changed England"
• "a leader in global, collaborative environments"
• "an authentic model"
• paragon of inclusion, modeling effective inclusion in all aspects of our work
• Reputation brings in more contributors

Healthy discourse online

• "how to structure factual, polite discourse online at a global scale"
• "Decreasing the toxicity of the Internet"
• "a cooperative approach to the web"
• "create the utopia that the internet was originally intended to be"
• "Our wikis could be a light beacon"
• "an important impact on how people perceive the internet as something they can co-create"

Focusing on healthy communities would make the world a better place

• "making the world a better place"
• "enable scientific discoveries on a global scale"
• "helping individuals forge genuine social connections"
• If we follow this theme, it will directly reflect on our world, when people hear that there's no division in gender, socioeconomic status, physical abilities, etc in the Wikimedia projects, it'll be easier for them to imagine a world where that is true as well.
• "the movement has the potential to fulfill the utopian ideals many of us have for it"

Fill gaps in social education

Growth; uniqueness

• "so the volunteers will stay […] and help us grow"
• "The added value that distinguishes Wikimedia from other platforms in this community"
• "we can’t grow if there is no unity in the community"

Why radically open participation? References to organize

• "we are a living example of democracy - everybody is allowed to be part of this and the only demand is 'Stick to the rules'"
• "Developing awareness in societies around the world for the Wikimedia projects being a shared responsibility of all humankind"
• "People do not trust a source because it is accurate; they trust it because they see that they have a chance to fix errors"

Communities of participants

Vibrant, close-knit communities; support; safety

Language barriers blur

It requires intentional action, focus; it's the real threat

• "Any threat to the community could jeopardize its projects"
• "Enforcement of power by cultivating a bullying culture on productive editors equals to editor and contribution loss. […] community health is not self sustainable if not specially taken care of"
• "This theme has the power to make or break our movement "
• "This theme is relevant today"
• "we would need to focus"

Hedgehog syndrome; isolationism; "health"

Root cause and barriers

• "It is also problematic that the community finds it easier to punish the newcomers than to deal with misbehaviors by experienced users. "
• "As long as some "old guard", real or imagined, refuses to cooperate or engages in behavior characteristic of ownership, improvements will be stifled and lost, and editors will be turned away."
• "Acknowledge openly that people who are skilled at finding and synthesizing information are not always skilled in social interactions, and vice versa."

A prerequisite / core to who we are

Healthy communities are a prerequisite for any direction.

• "a necessary foundation for any of the other themes"
• "Goals without a healthy community is empty rhetoric."
• "Within an environment of disinformation, harassment, and exclusion, there's no progress."
• This theme is essential and conditional for the impact of the other themes.
• "all others depends on it"
• "it would be hard to reach any of the other goals"
• "A toxic environment kills participation, making all the rest of the themes impossible to achieve."
• "The underlying reason of growth of the Wikimedia movement is its thriving contributors community"
• "Any tool is only as good as those who wield it; if the community is not healthy, Wikimedia will be poisoned from within."

This is a prerequisite

This is the highest priority / the most important

This is very important

This is somewhat important

There's nothing that we need to stop doing / no trade-offs

• "community work do not takes much time and efforts"

Intrinsic to our movement

• "the heart of all what we do in the movement"
• "Investing in the growth of small communities is vital"
• "the core of our movement"

There is a sense of urgency

• "When I think of all of the untapped talent globally[…], it seems like burning the Library of Alexandria every hour."
• Change is necessary

Sustainability and productivity

• "ensuring a broader legacy for future generations"
• "keep an important source of knowledge alive"
• "A healthy, inclusive community is a growing and adaptable community"
• "Healthy communities are more productive and survive"
• "the most crucial theme as long as we want a very sustainable and thriving Wikimedia movement. The community or the volunteers are the ones who keep this movement alive."

Increasing contributors; retaining newcomers

"The environment of Wikipedia is becoming more and more hostile." Newcomers are intimidated and "long-time editors are leaving the project"

• "the way we treat newcomers will increasingly define the life or death of the site"
• "The environment of Wikipedia is still becoming more and more hostile."
• "bettering the community will allow more projects and people to contribute and thrive"
• "A lot of the shields we have in community process will hopefully be rendered moot, lowering the barrier for participation"
• "some Wikipedians feel like that they are excluded from the community"
• "the level of newbie-biting is very high"
• "there are clear trends for pushing out users, […] making use of hostile and aggresive stands by people who represent the supposed "good and righteous" users"
• "Stop driving out others, especially experts"
• "Users who make many personal attacks should be banned even if they are experienced users"

Humility, forgiveness

• "make clear that haughtiness is not a behavior that pays and stop tolerating it from anyone"
• "stop considering the opinion of some people as the opinion of the community"
• "give up being right all the time"
• "we will have to be more complacent with mistakes, not only mistakes made by newbies, but also those made by experienced users"

Protecting contributors from "disruptive and abusive editors"

Attracting editors is difficult, and "A good environment for newcomers is fundamental"

• "A good environment for newcomers is fundamental if we want to increase significantly the number of active wikipedians"
• "We need to dedicate more time to people who sincerely want to contribute but may have some difficulties"
• "experienced users can help them rather than having high expectations of policy implementation" "a series of friendly mini-tutorials for the moment an account is created."
• "they wouldn't feel like noobs"
• "An "outbreak of niceness" is required"
• "The Wikimedia movement suffers from the "eternal September" problem of having to socialize large numbers of newcomers."
• "a motivated and diverse community, enabling newbies an easy start and leading to more editors"
• "a more welcoming and safe environment for new collaborators, so we can foster a stable growth in the community."
• "a support network when they sign up"
• mentoring
• "technical methods to connect patient/friendly/experienced editors, with newcomers and with editors seeking help"
• "it helps new users gain confidence"
• "Everyone needs a friendly environment to enter the ecosystem and maintain collaboration over time."

• "long-time wikimedians have to express themselves clearly"
• "Tutorials for new users"

New and future contributors are as important as current ones

• "community members that we do not yet have"

Assume good faith / Don't bite the newcomers

• "these actions are sometimes made due to ignorance rather than vandalism"

"increase the number of editors collaborating on the project"; congeniality; fun; joy; retention

• "More fun -> more people"
• "An inclusive and healthy community would increase the number of editors collaborating on the project"
• "essential", "Everyone should be able to contribute with joy"
• "increasing participation and growing new contributors"
• fun "come[s] out of healthy, safe and inclusive community"
• "With better representation, the interests of new editors are served better"
• "the barrier for low-level participation is lower"
• "stronger and more expansive community"
• "Each contributor should talk correctly and be polite during discussions."
• "Give up the non-productive behaviors that we do because they are easy, and adopt the productive behaviors that we do not do because they are hard"

Don't reward abusive editors

[community health] "We need valid Wikipedians"; "We have to continue to exclude people who want to damage the project"

• "We have to continue to exclude people who want to damage the project, wasting less time on them"
• "We need valid Wikipedians, who have the sources and study them."
• "It's not easy to fight those who manipulate sources."
• "include only those who come at Wikipedia to write articles by studying sources", and not "promote their unsourced ideas, sell their products or discuss without sources"

Productive conflict, avoiding internal in-fighting

• "improve morale by avoiding internal politics and in-fighting between subsections of the community"
• "maintain harmony in the community so that editor retention stops being an issue"
• "The problem right now is not that not everyone loves each other, but that we don't have a culture of productive dissent"

Less bureaucracy / Rethink our policies

• "lay off a bit on file deletions"
• "Overfocussing on policy compliance"
• "stop allowing wikilawyering to be used as a shield for protecting biased attitudes"
• "Administrators and editors lost sight of the spirit of the rules. […] It has detrimental effects. Kick out editors with a negative influence. Those that are not assuming good faith and reverting"
• "The renunciation of existing and cumbersome procedures"
• "Reconsider the secondary sources dogma in order to make room for non-secondary sources"
• "Reducing the the complexity concerning legal and financial processes around grant making or the usage of Wikimedia trademarks would decrease the overhead costs on the side of the WMF, save volunteer time and decrease the hurdle for many volunteers to get involved in first place. We are an online movement and should be careful not to loose the power and strengths that come with that by overinstitutionalizing things in a way the offline world works."
• Policies and norms adapted to culture and local context

Focus more on languages that are not English

• "diversify languages during international meetings"

Dissent and concerns

[community health] Avoid community pressure and allow for individual expression and motivation

• "an explicit threat to individualism"

• Our sites will become a social network among others

[community health] There is no deadline, therefore decline in contribution is not an issue.

"We do need to be inclusive" but "This theme does not explain how to get new users" This is included in other themes

Communities of participants: References to organize

• "unify policies across wikis. These policies should be made as to protect newcomers more thoroughly, and to organize users interactions with each other."
• "Wikimedia should support research on emerging communities around the globe, in order to understand the specific needs of each community."
• "a lot of communities remain very separate"
• "The behavior of editors towards other editors may be more important than any edits they make to articles"
• "tools to track changes and learn how various policies change the healthiness of our community"
• "Get wikimedia projects to know each other better"
• "Make projects more inter-connected"
• "Know more about other languages and cultures"
• "There will always be editors who get hurt. We have to find solutions on how to deal with this."
• Limits of technology to fix attitudes. "real life meetings and trainings"
• "Add a code of conduct, standards of practice, improve leadership, provide training in human resource management."
• "Readers should be able to rate articles and easily comment them. […] Reading experience has to be satisfactory and enjoyable."
• "If we find out that readers would like to have articles about topics for which we don't have editors maybe we can do something about it."
• "A decline in the number of users is physiological and is not an emergency."
• "Research whether allowing unregistered users to edit helps or harms the community"
• "A protocol should be created for harassment victims can know what to do"
• "There is a problem with language used in Wikimedia projects which contains a lot of terms and acronyms knows only to devoted Wikimedians; […] it is big barrier for newbies"
• ""Community of editors won't solve such problems as gender gap. It needs support of professional experts in sociology and volunteer management who should sometimes even force needed changes from outside. This is a role for WMF"
• "As long as we have Wikipedia as an open system (and it should stay this way) people will get together here that have fundamentally different opinions. This will always cause friction and dissent."
• "Train users to which behaviour is accepted and which not"
• Partnerships with universities
• "communities can pop in and pop put of existence"
• "Education about how to be a respectful and healthy community member"
• "Emphasize the engagement and support of new users, especially those who are not the demographic norm on Wikipedia and out in society at large"
• "allow the Wikipedia community to have more of a voice in decision making"
• "Do more to develop the people of flesh and blood who edit Wikipedia do less to develop software"
• "Moral harassment and mobbing is a strong part of Wiki communities culture."
• "Everybody should be more friendly to each other. You might have a controversial debate, but you should never offend somebody personally. If you treat each other more peacefully others will be inspired by this."
• "Harassment is a major issue in the process of creating power boundaries among contributors."
• "We need more research and recommendations on the role of WikiProjects − whether they should help with work in articles, form a mini-community amongst themselves"
• "treat newcomers and the content created by them more carefully"
• "Take into account childcare costs in the budget of our events"
• "We need to ensure the protection of those who take risks to report what is wrong about society (ex: whistleblowers)."
• "Teach the wiki codes to pupils and students from an early age and anticipate the 2030 projects"
• "put some kind of protective fence around new good-faith users, and restrict those who can react to them to people who are willing to commit to "not biting" newcomers"
• "WMF has not been dealing with the toxic aspects of the movement effectively so far."
• "define what we mean by "inclusive", so that it does not cover people of groups acting in bad faith"
• "Defending the "anyone-can-edit" openness and anonymity should be a non-negotiable principle"
• "we cannot be welcoming to diversity in a world wide movement without being inviting and kind to each other and to newbies"
• "content contributors need to be made to feel [that] their time and effort is valued"

Infrastructure for participation

Local opportunities and presence everywhere; paths to participation (beyond editing)

[community health] Way of life; normalization

• "Creating a world population that is accustomed to contributing."
• "Contribut[ing] to free knowledge is something you do naturally, because it is a natural part of how you learn things"
• "get people involved at an earlier age"

More frequent offline communication

• "Expand participation in events to the maximum number of contributors"
• "start socializing offline more"

Decentralization

Decentralization

• "Radically reduce the size of central organization in favor of local organizations"

Spreading across more continents

• "Wikimedia movement will spread across the continents such as Africa, Middle East, South Asia and Latin America"

"the sustainable and inclusive community would result in a better and more effective affiliates ecosystem"

Structures and governance

• "The important question instead is the power structure of WMF. Even communities that work reasonably well don't have any influence on what the WMF is doing."

Infrastructure and tools for participation (UX, AI)

• "technological solutions will not solve social conflict"
• "the human factor is always more relevant than technology or processes"

Focus on human interaction / less automation

• Template-based communication doesn't work
• "data mining techniques to identify and report personal attacks"
• "wary of the "progress" brought by computers and automation"

Identifying/addressing personal attacks is difficult

Real names

• "De-prioritize pseudonymity in favor of real names"

How

• "Thematic WikiProject could attract more people to contributing"
• "make the contributors feel very clearly that their contribution is appreciated"
• "give special attention to accessibility of Wikipedia"
• "yearly overview of main language editions and readiness from the global community to involve itself into local activities"
• "Offline legislation will have caught up with online activity and will no longer focus on what's legal, but also on what behavior encourages productivity"
• technology increases efficiency and frees up time for thoughtful interactions with newcomers
• "find better ways to communicate, like facebook, what’s app"

Research

• "Wikipedia community is aging, therefore we should perform more studies to understand better why young people do not join"
• "The most important issue is to find and answer why the number of editors is not growing"
• "we have limited knowledge about real trends in retention"

It is difficult for the Wikimedia Foundation to influence community health.

• concern that the Foundation will "call dibs" and others won't have an opportunity to influence this

"Wikimedia Foundation and chapters should be more integrated with the community of editors", notably in their outreach and recruiting activities

• "Wikimedia Foundation and chapters should be more integrated with the community of editors."
• Better decisions and collaboration

Outreach projects favor quantity over quality.

Impact on other goals

[community health] A larger community has a larger reach

[community health] Related to Global movement

• "We're missing out on so many perspectives that could help shape our communities to be more healthy and inclusive."
• "It is not possible to build a healthy and inclusive community without adapting to the circumstances of [emerging and underdeveloped communities]."

[community health] Related to respect

[community health] Related to technology

Infrastructure for participation: References to organize

• Simplify the "process for creating new Wikimedia communities, languages, and projects"
• "The Thanks notifications […], the visual editor and GLAM cooperations."
• Discuss the specific features and measures to increase community health
• "We need more Wikipedia interaction in the social networks (e.g. Facebook)"
• "If fighting vandalism and similar activities took less time […] we would have more time to write articles readers look for."
• "If technology can make it easier for the user to contribute, for example with editing wizards, we can expect a bigger and more engaged community which in turn would incorporate more readers and broaden WP's impact."
• the basis of expanding Wikipedia more quickly
• Better monitoring of edits

Reach: Every single human being

Why reach every single human being?

Why reach every single human being? References to organize

• "By making knowledge easier to access and use across languages, the technological, economic and social gap that separates people around the world can be narrowed. This in turn would help development, democratization and promote peace."
• "improve access"
• Better tools for participation won't help if there is a lack of awareness
• Broader access means donors and therefore no need so scale back on anything

Communities to reach

Communities to reach: References to organize

• "Ensure that wikis projects are accessible to everyone regardless of wealth and location"
• "Our readers is humanity."
• "We need to write clearly and to make our project more readable. We need to make our project easy to use and search."
• self-censorship
• more language options

Infrastructure for reach

Infrastructure for reach: References to organize

• augmented reality
• "improving the distribution of knowledge"
• Instructions on how to circumvent state censorship

Sources to organize

Healthy, inclusive communities

Healthy, inclusive communities: What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?

Parking lot

• "maintaining and developing small languages"
• IP and copyright law will catch up
• language preservation
• technical methods, communication
• Decrease the rule of the majority
• Diversification of collaborative knowledge platforms

Healthy, inclusive communities: How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?

Healthy means…

Inclusive means…

Parking lot

• strategy on a shorter horizon

Healthy, inclusive communities: Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?

To sort

• "[Wikipedia] isn't an extremely inclusive project"
• "diverse opinions, small cultures and backgrounds"
• "Don't use Meta-wiki for everything"
• "Go to them directly and they will tell you all the answers for this problem"
• "set the entrenched wiki-culture aside, [...] make the community less rigid and static"
• "Stop narrowing the sense of notability"
• "The role of WMF should be [measured] on how it generates elements that have strategic benefits to the communities"
• "We need to stop catering to high performance users who are also high maintenance. Despite our best efforts, it is often impossible to integrate them into a healthy and inclusive community, because they make our communities less inclusive and therefore less healthy."
• work with universities

Parking lot

The augmented age (Advancing with technology)

The augmented age (Advancing with technology): How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?

• "Technology is a means to an end"
• "This theme is very important"
• "This theme is the least important of all five themes."
• "I would say that it's most important"
• Low priority due to uncertainty about augented reality
• "Together with 4 and 5 this theme is important (theme 1 as very important and theme 3 as not so important)."
• "This theme is the top priority"

A truly global movement

A truly global movement: How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?

• "Extremely important."
• "Most important."
• "This is the least important thing, because Wikimedia can't fix the world yet."
• "This theme is the most important themes of all"

The most respected source of knowledge: Parking lot

• better grades
• do not know

The most respected source of knowledge: How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?

• "This is the most important theme
• "This is by far the most important theme"
• "This theme is the second most important, only after the community health."
• "This is the most important theme."
• "it is the most important"
• "Possibly the most important theme."
• "The most important."
• "I see this as one of the most important of the 5 themes."
• very
• "Very important".
• "D is the most important theme"
• "This is the most important issue."
• "This is the most important theme."
• "This topic is the most important"
• "This topic is not that important."
• "Most important"
• "This is the most important theme."

Other

• Why Do Some Forms of Knowledge Go Extinct?