User talk:MF-Warburg/Archive1

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Archive from 2007-2011 – with history

Request for permissions

Hello. VolkovBot@tetwiki has been flagged as a bot by your request (request, log). Thanks. —{admin} Pathoschild 03:27:25, 05 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! --MF-Warburg 07:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tetum localization for Whatredirectshere

Hi MF-Warburg, thank you very much for your translation of Whatredirectshere in Tetum! I've now uploaded it to http://tools.wikimedia.de/~tangotango/whatredirectshere.php?lang=tet, and it is available via that link and via the language selector that appears at the top of the tool. Please take a look and see if anything is amiss.

Also, as you might notice, some portions of the interface are not yet translated. This is because they are in a separate language file called "general", which is shared across all my tools. If possible, could you please translate this file too? The code for this file is:

$lang['gen_error'] = 'Error';
$lang['gen_db-connect-error'] = 'Could not connect to database server (it may be down); Error was: ';
$lang['gen_db-select-error'] = 'Could not select database (The database you selected may be non-existent); Error was: ';
$lang['gen_welcome'] = 'Welcome';
$lang['gen_invalid_dbname'] = 'Patently invalid database name';

$lang['gen_nonexistent_wiki'] = 'The project you selected is either non-existent or is not replicated to the toolserver.';
$lang['gen_query_failed'] = 'The SQL query failed with the following error: ';
$lang['gen_query_failed_badrowcount'] = 'The SQL query did not return the correct number of rows.';

Once again, thank you very, very much! - Tangotango 12:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the translation! I've posted the general language file, as well as the new Whatredirectshere localization, to the toolserver. Please take a look to see if everything is as you accepted. Cheers, Tangotango 15:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikischliessungen

Hi, ich sehe mit Freuden, dass Du Dich auch an das Management der Proposals for Closing Projects machst. Wenn Du eine Diskussion fuer beendet erklaerst, erreichst Du ggf. die Schliessung, indem Du bei bugzilla.wikimedia.org einen entsprechenden Bugreport mit Link auf Closure proposal einreichst. Wobei die Wikis infolge dessen nicht geloescht sondern nur gelockt werden. Sieh auch zu, dass ggf. Spam vorher entfernt wird. Falls Du das alles schon weisst, entschuldige die Stoerung. In Hektik, --Johannes Rohr 12:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, weiß ich schon. MF-Warburg(de) 16:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Inkubator verschieben.

Hi,

die Verschiebung in den Inkubator sollte nicht händisch erfolgen sondern über Special:Import. So wie Du es gemacht hast, gehen Versionsinformation verloren und die GFDL wird verletzt. Bitte reiche dazu einen Bugreport ein, siehe http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10519. Im Übrigen impliziert "verschieben", dass der Original-Artikel gelöscht wird, nicht bloß geblankt. --Johannes Rohr 16:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wieso, die Versionsgeschichte ist doch auf der Diskussionsseite der Incubatorseiten; so macht man das z. B. auch in Wikibooks, siehe b:de:Hilfe:GFDL-Import --MF-Warburg(de) 17:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Schau mal unter b:de:Hilfe:GFDL-Import#Import_von_ganzen_Artikeln. --Johannes Rohr 18:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ächä, ja. --MF-Warburg(de) 18:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Herero Wikipedia

Hi MF-Warburg! I want to ask, what happened to the Herero wiki? I known that maybe is a good idea to move some articles to the incubator, it's ok; but these days I tried to access to the Herero Incubator and I can't, the link is not funtional. Please, see what is happening? =s --Kanon6917 17:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kanon6917! The Herero Test-WP will be created soon incubator:Wp/hz will be the location, but there are saome plroblems, but you can expect the Test-wp until 3 days, I think. Best regards MF-Warburg(de) 17:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
go to incubator:Special:Prefixindex/Wp/hz. there you can see all the pages. Note that in Incubator all Herero Wikipedia page titles start with Wp/hz. See also incubator:Help:Tips_for_working_with_prefixes. --MF-Warburg(de) 05:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ich würde da die Finger von lassen. Ich sehe nicht, wie und mit welcher Autorität wir da eine Entscheidung treffen könnten. Ich bin zwar persönlich der Meinung, dass die "sibirische" Wikipedia ein Unding ist - eine konstruierte Sprache, die ein reines Internetphänomen ist und einen /sehr/ überschaubaren Kreis von Anhängern hat. Auch ist die inhaltliche Qualität der Artikel teilweise unter aller Kanone. Aber eine Schließung eines Projekts aus solchen Gründen wäre ein komplettes Novum und ist nicht durchsetzbar. Andersherum würde eine Entscheidung pro Fortbestehen des Projekts einen Proteststurm aus dem ru:-Lager provozieren. Ich finde, wir sollten uns auf das reine Aufräumen beschränken, also die Schließung von Wikis, die wirklich vergessen sind. Sich in einen solchen Streit einzumischen, könnte da eher kontraproduktiv sein und diese Aufgabe erschweren.

Meiner Meinung nach bräuchte es für die Lösung dieses Konflikts ein Arbitration Committee, das auch andere Optionen zu Gebote hat und mit den nötigen Vollmachten ausgestattet ist. Es wäre z.B. möglich, dafür zu sorgen, dass einzelne besonders kontroverse Artikel entfernt werden oder die Adminrechte neu vergeben werden etc. pp.

Also, wie gesagt - das beste was ich Dir raten kann, ist, das Problem der sibirischen Wikipedia zu ignorieren. Mit einer einfachen Ja-Nein-Entscheidung ist das nicht zu lösen. Zudem stelle ich es mir relativ schwierig vor, sich ohne Russischkenntnisse (nach Deiner Babel-Selbsteinstufung) ein Bild von der Lage zu machen. Gruß, --Johannes Rohr 21:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Na denn, lass ich's. Aber dem Streit sollte wirklich mal wer ein Ende machen, die Druckvorschau in Firefox zeigt 126(!) Seiten an. Naja. --MF-Warburg(de) 08:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Soll Ignorieren die Lösung sein? --Obersachse 15:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (Bürokrat in der ruwiki)[reply]
Ach warum hab ich dich nur drauf hingewiesen ;-). Aber hierfür braucht man echt so was wie ein ArbCom. Du hast ja Yaroslav, Kalan und Vasiliev im Chat erlebt. MF-Warburg(de) 15:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wer das entscheidet, ist am Ende egal. Aber eine Entscheidung (so oder so) muss getroffen werden. Alles andere wird als Feigheit und Ignoranz gedeutet. --Obersachse 16:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ja. Und was schlägst du vor? Ich geh jetzt auf die Seite, schreibe I propose to close this discussion within 4 days from now, if there are no other opinions und kündige dann das Ergebnis an. Dann hätt ich gern Checkuser access um auf Sockenpuppenstimmen zu überprüfen, und dann mache ich evtl. einen bugzilla:-Bug? Da wird's Beschwerden hageln... MF-Warburg(de) 16:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dass die "sibirische" Wikipedia ein Unding ist, hat Johannes gesagt. Treffender hätte ich es auch nicht ausdrücken können. Ich bin in dieser Sache nicht neutral und werde nicht versuchen, dir meine Meinung aufzudrücken. Die Entscheidung abnehmen kann ich Dir auch nicht. Ich gebe nur zu bedenken, dass der Antrag auf Schließung am 3. November letzten Jahres (also vo 9 Monaten) gestellt wurde, die wesentlichen Argumente in den ersten Tagen genannt wurden und daher wirklich genug Zeit war, die Sache zu entscheiden.
Ich teile die Ansicht der meisten Russen, mit denen ich mich über das Problem unterhalten habe. Sie sind der Meinung, dass es "dem Westen" scheißegal ist, was mit ru-sib passiert, weil der Westen das für ein innerrussisches Gezänk und Trolling hält. Würde jemand etwas analoges mit der englischen Sprache anstellen, hätte es die Genehmigung gar nicht erst gegeben. Man ist Zolotaryov aber aus Unkenntnis auf den Leim gegengen und hat nun keine Lust, sich die Mühe zu machen, einen Experten anzusetzen, der die Argumente überprüft und bewertet. Deswegen hält man im Westen lieber still.
Ich weiß nicht, ob Du Kenntnis davon hast, daß seit vielen Monaten in der ru-wiki per Mehrheitsbeschluß die Interwikiverlinkung zu ru-sib geblockt wird. Begründet wurde das mit Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Ru-sib wäre keine zuverlässige Quelle. Ich hatte erfolglos dagegen gestimmt, weil ich der Meinung bin, daß soetwas nicht hinnehmbar ist und Zensur dem Gedanken einer freien Enzyklopädie widerspricht. Stelle Dir nur vor, die Araber würden gleiches mit der hebräischen wiki tun (oder umgedreht). Da wäre das Geschrei groß und der Westen würde sofort reagieren. Aber bei russischen Problemen ...
Also, habt Mut und entscheidet. --Obersachse 17:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dellie

Yes, I just posted the source code here for your perusal. The bot is written in Python, and you need to put the two files in a directory containing a working installation of pywikipedia. (i.e., inside the pywikipedia directory). Cheers, Tangotango 12:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRC cloak request

I am MF-Warburg on freenode and I would like the cloak Wikimedia/MF-Warburg. Thanks. MF-Warburg(de) 16:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dellie

Hi MF-Warburg. As I didn't intend to release the source code in the first place, I wrote that by force of habit. You can consider it released under the terms of the MIT License. If you are modifying Dellie to introduce a new feature to add {{delete}} to pages, could I see the source code when you're finished please? Thanks, Tangotango 00:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you were missing StdTimer.py. Cheers, Tangotango 14:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Incubator?

Rather than moving Wikis to incubator before they are locked by a developer, please wait so that we do not have two concurrent Wikis running. Also please kindly let votes run longer. --Node ue 14:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also please consider appropriate solutions for individual Wikis. For example, Chamorro Wiki could probably be easily helped by blanking and protecting w/index.php and such pages, and if necesssary main page could be protected as well (although I doubt it is needed). Eventuality principle has been working for small Wikis for ages, the idea is it is easier for someone to add to something that already exists than to propose to start something that doesn't yet. --Node ue 14:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please, ch: was created in July 2004, according to Main Page history. It has had its chance. MF-Warburg(de)
"It has had its chance"? What sort of an attitude is this!? It takes time for Wikis to develop. An attitude such as yours is extremely unhelpful.

Resurrection/hijacking of the Herero Wikipedia as a sort of personal hosting space

FYI, this Wikipedia has now been resurrected and hijacked to support a constructed language called "Wikihero" and a number of Turkish related pages have been added; see Special:Allpages now. Also note this new infobox and text added today to the en:Herero language article (since reverted). --A. B. (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ZaDiak

Hello How are you? I would like to talk to you on IRC is this possible? If yes send me a message at beta wikiversity and tell me the day and the time that you would like.--ZaDiak

Bugzilla-Ärger

Hi, ich habe aktuell keine Zeit, mich um closure requests zu kümmern. Falls Du noch motiviert bist, kannst Du Dich um folgende bugs kümmern:

http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10748 http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10707 http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10705 http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10720

Ciao, herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Rohr 04:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, die meisten sehen ja erledigt aus. Ich guck dann mal. --MF-Warburg(de) 11:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Auf dem Wolof-Wiktionary scheint es nach dem Closure request einige Aktivität gegeben zu haben. Ich wäre dafür, es wieder zu entsperren. Was meinst Du? --Johannes Rohr 19:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please secure this page. --Flrn 14:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yaroslav has been blocked by Aphaia, so no problems should be in future. — Kalan ? 14:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rm

Hi,

removed two bits of yours: http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_permissions/Approved_temporary&oldid=694620#Import_access_at_SiSwati_Wikipedia_and_Wiktionary (and a few more that stayed apperently by mistake) Effeietsanders 13:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, those were given because developers didn't define import sources. Now they did. --MF-Warburg(de) 09:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolof Wikiquote

Can you stop the closure? I want to create articles, I speak Wolof. here. SF-Language 09:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Warburg. SF-Language 13:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Volapük Wikipedia

Hi, Warburg! Just to remind you the deadline has finished at Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Volapük Wikipedia. Votes seems to have stabilized. Regards, Malafaya 11:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Volapük Wikipedia II

Hi MF-Warburg,
Despite the end of the voting on the Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Volapük Wikipedia, I added a link to a new List of Wikipedias by sample of articles that I've been working on as an alternative to article count. I thought it would be a good idea to put a link there because of the criticism in the discussion on article count as a parameter for ranking Wikipeidas; I wanted to show a possible alternative to any discussion participants who might be interested. But if it is too late to add anything to the discussion, let me know and I'll remove it. --Smeira 16:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

import @ stq

Hi. I've granted you import rights on stq per the request. It will expire in four days. I'm sure that's more than enough. Cheers, FiLiP ¤ 10:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --MF-Warburg 15:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

importing incubator->betawikiversity

MF-Warburg, I have been importing pages from incubator: to betawikiversity:. The process is not finished, but a lot of these pages are not to be found on the incubator anymore. Please check betawikiversity:WV:RFI. Hillgentleman 08:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, a non-admin has stricken your decision.

I have left a note at:

--A. B. (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why just don't close such project, not writing "I propose to close it in 7 days from now". There are no votes oppose, and it's not controversal — VasilievVV 21:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because there is no defined period for closing proposals. --MF-W 14:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help?

Please see my comment here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual_talk:%24wgAutopromote#help. TIA.Catagraph 21:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for global JavaScript

Hello MF-Warburg. You now have global JavaScript on most wikis using global.js (see discussion and logs of changes). —Pathoschild 06:19:54, 05 November 2008 (UTC)

Dellieplagiat

Can you please update the bot to write on Steward requests/Speedy deletions/Bot-reported in line with the new naming convention. When you do that, Multilingual speedy deletions/Bot-reported and Multilingual speedy deletions/Bot-reported/Header should be moved (with their talk pages). I'll let you do that since the bot needs to change at the same time as the pages get moved. Thanks.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done --MF-W 16:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a bunch  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pontic Greek Wikipedia

Hello MF-Warburg, i'm consta one of the proposers' and helper of pontic greek wikipedia. I want to ask you, if you know, how we place

in the left corner of this wiki and if you know how we can do interwiki links and we place that in the other wikipedias? Thank you! (you can find me in pontic wiki dessision page) --Consta 11:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sc wiktionary

Hello MF-Warburg, please can you tell me if the sardinian wiktionary can reopen (without request for new project)? Thank you in advance --Marzedu 01:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, you need to make request for a new project; and of course you can start a test project on Incubator.
Ok, thank you, --Marzedu 15:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dellieplagiat's dead.

The IRC bot is working fine, however the bot onwiki hasn't made any edits for the past few days. Can you push it, or unstick it? Thanks, GrooveDog 02:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restarted the bot. Should work now. --MF-W 10:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :) GrooveDog 12:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And now it's adding my reports...once every minute (from just one IRC command) :( GrooveDog 13:08, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberley-nia Bot

Hi MF-Warburg, fyi: I'm sorry, but I've blocked Kimberley-nia Bot: it seems to have gone wild, see here. Regards, Wutsje 13:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Can you unblock me? --Thestarblaydialegend 17:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for this. Very very stupid mistake when reading a diff someone sent me asking for it to be deleted (it already had been so the "title" was the main page..... James (T C) 18:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dellieplagiat not running

Hello, I pressume you are operating Dellieplagiat, the bot that takes !delete etc. on #cvn-sw. It is not avaible at the moment and it would be fine, if you could start it again, cause putting {{delete}} per Hand on all pages that should be deleted isn't fun... - Hoo man 19:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's back online again, thanks ;-) - Hoo man 20:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another isue regarding your BOT... it's now up and taking !deletes, but it doesn't update the list over here (!status says: "Last update Tue 15:58:48 | Last prune Thu 11:24:28 | Now Thu 11:58:22 | 1 items on list | 15 new items queued"). I already tried to force it to update the list using !update but it doesn't work either... - Hoo man 11:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the bot was not logged in anymore and therefore wasn't able to update the list anymore as it doesn't edit anonymously. I let the bot add those pages that were scheduled for deletion during the outtime and still exist with no reasonable content. --MF-W 18:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it again ;-) - Hoo man 20:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you BOT is not updating the list... (Status: "Last update Mon 19:27:16 | Last prune Tue 13:34:49 | Now Tue 13:35:52 | 2 items on list | 11 new items queued") - Hoo man 13:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disturb you once again... your bot doesn't update the on wiki list again. (Status: "Last update Fri 00:27:09 | Last prune Fri 00:25:08 | Now Fri 19:21:10 | 2 items on list | 8 new items queued") - Hoo man 19:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I had the same problem two times in August, and it's the same today. I noticed that the command !update does not work too. Probably is it linked to the fact that Dellie doesn't update on-wiki list ? -- Quentinv57 14:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, normally, it does work, however once a problem with page names with special charachters arises, the bot stops adding pages until it is restarted. I'm trying to fix this problem. --MF-W 19:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Good luck :) -- Quentinv57 09:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting

Hello, MF-Warburg. I'm not sure, but I guess Kimberley-nia Bot is not working. I sent a few pages today and it didn't list them on "Steward requests/Speedy deletions/Bot-reported". Regards.” Teles (Talk @ C G) 07:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This should be fixed now. --MF-W 20:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's working. Thank you.” Teles (Talk @ C G) 09:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Why are you changing the list? To ask for delete in all the wikis minus one (in one should ask for local permission) it's the form? Writing a long list? --Emporio2012 18:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which list are you talking about? --MF-W 21:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This page lists. What kind of cases is it used for? --Emporio2012 20:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The list's header says: This section is for reports filed via Kimberley-nia Bot on the SWMT's IRC channel #cvn-sw (bot's irc nick is Dellieplagiat). SWMT members usually make the bot add a pages if it is vandalism that should be deleted on wikis with only a few or no active administrators. If you want to add such vandalized pages on the list, please follow the formatting that is prescribed there. --MF-W 20:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thank you. Someone gave me the link to go there via IRC. --Emporio2012 21:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I had doubts about your message about change things in that page. --Emporio2012 21:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dellieplagiat is off

Hi MF-Warburg. I was told you own Dellieplagiat and I want to inform you that the bot off is. Could you please restart it? Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Trijnstel 18:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot header

Hello. Could be possible to set the bot to respect this page format? Otherwise the heading of that page transcludes bad at Steward requests/Speedy deletions and it's a bit confusing. Thank you, -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done by putting the headline into the transcluded header (the bot didn't need the line, but if it was there, it was always put below the header as nothing should be above the header...) (example of how it works now). --MF-W 19:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, -- Dferg ☎ talk 23:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Moving the section header to /Header means that it's not possible to edit the bot-reported list by simply clicking the section edit link anymore. Would it be possible to move the header back to the /Bot-reported subpage? Jafeluv 09:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it is, by reverting the change described above (i.e. putting the headline back to where it formerly was). --MF-W 19:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And how about adding an edit link on the subpage, rather than disrupting the style of the page? :-) -- Dferg ☎ talk 19:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How does it disrupt the style of the page? I would expect a section edit link to take me to the actual section, not a subpage. Jafeluv 19:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and well, it's added on the text too since it's creation so... -- Dferg ☎ talk 19:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it allowed in Wikipedia?

To keep in the pages of wiki Administrator's personnel thesis? at http://sd.wikipedia.org ? Other problem is We call Computer as same in English, but admin forcibly used his word Ganpukar of Computer. I have proof that thousands of published books called it Computer not Ganpukar. If some one oppose him he started abusive language. That is the reason sd.wikipedia.org never got attraction to Sindhi community. Plz check record there. Other things are he locked CSS due to that on the same site there are lot of font styles appeared there. He is not able to set commonCSS or Monocss. We are in trouble to work in our local Sindhi language. I don't know where to say for this problem. Record history says all the situation there. I appeal plz warn him to follow en.wikipedia.org rules, other wise he will continue use his personnel details and personnel promoted articles there. Dear I am sorry If u r not right person to say all about this, Plz suggest me where I can raise this issue. My sd.wikipedia.org ID is same. His thesis is not a violetion? http://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/ماحولياتي_انتظام_ڪاڻ_اُپُگِرَهِي_عَڪس_ضماءُ_۽_درجه_بنديءَ_جي_طريقن_جو_اَڀياس

Alixafar 00:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, now that this is officially policy I think it's better if you "request" (confirm) the flag through the usual steward request process, as everyone else will have to. Just a formalism, but no harm in it. Thanks, Nemo 22:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree as I got the flag at first only temporarily for one import that needed to be done and as a kind of test for the group. I will add a request on SRGP. --MF-W 22:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]