Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
URGENT: need CU on pt.wikt: recurring vandal
Line 89: Line 89:
}}
}}
:Nothing to check, {{duck}}. [[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] 07:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
:Nothing to check, {{duck}}. [[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] 07:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

===D&S@pt.wikt===
{{CU request
|status =
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= wikt
|user name1 = Ant(óô)nio
|user name2 = Pinto
|user name3 = Trinta e um
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion =
|reason = Suspected sock puppets of known pt.wikt vandal D&S. Please see my [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=2882933#D.26S.40pt.wikt previous request related to this vandal] for more information. And please, check them not only among themselves (to see if they are the same person) but also with other accounts used by this vandal in the past. Also take into account that he has been known to use open proxies in his vandalisms. It would also be appreciated if you could check if he has other sleeper accounts. Thanks.
}}

--[[User:ValJor|ValJor]] 18:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


== See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->
== See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 18:12, 12 December 2011

Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate>
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
    }}
    

    <translate> For example:</translate>

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
    }}
    
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Fátima S.@pt.wikipedia

Did you ever met Ajudante do Coelho da Páscoa? --Vituzzu 21:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No.--Demander 21:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, please ensure that future requests for ptwiki come from administrators, unless it is an emergency. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neither Ajudante do Papai Noel? --Vituzzu 21:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Acept this check, is a liar explication. It`s not future resuest.--Demander 21:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please, can see if it is technically possible a rangeblock? PcTalk 21:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I already said it's not possible and it's easier to manage these sockfarm with some semi-protections, anyway Fátima S.  It looks like a duck to me
--Vituzzu 21:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The semi-protections do not help. PcTalk 21:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since the pattern is quite known you just need to block every new account acting in the same way as the previous socks. --Vituzzu 21:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Agree with Pedroca Cerebral. The same protections do not help.--Demander 22:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wet12@pt.wikipedia

Sorry, but Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. If you suspect Wet12 to be a sock, please tell us which user you suspect it to be a sock, and the reasons of such a suspiction. Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see if the user mentioned is not ElectroStatic Jolt (talk · contribs). He has the same behavior (shows lock requests unfounded). PcTalk 01:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stale Sorry, but the data for ElectroStatic Jolt has expired. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pedrobl@pt.wikipedia

 Confirmed but there is no range to be blocked to avoid this.
Likely Likely for Rodrigomastersom, but not enough likely to block in my opinion (depends on what he did / will do).
Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Own-user page spammers @ incubatorwiki

 Confirmed along with a host of other locked accounts. --Bsadowski1 20:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(after ec)  Confirmed Already performed a checkuser earlier today. I locked all confirmed spam accounts and globally blocked all IP addresses (most likely to be open proxies). Trijnstel 20:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the strategy spammers came there. I will be putting the filter in the case of a new spammer. I think that we should watch out for outreach now. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 16:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some IP users@zh.wikipedia

Nothing to check,  It looks like a duck to me. Bencmq 07:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D&S@pt.wikt

--ValJor 18:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also