Grants:IdeaLab/Program coordinator training to handle disruptive behavior on-wiki

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NounProject Leaves.png
Program coordinator training to handle disruptive behavior on-wiki
Several policies may be applicable in situations where disruptive behavior comes up on-wiki in programs funded or hosted by the WMF. The goal of this idea is to develop a program helping individuals leading or coordinating these programs to navigate considerations and actions to take when faced with disruptive behavior from one or multiple editors.
Hex icon with lightning white.svg
idea creator
I JethroBT (WMF)
Hex icon with flask white.svg
researcher
Mathmensch
Hex icon with circles white.svg
designer
Sgffjfg
Hex icon with hand white.svg
volunteer
LiridonLiluala
this project needs...
Hex icon with bee black.svg
community organizer
Hex icon with hand black.svg
volunteer
Hex icon with star black.svg
project manager
join
endorse
created on22:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


Project idea[edit]

What is the problem you're trying to solve?[edit]

Currently, there are several considerations that could be relevant to dealing with situations where on-wiki disruptive behavior arises in a program relevant to a WMF grant:

What is your solution?[edit]

Provide training and create clear guidelines and resources for program leaders/coordinators. The training will:

  • Give guidance on applicable policies and procedures given a specific Wikimedia project or set of projects
  • De-escalation techniques and general engagement recommendations
  • Proper reporting procedures and and expectations around appropriate action to prevent further incidents.

Goals[edit]

Open Questions[edit]

  • Who will provide the training?
    Administrators, WMF Staff, experts in harassment prevention, a group consisting of all of these roles?
  • What methods of providing the training to program coordinators should be considered?
    Scheduling a discussion workshop with a group, providing an online module, 1:1 trainings with individuals, assessment of comprehension?
    Several approaches may be feasible; also allow training participants to choose what method is best for them and their audience.
  • What existing programs or resources for training are available that may be useful?
    Grants:PEG/Ada Initiative/Gender-gap admin training, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard

Get Involved[edit]

Roles[edit]

  • Community organiser work with program leaders to build awareness of project, get feedback on desired elements, potentially lead actual training
  • Project manager coordinate research and construction efforts, build a timeline, schedule meetings with interested parties, manage budget, summarize feedback into plan for training
  • Designer work with project manager, program leaders, and researchers to decide on best design for project; create drafts, training scripts, and/or discussion goals of training for feedback; incorporate feedback into final design
  • Researcher determine common points of conflict, established methods of conflict resolution/de-escalation

About the idea creator[edit]

Participants[edit]

  • Advisor PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Advisor Will advise and help coordinate tasks with individuals interested in providing this kind of training to program facilitators. I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Researcher I should very much like to help out with the design of guidelines that allow for a resolution of conflicts using logic. Mathmensch (talk) 11:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Happy to support this project. Sydney Poore/FloNight (talk) 03:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Volunteer I would like to help. Liridon (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Designer Nice Sgffjfg (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Volunteer I would like to assist by research if possible. I'm especially interested in researching the motivations of harassers, with an eye towards preventing harassment through didactic approach. Liluala (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Endorsements[edit]

  • I like this idea but I think the in-person meetup disruptors would be a higher priority. Currently, there are numerous online methods of dealing with disruptive people. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  • yes we need more training of persons in positions of responsibility. Slowking4 (talk) 14:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Support but this proposal needs to be more focused, and handled by the WMF, not volunteers. I really hate to say this, especially after my experiences on enwiki, but may need to be anonymous in order to shield the decision-makers from harassment. —Neotarf (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Support per Neotarf. Smallbones (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Support also per Neotarf. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Support. I think that this is a good idea. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
  • This is a good idea, but it is important to know the answers to the open questions. Kenzia (talk) 09:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Expand your idea[edit]

Would a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation help make your idea happen? You can expand this idea into a grant proposal.

Expand into a Rapid Grant
Expand into a Project Grant
(launching July 1st)