Meta:Requests for adminship/Matanya

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Clear consensus, so successful. -- Menti fisto 11:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya[edit]

Matanya (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 11:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I want to nominate Matanya as meta admin, because he is quite active over here and already asked me (and probably others) a few times for speedy deletions on IRC. With that flag he could do that himself without having to ping others. As hewiki sysop and steward he for sure knows the rules and the tools. We will surely benefit even more from him as admin. - Hoo man (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you hoo man. Hope I'll be useful and helpful here. I accept the nomination. Matanya 11:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Trusted user, is a steward and as a stewards it is surely annoying to always poke others to do the work he could simply do himself. All stewards who want the mop on meta should get it automatically. -Barras 11:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 11:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per Barras. Steward! Theo10011 11:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Can't stand on what I said on IRC. :P — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure :) micki t 11:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, never, never! I will never oppose that! ;) Béria Lima ^msg 11:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. Jafeluv 12:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 12:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per what Barras said. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. Grunny (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 14:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Barras. This is already boring. --WizardOfOz ^talk 15:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have to agree with Barras here. If a steward wants to have the mop here (something they "technically" already have, they should get it speedily. fr33kman 17:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support automatic adminship on meta for stewards, and by consequence this request. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - 4 deleted contributions and little maintenance on meta. Matanya is IMHO a good steward but I see little work in admin areas here. I'm not concerned enough to oppose because I trust him, but I can not support right now due to the IMHO low admin involvement in meta as stated above. Sorry. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 18:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retracted, after further consideration. Now supporting, see below. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 21:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - of course; @Dferg: he asked me a couple of times to create new abusefilters, also a thing only admins can do. Trijnstel 18:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per Barras. --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —mc10 (t/c) 04:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I always see him around on metawiki. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 12:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Logical compliment to the steward flag. Courcelles 02:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. –BruTe ^talk 05:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Barras. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 10:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per hoo -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 11:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aude 00:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Duh. --Philippe 21:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, after further consideration. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 21:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes--^Ομιλία Sahim 13:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 15:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 10:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avi 19:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bsadowski1 19:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]