Meta:Requests for adminship/Thehelpfulone

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Thehelpfulone[edit]

Thehelpfulone (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Ending 23 May 2011 at 22:10 (UTC)

I would like to hereby nominate User:Thehelpfulone for adminship on Meta. He is an admin on en.wiki, outreach wiki, a crat/admin on test wiki and pending changes wiki as well as a moderator on a Wikimedia mailing list. He is also an op on several Wikimedia IRC channels. True to his name, he has been very helpful in IRC and on-wiki. He has been checking and fixing a lot of things on Meta recently, granting him sysops rights would help him fix those minor issues himself, as well as help out with general maintenance related tasks here. Thehelpfulone, please acknowledge that you accept this nomination. Regards. Theo10011 22:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nom: THO and I discussed the prospect of a potential nomination several days ago, so I'm glad to see this moving ahead. Meta has a lot of admins, yet we cease to have a ton of work to do in different areas. THO isn't one to dwell in the same area for very long; he moves from place to place, making small corrections and tidying things up, as Theo explains. He obviously knows how to use the admin tools, and I think promoting him would be a nice benefit for the project. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words Theo and Juliancolton, I accept this nomination. The Helpful One 22:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. Theo10011 22:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as co-nom. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no problemo here. Jafeluv 22:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can´t see why not. --WizardOfOz ^talk 22:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, absolutely no issues here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was just saying this should happen the other day. Courcelles 23:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Trustworthy and very active here. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 23:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matanya 08:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Will do well as an admin. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support MBisanz ^talk 10:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –BruTe ^talk 10:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 10:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I have no doubt that he is the helpful one. :) — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not? - Hoo man (talk) 11:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good luck. --Meno25 11:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. Trijnstel 12:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nominators. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support self-explanatory name. Sa vh ^ñ 17:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support & thanks for your help :) axp_de ^Hello! 15:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Philippe 21:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 10:40, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 12:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support micki t 15:22, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 19:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A more close participation from him on this project is a little recent, but is also intense and his past can say he is trusted.” T_ele^s (T_alk _{@ C S}) 22:12, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 18:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support -- Maximillion Pegasus 20:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clear consensus, closed as promoted. --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]