Meta:Requests for translation adminship/Wladek92 (2)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Wladek92 (2)[edit]

Wladek92 (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

I translate EN->FR fluently for about 10 years and I often need to make isolated corrections in EN articles. Then as these actions are isolated I would avoid to bother other admin for only setting the page 'FOR TRANSLATION' and I can check immediatly if it is ok on the FR page. This experience as a newbie was necessary to understand the process. With the new rights I will be able to prepare on Meta completly the entire articles for translation. I received the translator rights on MediaWiki (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Requests/User_rights/Wladek92 ) which have facilitated me to make a lot of translations there (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Wladek92) and I whish to reconduct the same process on meta. I hope my help will be welcomed. Thanks.

Christian Wia (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have not 'prepared' pages for translation since I am not yet an administrator here. Articles I speak of are the messages, the pages I have already translated EN => FR on this site (see=> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wladek92) i.e. 10 022 items until now and my global experience is over 60 000 messages with Wikimedia not taking into account ranslateWiki.net over last 10 years. Transltation process is important since it allows rereading of EN text. Several mistakes can then be detected in this original EN text when making the translations: errors of type, anchors no longer accessible on the translated page... So as a feed back I correct the EN text and need to resent it for translation to integrate the result. For example I added an anchor in => https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups and the translated page (FR in my case) is still not seeing it. If this cycle is shortened, faster will be the coherence between pages and better the pleasure to navigate on Meta.

Christian Wia (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The EN root pages I have corrected/marked up are those I have set 'for translation' on the Mediawiki, since I have the right there (july) that is a bit less than 400 lines. They may be listed under:

=> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=pagetranslation&user=Wladek92&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=

Christian Wia (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to your question of 13 december is herabove on 14 dec. Just follow the timestamps or check upd history.

Christian Wia (talk) 23:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Translation admin on Wikidata (50k+edits) and meaningful justification. -MrJaroslavik (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support experienced user.--Turkmen ^talk 21:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question: @Wladek92: I'm really confused of what you are trying to do here on the meta-wiki. What are these "articles" you are talking about? Can you point to any pages here on meta-wiki that you have prepped for translation? — xaosflux ^Talk 03:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no response to question, this request doesn't seem to make sense and I don't see anything that changed since Meta:Requests for translation adminship/Wladek92. — xaosflux ^Talk 21:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment TA is only for marking pages on metawiki for translation and not to translate pages on wikis to each other (like enwp to dewp - this will be either done via manual translation with attribution or Content Translation). Just to make sure that you are requesting the correct thing, can you give some examples of pages you will mark for translation if given the right. @Wladek92:. Best, --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~I think I had given sufficient time for the candidate to reply, there are 2 pings in total.~~ No demonstrated need and no clue on whether the candidate understand what this right is used here. In addition, the application rationale seems esoteric and arcane. Thanks for volunteering anyway ~~and do ping me if you wish to reply~~. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment User actually replied to questions but below their nomination statement. cc: @Xaosflux and Camouflaged Mirage:. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks 1997kB. Odd way of answering but sorry for not seeing it. I stand corrected and stricken that part. Otherwise the rest of the oppose rationale still stand, I really don't understand the reply at all and mediawiki isn't meta. Regards, --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel there's consensus to promote at this time. Sorry. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.