Stewards/confirm/2011/Rdsmith4

Rdsmith4[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en, es-3, it-3, la-2, ar-1
Personal info: Hello all. As ever I would be pleased and honored to continue giving what effort I can to the Wikimedia projects. I've had a busy year, and cannot promise any dramatic change in the next. If not confirmed, I will of course understand; if confirmed, I will humbly serve you to the best of my ability for another twelvemonth. — Dan

Comments about Rdsmith4[edit]

Keep - @lestaty ^discuţie 00:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, in good faith - Dan has been recently out, I think that he's currently busy but I think he will return. Since he has enough log actions per current policy to be considered active and has done an overall good work I'm in good faith thinking he should be confirmed at least for this year. Thank you for your assistance, -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 00:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - too little too late. Sorry but not for the first year just not active never mind active enough. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dferg. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
meow? DarkoNeko 15:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Dferg. Maximillion Pegasus 16:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove - Inactive. Maximillion Pegasus 14:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos 17:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
confirm, not active in a long time but always insightful and helpful when he is present –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove - not really active, no statement here, this page was created by an other steward. I currently don't see a reason to confirm, sorry. -Barras 20:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trijnstel 20:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove Sorry, remove per Barras. Finn Rindahl 01:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove Not active. — Tanvir • 02:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since he posted a statement, I like to see him for another year. Thanks for all your services! — Tanvir • 03:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Although not very active lately, he sure has done good to Wikimedia projects. I've got no problems with seeing him again with stewardship during 2011. We'll see how it goes afterwards. Elfix 15:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove. I agree with the Barras, it is not active. Salamat ^disc 03:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove reluctantly for very limited activity with no statement.--Jusjih 09:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Having a statement is much better now. Better late than never.Jusjih 17:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If i see a statement then Keep otherwise Remove Mardetanha ^talk 12:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scarcely active, no statement... --Mercy 12:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
remove Haven't seen him on IRC, plus if he was truly active then he is perfectly capable of creating his own confirmation without any needed outside help. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 15:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~remove~~ per Mardethana, if I see a statement I could change my opinion--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 15:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ok--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 22:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Same as Mardetanha. If a statement is posted, Keep.If not, Remove--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 16:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Inactivity. Tiptoety ^talk 21:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep fetchcomms☛ 02:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Ancient Apparition 06:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, inactive. Jafeluv 09:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove basically needs the extra time for other activities fr33kman 05:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nemo 22:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guido den Broeder 18:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mjbmr ^Talk 15:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive.--Snaevar 21:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hope that he will be more active in the future. --Millosh 17:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately I feel the level of inactivity (especially if he believes it is likely/possible it will remain so) do not justify continuing to hold the tools. I know the policy says he doesn't meet the threshold for automatic removal but I don't think that removes inactivity as a completely valid reason for opposition (I'm happy to debate it again but I had quite a bit of that debate last year if anyone wants to read :) ). James (T C) 09:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AGK 22:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]