Stewards/confirm/2011/en

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2011
(Redirected from Stewards/confirm/2011)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning
English: The 2011 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2011 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2011 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2011 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2011 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد. [update needed: en]
Français : Les élections Steward de 2011 sont terminées. Il n'est plus possible de voter.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2011 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2011. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2011 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2011 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה. [update needed: en]
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el. [update needed: en]
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2011 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2011年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2011 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2011 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2011 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2011 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2011 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2011年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（简体）： 2011年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废 [update needed： en]
中文（繁體）: 2011年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢 [update needed: en]
Tiếng Việt: Cuộc bầu cử tiếp viên năm 2011 đã kết thúc. Không có phiếu bầu nào tiếp tục được chấp nhận.
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2011 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι. [update needed: en]
Türkçe: 2011 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2011 stüard seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha səslər qəbul olunmur.
Geographylogo.png In other languages: Deutsch (de) English (en) español (es) français (fr) Nederlands (nl) português (pt) Tiếng Việt (vi) [edit]
Stewards (2011 confirmations)
English:

The 2011-12 confirmation will begin on February 7, and will finish on February 27th.

The 2011-12 steward confirmations are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before February 1st 2011. During the 2011 elections, please mention if you are unhappy with one of the persons listed below and why. For example, you may mention inactivity. Inactive stewards, as stated in the steward policies, will lose their steward access.

At the end of the elections, the current and newly elected stewards will consider complaints left on this page, and choose to remove stewardship as necessary taking into account both the comments left by community and their own perspective and understanding of the job. All stewards will go through this process after each election.

See also:


Purge the cache of this page?

Andre Engels[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl, en-3, de-2.5, fr-1, nds-1, experience in 'scanning' the contents of articles in other languages
  • Personal info: I used to be a rather inactive Steward, but in the last few months I got active especially with checkuser requests. Apart from that a little bit of action in many different Steward activities: granting sysop, bots and global-ip-exempt rights, working back deletion backlogs in small wikis, global blocking and locking, oversight actions. On a more personal level, being able to see deleted pages has enabled me to set interwiki right in cases where a page had been moved without creation of a redirect. I'm one of the oldest still participating Wikipedia editors (first edit in March 2001), and through my bot work one of the most multilingually active.

Comments about Andre Engels[edit]

Avraham[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: As someone who was elected last year, this is my first steward confirmation. I believe I have been a sufficiently active steward this past year, promptly responding to requests on both Meta and IRC. A partial record of my steward statistics can be seen on my userpage at User:Avraham#Steward activity. I would like to continue to serve the greater wikimedia project community by continuing to volunteer as a steward for 2011. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Comments about Avraham[edit]

Bastique[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, fr-3, es-2
  • Personal info: I'm not as active as I once was before I worked for the Wikimedia Foundation, and being in graduate school, don't anticipate very high activity as many other stewards. However, I will certainly avail myself as needed and participate in other steward activity, backlog cleanup, etc. I'm grateful for the trust that the community has given to me and hope to continue to be worthy of it.

Comments about Bastique[edit]

Darkoneko[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: My general statement isn't that different from last year's : as a steward, I sometimes make a few mistakes but I think I'm not doing a bad work overall.
    For those not aquainted to me yet:
    • My home wiki is frwiki, the french Wikipedia. I arrived in nov. 2004 and became a sysop there in march 2005. I also worked there as a bureaucrat for 3 years (jun 2006 - sep. 2009) but gave up the bit so I could spend more time on other things.
    • I manage a bot named Loveless (see [4] and [5])
    • I became steward at end of 2006. I don't really do steward requests on wiki but rather use my availability time to take care of the emergency people tells us of on IRC (#wikimedia-stewards). My public steward activities (everything but Oversight and Checkuser) are viewable on this page ; those local to meta (like right changes) on this one.

Comments about Darkoneko[edit]

DerHexer[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Comments about DerHexer[edit]

  • Keep Keep, active and always helpful user - Hoo man (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep. Nixón 00:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep excellent steward Mardetanha talk 00:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep behold Thank you for doing this job. Finn Rindahl 01:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 02:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose He added kowikinews to list of global bot wikis without normal process of implementation of global bot policy.[6] And there wasn't any notification to the projects. Steward should have gone through the normal process to implement the policy. Steward who ignored the process should be responsible to his actions and his right should be removed. – Kwj2772 (msg) 05:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    What else can I do to apologize after having done a mistake? Unluckily nobody is perfect and I feel very sorry when I make mistakes, but is much more important for me to be responsible to excuse them what I've done. I have not ignored the process, in fact, I didn't know it properly and so acted with best faith. It's nevertheless a shame and unluckily cannot be canged in the aftermath so I'm very sorry that I did not know the exact procedure and hereby ask again to be excused. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 07:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Saloca 06:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose - doesn't like to be opposed on his birthday. Happy birthday! Laaknor 07:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Keep Keep him at least until his next birthday... Laaknor 23:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Where's the dislike button? Where? … Oh, wait, it's not Facebook here. xD —DerHexer (Talk) 11:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Facebook had a dislike button ? XD Mardetanha talk 15:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    That was the joke. ;o) That question usually raises up on Facebook. ;o) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • outperformer --Jan eissfeldt 08:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. I still like to have you around as a steward. :) — Tanvir • 09:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Bennylin 12:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep & Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum Geburtstag! --MF-W 12:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Saibo (Δ) 12:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC) I liked your status report very much and only have good expierience with you.Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep mickit 14:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep seen them around doing a good job. No reason not to say keep going. -Djsasso 14:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose for today. :P Otherwise, Keep Keep because he is very active and trusted. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep everytime friendly --Pittimann 14:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Mjbmr Talk 14:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Yep. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 14:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Excellent steward. Maximillion Pegasus 14:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Stefan64 15:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Miauu! DarkoNeko 15:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Melos 17:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Excellent work, outstanding activity, nice user and steward! --Nirakka 17:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 18:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --WizardOfOz talk 19:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep confirm, one of our best. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Barras 20:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, of course. Savhñ 20:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Trijnstel 20:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep --Tinz 20:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep, does the job with the usual charm. Oh, and happy b'day! Wojciech Pędzich Talk 20:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Trustworthy and helpful user. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 21:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Of course! Tiptoety talk 21:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep why not? :P Lukas9950 09:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep per Julian, and he brings excellent skills in judging content. He charmed the socks off me, so he can do no wrong! Tony1 14:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma 14:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Avi 16:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Mayur (talk•Email) 18:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Leandro Martinez msg 18:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep ChristianH 19:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Anything else than a big KEEP would not be appropriate for his outstanding work in all the projects. Definitely one of the best users the Wikimedia Foundation has ever seen. Best Regards, LP mAn 20:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep J.delanoygabsadds 22:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Bhawani 01:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Pela atenção às regras e pela boa convivência com outros usuários.” Teles (Talk @ C G) 01:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Nick1915 - all you want 09:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih 09:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, active and dedicated steward --Mercy 13:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Guido den Broeder 16:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Alex Pereira falaê 17:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep CasteloBrancomsg 20:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Neozoon 21:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)outstanding work, very helpful, there is little left that this guy can improveReply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Aleposta 21:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep  fetchcomms☛ 23:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Not even for a higher salary could we demand perfection. I'm not familiar with DerHexer yet, but no news is good news. Happy birthday. --Abd 03:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep —Ancient Apparition 06:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - in my personal capacity. --Philippe 08:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Jafeluv 09:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep rubin16 16:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ticketautomat 19:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --APPER 20:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - valuable, experienced, active, often available on IRC. I am desperately looking for a reason for saying "Oppose"... Elfix 20:03, 10 February 2011 UTC
  • Keep Keep The best of all! XenonX3 20:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Conny 22:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC).Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- he has so much do do, so much interests - I would like to say no. But he's too good as Stewart und I have to meet him to often... ;) Marcus Cyron 00:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep really nice and really helpful fr33kman 06:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Resolute 15:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Steef 389 19:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Romaine 20:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Varina 09:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Church of emacs talk · contrib 17:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Emes 21:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Active and helpful. VonTasha 21:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. --Erwin 12:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep if needs must :-P --kaʁstn Disk 13:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo 16:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep without any comment. :-P Memorino 18:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Curtis Newton 08:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--FlügelRad 12:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Inkowik (Talk) 12:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. a, ok. --Fauust 14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Dalibor Bosits © 20:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira 22:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC) it says nowhere you cannot vote for your husbandReply[reply]
  • Keep Keep him at least until his next birthday... --Gruß Tom 12:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep no doubt --Schwalbe 22:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Jon Harald Søby 17:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Snaevar 22:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Müdigkeit 08:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose It seems that he/she gave/took the oversight privilage to/from his/herself on several wiki even though they looked unnecessary.--Vigorous action 10:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Could you please provide examples? You maybe refer to my quick additions and removal of oversight rights on several wikis. You maybe think that I could not have oversighted all needed revisions within that short time (just a few seconds). That's due to a bug (bugzilla:20954): The function of bug 20954 forces stewards to switch on global oversight rights, just to be able to review potentially oversightable edits by users whose username stewards have quickly had to hide from logs and article histories. So I could do all needed oversight actions before I had to change my rights. For transparency issues I changed my rights in the aftermath but that only takes seconds to switch on and switch off the bit. You're right, that looks a bit like not having done anything. But I can assure you that I only give myself oversight rights when it is really needed. Maybe another steward can confirm that behaviour but you can also look at my comment on this bug: “Anyone interested in fixing that bug so that stewards do not have to stay global oversights to see contributions of hidden accounts? Stewards are suppossed to change their rights because of transparency issues when doing oversight actions. Most of them still do that but we cannot control if anyone did one without changing it. That is not acceptable. So I again beg to our developers to fix that bug as soon as possible.” Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC) P. S. If you're looking at my user page you can see that I'm male. ;o)Reply[reply]
    It is ..""10:10, 28 September 2010 DerHexer (talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:DerHexer@jawiki from (none) to oversight ‎ (they have no oversights? o_O)". the one at this time.--Vigorous action 11:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    As per request by DerHexer I've been asked to review his actions there. In 28 September 2010 DerHexer performed oversight action to remove personal information combined with slander & abusive user name in an article, according to Oversight#Use:§1 «Removal of non-public personal information», §2 «Removal of potentially libelous information» and §4 «Hiding of blatant attack names [...]». The Japanese Wikipedia has no local oversighters and I find the oversight action according the use of the tool as I've said above. The summary could have been more descriptive but there's absolutelly no abuse here. Even if the wiki had local oversighters as per oversight policy «[s]tewards may perform local oversighting in emergencies, during crosswiki oversighting [...]». Respectfully sumbitted, -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep le maintenir xD --Niemot 20:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep As a steward imho a role model. --Matthiasb 09:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, one of the better and active stewards who i have known for quite a long time now. His ability to deal with vandalism faster than the bots on the English wikipedia was something to marvel at and now being able to do the same for over 600+ wikis, he has shown he is reliable, hardworking and up to task..many better stewards have retired but he has not let the pressure get to him..one of the best stewards ever.. :) ..--Stemoc 15:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep I like very much the fact that DerHexer is one of the stewards who has become to care about steward's meta issues. --Millosh 18:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Zyephyrus 19:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Kiran Gopi 10:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sure :D Béria Lima msg 17:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Bojan  Talk  17:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Poco a poco 20:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --buecherwuermlein 16:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ne discere cessa! 19:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. He is very active. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 14:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dferg[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: es, en-3, fr-3 (able to read most romanic languages/dialects)
  • Personal info: Hello. This is my first steward confirmation. During my first year as steward I have been actively processing requests in all the request pages. I have also been answering questions and helping in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel & continued doing SWMT and antispam work as in the past. Additionally I do follow and try to help in the stewards' and checkusers' mailing lists where we also receive requests. If the Wikimedia community agrees, I would like to continue serving as steward.
    Best regards,
    --dferg ☎ talk 02:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Dferg[edit]

  • Diegusjaimes 00:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - @lestaty discuţie 00:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep he solely does the most of The job , Damn are u a BOT ? as Derhexer mentioned above best steward last year Mardetanha talk 00:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep. Nixón 00:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Edmenb ( Mensajes ) Wikipedia en Español 01:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep behold Bra med flere norskspråklige forvaltere. Finn Rindahl 01:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 02:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Undoubtedly has shown great use of tools, always ready and willing to help. Saloca 06:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep exceedingly helpful. sonia 07:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • top steward --Jan eissfeldt 08:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • More than useful :) --Herby talk thyme 09:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep — Tanvir • 09:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Bennylin 12:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep mickit 14:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep seen them around doing a good job. No reason not to say keep going. -Djsasso 14:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per Herby. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Mjbmr Talk 14:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Miau ! DarkoNeko 15:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Maximillion Pegasus 16:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep ¡Keep! Wonderful steward :) Savhñ 16:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Melos 17:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 18:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --WizardOfOz talk 19:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep confirm, among the most active. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Barras 20:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Trijnstel 20:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Trustworthy and helpful user. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep—Obliging, ultra-reliable. Thanks, Dferg. Tony1 14:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma 14:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Always active and perfect --Bhawani 16:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Avi 16:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Have witnessed him being helpful and prompt on IRC. Chaojoker 17:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Leandro Martinez msg 18:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Ομιλία Sahim 19:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Off course! Olivier Bommel 19:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, no way. ChristianH 19:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep J.delanoygabsadds 22:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Deserves a barnstar in the category of last year best steward ever of the day. Thanks for taking care of the Portuguese projects. I hope you don't change.” Teles (Talk @ C G) 03:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Lobo 03:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Nick1915 - all you want 09:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih 09:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, outperformer, dedicated steward --Mercy 13:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Alex Pereira falaê 17:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -Aleposta 21:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep  fetchcomms☛ 23:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Great Steward. Tiptoety talk 01:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep —Ancient Apparition 06:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - in my personal capacity. --Philippe 08:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Good work, no concerns here. Jafeluv 09:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ticketautomat 19:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep always helpful fr33kman 06:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Romaine 20:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep - Varina 09:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. Very active. VonTasha 21:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep. --Erwin 12:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo 17:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu 23:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Ensada 04:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Dalibor Bosits © 20:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira 22:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 15:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Jon Harald Søby 17:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Vigorous action 09:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 20:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Quoting Dungodung: "Hyperactive steward" :) --Millosh 17:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Zyephyrus 19:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Remove Remove Se supone que estos cargos son para situaciones que atenten contra la normativa de los proyectos y contra su integridad, no intromisiones en cuentas de caracter global que tú catalogas de "abusing" cuando se está intentando revertir algo a nivel global, me parece que exageras. Tampoco me gusta que siendo steward digas que Magister tiene tu "full trust" ¿qué pasaría si Magister se equivocara? no te darías cuenta. --†Emporio2012 22:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Gracias por tomar parte en mi proceso de revisión anual. Por cortesía le responderé en castellano/español. Lamento comunicarle de que no poseo ningún «cargo» sino una serie de herramientas para servir a las comunidades locales en múltiples facetas. Mi colaboración es enteramente voluntaria y no remunerada. En relación a su segunda premisa: ¿sería usted tan amable de señalarme a qué cuenta o cuentas se refiere, por favor? Sin más datos no puedo concretar esa supuesta "exageración" a la que usted alude. ¿Alguna en especial? Por otro lado: mi confianza en el usuario que usted cita arriba está basado en mi continuo trabajo con él en múltiples áreas y proyectos y no lo encuentro relacionado, a menos que usted pueda argumentarlo. Para finalizar y como respuesta al inciso en el que hace referencia a que, según usted, si ese mismo usuario se equivocase yo no me daría cuenta porque tengo «plena confianza» en el susodicho he de decir que personalmente considero esa afirmación faláz en tanto varias razones entran en juego otrosí de no ser el único usuario con la potestad de revisión de los actos de los demás y por lo tanto en el caso de que yo no me diese cuenta no sería una conditio sine quae non otros no pudiesen advertirlo; y lo mismo aplica para todos. Atentamente, -- Dferg ☎ talk 00:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    In English (guess literal translation): Remove Remove It's supposed that this positions are for situations that attempt against the rules of the projects and against its integrity, no interference in accounts of global character that you catalog of "abusing" while is trying to reverse something at global level, I think you exaggerate. Neiter I like that being steward say that Magister has your "full trust" what would happen if Magister makes a mistake? you would't realize. --†Emporio2012 01:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Response: About your "full trust", you said that here. --†Emporio2012 01:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you. I've already clarified on the «full trust» issue posted by you in your earlier comment and have no further comments to made there. As I've said before I'd like to know on which account(s) I've «exaggerated» so that it can be reviewed, but you've posted nothing about that yet. Would you be so kind? Thank you, -- Dferg ☎ talk 07:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    At least more than one have your "full trust" (I gave the link to show the context). I think by the context that it may cause also a sense of coalition between stewards (and less security for the users in the mistaken situations - professional judges were wrong in many situations, it's nothing personal -) while they should be neutral also considering the other stewards acts. You say that you don't find this trust related but, you say it in the "confirm process" of the stewards (not in their users pages i.e.). This made me think that. If you consider it's a falacy I suppose is because you refuse my comment. --†Emporio2012 07:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Rebel 14:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Béria Lima msg 17:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Poco a poco 20:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --buecherwuermlein 16:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Laura Fiorucci 03:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep, always helpful and extreme active - Hoo man (talk) 11:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dungodung[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Even though I've been less active in 2010 than previously, I think I've had enough steward actions to still be considered active. In my opinion, I've done a relatively good job in the past three years, so I'd like to keep my steward rights, if the community agrees. I'm usually hanging on IRC and most of the times I'm ready to help out.

Comments about Dungodung[edit]

Erwin[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, xWikiness, recent logs, all logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: Last year I haven't been as active as the year before, but I do feel that I've made a contribution as a steward. My work was mostly concentrated on the request pages, but I could also be found on IRC doing SWMT work. To be honest I don't expect being able to spend much more time on Wikimedia in the future. Nevertheless, I'd like to remain a steward and help out whenever possible.

    Note that during the elections I will have limited internet access.

Comments about Erwin[edit]