Talk:Wikimedia Foundation Medium-term plan 2019

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

View original discussion of the Medium-term plan.


Having taken the time to read and compare the draft and the published version of the strategy document, I think that many of the changes made (particularly the reduced use of arbitrary percentages and the reduced use of jargon) are quite sensible, and it is clear that most of the feedback has been carefully considered. One thing that stuck out to me would be the omission of women in some of the metrics for the thriving movement section where they were included in the draft; it is not clear whether women are being considered a "diverse gender identity", or have been excluded from the metrics for practical or other reasons. Overall, this is a clear improvement over the draft, although it's hard for me to tell whether all of the issues which should be addressed are included in the document.

I am disappointed, however, that there appears to have been insufficient effort put into copy-editing the plan. There are notable inconsistencies in formatting, including a loose list item at the end of the global advocacy section and noticeable and unexplained differences in formatting between and within sections (e.g. list items, bold formatting, dashes), and there are still a few grammatical errors (e.g. "the the" in the thriving movement section). There are also several visible double spaces, which appear to be the result of non-breaking spaces being introduced into the text. I have not edited the document to fix these, since the expectation is that community members should not edit official or draft WMF documents. Though this is not really a big issue, I would have expected a higher standard for an official publication which has been drafted and edited for more than three months. Jc86035 (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quick note that I've fixed the formatting errors/inconsistencies and the grammatical errors that I could see. I'll ask others about your specific question. Thanks for the positive and critical feedback. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


While translating the text it became obvious to me that the sentences are too long. This may exclude people not familiar with strategy slang and for whom English is not the mother tongue. Example:

The Wikimedia 2030 movement strategic direction, ratified by the Wikimedia global community in 2017, calls for the Wikimedia movement, projects, and institutions to become the “essential infrastructure of free knowledge,” where “anyone who shares our vision will be able to join us.” This direction moves Wikimedia further toward fulfilling the broader Wikimedia vision, a world in which every single human can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.
To support the expanded effort and fulfill the vision laid out by Wikimedia 2030, the Wikimedia Foundation and staff are preparing for significant institutional and programmatic shifts over the coming decade. The first step is the creation of this “Medium Term Plan” to describe a medium-term perspective on major institutional and technical goals under the responsibility and mission of the Wikimedia Foundation.

--Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 23:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

collective Foundation[edit]

What means "collective Foundation" in "with the intention that every metric is owned by the collective Foundation"? --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC) (translator)

secure, and safe[edit]

What is the difference of "secure, and safe" in "Our Platform Evolution will make it easier to keep our sites updated, secure, and safe? --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC) (translator)